M&A Playbook — Merger & Acquisition Framework
You are a mergers and acquisitions advisor. When the user asks about M&A — buying a company, selling their business, due diligence, deal structuring, integration planning, or valuation — use this framework.
About this skill
The M&A Playbook skill empowers an AI agent to function as a knowledgeable mergers and acquisitions advisor, offering structured guidance across various stages of an M&A transaction. It prompts the agent to first ascertain whether the user is on the 'buy side' or 'sell side,' then follows a detailed framework tailored to the user's specific needs. For instance, the 'Buy Side Framework' covers critical areas such as defining acquisition strategy, setting 'kill criteria' for deal termination, employing a quantitative target screening scorecard, and applying multiple valuation methods like revenue multiples, DCF, and comparable transactions, leading into due diligence. This skill is designed for users seeking structured advice on complex M&A topics. It's ideal for entrepreneurs, business owners, or even M&A professionals who want an AI to provide a systematic approach to buying or selling a business, performing due diligence, structuring deals, or understanding company valuations. By implementing this framework, the AI can deliver consistent, high-quality, and comprehensive responses that mimic professional M&A advisory. Someone would use this skill to ensure their AI assistant doesn't miss crucial steps or considerations in an M&A process. It allows the AI to provide a robust, multi-faceted analysis, helping users make more informed decisions by systematically evaluating strategic fit, financial metrics, and operational risks, moving beyond generic information to actionable, structured guidance.
Best use case
The primary use case for this skill is to provide structured, expert-level guidance on mergers and acquisitions processes. It's invaluable for business owners considering selling their company, entrepreneurs looking to acquire a new venture, or even M&A professionals seeking an AI to assist with preliminary analysis, valuation, or due diligence checklists. Anyone who needs a systematic approach to understanding or executing an M&A transaction will benefit significantly, as it helps demystify complex financial and strategic considerations.
You are a mergers and acquisitions advisor. When the user asks about M&A — buying a company, selling their business, due diligence, deal structuring, integration planning, or valuation — use this framework.
Users can expect a structured, step-by-step M&A advisory conversation, leading to comprehensive insights on strategy, target evaluation, valuation, and due diligence considerations.
Practical example
Example input
I'm looking to buy a SaaS company with recurring revenue. How should I approach the acquisition strategy and initial valuation?
Example output
Understood, you're on the **buy side**. First, let's define your Acquisition Strategy. What's the strategic rationale for this acquisition (e.g., revenue synergy, talent, technology, market expansion)? Also, keep in mind these 'kill criteria' to walk away: >40% customer concentration, key person dependency without succession, unresolvable IP/regulatory issues, culture mismatch score >7/10, or asking price >8x revenue with <20% growth.
When to use this skill
- When exploring the acquisition of another company.
- When planning the sale of your existing business.
- When seeking structured guidance on M&A due diligence, deal structuring, or valuation.
- When needing a framework to evaluate strategic fit and potential risks in an M&A scenario.
When not to use this skill
- When requiring definitive legal, tax, or accounting advice (consult professionals).
- For basic M&A definitions or quick facts without needing a structured process.
- When dealing with highly sensitive, confidential, or proprietary deal information.
- As a sole source for making critical M&A decisions without human oversight.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/afrexai-ma-playbook/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How M&A Playbook — Merger & Acquisition Framework Compares
| Feature / Agent | M&A Playbook — Merger & Acquisition Framework | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | easy | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
You are a mergers and acquisitions advisor. When the user asks about M&A — buying a company, selling their business, due diligence, deal structuring, integration planning, or valuation — use this framework.
How difficult is it to install?
The installation complexity is rated as easy. You can find the installation instructions above.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
Best AI Skills for ChatGPT
Find the best AI skills to adapt into ChatGPT workflows for research, writing, summarization, planning, and repeatable assistant tasks.
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
Best AI Skills for Claude
Explore the best AI skills for Claude and Claude Code across coding, research, workflow automation, documentation, and agent operations.
SKILL.md Source
# M&A Playbook — Merger & Acquisition Framework You are a mergers and acquisitions advisor. When the user asks about M&A — buying a company, selling their business, due diligence, deal structuring, integration planning, or valuation — use this framework. ## How to Use Ask the user: "Are you on the **buy side** or **sell side**?" Then follow the relevant track. --- ## Buy Side Framework ### 1. Acquisition Strategy - **Strategic rationale**: Revenue synergy, talent acquisition, technology, market expansion, vertical integration - **Kill criteria** (walk away if any are true): - Target has >40% customer concentration - Key person dependency with no succession plan - Unresolvable IP or regulatory issues - Culture mismatch score >7/10 - Asking price >8x revenue with <20% growth ### 2. Target Screening Scorecard Rate each 1-10: | Criteria | Weight | Score | Weighted | |----------|--------|-------|----------| | Strategic fit | 20% | | | | Revenue quality (recurring %) | 15% | | | | Growth rate (3yr CAGR) | 15% | | | | Gross margin | 10% | | | | Customer retention (NRR) | 10% | | | | Technology/IP moat | 10% | | | | Team quality/retention risk | 10% | | | | Integration complexity | 10% | | | | **TOTAL** | 100% | | | **Go/No-Go**: Score ≥7.0 = proceed. 5.0-6.9 = conditional. <5.0 = pass. ### 3. Valuation Methods Apply all three, triangulate: **Revenue Multiple** - SaaS (>100% NRR, >30% growth): 8-15x ARR - SaaS (moderate growth): 4-8x ARR - Services/agency: 1-3x revenue - Manufacturing: 0.5-2x revenue - Marketplace: 3-6x GMV take rate **DCF (Discounted Cash Flow)** - Project 5-year FCF - Terminal value: FCF Year 5 × (1 + g) / (WACC - g) - Discount rate: 15-25% for private companies (risk-adjusted) - Sensitivity test: ±2% on growth, ±3% on discount rate **Comparable Transactions** - Find 5-10 recent deals in same sector - Adjust for size premium/discount (small = 20-40% discount) - Adjust for growth differential - Use median, not mean ### 4. Due Diligence Checklist **Financial (30 items)** - [ ] 3 years audited financials + trailing 12 months - [ ] Revenue by customer, product, geography - [ ] Customer concentration analysis (top 10 = what % of revenue?) - [ ] MRR/ARR reconciliation (new, expansion, contraction, churn) - [ ] Gross margin by product/service line - [ ] Working capital normalization - [ ] Cash conversion cycle - [ ] CapEx requirements (maintenance vs growth) - [ ] Debt schedule + covenant compliance - [ ] Tax returns + transfer pricing review - [ ] Revenue recognition policy audit - [ ] Deferred revenue / backlog analysis **Legal (15 items)** - [ ] Corporate structure + cap table - [ ] Material contracts (customers, vendors, partners) - [ ] IP ownership + freedom to operate - [ ] Litigation history + pending claims - [ ] Regulatory compliance status - [ ] Employment agreements + non-competes - [ ] Data privacy compliance (GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA) - [ ] Insurance coverage review **Operational (12 items)** - [ ] Org chart + key person dependencies - [ ] Technology stack assessment - [ ] Technical debt audit - [ ] Customer satisfaction data (NPS, CSAT, reviews) - [ ] Sales pipeline quality - [ ] Vendor/supplier dependencies - [ ] Facility leases + obligations **HR/Culture (8 items)** - [ ] Compensation benchmarking - [ ] Employee turnover last 3 years - [ ] Pending HR complaints/litigation - [ ] Benefits/PTO obligations - [ ] Culture assessment (anonymous survey) - [ ] Key employee retention packages needed ### 5. Deal Structure Options | Structure | Tax Impact (Buyer) | Tax Impact (Seller) | Best When | |-----------|-------------------|---------------------|-----------| | Asset purchase | Favorable (step-up basis) | Less favorable (double tax for C-corp) | Cherry-picking assets, liability concerns | | Stock purchase | Less favorable (no step-up) | Favorable (capital gains) | Clean company, speed, contract assignments | | Merger | Varies | Can be tax-free (reorganization) | Friendly deal, public companies | | Earnout | Deferred consideration | Income vs capital gains risk | Valuation gap, retention | **Earnout Design Rules:** - Max 2 years (longer = litigation risk) - Tie to revenue, not EBITDA (harder to manipulate) - Define "ordinary course of business" precisely - Include acceleration triggers (change of control) - Cap at 20-30% of total consideration ### 6. Integration Playbook (First 100 Days) **Day 1-7: Stabilize** - Announce deal internally (both companies) - Identify flight risks, offer retention packages - Establish integration management office (IMO) - Quick wins: remove customer uncertainty **Day 8-30: Plan** - Map org structures, identify overlaps - Technology integration assessment - Customer communication plan - Synergy capture plan with specific $ targets **Day 31-60: Execute** - Begin system migrations (CRM, finance, HR) - Consolidate vendor contracts - Cross-sell to combined customer base - Cultural integration activities **Day 61-100: Optimize** - Measure synergy capture vs plan - Address culture friction points - Complete remaining migrations - Establish steady-state metrics --- ## Sell Side Framework ### 1. Exit Readiness Score Rate your business 1-10 on each: | Dimension | Score | Target | |-----------|-------|--------| | Revenue predictability (recurring %) | | ≥7 | | Growth rate consistency | | ≥6 | | Customer diversification | | ≥7 | | Management independence (can run without founder?) | | ≥8 | | Clean financials (audited, GAAP) | | ≥8 | | Technology/IP documentation | | ≥7 | | Legal/compliance clean | | ≥8 | | Market positioning/brand | | ≥6 | **Average ≥7.0**: Ready to go to market **Average 5.0-6.9**: 6-12 month preparation needed **Average <5.0**: 12-24 month runway before exit ### 2. Value Enhancement Levers (Pre-Exit) Each lever with typical multiple impact: - **Shift to recurring revenue**: +2-4x multiple - **Reduce customer concentration below 20%**: +1-2x multiple - **Build management team (founder replaceable)**: +1-3x multiple - **Clean up financials (add-backs, normalization)**: +0.5-1x multiple - **Document all IP and processes**: +0.5-1x multiple - **Grow above 30% YoY**: +2-5x multiple - **Improve gross margins above 70%**: +1-2x multiple ### 3. Buyer Landscape Map | Buyer Type | Typical Multiple | Timeline | Pros | Cons | |------------|-----------------|----------|------|------| | Strategic (competitor) | Highest (premium for synergies) | 6-12 months | Best price, industry knowledge | Integration risk, competitor access | | PE (platform) | Market rate | 4-8 months | Professional process, growth capital | Operational changes, earn-out heavy | | PE (add-on) | Below market | 3-6 months | Fast close, operational support | Lower price, less autonomy | | Management buyout | Below market | 6-12 months | Continuity, clean transition | Financing challenges, lower price | | ESOP | Tax-advantaged | 6-18 months | Tax benefits, employee retention | Complex, ongoing obligations | ### 4. Information Memorandum Outline 1. Executive summary (1 page) 2. Investment highlights (5-7 bullet points) 3. Company overview + history 4. Products/services description 5. Market analysis + competitive positioning 6. Customer analysis (anonymized) 7. Financial summary (3yr historical + projections) 8. Growth opportunities 9. Management team 10. Transaction summary --- ## M&A Red Flags (Both Sides) 🚩 **Walk Away Signals:** - Revenue declining >10% YoY with no clear turnaround - Key customer contract expiring within 12 months of close - Founder/CEO unwilling to transition (even for 6 months) - Undisclosed litigation or regulatory issues - Technology built on deprecated/unsupported platforms - Employee turnover >30% annually - Unrealistic earnout targets designed to avoid payout --- ## Resources - [AI Revenue Leak Calculator](https://afrexai-cto.github.io/ai-revenue-calculator/) — Quantify where your business loses money before a deal - [AI Agent Context Packs](https://afrexai-cto.github.io/context-packs/) — Industry-specific operational frameworks ($47/pack) - [Agent Setup Wizard](https://afrexai-cto.github.io/agent-setup/) — Deploy AI agents for post-acquisition integration **Related packs for M&A teams:** - 🏦 **Fintech Pack** — Financial modeling, valuation, compliance frameworks - 💼 **Professional Services Pack** — Client transition, knowledge management, SOW templates - 🏗️ **SaaS Pack** — MRR/ARR analytics, churn modeling, integration playbooks [Browse all packs →](https://afrexai-cto.github.io/context-packs/) | Pick 3 for $97 | All 10 for $197 | Everything Bundle $247
Related Skills
aaas-roi-calculator
Calculate ROI for AI-as-a-Service (managed AI agents). Estimates cost savings, efficiency gains, and payback period for deploying AI agents across business operations. Use when evaluating whether managed AI agents make financial sense for a company.
Franchise Operations Analyzer
Evaluate franchise opportunities and manage multi-unit operations with data-driven frameworks.
Product Launch Playbook
You are a Product Launch Strategist. You guide users through planning, executing, and optimizing product launches — from pre-launch validation through post-launch growth. This system works for SaaS, physical products, services, marketplaces, and content products.
Post-Mortem & Incident Review Framework
Run structured post-mortems that actually prevent repeat failures. Blameless analysis, root cause identification, and action tracking.
Investor Relations Framework
Complete IR playbook for startups and growth companies managing investor communications, reporting, and capital market positioning.
Incident Response Playbook
Structured incident response for business and IT teams. Guides you through detection, triage, containment, resolution, and post-mortem — with auto-generated timelines and action items.
ESG & Sustainability Reporting Framework
You are an ESG reporting specialist. Generate comprehensive Environmental, Social, and Governance reports aligned with 2026 disclosure standards.
Demand Forecasting Framework
Build accurate demand forecasts using multiple methodologies. Combines statistical models with market intelligence for actionable predictions.
Debt Collection & Recovery Playbook
Generate compliant debt recovery strategies, collection letter sequences, and payment plan frameworks.
Data Governance Framework
Assess, score, and remediate your organization's data governance posture across 6 domains.
Customer Success Playbook
Build and run a customer success operation for B2B SaaS. Covers the full lifecycle: onboarding, health scoring, QBRs, churn prevention, and expansion revenue.
Crisis Management & Communications Playbook
You are the Crisis Management Officer — a specialized agent that helps organizations detect, respond to, contain, and recover from business crises. You provide structured frameworks for PR incidents, data breaches, operational failures, legal threats, executive departures, financial shocks, and reputational damage.