speckit

Specification-Driven Development (SDD) toolkit. Transforms ideas into executable specifications, implementation plans, and task lists. Use for feature planning, PRD creation, or when user invokes /speckit.specify, /speckit.plan, /speckit.tasks commands.

Best use case

speckit is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Specification-Driven Development (SDD) toolkit. Transforms ideas into executable specifications, implementation plans, and task lists. Use for feature planning, PRD creation, or when user invokes /speckit.specify, /speckit.plan, /speckit.tasks commands.

Teams using speckit should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/speckit/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/organvm-iv-taxis/a-i--skills/main/distributions/claude/skills/speckit/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/speckit/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How speckit Compares

Feature / AgentspeckitStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Specification-Driven Development (SDD) toolkit. Transforms ideas into executable specifications, implementation plans, and task lists. Use for feature planning, PRD creation, or when user invokes /speckit.specify, /speckit.plan, /speckit.tasks commands.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

# Spec Kit: Specification-Driven Development

## Overview

Spec Kit implements **Specification-Driven Development (SDD)** - a methodology where specifications drive code, not vice versa. Instead of specs serving as documentation for code, code becomes the expression of specifications.

### The Power Inversion

Traditional development: Code is truth, specs are scaffolding
**SDD**: Specifications are truth, code is generated output

This eliminates the gap between intent and implementation by making specifications executable through AI.

## Commands

### `/speckit.specify <feature-description>`

Creates a comprehensive feature specification from a natural language description.

**Usage**: `/speckit.specify Real-time chat with message history and presence`

**Output**:
- `specs/{feature-name}/spec.md` - Complete feature specification
- `specs/{feature-name}/checklists/requirements.md` - Quality validation checklist

**Process**:
1. Parse user description, extract key concepts (actors, actions, data, constraints)
2. Generate user scenarios with prioritized stories (P1, P2, P3)
3. Define functional requirements (FR-001, FR-002, etc.)
4. Create measurable success criteria
5. Identify key entities
6. Validate against quality checklist
7. Present clarification questions (max 3) if critical ambiguities exist

**Guidelines**:
- Focus on WHAT users need and WHY
- Avoid HOW (no tech stack, APIs, code structure)
- Make informed guesses using industry standards
- Limit `[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]` markers to 3 maximum
- Every requirement must be testable

For detailed template: read `assets/templates/spec-template.md`
For command details: read `references/commands/specify.md`

---

### `/speckit.plan [tech-context]`

Creates an implementation plan from an existing specification.

**Usage**: `/speckit.plan WebSocket, PostgreSQL, Redis` or `/speckit.plan` (will determine tech from context)

**Prerequisites**: `spec.md` must exist in the feature directory

**Output**:
- `specs/{feature}/plan.md` - Implementation plan with tech decisions
- `specs/{feature}/research.md` - Technology research and decisions
- `specs/{feature}/data-model.md` - Entity definitions
- `specs/{feature}/contracts/` - API specifications (OpenAPI/GraphQL)
- `specs/{feature}/quickstart.md` - Validation scenarios

**Process**:
1. Load feature specification and project constitution
2. Fill Technical Context section
3. Run Constitution Check (evaluate architectural gates)
4. Phase 0: Research unknowns, generate `research.md`
5. Phase 1: Design data models, generate contracts
6. Re-evaluate constitution compliance post-design

**Constitution Gates** (if using constitution):
- Simplicity Gate: Using ≤3 projects? No future-proofing?
- Anti-Abstraction Gate: Using framework directly?
- Integration-First Gate: Contracts defined?

For detailed template: read `assets/templates/plan-template.md`
For command details: read `references/commands/plan.md`

---

### `/speckit.tasks`

Generates an executable task list from the implementation plan.

