stock-grades

Retrieve the latest stock grades and ratings from top analysts and financial institutions using Octagon MCP. Use when tracking analyst upgrades, downgrades, rating changes, and institutional sentiment over time.

27 stars

Best use case

stock-grades is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Retrieve the latest stock grades and ratings from top analysts and financial institutions using Octagon MCP. Use when tracking analyst upgrades, downgrades, rating changes, and institutional sentiment over time.

Teams using stock-grades should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/stock-grades/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/OctagonAI/skills/main/skills/stock-grades/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/stock-grades/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How stock-grades Compares

Feature / Agentstock-gradesStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Retrieve the latest stock grades and ratings from top analysts and financial institutions using Octagon MCP. Use when tracking analyst upgrades, downgrades, rating changes, and institutional sentiment over time.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

# Stock Grades

Retrieve analyst grades, ratings, and rating changes from top financial institutions using the Octagon MCP server.

## Prerequisites

Ensure Octagon MCP is configured in your AI agent (Cursor, Claude Desktop, Windsurf, etc.). See [references/mcp-setup.md](references/mcp-setup.md) for installation instructions.

## Workflow

### 1. Identify the Stock

Determine the ticker symbol for the company you want to analyze (e.g., AAPL, MSFT, GOOGL).

### 2. Execute Query via Octagon MCP

Use the `octagon-agent` tool with a natural language prompt:

```
Get the latest stock grades for the symbol <TICKER> from top analysts and financial institutions.
```

**MCP Call Format:**

```json
{
  "server": "octagon-mcp",
  "toolName": "octagon-agent",
  "arguments": {
    "prompt": "Get the latest stock grades for the symbol AAPL from top analysts and financial institutions."
  }
}
```

### 3. Expected Output

The agent returns analyst rating history including:

- **Rating Actions**: Upgrades, downgrades, maintains
- **Analyst/Institution**: Source of the rating
- **Previous Rating**: Prior grade
- **New Rating**: Current grade
- **Date**: When the rating was issued

**Example**: Maxim Group upgraded from Hold to Buy on 2026-01-30

**Data Sources**: octagon-stock-data-agent

### 4. Interpret Results

See [references/interpreting-results.md](references/interpreting-results.md) for guidance on:
- Understanding rating scales
- Analyzing upgrade/downgrade trends
- Evaluating analyst credibility
- Tracking sentiment changes

## Example Queries

**Basic Query:**
```
Get the latest stock grades for the symbol AAPL from top analysts and financial institutions.
```

**Recent Changes:**
```
What are the most recent analyst rating changes for TSLA?
```

**Upgrade Focus:**
```
Show me recent upgrades for NVDA from major investment banks.
```

**Historical View:**
```
What is the history of analyst ratings for MSFT over the past year?
```

**Specific Institution:**
```
What is Goldman Sachs' current rating on AMZN?
```

## Understanding Rating Scales

### Common Rating Systems

| Rating Level | Common Terms |
|--------------|--------------|
| Strong Buy | Buy, Overweight, Outperform |
| Buy | Accumulate, Add, Positive |
| Hold | Neutral, Market Perform, Equal-Weight |
| Sell | Underweight, Underperform, Reduce |
| Strong Sell | Sell, Avoid |

### Rating Equivalencies

| Bank A | Bank B | Bank C | Meaning |
|--------|--------|--------|---------|
| Overweight | Buy | Outperform | Bullish |
| Equal-Weight | Hold | Market Perform | Neutral |
| Underweight | Sell | Underperform | Bearish |

## Rating Actions

### Action Types

| Action | Description |
|--------|-------------|
| Upgrade | Rating improved (e.g., Hold → Buy) |
| Downgrade | Rating lowered (e.g., Buy → Hold) |
| Maintain | Rating unchanged (reaffirmed) |
| Initiate | New coverage started |
| Reiterate | Rating repeated with emphasis |
| Resume | Coverage restarted |
| Suspend | Coverage temporarily halted |

### Significance Ranking

| Action | Impact |
|--------|--------|
| Upgrade from Sell | Highest positive |
| Upgrade from Hold | Significant positive |
| Initiate at Buy | Positive |
| Maintain at Buy | Stable positive |
| Downgrade to Hold | Negative signal |
| Downgrade to Sell | Highest negative |

## Analyst Credibility

### Factors to Consider

| Factor | Description |
|--------|-------------|
| Track Record | Historical accuracy |
| Institution Tier | Major bank vs. boutique |
| Sector Expertise | Specialization |
| Coverage Length | Experience with stock |
| Independence | Conflicts of interest |

### Institution Tiers

| Tier | Examples |
|------|----------|
| Bulge Bracket | Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan |
| Major Banks | Bank of America, Citi, UBS |
| Boutiques | Wedbush, Piper Sandler, Needham |
| Independent | Morningstar, CFRA |

## Trend Analysis

### Sentiment Indicators

| Pattern | Interpretation |
|---------|----------------|
| Multiple upgrades | Improving sentiment |
| Multiple downgrades | Deteriorating outlook |
| Mixed actions | Uncertainty/debate |
| All maintains | Stable consensus |

### Momentum Signals

| Signal | Meaning |
|--------|---------|
| Upgrade cluster | Catalyst or breakout |
| Downgrade cluster | Concerns emerging |
| Initiation wave | Growing interest |
| Coverage drops | Reduced attention |

## Rating Distribution

### Consensus Rating

| Distribution | Interpretation |
|--------------|----------------|
| Mostly Buy | Strong bullish consensus |
| Mostly Hold | Neutral/wait-and-see |
| Mostly Sell | Bearish consensus |
| Mixed | Divergent views |

### Rating Counts

| Metric | What It Shows |
|--------|---------------|
| Buy % | Bullish proportion |
| Hold % | Neutral proportion |
| Sell % | Bearish proportion |
| Total Analysts | Coverage level |

## Timing Considerations

### When Ratings Change

| Catalyst | Typical Timing |
|----------|----------------|
| Earnings | Day of or day after |
| Guidance | Within 24-48 hours |
| Product News | Same day |
| Macro Events | As needed |
| Sector Rotation | Periodic |

### Staleness

| Age | Reliability |
|-----|-------------|
| <1 month | Current view |
| 1-3 months | Reasonably current |
| 3-6 months | May be outdated |
| >6 months | Likely stale |

## Common Use Cases

### Sentiment Check
```
What is the current analyst sentiment on AAPL?
```

### Change Monitoring
```
Have any analysts upgraded or downgraded TSLA recently?
```

### Catalyst Research
```
Why did analysts upgrade NVDA last week?
```

### Consensus View
```
What percentage of analysts rate MSFT as a buy?
```

### Historical Tracking
```
How has analyst sentiment on META changed over the past year?
```

## Analysis Tips

1. **Weight by institution**: Major banks carry more weight.

2. **Track changes, not just ratings**: Upgrades/downgrades signal shifts.

3. **Consider timing**: Post-earnings ratings are most current.

4. **Look for clusters**: Multiple changes = significant.

5. **Check track record**: Some analysts are more accurate.

6. **Combine with targets**: Rating + price target = complete view.

## Integration with Other Skills

| Skill | Combined Use |
|-------|--------------|
| price-target-consensus | Ratings + price targets |
| analyst-estimates | Ratings + earnings expectations |
| stock-quote | Rating changes + price reaction |
| stock-performance | Historical ratings vs. performance |

Related Skills

stock-quote

27
from OctagonAI/skills

Retrieve real-time stock quotes using Octagon MCP. Use when you need current price, day range, 52-week range, volume, market cap, and moving averages for any publicly traded stock.

stock-price-change

27
from OctagonAI/skills

Retrieve stock price change statistics across multiple time periods using Octagon MCP. Use when analyzing short-term and long-term returns, comparing performance across timeframes, and evaluating momentum and historical growth.

stock-performance

27
from OctagonAI/skills

Retrieve stock price data and performance metrics using Octagon MCP. Use when analyzing daily closing prices, trading volume, price trends, historical performance, and comparing stock movements over specific time periods.

stock-historical-index

27
from OctagonAI/skills

Retrieve full historical end-of-day price data for market indices using Octagon MCP. Use when analyzing index performance over time, tracking market trends, calculating returns, and understanding market context for individual stock analysis.

sector-performance-snapshot

27
from OctagonAI/skills

Retrieve a snapshot of market sector performance using Octagon MCP. Use when analyzing sector-wide metrics including revenue, EBITDA, net income, market cap, and enterprise value for companies within a specific sector and exchange.

sector-pe-ratios

27
from OctagonAI/skills

Retrieve sector P/E ratios using Octagon MCP. Use when comparing company valuations to sector benchmarks, analyzing sector valuations across exchanges, and understanding market-wide valuation trends.

sec-risk-factors

27
from OctagonAI/skills

Extract and summarize risk factors from SEC filings using Octagon MCP. Use when analyzing Item 1A risk disclosures, categorizing business risks, identifying new or material risks, and comparing risk profiles across companies or time periods.

sec-proxy-analysis

27
from OctagonAI/skills

Analyze proxy statements (DEF 14A) to extract executive compensation, governance information, and shareholder voting matters using Octagon MCP. Use when researching CEO pay, board composition, say-on-pay votes, and corporate governance practices.

sec-mda-analysis

27
from OctagonAI/skills

Analyze Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) sections from SEC filings using Octagon MCP. Use when extracting strategic initiatives, financial performance commentary, macroeconomic challenges, and forward-looking statements from 10-K and 10-Q filings.

sec-footnotes-analysis

27
from OctagonAI/skills

Analyze footnotes and accounting policies from SEC filings using Octagon MCP. Use when researching revenue recognition policies, critical estimates, lease obligations, pension assumptions, stock compensation, contingencies, and new accounting pronouncements.

sec-debt-covenant

27
from OctagonAI/skills

Analyze debt covenants and credit agreement terms from SEC filings using Octagon MCP. Use when researching financial covenants, leverage ratios, interest coverage requirements, credit facilities, debt maturity schedules, and covenant compliance from 10-K, 10-Q, and 8-K filings.

sec-corp-governance

27
from OctagonAI/skills

Review corporate governance practices and board composition from SEC filings using Octagon MCP. Use when researching board structure, director qualifications, committee composition, governance policies, shareholder rights, and related party transactions from proxy statements.