rare-disease-hpo-mapper

Map patient symptoms to Human Phenotype Ontology terms for gene diagnosis.

3,891 stars

Best use case

rare-disease-hpo-mapper is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Map patient symptoms to Human Phenotype Ontology terms for gene diagnosis.

Teams using rare-disease-hpo-mapper should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/rare-disease-hpo-mapper/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openclaw/skills/main/skills/aipoch-ai/rare-disease-hpo-mapper/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/rare-disease-hpo-mapper/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How rare-disease-hpo-mapper Compares

Feature / Agentrare-disease-hpo-mapperStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Map patient symptoms to Human Phenotype Ontology terms for gene diagnosis.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

Related Guides

SKILL.md Source

# Rare Disease HPO Mapper

Clinical phenotype standardization tool.

## When to Use

- Use this skill when the task is to Map patient symptoms to Human Phenotype Ontology terms for gene diagnosis.
- Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format.
- Use this skill when you need a documented fallback path for missing inputs, execution errors, or partial evidence.

## Key Features

- Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Map patient symptoms to Human Phenotype Ontology terms for gene diagnosis.
- Packaged executable path(s): `scripts/main.py`.
- Reference material available in `references/` for task-specific guidance.
- Structured execution path designed to keep outputs consistent and reviewable.

## Dependencies

See `## Prerequisites` above for related details.

- `Python`: `3.10+`. Repository baseline for current packaged skills.
- `difflib`: `unspecified`. Declared in `requirements.txt`.

## Example Usage

```bash
cd "20260318/scientific-skills/Evidence Insight/rare-disease-hpo-mapper"
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
python scripts/main.py --help
```

Example run plan:
1. Confirm the user input, output path, and any required config values.
2. Edit the in-file `CONFIG` block or documented parameters if the script uses fixed settings.
3. Run `python scripts/main.py` with the validated inputs.
4. Review the generated output and return the final artifact with any assumptions called out.

## Implementation Details

See `## Workflow` above for related details.

- Execution model: validate the request, choose the packaged workflow, and produce a bounded deliverable.
- Input controls: confirm the source files, scope limits, output format, and acceptance criteria before running any script.
- Primary implementation surface: `scripts/main.py`.
- Reference guidance: `references/` contains supporting rules, prompts, or checklists.
- Parameters to clarify first: input path, output path, scope filters, thresholds, and any domain-specific constraints.
- Output discipline: keep results reproducible, identify assumptions explicitly, and avoid undocumented side effects.

## Quick Check

Use this command to verify that the packaged script entry point can be parsed before deeper execution.

```bash
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
```

## Audit-Ready Commands

Use these concrete commands for validation. They are intentionally self-contained and avoid placeholder paths.

```bash
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
python scripts/main.py --help
```

## Workflow

1. Confirm the user objective, required inputs, and non-negotiable constraints before doing detailed work.
2. Validate that the request matches the documented scope and stop early if the task would require unsupported assumptions.
3. Use the packaged script path or the documented reasoning path with only the inputs that are actually available.
4. Return a structured result that separates assumptions, deliverables, risks, and unresolved items.
5. If execution fails or inputs are incomplete, switch to the fallback path and state exactly what blocked full completion.

## Use Cases
- Exome/genome analysis
- Rare disease diagnosis
- Genetic counseling
- Research cohort building

## Parameters
- `symptoms`: Clinical description
- `age_onset`: Pediatric/adult
- `inheritance_pattern`: AD/AR/XL

## Returns
- HPO term suggestions
- Confidence scores
- Differential diagnosis genes
- Literature links

## Example
"Wide-set eyes" → HP:0000316 (Hypertelorism)

## Risk Assessment

| Risk Indicator | Assessment | Level |
|----------------|------------|-------|
| Code Execution | Python/R scripts executed locally | Medium |
| Network Access | No external API calls | Low |
| File System Access | Read input files, write output files | Medium |
| Instruction Tampering | Standard prompt guidelines | Low |
| Data Exposure | Output files saved to workspace | Low |

## Security Checklist

- [ ] No hardcoded credentials or API keys
- [ ] No unauthorized file system access (../)
- [ ] Output does not expose sensitive information
- [ ] Prompt injection protections in place
- [ ] Input file paths validated (no ../ traversal)
- [ ] Output directory restricted to workspace
- [ ] Script execution in sandboxed environment
- [ ] Error messages sanitized (no stack traces exposed)
- [ ] Dependencies audited

## Prerequisites

```text

# Python dependencies
pip install -r requirements.txt
```

## Evaluation Criteria

### Success Metrics
- [ ] Successfully executes main functionality
- [ ] Output meets quality standards
- [ ] Handles edge cases gracefully
- [ ] Performance is acceptable

