tech-stack-evaluator

Technology stack evaluation and comparison with TCO analysis, security assessment, and ecosystem health scoring. Use when comparing frameworks, evaluating technology stacks, calculating total cost of ownership, assessing migration paths, or analyzing ecosystem viability.

3,891 stars

Best use case

tech-stack-evaluator is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Technology stack evaluation and comparison with TCO analysis, security assessment, and ecosystem health scoring. Use when comparing frameworks, evaluating technology stacks, calculating total cost of ownership, assessing migration paths, or analyzing ecosystem viability.

Teams using tech-stack-evaluator should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/tech-stack-evaluator/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openclaw/skills/main/skills/alirezarezvani/tech-stack-evaluator/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/tech-stack-evaluator/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How tech-stack-evaluator Compares

Feature / Agenttech-stack-evaluatorStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Technology stack evaluation and comparison with TCO analysis, security assessment, and ecosystem health scoring. Use when comparing frameworks, evaluating technology stacks, calculating total cost of ownership, assessing migration paths, or analyzing ecosystem viability.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

Related Guides

SKILL.md Source

# Technology Stack Evaluator

Evaluate and compare technologies, frameworks, and cloud providers with data-driven analysis and actionable recommendations.

## Table of Contents

- [Capabilities](#capabilities)
- [Quick Start](#quick-start)
- [Input Formats](#input-formats)
- [Analysis Types](#analysis-types)
- [Scripts](#scripts)
- [References](#references)

---

## Capabilities

| Capability | Description |
|------------|-------------|
| Technology Comparison | Compare frameworks and libraries with weighted scoring |
| TCO Analysis | Calculate 5-year total cost including hidden costs |
| Ecosystem Health | Assess GitHub metrics, npm adoption, community strength |
| Security Assessment | Evaluate vulnerabilities and compliance readiness |
| Migration Analysis | Estimate effort, risks, and timeline for migrations |
| Cloud Comparison | Compare AWS, Azure, GCP for specific workloads |

---

## Quick Start

### Compare Two Technologies

```
Compare React vs Vue for a SaaS dashboard.
Priorities: developer productivity (40%), ecosystem (30%), performance (30%).
```

### Calculate TCO

```
Calculate 5-year TCO for Next.js on Vercel.
Team: 8 developers. Hosting: $2500/month. Growth: 40%/year.
```

### Assess Migration

```
Evaluate migrating from Angular.js to React.
Codebase: 50,000 lines, 200 components. Team: 6 developers.
```

---

## Input Formats

The evaluator accepts three input formats:

**Text** - Natural language queries
```
Compare PostgreSQL vs MongoDB for our e-commerce platform.
```

**YAML** - Structured input for automation
```yaml
comparison:
  technologies: ["React", "Vue"]
  use_case: "SaaS dashboard"
  weights:
    ecosystem: 30
    performance: 25
    developer_experience: 45
```

**JSON** - Programmatic integration
```json
{
  "technologies": ["React", "Vue"],
  "use_case": "SaaS dashboard"
}
```

---

## Analysis Types

### Quick Comparison (200-300 tokens)
- Weighted scores and recommendation
- Top 3 decision factors
- Confidence level

### Standard Analysis (500-800 tokens)
- Comparison matrix
- TCO overview
- Security summary

### Full Report (1200-1500 tokens)
- All metrics and calculations
- Migration analysis
- Detailed recommendations

---

## Scripts

### stack_comparator.py

Compare technologies with customizable weighted criteria.

```bash
python scripts/stack_comparator.py --help
```

### tco_calculator.py

Calculate total cost of ownership over multi-year projections.

```bash
python scripts/tco_calculator.py --input assets/sample_input_tco.json
```

### ecosystem_analyzer.py

Analyze ecosystem health from GitHub, npm, and community metrics.

```bash
python scripts/ecosystem_analyzer.py --technology react
```

### security_assessor.py

Evaluate security posture and compliance readiness.

```bash
python scripts/security_assessor.py --technology express --compliance soc2,gdpr
```

### migration_analyzer.py

Estimate migration complexity, effort, and risks.

```bash
python scripts/migration_analyzer.py --from angular-1.x --to react
```

---

## References

| Document | Content |
|----------|---------|
| `references/metrics.md` | Detailed scoring algorithms and calculation formulas |
| `references/examples.md` | Input/output examples for all analysis types |
| `references/workflows.md` | Step-by-step evaluation workflows |

