Deal Desk — Structured Deal Review & Approval
Run every non-standard deal through a repeatable review process. Catch margin leaks, enforce discount guardrails, and close faster with pre-approved terms.
Best use case
Deal Desk — Structured Deal Review & Approval is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt. It is especially useful for teams working in multi. Run every non-standard deal through a repeatable review process. Catch margin leaks, enforce discount guardrails, and close faster with pre-approved terms.
Run every non-standard deal through a repeatable review process. Catch margin leaks, enforce discount guardrails, and close faster with pre-approved terms.
Users should expect a more consistent workflow output, faster repeated execution, and less time spent rewriting prompts from scratch.
Practical example
Example input
Use the "Deal Desk — Structured Deal Review & Approval" skill to help with this workflow task. Context: Run every non-standard deal through a repeatable review process. Catch margin leaks, enforce discount guardrails, and close faster with pre-approved terms.
Example output
A structured workflow result with clearer steps, more consistent formatting, and an output that is easier to reuse in the next run.
When to use this skill
- Use this skill when you want a reusable workflow rather than writing the same prompt again and again.
When not to use this skill
- Do not use this when you only need a one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- Do not use it if you cannot install or maintain the related files, repository context, or supporting tools.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/afrexai-deal-desk/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How Deal Desk — Structured Deal Review & Approval Compares
| Feature / Agent | Deal Desk — Structured Deal Review & Approval | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Run every non-standard deal through a repeatable review process. Catch margin leaks, enforce discount guardrails, and close faster with pre-approved terms.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
Best AI Skills for Claude
Explore the best AI skills for Claude and Claude Code across coding, research, workflow automation, documentation, and agent operations.
Cursor vs Codex for AI Workflows
Compare Cursor and Codex for AI coding workflows, repository assistance, debugging, refactoring, and reusable developer skills.
SKILL.md Source
# Deal Desk — Structured Deal Review & Approval
Run every non-standard deal through a repeatable review process. Catch margin leaks, enforce discount guardrails, and close faster with pre-approved terms.
## When to Use
- Custom pricing requests above standard discount thresholds
- Multi-year contracts needing approval
- Bundle or package deals outside published pricing
- Enterprise deals with non-standard terms (payment, SLA, liability)
- Partner/reseller margin negotiations
## Deal Review Framework
### 1. Deal Qualification Check
Before pricing, confirm the deal is worth pursuing:
| Question | Red Flag If... |
|----------|---------------|
| Annual contract value (ACV) | Below $10K for enterprise motion |
| Decision timeline | "No urgency" or 6+ months out |
| Budget confirmed? | "We'll find budget later" |
| Champion identified? | No internal advocate |
| Technical fit validated? | Requirements don't match product |
**Kill criteria:** 2+ red flags = send back to sales for re-qualification.
### 2. Pricing Guardrails
#### Standard Discount Authority
| Discount Level | Approver | Conditions |
|---------------|----------|------------|
| 0-10% | AE (self-approve) | Standard annual contract |
| 11-20% | Sales Manager | Multi-year or 3+ seat expansion |
| 21-30% | VP Sales + Finance | Strategic account, logo value documented |
| 31-40% | CRO/CEO | Exceptional — requires written business case |
| 40%+ | Board/CEO only | Almost never. Document why. |
#### Discount Offsets (Give to Get)
Never discount without getting something back:
- **Case study rights** → worth 5-10% discount
- **Multi-year commitment** → 5% per additional year
- **Upfront annual payment** → 5-10% (cash flow value)
- **Reference calls** → worth 3-5%
- **Expanded scope** → reduce per-unit but increase total ACV
- **Shorter payment terms** → Net-15 vs Net-60 = real cash value
### 3. Deal Structure Templates
#### Template A: Standard Annual
- Payment: Annual upfront
- Term: 12 months, auto-renew
- Discount: Per guardrails above
- SLA: Standard published SLA
#### Template B: Multi-Year
- Payment: Annual upfront each year (not all upfront unless 10%+ discount warranted)
- Term: 24-36 months
- Price lock: Year 1 rate locked, 3-5% annual increase cap
- Early termination: Remaining term billed at 50%
#### Template C: Enterprise Custom
- Payment: Quarterly or monthly (premium: +10-15% vs annual)
- Term: Negotiable
- SLA: Custom with defined penalties
- Liability cap: 12 months of fees (standard), negotiate up only with legal review
- Data processing: DPA required, included in standard terms
#### Template D: Partner/Reseller
- Margin: 20-30% off list (tiered by volume)
