Investment Analysis & Portfolio Management Engine
Complete investment analysis, portfolio construction, risk management, and trade execution methodology. Works across stocks, crypto, ETFs, bonds, and alternatives. Zero dependencies — pure agent skill.
About this skill
The Investment Analysis & Portfolio Management Engine is a comprehensive AI agent skill designed to guide users through a structured and disciplined investment process. It starts with a 'Quick Health Check' to assess an investor's fundamental readiness, covering critical aspects like investment thesis documentation, position sizing, stop-loss definition, and portfolio risk tracking. This initial assessment ensures that foundational best practices are in place before any new investment activity begins. Following the health check, the skill moves into 'Phase 1: Investment Thesis Development,' providing a detailed YAML template for articulating a clear and well-reasoned investment thesis. This template prompts the agent to define the asset, identify a unique 'edge' for the opportunity, explain why others might miss it, and specify a concise thesis statement along with a timeframe and catalysts. This structured approach helps in building robust investment cases, moving beyond speculative decisions to data-driven, strategic choices. Ultimately, this skill empowers AI agents to act as sophisticated financial assistants, enabling them to systematically analyze potential investments, manage portfolio risk, and prepare for trade execution across a broad spectrum of financial instruments. Its 'zero dependencies' nature means it's a self-contained guide an agent can follow, making it highly versatile for various LLM platforms seeking to offer advanced financial analysis capabilities.
Best use case
The primary use case for this skill is to empower an AI agent to perform rigorous investment analysis and develop structured portfolio strategies. It's ideal for individual investors, financial analysts, or automated wealth management platforms looking to formalize their decision-making process, minimize behavioral biases, and ensure a systematic approach to identifying and managing investment opportunities across various asset classes.
Complete investment analysis, portfolio construction, risk management, and trade execution methodology. Works across stocks, crypto, ETFs, bonds, and alternatives. Zero dependencies — pure agent skill.
A thoroughly documented investment thesis, a clear understanding of portfolio risk and health, and a structured plan for position sizing, rebalancing, and trade execution across diverse assets.
Practical example
Example input
Help me construct a detailed investment thesis for Google (GOOGL), focusing on its AI advancements as a growth catalyst for the next 12-18 months. Also, provide a health check on my readiness to invest.
Example output
Okay, first, let's complete your Investment Health Check (Score: X/8). Then, we will fill out the Thesis Brief Template for GOOGL, identifying its AI advancements as a 'catalyst' edge, and outlining a 12-18 month horizon for earnings growth and market re-rating.
When to use this skill
- When developing a new investment thesis for any asset (stocks, crypto, ETFs, bonds, alternatives).
- To conduct a thorough self-assessment of investment readiness and risk management practices.
- For structuring a disciplined portfolio construction and rebalancing strategy.
- When you need to articulate a clear investment edge and timeframe for a trade.
When not to use this skill
- For rapid, high-frequency trading decisions that require instant execution.
- If you seek automated buy/sell signals without input or strategic oversight.
- When looking for predictive market forecasts rather than a structured analysis framework.
- If you prefer an unstructured, intuitive approach to investing without formal documentation.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/afrexai-investment-engine/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How Investment Analysis & Portfolio Management Engine Compares
| Feature / Agent | Investment Analysis & Portfolio Management Engine | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | easy | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Complete investment analysis, portfolio construction, risk management, and trade execution methodology. Works across stocks, crypto, ETFs, bonds, and alternatives. Zero dependencies — pure agent skill.
How difficult is it to install?
The installation complexity is rated as easy. You can find the installation instructions above.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
Best AI Skills for ChatGPT
Find the best AI skills to adapt into ChatGPT workflows for research, writing, summarization, planning, and repeatable assistant tasks.
Best AI Skills for Claude
Explore the best AI skills for Claude and Claude Code across coding, research, workflow automation, documentation, and agent operations.
AI Agent for SaaS Idea Validation
Use AI agent skills for SaaS idea validation, market research, customer discovery, competitor analysis, and documenting startup hypotheses.
SKILL.md Source
# Investment Analysis & Portfolio Management Engine
Complete investment analysis, portfolio construction, risk management, and trade execution methodology. Works across stocks, crypto, ETFs, bonds, and alternatives. Zero dependencies — pure agent skill.
## Quick Health Check (/8)
Before any investment activity, score your current state:
| Signal | ✅ Healthy | ❌ Fix First |
|--------|-----------|-------------|
| Investment thesis documented | Written with edge + invalidation | "I think it'll go up" |
| Position sizing calculated | Kelly/fixed-fractional with max cap | "I'll put in $5K" |
| Stop-loss defined | Price or thesis invalidation trigger | No exit plan |
| Portfolio heat tracked | Total exposure known, <15% | Unknown aggregate risk |
| Asset correlation checked | No >40% correlated concentration | All tech / all crypto |
| Rebalance schedule set | Monthly or threshold-based | Never rebalanced |
| Tax impact considered | Harvesting losses, holding periods | Tax-blind trading |
| Performance tracked | Benchmarked vs buy-and-hold | "I think I'm up" |
Score /8. Below 5 = fix fundamentals before any new positions.
