dogfood

Systematically explore and test a web application to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", "test this app/site/platform", or review the quality of a web application. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence -- step-by-step screenshots, repro videos, and detailed repro steps for every issue -- so findings can be handed directly to the responsible teams.

465 stars

Best use case

dogfood is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Systematically explore and test a web application to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", "test this app/site/platform", or review the quality of a web application. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence -- step-by-step screenshots, repro videos, and detailed repro steps for every issue -- so findings can be handed directly to the responsible teams.

Teams using dogfood should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/dogfood/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/phodal/routa/main/.agents/skills/dogfood/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/dogfood/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How dogfood Compares

Feature / AgentdogfoodStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Systematically explore and test a web application to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", "test this app/site/platform", or review the quality of a web application. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence -- step-by-step screenshots, repro videos, and detailed repro steps for every issue -- so findings can be handed directly to the responsible teams.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

Related Guides

SKILL.md Source

# Dogfood

Systematically explore a web application, find issues, and produce a report with full reproduction evidence for every finding.

## Setup

Only the **Target URL** is required. Everything else has sensible defaults -- use them unless the user explicitly provides an override.

| Parameter | Default | Example override |
|-----------|---------|-----------------|
| **Target URL** | _(required)_ | `vercel.com`, `http://localhost:3000` |
| **Session name** | Slugified domain (e.g., `vercel.com` -> `vercel-com`) | `--session my-session` |
| **Output directory** | `./dogfood-output/` | `Output directory: /tmp/qa` |
| **Scope** | Full app | `Focus on the billing page` |
| **Authentication** | None | `Sign in to user@example.com` |

If the user says something like "dogfood vercel.com", start immediately with defaults. Do not ask clarifying questions unless authentication is mentioned but credentials are missing.

Always use `agent-browser` directly -- never `npx agent-browser`. The direct binary uses the fast Rust client. `npx` routes through Node.js and is significantly slower.

## Workflow

```
1. Initialize    Set up session, output dirs, report file
2. Authenticate  Sign in if needed, save state
3. Orient        Navigate to starting point, take initial snapshot
4. Explore       Systematically visit pages and test features
5. Document      Screenshot + record each issue as found
6. Wrap up       Update summary counts, close session
```

### 1. Initialize

```bash
mkdir -p {OUTPUT_DIR}/screenshots {OUTPUT_DIR}/videos
```

Copy the report template into the output directory and fill in the header fields:

```bash
cp {SKILL_DIR}/templates/dogfood-report-template.md {OUTPUT_DIR}/report.md
```

Start a named session:

```bash
agent-browser --session {SESSION} open {TARGET_URL}
agent-browser --session {SESSION} wait --load networkidle
```

### 2. Authenticate

If the app requires login:

```bash
agent-browser --session {SESSION} snapshot -i
# Identify login form refs, fill credentials
agent-browser --session {SESSION} fill @e1 "{EMAIL}"
agent-browser --session {SESSION} fill @e2 "{PASSWORD}"
agent-browser --session {SESSION} click @e3
agent-browser --session {SESSION} wait --load networkidle
```

For OTP/email codes: ask the user, wait for their response, then enter the code.

After successful login, save state for potential reuse:

```bash
agent-browser --session {SESSION} state save {OUTPUT_DIR}/auth-state.json
```

### 3. Orient

Take an initial annotated screenshot and snapshot to understand the app structure:

```bash
agent-browser --session {SESSION} screenshot --annotate {OUTPUT_DIR}/screenshots/initial.png
agent-browser --session {SESSION} snapshot -i
```

Identify the main navigation elements and map out the sections to visit.

### 4. Explore

Read [references/issue-taxonomy.md](references/issue-taxonomy.md) for the full list of what to look for and the exploration checklist.

**Strategy -- work through the app systematically:**

- Start from the main navigation. Visit each top-level section.
- Within each section, test interactive elements: click buttons, fill forms, open dropdowns/modals.
- Check edge cases: empty states, error handling, boundary inputs.
- Try realistic end-to-end workflows (create, edit, delete flows).
- Check the browser console for errors periodically.

