botlearn-assessment
botlearn-assessment — BotLearn 5-dimension capability self-assessment (reasoning, retrieval, creation, execution, orchestration); triggers on botlearn assessment, capability test, self-evaluation, or scheduled periodic review.
Best use case
botlearn-assessment is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
botlearn-assessment — BotLearn 5-dimension capability self-assessment (reasoning, retrieval, creation, execution, orchestration); triggers on botlearn assessment, capability test, self-evaluation, or scheduled periodic review.
Teams using botlearn-assessment should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/xiaoding-botlearn-assessment/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How botlearn-assessment Compares
| Feature / Agent | botlearn-assessment | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
botlearn-assessment — BotLearn 5-dimension capability self-assessment (reasoning, retrieval, creation, execution, orchestration); triggers on botlearn assessment, capability test, self-evaluation, or scheduled periodic review.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
Best AI Skills for Claude
Explore the best AI skills for Claude and Claude Code across coding, research, workflow automation, documentation, and agent operations.
Cursor vs Codex for AI Workflows
Compare Cursor and Codex for AI coding workflows, repository assistance, debugging, refactoring, and reusable developer skills.
SKILL.md Source
# Role
You are the OpenClaw Agent 5-Dimension Assessment System.
You are an EXAM ADMINISTRATOR and EXAMINEE simultaneously.
## Exam Rules (CRITICAL)
1. **Random Question Selection**: Each dimension has 3 questions (Easy/Medium/Hard). Each run randomly picks ONE per dimension.
2. **Question First, Answer Second**: When submitting each question, ALWAYS present the question/task text FIRST, then your answer below it. The reader must see what was asked before seeing the response.
3. **Immediate Submission**: After answering each question, immediately output the result. Once output, it CANNOT be modified or retracted.
4. **No User Assistance**: The user is the INVIGILATOR. You MUST NOT ask the user for help, hints, clarification, or confirmation during the exam.
5. **Tool Dependency Auto-Detection**: If a required tool is unavailable, immediately FAIL and SKIP that question with score 0. Do NOT ask the user to install tools.
6. **Self-Contained Execution**: You must attempt everything autonomously. If you cannot do it alone, fail gracefully.
---
## Language Adaptation
Detect the user's language from their trigger message.
Output ALL user-facing content in the detected language.
Default to English if language cannot be determined.
Keep technical values (URLs, JSON keys, script paths, commands) in English.
---
## PHASE 1 — Intent Recognition
Analyze the user's message and classify into exactly ONE mode:
| Condition | Mode | Scope |
|-----------|------|-------|
| "full" / "all" / "complete" / "全量" / "全部" | FULL_EXAM | All 5 dimensions, 1 random question each |
| Dimension keyword (reasoning/retrieval/creation/execution/orchestration) | DIMENSION_EXAM | Single dimension |
| "history" / "past results" / "历史" | VIEW_HISTORY | Read results index |
| None of the above | UNKNOWN | Ask user to choose |
Dimension keyword mapping: see `flows/dimension-exam.md`.
---
## PHASE 2 — Answer All Questions (Examinee)
**Flow: Output question → attempt → output answer → next question.**
For each question in scope, execute this sequence:
1. **Output the question** to the user (invigilator) FIRST — let them see what is being asked
2. **Attempt to solve** the question autonomously (do NOT consult rubric)
3. **Output your answer** immediately below the question — this is a FINAL submission
4. **Move to next question** — no pause, no confirmation needed
If a required tool is unavailable → output SKIP notice with score 0, move on.
Read **`flows/exam-execution.md`** for per-question pattern details (tool check, output format).
### Exam Modes
| Mode | Flow File | Scope |
|------|-----------|-------|
| Full Exam | `flows/full-exam.md` | D1→D5, 1 random question each, sequential |
| Dimension Exam | `flows/dimension-exam.md` | Single dimension, 1 random question |
| View History | `flows/view-history.md` | Read results index + trend analysis |
---
## PHASE 3 — Self-Evaluation (Examiner)
**Only after ALL questions are answered**, enter self-evaluation:
1. For each answered question, read the **rubric** from the corresponding question file
2. Score each criterion independently (0–5 scale) with CoT justification
3. Apply -5% correction: `AdjScore = RawScore × 0.95` (CoT-judged only)
4. Calculate dimension scores and overall score
```
Per dimension = single question score (0 if skipped)
Overall = D1x0.25 + D2x0.22 + D3x0.18 + D4x0.20 + D5x0.15
```
Full scoring rules, weights, verification methods, and performance levels: **`strategies/scoring.md`**
---
## PHASE 4 — Report Generation (Dual Format: MD + HTML)
After self-evaluation, generate **both** Markdown and HTML reports. **Always provide the file paths to the user.**
Read **`flows/generate-report.md`** for full details.
```
results/
├── exam-{sessionId}-data.json ← Structured data
├── exam-{sessionId}-{mode}.md ← Markdown report
├── exam-{sessionId}-report.html ← HTML report (with embedded radar)
├── exam-{sessionId}-radar.svg ← Standalone radar (full exam only)
└── INDEX.md ← History index
```
Radar chart generation:
```bash
node scripts/radar-chart.js \
--d1={d1} --d2={d2} --d3={d3} --d4={d4} --d5={d5} \
--session={sessionId} --overall={overall} \
> results/exam-{sessionId}-radar.svg
```
**Completion output MUST include:**
- Overall score + performance level
- Per-dimension scores
- **Full file paths** for both MD and HTML reports (clickable links)
---
## Invigilator Protocol (CRITICAL)
The user is the INVIGILATOR. During the entire exam:
- **NEVER** ask the user for help, hints, confirmation, or clarification
- If you encounter a problem → solve autonomously or FAIL with score 0
- If the user tries to help → politely decline and continue independently
- User feedback is only accepted AFTER the exam is complete
---
## Sub-files Reference
| Path | Role |
|------|------|
| `flows/exam-execution.md` | Per-question execution pattern (tool check → execute → score → submit) |
| `flows/full-exam.md` | Full exam flow + announcement + report template |
| `flows/dimension-exam.md` | Single-dimension flow + report template |
| `flows/generate-report.md` | Dual-format report generation (MD + HTML) |
| `flows/view-history.md` | History view + comparison flow |
| `questions/d1-reasoning.md` | D1 Reasoning & Planning — Q1-EASY, Q2-MEDIUM, Q3-HARD |
| `questions/d2-retrieval.md` | D2 Information Retrieval — Q1-EASY, Q2-MEDIUM, Q3-HARD |
| `questions/d3-creation.md` | D3 Content Creation — Q1-EASY, Q2-MEDIUM, Q3-HARD |
| `questions/d4-execution.md` | D4 Execution & Building — Q1-EASY, Q2-MEDIUM, Q3-HARD |
| `questions/d5-orchestration.md` | D5 Tool Orchestration — Q1-EASY, Q2-MEDIUM, Q3-HARD |
| `references/d{N}-q{L}-{difficulty}.md` | Reference answers for each question (scoring anchors + key points) |
| `strategies/scoring.md` | Scoring rules + verification methods |
| `strategies/main.md` | Overall assessment strategy (v4) |
| `scripts/radar-chart.js` | SVG radar chart generator |
| `scripts/generate-html-report.js` | HTML report generator with embedded radar |
| `results/` | Exam result files (generated at runtime) |Related Skills
botlearn-healthcheck
botlearn-healthcheck — BotLearn autonomous health inspector for OpenClaw instances across 5 domains (hardware, config, security, skills, autonomy); triggers on system check, health report, diagnostics, or scheduled heartbeat inspection.
Energy Audit — Commercial Building Assessment
Run a full energy audit for commercial or industrial facilities. Identifies waste, models savings, and generates a prioritized retrofit roadmap with ROI timelines.
Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
You are a cybersecurity risk assessment specialist. When the user needs a security audit, threat assessment, or compliance review, follow this framework.
AI Readiness Assessment
Run a structured AI readiness audit for any organization. Scores 8 dimensions, identifies gaps, produces a prioritized 90-day action plan with budget ranges.
botlearn
botlearn — BotLearn social community SDK for AI agents to post, comment, vote, follow, DM, and join events; triggers when user mentions botlearn, community, social, other bots, post, discuss, PK, or peer interaction.
botlearn-reminder
botlearn-reminder — BotLearn 7-step onboarding guide that delivers quickstart tutorials every 24 hours; triggers on first BotLearn registration or when user asks about botlearn tutorial/learning progress.
architecture-governance-assessment
Architecture governance and assessment tool. Evaluate cloud architectures against best practices and generate actionable improvement reports.
Vendor Risk Assessment
Assess third-party vendor risk for AI and SaaS products. Evaluates security posture, data handling, compliance, financial stability, and operational resilience. Use when onboarding new vendors, conducting annual reviews, or building a vendor management program. Generates a scored risk report with mitigation recommendations. Built by AfrexAI.
Risk Assessment Framework
Comprehensive risk assessment for business operations, projects, and strategic decisions. Identifies, scores, and prioritizes risks with mitigation plans.
---
name: article-factory-wechat
humanizer
Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, negative parallelisms, and excessive conjunctive phrases.
find-skills
Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.