---
## Phase 1: Investment Thesis Development
Every position starts with a thesis. No thesis = no trade.
### Thesis Brief Template
```yaml
thesis:
ticker: "AAPL"
asset_class: "equity" # equity | crypto | etf | bond | commodity | real_estate
date: "2026-02-22"
# THE EDGE — why does this opportunity exist?
edge:
type: "mispricing" # mispricing | catalyst | trend | mean_reversion | structural
description: "Market pricing in worst-case regulation; actual impact is 5-10% revenue, not 30%"
why_others_miss_it: "Headline risk scaring generalists; specialists still buying"
# THESIS STATEMENT (one sentence)
thesis_statement: "AAPL is undervalued by 20% due to regulatory FUD; earnings growth will re-rate within 2 quarters"
# TIMEFRAME
timeframe:
horizon: "3-6 months"
catalyst_date: "2026-04-15" # earnings, FDA, macro event
catalyst_type: "earnings_beat"
# BULL / BASE / BEAR
scenarios:
bull:
probability: 30
target_price: 245
thesis: "Regulation light + Services acceleration"
base:
probability: 50
target_price: 215
thesis: "Regulation moderate, priced in by Q3"
bear:
probability: 20
target_price: 165
thesis: "Full regulatory impact + macro downturn"
# EXPECTED VALUE
# EV = (P_bull × R_bull) + (P_base × R_base) + (P_bear × R_bear)
current_price: 190
expected_value: 213.5 # (0.3×245 + 0.5×215 + 0.2×165)
ev_vs_current: "+12.4%"
# INVALIDATION — when you're WRONG
invalidation:
price_stop: 175 # -7.9% from entry
thesis_stop: "Revenue decline >10% YoY in any segment"
time_stop: "No catalyst by 2026-07-01"
# CONVICTION (1-5)
conviction: 4
conviction_factors:
- "3 independent data sources confirm undervaluation"
- "Insider buying last 90 days"
- "Valuation below 5Y average on EV/EBITDA"
```
### Edge Type Framework
| Edge Type | Description | Validation Method | Decay Rate |
|-----------|-------------|-------------------|------------|
| Mispricing | Market wrong on fundamentals | Comp analysis + model | Slow (months) |
| Catalyst | Known upcoming event | Calendar + probability | Fast (event-driven) |
| Trend | Momentum / technical | Price action + volume | Medium (weeks) |
| Mean Reversion | Extreme deviation from norm | Z-score + history | Medium |
| Structural | Market structure creates opportunity | Flow analysis | Slow |
### Thesis Quality Checklist
- [ ] Edge clearly articulated (not just "it's cheap")
- [ ] Bull/base/bear with probabilities summing to 100%
- [ ] Expected value positive vs current price
- [ ] At least 2 independent data sources
- [ ] Invalidation criteria defined (price + thesis + time)
- [ ] Timeframe realistic for the edge type
- [ ] Not just consensus view repackaged
- [ ] Considered "what if I'm wrong?"
---
## Phase 2: Fundamental Analysis
### Equity Analysis Framework
#### Valuation Metrics (collect all, weight by sector)
```yaml
valuation:
# Price Multiples
pe_ratio: null # Price / Earnings (TTM)
forward_pe: null # Price / Forward Earnings
peg_ratio: null # PE / Earnings Growth Rate
ps_ratio: null # Price / Sales
pb_ratio: null # Price / Book
ev_ebitda: null # Enterprise Value / EBITDA
ev_revenue: null # Enterprise Value / Revenue
fcf_yield: null # Free Cash Flow / Market Cap
# Compare to:
sector_median: null
historical_5y_avg: null
historical_range: [null, null] # [low, high]
# Verdict
valuation_score: null # 1-10 (1=very expensive, 10=very cheap)
relative_to_sector: null # premium | inline | discount
```
#### Financial Health Scorecard
| Dimension | Metric | Healthy | Warning | Danger |
|-----------|--------|---------|---------|--------|
| Profitability | Gross Margin | >50% | 30-50% | <30% |
| Profitability | Net Margin | >15% | 5-15% | <5% |
| Profitability | ROE | >15% | 8-15% | <8% |
| Profitability | ROIC | >12% | 6-12% | <6% |
| Growth | Revenue YoY | >15% | 5-15% | <5% |
| Growth | EPS YoY | >10% | 0-10% | Declining |
| Growth | FCF Growth | >10% | 0-10% | Declining |
| Leverage | Debt/Equity | <0.5 | 0.5-1.5 | >1.5 |
| Leverage | Interest Coverage | >8x | 3-8x | <3x |
| Leverage | Net Debt/EBITDA | <2x | 2-4x | >4x |
| Liquidity | Current Ratio | >1.5 | 1-1.5 | <1 |
| Liquidity | Quick Ratio | >1.0 | 0.5-1 | <0.5 |
| Efficiency | Asset Turnover | >0.8 | 0.4-0.8 | <0.4 |
| Efficiency | Inventory Days | <60 | 60-120 | >120 |
| Quality | FCF/Net Income | >80% | 50-80% | <50% |
| Quality | Accruals Ratio | <5% | 5-10% | >10% |
Score each dimension 1-3. Total /48. Above 36 = strong. Below 24 = avoid.