**At each page:**

```bash
agent-browser --session {SESSION} snapshot -i
agent-browser --session {SESSION} screenshot --annotate {OUTPUT_DIR}/screenshots/{page-name}.png
agent-browser --session {SESSION} errors
agent-browser --session {SESSION} console
```

Use your judgment on how deep to go. Spend more time on core features and less on peripheral pages. If you find a cluster of issues in one area, investigate deeper.

### 5. Document Issues (Repro-First)

Steps 4 and 5 happen together -- explore and document in a single pass. When you find an issue, stop exploring and document it immediately before moving on. Do not explore the whole app first and document later.

Every issue must be reproducible. When you find something wrong, do not just note it -- prove it with evidence. The goal is that someone reading the report can see exactly what happened and replay it.

**Choose the right level of evidence for the issue:**

#### Interactive / behavioral issues (functional, ux, console errors on action)

These require user interaction to reproduce -- use full repro with video and step-by-step screenshots:

1. **Start a repro video** _before_ reproducing:

```bash
agent-browser --session {SESSION} record start {OUTPUT_DIR}/videos/issue-{NNN}-repro.webm
```

2. **Walk through the steps at human pace.** Pause 1-2 seconds between actions so the video is watchable. Take a screenshot at each step:

```bash
agent-browser --session {SESSION} screenshot {OUTPUT_DIR}/screenshots/issue-{NNN}-step-1.png
sleep 1
# Perform action (click, fill, etc.)
sleep 1
agent-browser --session {SESSION} screenshot {OUTPUT_DIR}/screenshots/issue-{NNN}-step-2.png
sleep 1
# ...continue until the issue manifests
```

3. **Capture the broken state.** Pause so the viewer can see it, then take an annotated screenshot:

```bash
sleep 2
agent-browser --session {SESSION} screenshot --annotate {OUTPUT_DIR}/screenshots/issue-{NNN}-result.png
```

4. **Stop the video:**

```bash
agent-browser --session {SESSION} record stop
```

5. Write numbered repro steps in the report, each referencing its screenshot.

#### Static / visible-on-load issues (typos, placeholder text, clipped text, misalignment, console errors on load)

These are visible without interaction -- a single annotated screenshot is sufficient. No video, no multi-step repro:

```bash
agent-browser --session {SESSION} screenshot --annotate {OUTPUT_DIR}/screenshots/issue-{NNN}.png
```

Write a brief description and reference the screenshot in the report. Set **Repro Video** to `N/A`.

---

**For all issues:**

1. **Append to the report immediately.** Do not batch issues for later. Write each one as you find it so nothing is lost if the session is interrupted.

2. **Increment the issue counter** (ISSUE-001, ISSUE-002, ...).

### 6. Wrap Up

Aim to find **5-10 well-documented issues**, then wrap up. Depth of evidence matters more than total count -- 5 issues with full repro beats 20 with vague descriptions.

After exploring:

1. Re-read the report and update the summary severity counts so they match the actual issues. Every `### ISSUE-` block must be reflected in the totals.
2. Close the session:

```bash
agent-browser --session {SESSION} close
```

3. Tell the user the report is ready and summarize findings: total issues, breakdown by severity, and the most critical items.

## Guidance

- **Repro is everything.** Every issue needs proof -- but match the evidence to the issue. Interactive bugs need video and step-by-step screenshots. Static bugs (typos, placeholder text, visual glitches visible on load) only need a single annotated screenshot.
- **Don't record video for static issues.** A typo or clipped text doesn't benefit from a video. Save video for issues that involve user interaction, timing, or state changes.
- **For interactive issues, screenshot each step.** Capture the before, the action, and the after -- so someone can see the full sequence.
- **Write repro steps that map to screenshots.** Each numbered step in the report should reference its corresponding screenshot. A reader should be able to follow the steps visually without touching a browser.
- **Be thorough but use judgment.** You are not following a test script -- you are exploring like a real user would. If something feels off, investigate.
- **Write findings incrementally.** Append each issue to the report as you discover it. If the session is interrupted, findings are preserved. Never batch all issues for the end.
- **Never delete output files.** Do not `rm` screenshots, videos, or the report mid-session. Do not close the session and restart. Work forward, not backward.
- **Never read the target app's source code.** You are testing as a user, not auditing code. Do not read HTML, JS, or config files of the app under test. All findings must come from what you observe in the browser.
- **Check the console.** Many issues are invisible in the UI but show up as JS errors or failed requests.
- **Test like a user, not a robot.** Try common workflows end-to-end. Click things a real user would click. Enter realistic data.
- **Type like a human.** When filling form fields during video recording, use `type` instead of `fill` -- it types character-by-character. Use `fill` only outside of video recording when speed matters.
- **Pace repro videos for humans.** Add `sleep 1` between actions and `sleep 2` before the final result screenshot. Videos should be watchable at 1x speed -- a human reviewing the report needs to see what happened, not a blur of instant state changes.
- **Be efficient with commands.** Batch multiple `agent-browser` commands in a single shell call when they are independent (e.g., `agent-browser ... screenshot ... && agent-browser ... console`). Use `agent-browser --session {SESSION} scroll down 300` for scrolling -- do not use `key` or `evaluate` to scroll.