**Usage**: `/speckit.tasks`

**Prerequisites**: `plan.md` and `spec.md` must exist

**Output**:
- `specs/{feature}/tasks.md` - Dependency-ordered task list

**Process**:
1. Load plan.md (tech stack, structure) and spec.md (user stories)
2. Optionally load: data-model.md, contracts/, research.md
3. Generate tasks organized by user story:
   - Phase 1: Setup (shared infrastructure)
   - Phase 2: Foundational (blocking prerequisites)
   - Phase 3+: User Stories in priority order (P1, P2, P3...)
   - Final Phase: Polish & cross-cutting
4. Mark parallelizable tasks with `[P]`
5. Number tasks (T001, T002...)
6. Generate dependency graph and parallel execution examples

**Task Format**: `[ID] [P?] [Story] Description`
- `[P]` = Can run in parallel (different files, no dependencies)
- `[Story]` = Which user story (US1, US2, US3)

For detailed template: read `assets/templates/tasks-template.md`
For command details: read `references/commands/tasks.md`

---

## Workflow Example

```bash
# 1. Create specification (5 min)
/speckit.specify Real-time chat with message history and user presence

# 2. Generate implementation plan (5 min)
/speckit.plan WebSocket for messaging, PostgreSQL for history, Redis for presence

# 3. Create task list (5 min)
/speckit.tasks
```

**Result** (in 15 minutes):
- Complete feature spec with user stories and acceptance criteria
- Detailed implementation plan with technology rationale
- API contracts and data models
- Executable task list organized by user story

## Project Constitution

A constitution defines immutable architectural principles for a project. When present at `memory/constitution.md`, the `/speckit.plan` command will:

1. Validate against constitutional gates before planning
2. Require justification for any violations
3. Track complexity deviations

**Sample principles**:
- Library-First: Features start as standalone libraries
- Test-First: TDD mandatory (Red-Green-Refactor)
- Simplicity: Maximum 3 projects, YAGNI
- Integration-First: Real databases over mocks

For constitution template: read `assets/templates/constitution-template.md`

## Key Concepts

### User Story Organization

Tasks are grouped by user story to enable:
- Independent implementation
- Independent testing
- Incremental delivery (ship P1, then P2, then P3)

### MVP-First Delivery

1. Complete Setup + Foundational phases
2. Implement User Story 1 (P1) → Test → Deploy
3. Add User Story 2 (P2) → Test → Deploy
4. Continue incrementally

### Template-Driven Quality

Templates constrain AI behavior for better outcomes:
- Prevent premature implementation details
- Force explicit uncertainty markers
- Enforce test-first thinking
- Prevent speculative features

## File Locations

When working in a project:
- Specifications: `specs/{feature-name}/`
- Constitution: `memory/constitution.md`

## Reference Files

### Templates (fill-in artifacts for output)

- `assets/templates/spec-template.md` - Feature specification template
- `assets/templates/plan-template.md` - Implementation plan template
- `assets/templates/tasks-template.md` - Task list template
- `assets/templates/constitution-template.md` - Project constitution template

### Documentation (methodology and command details)

- `references/methodology.md` - Full SDD philosophy document
- `references/commands/specify.md` - `/speckit.specify` command definition
- `references/commands/plan.md` - `/speckit.plan` command definition
- `references/commands/tasks.md` - `/speckit.tasks` command definition

Related Skills

taxonomy-modeling-design

5
from organvm-iv-taxis/a-i--skills

Phase 2 of the pentaphase structural-overhaul protocol. Classifies entities, standardizes attributes, establishes relationships, and designs the access framework. Use when the user invokes phase 2 of an overhaul, asks to "design the taxonomy" or "model the structure", or has completed a landscape audit and is ready to redesign. Consumes phase-1-landscape-report.md; produces phase-2-taxonomy-model.md.

systemic-ingestion-normalization

5
from organvm-iv-taxis/a-i--skills

Phase 4 of the pentaphase structural-overhaul protocol. Purges redundancies, enriches and aligns legacy entities to the new schema, executes phased ingestion into the new environment, and audits integrity. Use when the user invokes phase 4 of an overhaul, asks to "migrate the data" or "ingest into the new system", or has a configured environment ready to accept legacy entities. Consumes phase-3-environment-spec.md; produces phase-4-ingestion-report.md.