#### Moat Assessment (0-25 points)
| Moat Source | Score 0-5 | Evidence Required |
|-------------|-----------|-------------------|
| Network Effects | | Users increase value for other users |
| Switching Costs | | Painful to leave (data lock-in, integrations) |
| Cost Advantages | | Structural cost below competitors |
| Intangible Assets | | Brand, patents, regulatory licenses |
| Efficient Scale | | Market only supports limited competitors |
Score /25. Above 15 = wide moat. 8-15 = narrow. Below 8 = no moat.
### Crypto Analysis Framework
```yaml
crypto_analysis:
# Network Fundamentals
network:
daily_active_addresses: null
transaction_volume_24h: null
hash_rate_trend: null # BTC/PoW
staking_ratio: null # PoS chains
developer_activity: null # GitHub commits 90d
tvl: null # DeFi protocols
tvl_trend_30d: null
# Tokenomics
tokenomics:
supply_schedule: null # inflationary | deflationary | fixed
circulating_vs_total: null # % circulating
unlock_schedule: null # upcoming unlocks
concentration: null # top 10 holders %
# On-Chain Signals
on_chain:
exchange_reserves_trend: null # decreasing = bullish
whale_accumulation: null # large wallet changes
realized_profit_loss: null # NUPL
mvrv_ratio: null # Market Value / Realized Value
# Market Structure
market:
funding_rate: null # perpetuals funding
open_interest_trend: null
spot_vs_derivatives_volume: null
correlation_to_btc: null
correlation_to_sp500: null
```
### Crypto Valuation Methods
| Method | Best For | Formula |
|--------|----------|---------|
| Stock-to-Flow | BTC | Price = 0.4 × S2F^3 (check vs actual) |
| NVT Ratio | L1 chains | Network Value / Daily Transaction Value |
| TVL Ratio | DeFi | Market Cap / TVL (below 1 = undervalued) |
| Fee Revenue Multiple | Revenue-generating | MC / Annualized Fees |
| Metcalfe's Law | Network tokens | Value ∝ n² (active addresses) |
---
## Phase 3: Technical Analysis
### Price Action Framework
```yaml
technical_analysis:
ticker: "BTC-USD"
timeframe: "daily"
date: "2026-02-22"
# TREND
trend:
primary: "uptrend" # uptrend | downtrend | range
higher_highs: true
higher_lows: true
above_200ma: true
above_50ma: true
ma_alignment: "bullish" # 20 > 50 > 200 = bullish
# KEY LEVELS
levels:
resistance: [105000, 110000, 120000]
support: [95000, 88000, 80000]
current_price: 98500
distance_to_resistance: "+6.6%"
distance_to_support: "-3.6%"
# MOMENTUM
momentum:
rsi_14: 58 # <30 oversold, >70 overbought
rsi_divergence: null # bullish_div | bearish_div | none
macd_signal: "bullish" # bullish | bearish | neutral
macd_histogram_trend: "increasing"
# VOLUME
volume:
vs_20d_avg: "+15%"
trend: "increasing_on_up_days" # confirms trend
# PATTERN
pattern:
current: "ascending_triangle"
reliability: "high"
target: 112000
invalidation: 93000
```
### Signal Scoring Matrix
| Factor | Bullish (+) | Neutral (0) | Bearish (-) |
|--------|-------------|-------------|-------------|
| Trend (weight 3x) | Above 200MA, higher highs | Ranging | Below 200MA, lower lows |
| Momentum (weight 2x) | RSI 40-60 rising, MACD bull cross | RSI 45-55 flat | RSI >75 or bearish div |
| Volume (weight 2x) | Rising on up moves | Average | Rising on down moves |
| Support/Resistance (weight 1x) | Near strong support | Mid-range | Near strong resistance |
| Pattern (weight 1x) | Bullish continuation | No pattern | Bearish reversal |
Score -9 to +9. Above +5 = strong buy signal. Below -5 = strong sell signal.
---
## Phase 4: Position Sizing & Risk Management
### Position Sizing Rules (MANDATORY)
```yaml
risk_rules:
# Per-Trade Risk
max_risk_per_trade: 2% # of total equity
max_risk_aggressive: 3% # only with 5/5 conviction
# Portfolio Heat
max_portfolio_heat: 15% # total risk across all positions
max_correlated_exposure: 25% # in correlated assets
max_single_position: 10% # of total equity
# Position Size Formula
# Position Size = (Account × Risk%) / (Entry - Stop Loss)
# Example: ($100K × 2%) / ($190 - $175) = $2,000 / $15 = 133 shares
# Kelly Criterion (optional, aggressive)
# f* = (bp - q) / b
# b = win/loss ratio, p = win probability, q = 1-p
# ALWAYS use Half-Kelly or Quarter-Kelly (full Kelly = too aggressive)
```
### Position Size Calculator
```
Account Equity: $___________
Risk Per Trade: ___% (max 2%)
Dollar Risk: $___________ (equity × risk%)
Entry Price: $___________
Stop Loss Price: $___________
Risk Per Share: $___________ (entry - stop)
Position Size: ___________ shares (dollar risk / risk per share)
Position Value: $___________ (shares × entry)
Portfolio Weight: ___% (position value / equity)
CHECK: Portfolio weight < 10%? ☐ Yes ☐ No (reduce if no)
CHECK: Portfolio heat < 15%? ☐ Yes ☐ No (reduce if no)
CHECK: Correlated exposure ok? ☐ Yes ☐ No (reduce if no)
```
### Stop-Loss Decision Tree
```
Is this a TREND trade?
├── YES → Trailing stop below swing low (ATR-based: 2× ATR)
│ Initial stop: Below last higher low
│ Trail: Move stop to below each new higher low
│
└── NO → Is this a CATALYST trade?
├── YES → Time-based + price stop
│ Price: Below pre-catalyst support
│ Time: Close if no move within 2 days post-catalyst
│
└── Is this a VALUE trade?
├── YES → Thesis invalidation stop
│ Price: Below bear case scenario price
│ Thesis: Close if fundamental thesis breaks
│ Time: Close if no re-rating in stated timeframe
│
└── MEAN REVERSION → Tight stop
Price: If moves further from mean (wider Z-score)
Target: Mean / fair value level
```
### Risk Management Hard Rules
1. **Never average down without a plan** — Adding to losers kills accounts. Only add if: thesis intact AND price at predetermined add level AND total position still within limits
2. **Cut losses fast, let winners run** — Asymmetric payoff is the goal. 1:3 risk/reward minimum
3. **No revenge trading** — After a loss, wait 24 hours before next trade
4. **Daily loss limit** — Stop trading for the day after -3% account drawdown
5. **Weekly loss limit** — Reduce position sizes by 50% after -5% weekly drawdown
6. **Monthly loss limit** — Go to cash if -10% monthly drawdown. Review all positions.
7. **Correlation check** — Before every new position, check correlation to existing holdings
8. **Black swan rule** — If any asset moves >15% in 24h, review ALL positions immediately
---
## Phase 5: Portfolio Construction
### Asset Allocation Framework
```yaml
portfolio:
name: "Growth + Income"
target_allocation:
# Core (60-70% — low turnover)
core:
us_large_cap: 25% # S&P 500 / quality growth
international: 10% # Developed markets
fixed_income: 15% # Bonds / treasuries
bitcoin: 10% # Digital gold thesis
real_estate: 5% # REITs
# Satellite (20-30% — active management)
satellite:
growth_stocks: 15% # Individual stock picks
crypto_alts: 5% # L1s, DeFi
thematic: 5% # AI, clean energy, etc.
# Cash (5-15%)
cash: 10% # Dry powder for opportunities
# Rebalance Rules
rebalance:
method: "threshold" # calendar | threshold | hybrid
threshold: 5% # Rebalance when drift >5% from target
calendar_check: "monthly" # Review allocations monthly
tax_aware: true # Use new contributions to rebalance first
```
### Portfolio Models by Risk Profile
| Profile | Stocks | Bonds | Crypto | Alts | Cash | Expected Return | Max Drawdown |
|---------|--------|-------|--------|------|------|----------------|--------------|
| Conservative | 30% | 40% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 6-8% | -15% |
| Balanced | 50% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 8-12% | -25% |
| Growth | 60% | 10% | 15% | 10% | 5% | 12-18% | -35% |
| Aggressive | 50% | 0% | 30% | 15% | 5% | 15-25% | -50% |
| Degen | 20% | 0% | 50% | 25% | 5% | 20-40%+ | -70%+ |
### Correlation Matrix Template
Track correlations between holdings. Target: no two positions with >0.7 correlation exceeding 20% combined weight.
```
SPY BTC ETH AAPL MSFT GLD TLT
SPY 1.00
BTC 0.35 1.00
ETH 0.30 0.85 1.00
AAPL 0.82 0.25 0.20 1.00
MSFT 0.85 0.28 0.22 0.78 1.00
GLD -0.10 -0.05 -0.08 -0.12 -0.10 1.00
TLT -0.35 -0.15 -0.12 -0.30 -0.32 0.40 1.00
```
---
## Phase 6: Trade Execution
### Trade Journal Template
```yaml
trade:
id: "T-2026-042"
date_opened: "2026-02-22"
date_closed: null
# WHAT
ticker: "BTC-USD"
direction: "long"
asset_class: "crypto"
# SIZING
entry_price: 98500
position_size: 0.15 # BTC
position_value: 14775
portfolio_weight: "8.2%"
# RISK
stop_loss: 93000
risk_amount: 825 # (98500-93000) × 0.15
risk_percent: "0.82%" # of portfolio
# TARGETS
target_1: 105000 # 50% of position
target_2: 115000 # 30% of position
target_3: 130000 # 20% of position (runner)
risk_reward: "1:3.8" # avg target vs risk
# THESIS
thesis: "BTC consolidating above 200MA, halving supply reduction, ETF inflows accelerating"
edge_type: "trend + structural"
conviction: 4
# EXECUTION
entry_type: "limit" # market | limit | scaled
scale_plan: null # or: [{"price": 97000, "size": "50%"}, {"price": 95000, "size": "50%"}]
# RESULT (fill on close)
exit_price: null
exit_reason: null # target_hit | stop_hit | thesis_invalidated | time_stop | manual
pnl_dollar: null
pnl_percent: null
r_multiple: null # PnL / initial risk
# REVIEW
followed_plan: null # yes | partially | no
lessons: null
mistakes: null
grade: null # A-F
```
### Execution Checklist (Before EVERY Trade)
- [ ] Thesis documented with edge, invalidation, timeframe
- [ ] Position size calculated (≤2% risk, ≤10% portfolio weight)
- [ ] Stop-loss set (price + thesis + time)
- [ ] At least 2 take-profit targets defined
- [ ] Risk/reward ≥1:2 (preferably 1:3+)
- [ ] Portfolio heat check (total risk <15%)
- [ ] Correlation check (not adding to concentrated exposure)
- [ ] No emotional driver (revenge, FOMO, boredom)
- [ ] Checked economic calendar (no surprise events imminent)
- [ ] Entry type decided (market/limit/scaled)
### Order Types Decision
| Situation | Order Type | Why |
|-----------|-----------|-----|
| Strong conviction, want in now | Market | Speed over price |
| Good setup, not urgent | Limit at support | Better entry |
| High-conviction, want scale in | Scaled limits (3 levels) | Average entry, reduce timing risk |
| Breakout trade | Stop-limit above resistance | Only enter if breakout confirms |
| Catalyst trade | Limit pre-catalyst | Position before event |
---
## Phase 7: Performance Tracking
### Daily Dashboard
```yaml
daily_dashboard:
date: "2026-02-22"
# PORTFOLIO SNAPSHOT
portfolio:
total_equity: null
daily_pnl: null
daily_pnl_percent: null
weekly_pnl: null
monthly_pnl: null
ytd_pnl: null
# POSITIONS
open_positions: 0
portfolio_heat: "0%" # sum of all position risks
cash_percent: "100%"
# BENCHMARK
benchmark:
sp500_ytd: null
btc_ytd: null
portfolio_vs_sp500: null
portfolio_vs_btc: null
# ACTIVITY
trades_today: 0
alerts_triggered: []
```
### Performance Metrics (Track Weekly)
| Metric | Formula | Target |
|--------|---------|--------|
| Win Rate | Winning trades / Total trades | >50% |
| Average R | Average R-multiple of all trades | >1.5R |
| Profit Factor | Gross profit / Gross loss | >2.0 |
| Expectancy | (Win% × Avg Win) - (Loss% × Avg Loss) | Positive |
| Max Drawdown | Peak to trough decline | <-15% |
| Sharpe Ratio | (Return - RFR) / Std Dev | >1.5 |
| Sortino Ratio | (Return - RFR) / Downside Dev | >2.0 |
| Calmar Ratio | Annual Return / Max Drawdown | >1.0 |
| Recovery Factor | Net Profit / Max Drawdown | >3.0 |
### Monthly Review Template
```yaml
monthly_review:
month: "2026-02"
# PERFORMANCE
portfolio_return: null
benchmark_return: null # vs S&P 500
alpha: null # portfolio - benchmark
# TRADING STATS
total_trades: 0
winning_trades: 0
losing_trades: 0
win_rate: null
average_winner: null
average_loser: null
largest_winner: null
largest_loser: null
profit_factor: null
# RISK STATS
max_drawdown: null
avg_portfolio_heat: null
risk_rule_violations: 0
# BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS
followed_plan_rate: null # % of trades that followed the plan
emotional_trades: 0 # trades driven by FOMO/revenge/boredom
early_exits: 0 # cut winners short
late_exits: 0 # held losers too long
# TOP 3 LESSONS
lessons:
- null
- null
- null
# ADJUSTMENTS FOR NEXT MONTH
adjustments:
- null
```
---
## Phase 8: Market Regime Detection
### Regime Framework
| Regime | Characteristics | Strategy | Position Size |
|--------|----------------|----------|---------------|
| Bull Trend | Rising 200MA, breadth >60%, VIX <20 | Trend following, buy dips | Full size |
| Bear Trend | Falling 200MA, breadth <40%, VIX >30 | Short / inverse, raise cash | Half size |
| Range/Chop | Flat 200MA, breadth 40-60% | Mean reversion, sell premium | Quarter size |
| High Vol | VIX >35, large daily swings | Reduce exposure, hedge | Minimum size |
| Euphoria | VIX <12, extreme bullish sentiment | Take profits, hedge | Scale down |
| Panic | VIX >50, capitulation signals | Accumulate quality | Scale in slowly |
### Macro Checklist (Weekly)
- [ ] Fed funds rate / next meeting: ___
- [ ] US 10Y yield trend: ___
- [ ] Dollar (DXY) trend: ___
- [ ] VIX level: ___
- [ ] Credit spreads: ___ (tightening/widening)
- [ ] Yield curve: ___ (inverted/flat/steep)
- [ ] Leading indicators: ___ (improving/declining)
- [ ] Global liquidity trend: ___ (expanding/contracting)
- [ ] Sector rotation: ___ (risk-on/risk-off)
- [ ] Crypto market cap trend: ___
### Sentiment Indicators
| Indicator | Extreme Fear (Buy) | Neutral | Extreme Greed (Sell) |
|-----------|-------------------|---------|---------------------|
| CNN Fear & Greed | <20 | 40-60 | >80 |
| AAII Bull-Bear | >-30% spread | ±10% | >+30% spread |
| Put/Call Ratio | >1.2 | 0.7-0.9 | <0.5 |
| VIX Term Structure | Backwardation | Flat | Steep contango |
| Crypto Fear & Greed | <15 | 40-60 | >85 |
| BTC Funding Rates | Deeply negative | Neutral | >0.05% |
---
## Phase 9: Dividend & Income Analysis
### Dividend Quality Score (0-100)
| Factor | Weight | Scoring |
|--------|--------|---------|
| Yield vs Sector | 15 | At/above median = 15, below = proportional |
| Payout Ratio | 20 | <50% = 20, 50-75% = 15, 75-100% = 5, >100% = 0 |
| Growth Rate (5Y CAGR) | 20 | >10% = 20, 5-10% = 15, 0-5% = 10, declining = 0 |
| Consecutive Years | 15 | >25y = 15 (Aristocrat), 10-25 = 10, 5-10 = 5, <5 = 0 |
| FCF Coverage | 15 | FCF/Div >1.5 = 15, 1-1.5 = 10, <1 = 0 |
| Debt/EBITDA | 15 | <2 = 15, 2-4 = 10, >4 = 5 |
Score /100. Above 75 = excellent income pick. Below 40 = dividend at risk.
### Income Portfolio Construction
- **Core income** (60%): Dividend Aristocrats, quality REITs, investment-grade bonds
- **Growth income** (25%): Dividend growers (low yield, high growth rate)
- **High yield** (15%): Higher risk, higher yield (junk bonds, BDCs, covered calls)
- **Yield target**: 4-6% blended, growing 5-8% annually
---
## Phase 10: Tax Optimization
### Tax-Loss Harvesting Rules
1. **When**: Position down >10% from cost basis AND held <12 months
2. **How**: Sell the position, immediately buy a correlated (not substantially identical) replacement
3. **Wash sale rule**: Cannot buy back the same security within 30 days (before or after)
4. **Replacement examples**: SPY→VOO, AAPL→QQQ, BTC spot→BTC futures ETF
5. **Track**: Cumulative harvested losses, offset against gains + $3K income deduction
### Holding Period Optimization
| Holding Period | Tax Rate (US) | Strategy |
|----------------|--------------|----------|
| <1 year | Ordinary income (up to 37%) | Only for high-conviction short-term trades |
| >1 year | Long-term CG (0/15/20%) | Default for all positions when possible |
| >5 years (QOZ) | Reduced + deferred | Qualified Opportunity Zone investments |
### Tax-Efficient Account Allocation
| Account Type | Best For | Why |
|-------------|----------|-----|
| Taxable | Long-term holds, tax-loss harvesting | Capital gains treatment |
| Traditional IRA/401k | Bonds, REITs, high-dividend | Defer high-tax income |
| Roth IRA | Highest growth potential | Tax-free growth |
| HSA | Aggressive growth | Triple tax advantage |
---
## Phase 11: Screening & Idea Generation
### Stock Screener Criteria Templates
**Value Screen:**
- P/E < sector median
- P/B < 1.5
- Debt/Equity < 0.5
- ROE > 12%
- FCF positive 5 consecutive years
- Insider buying last 90 days
**Growth Screen:**
- Revenue growth > 20% YoY
- EPS growth > 15% YoY
- Gross margin > 50%
- Net retention > 110% (SaaS)
- TAM > $10B
**Dividend Screen:**
- Dividend yield > 3%
- Payout ratio < 60%
- Dividend growth > 5% CAGR (5Y)
- Consecutive increases > 10 years
- Debt/EBITDA < 3
**Crypto Screen:**
- Market cap > $1B (avoid micro-caps)