- Deal registration: 90-day protection window
- Co-sell vs resell: Define clearly — affects margin and support responsibility
- Minimum commitment: Required for highest tier
### 4. Approval Workflow
```
AE submits deal → Deal Desk reviews (same day) →
IF standard terms + approved discount: Auto-approve
IF non-standard: Route to approver chain →
Finance review (margin check) →
Legal review (if custom terms) →
Final approval →
AE receives approved terms + redlines
```
**SLA:** Deal Desk responds within 4 business hours. Escalation if no response in 8.
### 5. Margin Analysis
For every deal, calculate:
- **Gross margin %** = (ACV - COGS) / ACV × 100
- **Effective discount** = (List price - Deal price) / List price × 100
- **Payback period** = CAC / (Monthly revenue × Gross margin %)
- **LTV:CAC ratio** = (ACV × Expected years × Margin) / Total CAC
**Minimum thresholds:**
- Gross margin: >65% (SaaS), >40% (services)
- LTV:CAC: >3:1
- Payback: <18 months
### 6. Red Flags That Kill Deals
1. **"We need 50% off to start"** — They'll never pay full price. Walk away or repackage.
2. **Unlimited liability demand** — Legal trap. Cap at 12 months fees, firm.
3. **"Our legal will redline everything"** — Budget 4-6 weeks for legal cycle. Price it in.
4. **Payment terms beyond Net-60** — Cash flow killer. Offer early payment discount instead.
5. **Scope creep during negotiation** — New requirements = new SOW, not same price.
6. **No executive sponsor** — Deal will stall. Get sponsor or pause.
7. **Competitor benchmark bluff** — "Company X offered us 40% less." Verify. Usually inflated.
### 7. Post-Close Handoff
Deal Desk creates handoff doc:
- Agreed pricing and terms
- Custom commitments (SLAs, deliverables, timelines)
- Discount justification (for renewal team context)
- Upsell/expansion opportunities identified during negotiation
- Key contacts and decision-maker map
## Industry Deal Patterns
| Industry | Typical ACV | Common Ask | Watch For |
|----------|------------|------------|-----------|
| **Fintech** | $50K-$500K | SOC 2 + BAA | Compliance creep |
| **Healthcare** | $30K-$200K | HIPAA BAA mandatory | Slow procurement |
| **Legal** | $40K-$300K | Custom data retention | Scope inflation |
| **Construction** | $20K-$100K | Per-project pricing | Seasonal churn |
| **Ecommerce** | $25K-$150K | Revenue-share model | GMV volatility |
| **SaaS** | $30K-$250K | API/integration SLAs | Platform risk |
| **Real Estate** | $15K-$80K | Per-property pricing | Market sensitivity |
| **Recruitment** | $20K-$120K | Per-placement pricing | Volume variability |
| **Manufacturing** | $50K-$400K | On-prem/hybrid option | IT approval cycles |
| **Professional Services** | $25K-$200K | White-label rights | Margin compression |
## Resources
- **AI Revenue Leak Calculator** — quantify what deals are costing you: https://afrexai-cto.github.io/ai-revenue-calculator/
- **Industry Context Packs** ($47 each) — deep frameworks for your vertical: https://afrexai-cto.github.io/context-packs/
- **Agent Setup Wizard** — deploy deal desk automation: https://afrexai-cto.github.io/agent-setup/
### Bundle Deals
- Pick 3 packs: $97 (save $44)
- All 10 packs: $197 (save $273)
- Everything Bundle: $247Related Skills
Post-Mortem & Incident Review Framework
Run structured post-mortems that actually prevent repeat failures. Blameless analysis, root cause identification, and action tracking.
Pitch Deck Reviewer
Reviews pitch decks and provides investor-ready feedback with scoring
Performance Review Engine
> Your AI-powered performance management system. Write reviews that develop people, not just evaluate them. From self-assessments to 360° feedback to calibration — complete frameworks for every review cycle.
Contract Review Assistant
Analyze business contracts for risks, unfavorable terms, and missing clauses. Get a plain-English summary of what you're signing.
afrexai-code-reviewer
Enterprise-grade code review agent. Reviews PRs, diffs, or code files for security vulnerabilities, performance issues, error handling gaps, architecture smells, and test coverage. Works with any language, any repo, no dependencies required.
performance-review-cn
绩效面谈报告、OKR对齐度检测、校准辅助
desktop-monitor-widget
桌面监控悬浮球 - 实时显示系统资源状态
clawdtm-review
Review and rate OpenClaw skills on ClawdTM. See what humans and AI agents recommend.
cyber-owasp-review
Map application security findings to OWASP Top 10 categories and generate remediation checklists. Use for normalized AppSec review outputs and category-level prioritization.
plan-eng-review
Eng manager-mode plan review. Lock in the execution plan — architecture, data flow, diagrams, edge cases, test coverage, performance. Walks through issues interactively with opinionated recommendations.
plan-design-review
Designer's eye plan review — interactive, like CEO and Eng review. Rates each design dimension 0-10, explains what would make it a 10, then fixes the plan to get there. Works in plan mode.
plan-ceo-review
CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), SELECTIVE EXPANSION (hold scope + cherry-pick expansions), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials).