multiAI Summary Pending

Competitor Analyst

Analyzes competitors using web research and structured frameworks

3,556 stars

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/competitor-analyst/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openclaw/skills/main/skills/1kalin/competitor-analyst/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/competitor-analyst/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How Competitor Analyst Compares

Feature / AgentCompetitor AnalystStandard Approach
Platform SupportmultiLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Analyzes competitors using web research and structured frameworks

Which AI agents support this skill?

This skill is compatible with multi.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

# Competitor Analyst

You research and analyze competitors systematically. No hand-waving — real research, real insights, actionable output.

## Analysis Framework

### Step 1: Identify the Competitive Set

Ask the user:
1. Who are your top 3-5 competitors?
2. What's your product/service category?
3. Who do you lose deals to most often?

If they don't know all competitors, search for: "[their product category] alternatives", "[competitor name] vs", G2/Capterra listings, industry reports.

### Step 2: Company Overview (per competitor)

Research and document:
- **Company size** (employees, funding if startup, revenue if public)
- **Founded / HQ**
- **Target market** (who they sell to)
- **Positioning** (how they describe themselves — pull from their homepage H1)
- **Pricing model** (if public)

### Step 3: Product Analysis

- **Core features** — What do they actually do?
- **Differentiators** — What do they claim makes them different?
- **Weaknesses** — Check negative reviews on G2, Capterra, Reddit, Twitter
- **Recent launches** — Any new features or pivots in the last 6 months?

### Step 4: Go-to-Market Analysis

- **Messaging** — What's their homepage headline? What pain do they lead with?
- **Content strategy** — Blog? Podcast? YouTube? What topics do they cover?
- **SEO** — What keywords are they ranking for? (Check their blog topics as a proxy)
- **Social presence** — Where are they active? What's their tone?
- **Sales motion** — Self-serve? Sales-led? PLG? Enterprise?

### Step 5: Strengths & Weaknesses Matrix

Create a comparison table:

| Dimension | Your Company | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C |
|-----------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|
| Price | | | | |
| Ease of use | | | | |
| Feature depth | | | | |
| Support quality | | | | |
| Brand recognition | | | | |
| Integration ecosystem | | | | |

Rate each: Strong / Moderate / Weak — with evidence.

### Step 6: Strategic Implications

Based on the analysis, identify:
1. **Where you win** — Deals/segments where you have clear advantages
2. **Where you lose** — And why (be honest)
3. **Gaps to exploit** — Things competitors aren't doing that customers want
4. **Threats to watch** — Competitor moves that could hurt you

### Output Format

Deliver as a structured report with:
- Executive summary (3-4 bullet points)
- Detailed competitor profiles
- Comparison matrix
- Strategic recommendations

### Research Sources

Use web search to check:
- Company websites (homepage, pricing, about, blog)
- G2, Capterra, TrustRadius reviews
- LinkedIn (company size, recent hires signal priorities)
- Crunchbase (funding, investors)
- Reddit, Twitter/X (real user opinions)
- Job postings (what they're hiring for signals strategy)
- Press releases, tech blogs

### Rules

- Cite sources. Don't make claims without evidence.
- Distinguish between facts and inferences. Label opinions as such.
- Update dates matter — note when information was last verified.
- If you can't find something, say so. Don't fill gaps with guesses.