- Daily volume > $50M
- Active development (GitHub commits)
- Not >90% held by top 10 wallets
- Clear revenue model or adoption metrics
### Research Sources (No API Required)
| Source | URL | Best For |
|--------|-----|----------|
| Yahoo Finance | finance.yahoo.com | Fundamentals, quotes |
| Finviz | finviz.com | Screening, heatmaps |
| Macrotrends | macrotrends.net | Historical financials |
| CoinGecko | coingecko.com | Crypto data |
| DeFiLlama | defillama.com | DeFi TVL, yields |
| FRED | fred.stlouisfed.org | Macro data |
| TradingView | tradingview.com | Charts, technicals |
| SEC EDGAR | sec.gov/edgar | Filings, insider trades |
| Glassnode | glassnode.com | On-chain data |
| Fear & Greed | alternative.me | Crypto sentiment |
---
## Phase 12: Advanced Strategies
### Options Basics (for hedging)
| Strategy | When | Risk | Reward |
|----------|------|------|--------|
| Protective Put | Own stock, want downside protection | Premium paid | Unlimited upside, limited downside |
| Covered Call | Own stock, willing to cap upside | Capped gains | Premium income |
| Cash-Secured Put | Want to buy at lower price | Must buy at strike | Premium + lower entry |
| Collar | Want protection, willing to cap upside | Capped both ways | Low/no cost protection |
### DCA (Dollar Cost Averaging) Framework
```yaml
dca_plan:
asset: "BTC"
frequency: "weekly" # daily | weekly | biweekly | monthly
amount: 250 # per purchase
day: "Monday" # specific day
duration: "indefinite" # or end date
# SMART DCA (optional — buy more when cheap)
smart_dca:
enabled: true
base_amount: 250
multiplier_rules:
- condition: "price < 200MA"
multiplier: 1.5 # buy 50% more
- condition: "RSI < 30"
multiplier: 2.0 # double buy
- condition: "price > 200MA × 1.5"
multiplier: 0.5 # buy less in euphoria
```
### Rebalancing Decision Tree
```
Is any allocation >5% from target?
├── NO → No action needed. Check again next month.
│
└── YES → Is it a tax-advantaged account?
├── YES → Rebalance by selling overweight, buying underweight
│
└── NO (taxable) → Can you rebalance with new contributions?
├── YES → Direct new money to underweight positions
│
└── NO → Are there tax losses to harvest?
├── YES → Sell losers (harvest), redirect to underweight
│
└── NO → Is the drift >10%?
├── YES → Rebalance (accept tax hit for risk control)
└── NO → Wait for next contribution or year-end
```
---
## Investor Psychology Rules
### 10 Cognitive Biases That Kill Returns
| Bias | Trap | Defense |
|------|------|---------|
| Loss Aversion | Holding losers, cutting winners | Pre-set stops, mechanical exits |
| Confirmation Bias | Only seeing data that supports thesis | Actively seek disconfirming evidence |
| Recency Bias | Extrapolating recent performance | Look at full cycle data (10+ years) |
| Anchoring | Fixating on purchase price | Focus on current value vs alternatives |
| FOMO | Chasing after 50%+ move | Stick to your screener, your edge |
| Overconfidence | Too large positions after wins | Fixed position sizing rules |
| Disposition Effect | Selling winners too early | Trailing stops, let runners run |
| Herding | Buying because everyone is | Contrarian checkpoints |
| Sunk Cost | "I've held this long, can't sell now" | Would you buy this TODAY at this price? |
| Hindsight | "I knew it all along" | Review trade journal honestly |
### Trading Psychology Checklist (Daily)
- [ ] Am I calm? (no anger, fear, or euphoria)
- [ ] Am I following my system? (not improvising)
- [ ] Am I within risk limits? (checked portfolio heat)
- [ ] Am I trading my plan? (not reacting to noise)
- [ ] Have I done my analysis? (not trading on tips)
---
## Quality Scoring (0-100)
| Dimension | Weight | Criteria |
|-----------|--------|----------|
| Thesis Quality | 20 | Clear edge, documented invalidation, realistic timeframe |
| Risk Management | 25 | Position sizing, stops, portfolio heat, correlation |
| Analysis Depth | 15 | Fundamental + technical + macro considered |
| Execution | 15 | Entry/exit discipline, order type selection, patience |
| Record Keeping | 10 | Trade journal, performance metrics, monthly reviews |
| Psychology | 10 | Emotional control, bias awareness, plan adherence |
| Tax Efficiency | 5 | Harvesting, account allocation, holding periods |
Score /100. Above 80 = professional-grade process. Below 50 = gambling.
---
## Natural Language Commands
| Command | Action |
|---------|--------|
| "Analyze [ticker]" | Full fundamental + technical analysis |
| "Compare [ticker1] vs [ticker2]" | Side-by-side comparison |
| "Build thesis for [ticker]" | Generate thesis brief template |
| "Size position for [ticker] at [price]" | Calculate position size with risk |
| "Portfolio health check" | Score current portfolio /8 |
| "Monthly review" | Generate performance review template |
| "Screen for [value/growth/dividend/crypto]" | Apply screening criteria |
| "What's the market regime?" | Assess current macro environment |
| "Tax harvest opportunities" | Identify positions for loss harvesting |
| "DCA plan for [asset]" | Generate dollar cost averaging plan |
| "Dividend score for [ticker]" | Run dividend quality analysis |
| "Risk report" | Portfolio heat, correlations, exposure summary |
---
*Built by AfrexAI — turning market noise into signal.* 🖤💛Related Skills
Product Management OS
Complete product management system — discovery, prioritization, roadmapping, metrics, and cross-functional leadership. Use when building products, running discovery, prioritizing features, writing specs, planning launches, or measuring outcomes.
PRD Engine — Product Requirements That Ship
Complete product requirements methodology: from idea to spec to shipped feature. Not just a JSON template — a full system for writing PRDs that developers actually follow and stakeholders actually approve.
Portfolio Risk Analyzer
Complete investment portfolio risk management system. Analyze positions, calculate risk metrics, stress test scenarios, optimize allocations, and generate institutional-grade risk reports — all without external APIs.
Performance Review Engine
> Your AI-powered performance management system. Write reviews that develop people, not just evaluate them. From self-assessments to 360° feedback to calibration — complete frameworks for every review cycle.
afrexai-performance-engineering
Complete performance engineering system — profiling, optimization, load testing, capacity planning, and performance culture. Use when diagnosing slow applications, optimizing code/queries/infrastructure, load testing before launch, planning capacity, or building performance into CI/CD. Covers Node.js, Python, Go, Java, databases, APIs, and frontend.
Partnership & Channel Revenue Engine
Turn partnerships from handshake deals into a systematic revenue machine. This is the complete playbook for finding, qualifying, structuring, launching, and scaling partner-driven growth — whether you're building integration partnerships, reseller channels, affiliate programs, or strategic alliances.
OpenClaw Mastery — The Complete Agent Engineering & Operations System
> Built by AfrexAI — the team that runs 9+ production agents 24/7 on OpenClaw.
afrexai-okr-engine
Complete OKR & Strategy Execution system — from company vision to weekly execution. Covers goal hierarchy, OKR writing methodology, scoring rubrics, alignment cascading, KPI dashboards, review cadences, team accountability, and quarterly planning rituals. Use when setting goals, running planning cycles, tracking OKRs, building KPI dashboards, running retrospectives, or aligning team work to strategy. Trigger on: "OKR", "objectives", "key results", "goal setting", "quarterly planning", "KPIs", "strategy execution", "annual planning", "team goals", "alignment", "review cadence", "what should we focus on", "prioritize", "goal tracking", "north star metric".
afrexai-observability-engine
Complete observability & reliability engineering system. Use when designing monitoring, implementing structured logging, setting up distributed tracing, building alerting systems, creating SLO/SLI frameworks, running incident response, conducting post-mortems, or auditing system reliability. Covers all three pillars (logs/metrics/traces), alert design, dashboard architecture, on-call operations, chaos engineering, and cost optimization.
Next.js Production Engineering
> Complete methodology for building, optimizing, and operating production Next.js applications. From architecture decisions to deployment strategies — everything beyond "hello world."
n8n Workflow Mastery — Complete Automation Engineering System
You are an expert n8n workflow architect. You design, build, debug, optimize, and scale n8n automations following production-grade methodology. Every workflow you create is complete, functional, and follows the patterns in this guide.
ML & AI Engineering System
Complete methodology for building, deploying, and operating production ML/AI systems — from experiment to scale.