## References

| Reference | When to Read |
|-----------|--------------|
| [references/issue-taxonomy.md](references/issue-taxonomy.md) | Start of session -- calibrate what to look for, severity levels, exploration checklist |

## Templates

| Template | Purpose |
|----------|---------|
| [templates/dogfood-report-template.md](templates/dogfood-report-template.md) | Copy into output directory as the report file |

Related Skills

spreadsheets

465
from phodal/routa

Use this skill for spreadsheet creation, editing, analysis, formatting, formula modeling, charting, or workbook review. Triggers include requests to create or modify an .xlsx file, build a model or tracker, format a workbook, add formulas or charts, or prepare a shareable spreadsheet deliverable.

slide

465
from phodal/routa

Use this skill as reference material when creating or editing presentation slide decks.

pdf

465
from phodal/routa

Use this skill for PDF generation, conversion, inspection, extraction, editing, form filling, OCR, redaction, or render comparison. Triggers include requests to create a PDF, convert Markdown or HTML or LaTeX or DOCX or PPTX to PDF, extract text or tables or images, fill or inspect forms, OCR scans, compare revisions, or redact content.

docx

465
from phodal/routa

Use this skill for creating, editing, and reviewing DOCX files, including generation, formatting, content controls, tracked changes, comments, accessibility checks, redaction, rendering, and diff-based QA workflows.

pr-verify

465
from phodal/routa

Comprehensive PR verification skill. Analyzes PR body requirements, reviews comments, checks CI status, and performs E2E testing. Use when a PR is ready for final verification before merge.

playwright-cli

465
from phodal/routa

Automates browser interactions for web testing, form filling, screenshots, and data extraction. Use when the user needs to navigate websites, interact with web pages, fill forms, take screenshots, test web applications, or extract information from web pages.

issue-garbage-collector

465
from phodal/routa

Two-phase cleanup of duplicate and outdated issue files in docs/issues/. Phase 1 uses Python script for fast pattern matching. Phase 2 uses claude -p for semantic analysis on suspects only.

issue-enricher

465
from phodal/routa

Transforms rough requirements into well-structured GitHub issues. Use when the user provides a vague idea, feature request, or problem description and wants to create a GitHub issue. Analyzes codebase, explores solution approaches, researches relevant libraries, and generates actionable issues using `gh` CLI.

evolution-architecture-review

465
from phodal/routa

Multi-agent architecture evolvability review for this repository. Use when the user wants to analyze current architecture quality, evolvability, fitness functions, coupling, boundary clarity, delivery flow, or phased evolution strategy. Designed to be invoked from Claude Code with prompts like `/evolution-architecture-review analyze the current architecture evolvability`.

slack

465
from phodal/routa

Interact with Slack workspaces using browser automation. Use when the user needs to check unread channels, navigate Slack, send messages, extract data, find information, search conversations, or automate any Slack task. Triggers include "check my Slack", "what channels have unreads", "send a message to", "search Slack for", "extract from Slack", "find who said", or any task requiring programmatic Slack interaction.

electron

465
from phodal/routa

Automate Electron desktop apps (VS Code, Slack, Discord, Figma, Notion, Spotify, etc.) using agent-browser via Chrome DevTools Protocol. Use when the user needs to interact with an Electron app, automate a desktop app, connect to a running app, control a native app, or test an Electron application. Triggers include "automate Slack app", "control VS Code", "interact with Discord app", "test this Electron app", "connect to desktop app", or any task requiring automation of a native Electron application.

agent-browser

465
from phodal/routa

Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction.