sample-size-power-calculator

Advanced sample size and power calculations for complex study designs including survival analysis, clustered designs, and multiple comparisons.

3,891 stars

Best use case

sample-size-power-calculator is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Advanced sample size and power calculations for complex study designs including survival analysis, clustered designs, and multiple comparisons.

Teams using sample-size-power-calculator should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/sample-size-power-calculator/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openclaw/skills/main/skills/aipoch-ai/sample-size-power-calculator/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/sample-size-power-calculator/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How sample-size-power-calculator Compares

Feature / Agentsample-size-power-calculatorStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Advanced sample size and power calculations for complex study designs including survival analysis, clustered designs, and multiple comparisons.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

Related Guides

SKILL.md Source

# Sample Size & Power Calculator (Advanced)

Advanced sample size and power calculations for complex study designs including survival analysis, clustered designs, and multiple comparisons.

## When to Use

- Use this skill when the task needs Advanced sample size and power calculations for complex study designs including survival analysis, clustered designs, and multiple comparisons.
- Use this skill for academic writing tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format.
- Use this skill when you need a documented fallback path for missing inputs, execution errors, or partial evidence.

## Key Features

- Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Advanced sample size and power calculations for complex study designs including survival analysis, clustered designs, and multiple comparisons.
- Packaged executable path(s): `scripts/main.py`.
- Reference material available in `references/` for task-specific guidance.
- Structured execution path designed to keep outputs consistent and reviewable.

## Dependencies

See `## Prerequisites` above for related details.

- `Python`: `3.10+`. Repository baseline for current packaged skills.
- `numpy`: `unspecified`. Declared in `requirements.txt`.
- `scipy`: `unspecified`. Declared in `requirements.txt`.

## Example Usage

See `## Usage` above for related details.

```bash
cd "20260318/scientific-skills/Academic Writing/sample-size-power-calculator"
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
python scripts/main.py --help
```

Example run plan:
1. Confirm the user input, output path, and any required config values.
2. Edit the in-file `CONFIG` block or documented parameters if the script uses fixed settings.
3. Run `python scripts/main.py` with the validated inputs.
4. Review the generated output and return the final artifact with any assumptions called out.

## Implementation Details

See `## Workflow` above for related details.

- Execution model: validate the request, choose the packaged workflow, and produce a bounded deliverable.
- Input controls: confirm the source files, scope limits, output format, and acceptance criteria before running any script.
- Primary implementation surface: `scripts/main.py`.
- Reference guidance: `references/` contains supporting rules, prompts, or checklists.
- Parameters to clarify first: input path, output path, scope filters, thresholds, and any domain-specific constraints.
- Output discipline: keep results reproducible, identify assumptions explicitly, and avoid undocumented side effects.

## Quick Check

Use this command to verify that the packaged script entry point can be parsed before deeper execution.

```bash
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
```

## Audit-Ready Commands

Use these concrete commands for validation. They are intentionally self-contained and avoid placeholder paths.

```bash
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
python scripts/main.py --help
```

## Workflow

1. Confirm the user objective, required inputs, and non-negotiable constraints before doing detailed work.
2. Validate that the request matches the documented scope and stop early if the task would require unsupported assumptions.
3. Use the packaged script path or the documented reasoning path with only the inputs that are actually available.
4. Return a structured result that separates assumptions, deliverables, risks, and unresolved items.
5. If execution fails or inputs are incomplete, switch to the fallback path and state exactly what blocked full completion.

## Usage

```text
python scripts/main.py --test ttest --effect 0.5 --alpha 0.05 --power 0.8
python scripts/main.py --test survival --hazard-ratio 0.7 --alpha 0.05
```

## Test Types

- t-test (paired/independent)
- Chi-square test
- Log-rank test (survival)
- ANOVA
- Regression
- Clustered designs
- Non-inferiority trials

## Parameters

| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|-----------|------|----------|-------------|
| `--test` | string | Yes | Statistical test type (ttest, chi2, survival, anova, regression) |
| `--effect` | float | Yes | Effect size (Cohen's d, hazard ratio, etc.) |
| `--alpha` | float | No | Significance level (default: 0.05) |
| `--power` | float | No | Desired power (default: 0.8) |
| `--allocation` | string | No | Group allocation ratio (default: 1:1) |

## Output

- Required sample size
- Power curve data
- Sensitivity analysis
- Dropout-adjusted N

## Risk Assessment

| Risk Indicator | Assessment | Level |
|----------------|------------|-------|
| Code Execution | Python scripts with tools | High |
| Network Access | External API calls | High |
| File System Access | Read/write data | Medium |
| Instruction Tampering | Standard prompt guidelines | Low |
| Data Exposure | Data handled securely | Medium |

## Security Checklist

- [ ] No hardcoded credentials or API keys
- [ ] No unauthorized file system access (../)
- [ ] Output does not expose sensitive information
- [ ] Prompt injection protections in place
- [ ] API requests use HTTPS only
- [ ] Input validated against allowed patterns
- [ ] API timeout and retry mechanisms implemented
- [ ] Output directory restricted to workspace
- [ ] Script execution in sandboxed environment
- [ ] Error messages sanitized (no internal paths exposed)
- [ ] Dependencies audited
- [ ] No exposure of internal service architecture

## Prerequisites

```text

# Python dependencies
pip install -r requirements.txt
```

## Evaluation Criteria

### Success Metrics
- [ ] Successfully executes main functionality
- [ ] Output meets quality standards
- [ ] Handles edge cases gracefully
- [ ] Performance is acceptable

### Test Cases
1. **Basic Functionality**: Standard input → Expected output
2. **Edge Case**: Invalid input → Graceful error handling
3. **Performance**: Large dataset → Acceptable processing time

## Lifecycle Status

- **Current Stage**: Draft
- **Next Review Date**: 2026-03-06
- **Known Issues**: None
- **Planned Improvements**: 
  - Performance optimization
  - Additional feature support

## Output Requirements

Every final response should make these items explicit when they are relevant:

- Objective or requested deliverable
- Inputs used and assumptions introduced
- Workflow or decision path
- Core result, recommendation, or artifact
- Constraints, risks, caveats, or validation needs
- Unresolved items and next-step checks

## Error Handling

- If required inputs are missing, state exactly which fields are missing and request only the minimum additional information.
- If the task goes outside the documented scope, stop instead of guessing or silently widening the assignment.
- If `scripts/main.py` fails, report the failure point, summarize what still can be completed safely, and provide a manual fallback.
- Do not fabricate files, citations, data, search results, or execution outcomes.

## Input Validation

This skill accepts requests that match the documented purpose of `sample-size-power-calculator` and include enough context to complete the workflow safely.

Do not continue the workflow when the request is out of scope, missing a critical input, or would require unsupported assumptions. Instead respond:

> `sample-size-power-calculator` only handles its documented workflow. Please provide the missing required inputs or switch to a more suitable skill.

## References

- [references/audit-reference.md](references/audit-reference.md) - Supported scope, audit commands, and fallback boundaries

## Response Template

Use the following fixed structure for non-trivial requests:

1. Objective
2. Inputs Received
3. Assumptions
4. Workflow
5. Deliverable
6. Risks and Limits
7. Next Checks

If the request is simple, you may compress the structure, but still keep assumptions and limits explicit when they affect correctness.

Related Skills

aaas-roi-calculator

3891
from openclaw/skills

Calculate ROI for AI-as-a-Service (managed AI agents). Estimates cost savings, efficiency gains, and payback period for deploying AI agents across business operations. Use when evaluating whether managed AI agents make financial sense for a company.

Business & Finance

Market Sizing — TAM/SAM/SOM Calculator

3891
from openclaw/skills

Build defensible market sizing for any product, pitch deck, or business case. Top-down and bottom-up methodologies combined.

Data & Research

two-sample-mr-research-planner

3891
from openclaw/skills

Generates complete two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) research designs from a user-provided research direction. Use when users want to design, plan, or build a study using two-sample MR to test causal relationships. Triggers: "design a two-sample MR study", "build a publishable MR paper", "test whether this biomarker causally affects this disease", "generate Lite/Standard/Advanced MR plans", "screen multiple exposures with MR", "bidirectional MR design", "causal inference using GWAS summary statistics", or "I want to study X and Y using MR". Always outputs four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with a recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, and publication upgrade path.

serial-dilution-calculator

3891
from openclaw/skills

Generate qPCR/ELISA dilution protocols with precise pipetting steps

sample-size-basic

3891
from openclaw/skills

Basic sample size calculator for clinical research planning with common statistical scenarios

superpowers-executing-plans

3891
from openclaw/skills

Use when executing a written implementation plan in the current session with sequential task execution and review checkpoints - for when subagent-driven mode is not available

superpowers-writing-plans

3891
from openclaw/skills

Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code - guides writing comprehensive implementation plans with bite-sized tasks, TDD, and DRY/YAGNI principles

superpowers-verification

3891
from openclaw/skills

Use when about to claim any work is complete, fixed, passing, or successful - requires running fresh verification commands and reading actual output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

superpowers-tdd

3891
from openclaw/skills

Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code - enforces RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle: write failing test first, verify it fails, write minimal code, verify it passes, then refactor

superpowers-systematic-debugging

3891
from openclaw/skills

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior - enforces systematic four-phase debugging: root cause investigation, pattern analysis, hypothesis testing, and evidence-based fix verification

superpowers-subagent-dev

3891
from openclaw/skills

Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks - coordinates task execution by dispatching subagents per task with verification checkpoints, adapted for OpenClaw's isolated session model

superpowers-parallel-agents

3891
from openclaw/skills

Use when facing 2 or more independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state - dispatches parallel subagents using sessions_spawn for concurrent investigation and execution, adapted for OpenClaw