---

## Confidence Levels

| Level | Score | Interpretation |
|-------|-------|----------------|
| High | 80-100% | Clear winner, strong data |
| Medium | 50-79% | Trade-offs present, moderate uncertainty |
| Low | < 50% | Close call, limited data |

---

## When to Use

- Comparing frontend/backend frameworks for new projects
- Evaluating cloud providers for specific workloads
- Planning technology migrations with risk assessment
- Calculating build vs. buy decisions with TCO
- Assessing open-source library viability

## When NOT to Use

- Trivial decisions between similar tools (use team preference)
- Mandated technology choices (decision already made)
- Emergency production issues (use monitoring tools)

Related Skills

simple-tech-analyzer - 简易技术分析器

3891
from openclaw/skills

**版本**: 1.0.0

Finance & Trading

dailybit-tech-digest

3891
from openclaw/skills

Curated daily digest from 92 top tech blogs (Andrej Karpathy's list) with AI-generated Chinese summaries, hierarchical tags, and personalized recommendations. Triggers: "今日技术博客", "高质量技术文章", "tech blog digest", "优质博客推荐", "技术发展趋势", "AI行业动态", "每日技术简报", "中文科技摘要", "top tech blogs today", "curated tech reading", "what's trending in tech", "developer daily briefing", "有什么值得看的技术文章", "最近有什么技术趋势", "帮我看看今天的博客", "优质英文博客中文速览".

tech-news-digest

3891
from openclaw/skills

Generate tech news digests with unified source model, quality scoring, and multi-format output. Six-source data collection from RSS feeds, Twitter/X KOLs, GitHub releases, GitHub Trending, Reddit, and web search. Pipeline-based scripts with retry mechanisms and deduplication. Supports Discord, email, and markdown templates.

feynman-technique-explainer

3891
from openclaw/skills

Explain any concept using the Feynman Technique, plain language, a real-world analogy, a concrete example, and a comprehension quiz. No jargon from the concept allowed.

openclaw-memory-stack

3891
from openclaw/skills

Total recall, 90% fewer tokens. The best OpenClaw memory plugin — 5-engine local search, structured fact extraction, smart dedup, cross-agent sharing, and self-healing. Replace native memory with something that actually remembers. No cloud API, no subscription.

project-evaluator

3891
from openclaw/skills

描述一个项目想法,AI 从市场/技术/商业/风险四个维度系统评估, 输出评估报告、竞品速查、MVP建议,帮你决策「值不值得做」。

tech-debt-tracker

3891
from openclaw/skills

Scan codebases for technical debt, score severity, track trends, and generate prioritized remediation plans. Use when users mention tech debt, code quality, refactoring priority, debt scoring, cleanup sprints, or code health assessment. Also use for legacy code modernization planning and maintenance cost estimation.

senior-fullstack

3891
from openclaw/skills

Fullstack development toolkit with project scaffolding for Next.js, FastAPI, MERN, and Django stacks, code quality analysis with security and complexity scoring, and stack selection guidance. Use when the user asks to "scaffold a new project", "create a Next.js app", "set up FastAPI with React", "analyze code quality", "audit my codebase", "what stack should I use", "generate project boilerplate", or mentions fullstack development, project setup, or tech stack comparison.

browserstack

3891
from openclaw/skills

Run tests on BrowserStack. Use when user mentions "browserstack", "cross-browser", "cloud testing", "browser matrix", "test on safari", "test on firefox", or "browser compatibility".

🎛️ CLAW.FM ACID TECHNO LIVE MUSICIAN

3891
from openclaw/skills

**Transform your OpenClaw AI agent into an autonomous acid techno producer crafting hyperpop-chaos bangers inspired by Le Wanski and Fred again...**

llm-evaluator

3891
from openclaw/skills

LLM-as-a-Judge evaluation system using Langfuse. Score AI outputs on relevance, accuracy, hallucination, and helpfulness. Backfill scoring on historical traces. Uses GPT-5-nano for cost-efficient judging. Use when evaluating AI quality, building evals, or monitoring output accuracy.

biotech-pitch-deck-narrative

3891
from openclaw/skills

Use when creating biotech pitch decks, translating scientific data for investors, preparing fundraising presentations, or developing investor Q&A. Transforms complex scientific and clinical data into compelling investor narratives for biotech fundraising.