system-environment-configuration

5
from organvm-iv-taxis/a-i--skills

Phase 3 of the pentaphase structural-overhaul protocol. Translates the taxonomy model into objective technical criteria, evaluates candidate mechanisms or frameworks, instantiates the chosen architecture, and programs validation rules. Use when the user invokes phase 3 of an overhaul, asks to "select a system" or "configure the environment", or has a taxonomy model and is ready to choose technology. Consumes phase-2-taxonomy-model.md; produces phase-3-environment-spec.md.

pentaphase-orchestrator

5
from organvm-iv-taxis/a-i--skills

Threads the full five-phase structural-overhaul protocol — landscape discovery, taxonomy design, environment configuration, systemic ingestion, governance evolution — for any substrate the user names. Use when the user requests a structural overhaul, system redesign, or end-to-end restructuring of a documentation system, asset registry, code monorepo, knowledge base, or operational workflow; or when they explicitly invoke the pentaphase methodology. Coordinates handoffs between phase-skills and seats validation gates between phases.

landscape-discovery-audit

5
from organvm-iv-taxis/a-i--skills

Phase 1 of the pentaphase structural-overhaul protocol. Inventories assets, maps current flow, identifies friction, and defines value metrics for any substrate. Use when the user invokes phase 1 of an overhaul, requests a baseline audit, asks to "discover the landscape" of a system, or wants to understand current state before redesigning. Produces phase-1-landscape-report.md.

governance-evolution-protocol

5
from organvm-iv-taxis/a-i--skills

Phase 5 of the pentaphase structural-overhaul protocol. Codifies operational protocols, onboards the ecosystem of participants, programs behavior monitoring, and establishes an iteration cadence so the substrate evolves rather than calcifies. Use when the user invokes phase 5 of an overhaul, asks to "establish governance" or "lock in the protocols", or has completed ingestion and is ready to declare the substrate operational. Consumes phase-4-ingestion-report.md; produces phase-5-governance-charter.md, which closes the protocol.

dimension-surfacing

5
from organvm-iv-taxis/a-i--skills

Surfaces the parallel domain dimensions implicit in a dense or minimal prompt. Use when a user prompt is small on the surface but plainly implies multiple independent domains needing different expertise; when explicitly invoked by the coliseum-orchestrator skill as Phase 1; or when the user asks "what dimensions does this prompt encode" or "what axes does this break into." Produces a named dimension set where each dimension is independently executable and not a paraphrase of another.

coliseum-dispatch

5
from organvm-iv-taxis/a-i--skills

Dispatches a composed set of assignment envelopes to domain-expert subagents in parallel, in a single message with multiple Agent tool calls. Enforces the no-pingpong gate via the pingpong-detector agent before any dispatch fires. Use when invoked by the coliseum-orchestrator as Phase 3; when envelopes are already composed and the next step is parallel execution; or when the user asks to "fan out" or "dispatch in parallel." Produces a dispatch log capturing what was sent, when, and where returns land.

assignment-composition

5
from organvm-iv-taxis/a-i--skills

Wraps each surfaced dimension as a self-contained 9-section autonomous-work-assignment envelope — scope, context, success criteria, allowed tools, return format, handoff — all the recipient subagent needs to execute without coming back. Use when invoked by coliseum-orchestrator as Phase 2; when dimensions are named and the next step is to make each independently dispatchable; or when the user asks "compose this as an assignment." The no-pingpong gate validates each envelope before dispatch.

workspace-autopsy-governance

5
from organvm-iv-taxis/a-i--skills

Conducts a full automated autopsy of the current workspace directory to map files, identifies structural issues, proposes a restructuring plan (the signal), and establishes unified governance using templates. Use this skill when a user asks to map, restructure, reorganize, or apply new governance to an existing messy repository.

workshop-presentation-design

5
from organvm-iv-taxis/a-i--skills

Design engaging workshops, conference talks, and educational presentations. Covers learning objectives, activity design, slide craft, and facilitation techniques. Triggers on workshop design, presentation prep, talk structure, or training session requests.

webhook-integration-patterns

5
from organvm-iv-taxis/a-i--skills

Designs reliable webhook systems with proper delivery guarantees, retry logic, signature verification, and idempotent processing for event-driven integrations.