### Test Cases
1. **Basic Functionality**: Standard input → Expected output
2. **Edge Case**: Invalid input → Graceful error handling
3. **Performance**: Large dataset → Acceptable processing time

## Lifecycle Status

- **Current Stage**: Draft
- **Next Review Date**: 2026-03-06
- **Known Issues**: None
- **Planned Improvements**: 
  - Performance optimization
  - Additional feature support

## Output Requirements

Every final response should make these items explicit when they are relevant:

- Objective or requested deliverable
- Inputs used and assumptions introduced
- Workflow or decision path
- Core result, recommendation, or artifact
- Constraints, risks, caveats, or validation needs
- Unresolved items and next-step checks

## Error Handling

- If required inputs are missing, state exactly which fields are missing and request only the minimum additional information.
- If the task goes outside the documented scope, stop instead of guessing or silently widening the assignment.
- If `scripts/main.py` fails, report the failure point, summarize what still can be completed safely, and provide a manual fallback.
- Do not fabricate files, citations, data, search results, or execution outcomes.

## Input Validation

This skill accepts requests that match the documented purpose of `rare-disease-hpo-mapper` and include enough context to complete the workflow safely.

Do not continue the workflow when the request is out of scope, missing a critical input, or would require unsupported assumptions. Instead respond:

> `rare-disease-hpo-mapper` only handles its documented workflow. Please provide the missing required inputs or switch to a more suitable skill.

## References

- [references/audit-reference.md](references/audit-reference.md) - Supported scope, audit commands, and fallback boundaries

## Response Template

Use the following fixed structure for non-trivial requests:

1. Objective
2. Inputs Received
3. Assumptions
4. Workflow
5. Deliverable
6. Risks and Limits
7. Next Checks

If the request is simple, you may compress the structure, but still keep assumptions and limits explicit when they affect correctness.

Related Skills

bio-ontology-mapper

3891
from openclaw/skills

Map unstructured biomedical text to standardized ontologies (SNOMED CT.

spatial-transcriptomics-mapper

3891
from openclaw/skills

Map spatial transcriptomics data from 10x Genomics Visium/Xenium onto.

patent-claim-mapper

3891
from openclaw/skills

Use when mapping patent claims to products, analyzing patent infringement, or preparing freedom-to-operate analyses. Compares patent claims against product features for biotech and pharmaceutical IP assessment.

capability-graph-mapper

3891
from openclaw/skills

Helps map the composite permission surface across AI agent skill dependency chains. Traces what each skill can do individually, then computes what they can do together — revealing emergent capabilities nobody explicitly approved.

gene-structure-mapper

3891
from openclaw/skills

Visualize gene structure with exon-intron diagrams, domain annotations, and mutation position markers. Produces SVG, PNG, or PDF figures suitable for publication from a gene symbol input.

dual-disease-transcriptomic-ml-planner

3891
from openclaw/skills

Generates complete dual-disease transcriptomic + machine learning research designs from a user-provided disease pair. Use when users want to identify shared DEGs, common hub genes, cross-disease biomarkers, or shared molecular mechanisms between two diseases using public GEO data. Triggers: "shared biomarker study for two diseases", "dual-disease transcriptomic ML paper", "identify common DEGs between disease A and B", "cross-disease hub gene discovery", "shared DEG + PPI + ROC design", "immune infiltration shared biomarker", or "I want to study disease X and Y together". Always outputs four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with a recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, and publication upgrade path.

superrare-mint

3891
from openclaw/skills

Mint art to a SuperRare-compatible ERC-721 collection on Ethereum or Base via Bankr. Requires an explicit mint mode so aaigotchi can clearly choose between an artist-given collection and an own-deployed SR factory collection before minting.

superrare-deploy

3891
from openclaw/skills

Deploy a SuperRare Sovereign ERC-721 collection on Ethereum or Base via Bankr. Uses the official RARE factory createSovereignBatchMint path, dry-runs by default, and records auditable deploy receipts.

med-critical-disease-review

3891
from openclaw/skills

重大疾病理赔智能评估(支持 28 种病种)。输入住院病历结构化数据,调用内网评估接口,输出原始 JSON 与自然语言结论(结论 + 证据)。

med-chronic-disease-review

3891
from openclaw/skills

门诊慢病审核(糖尿病/高血压)。输入 OCR 结果数组 JSON,输出审核结论与原因(原始 JSON + 自然语言结论)。

evidence-gap-mapper

3891
from openclaw/skills

在报告、方案或演示稿中定位结论先行但证据不足的位置,并给出补证优先级。;use for evidence, gap-analysis, research workflows;do not use for 伪造数据支撑结论, 忽略高风险假设.

data-retention-mapper

3891
from openclaw/skills

梳理数据保留周期、落盘位置、清理责任与过期处置建议。;use for data-retention, governance, privacy workflows;do not use for 替代正式合规意见, 隐瞒敏感存储位置风险.