detecting-mimikatz-execution-patterns
Detect Mimikatz execution through command-line patterns, LSASS access signatures, binary indicators, and in-memory detection of known modules.
Best use case
detecting-mimikatz-execution-patterns is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Detect Mimikatz execution through command-line patterns, LSASS access signatures, binary indicators, and in-memory detection of known modules.
Teams using detecting-mimikatz-execution-patterns should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/detecting-mimikatz-execution-patterns/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How detecting-mimikatz-execution-patterns Compares
| Feature / Agent | detecting-mimikatz-execution-patterns | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Detect Mimikatz execution through command-line patterns, LSASS access signatures, binary indicators, and in-memory detection of known modules.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Detecting Mimikatz Execution Patterns ## When to Use - When proactively hunting for indicators of detecting mimikatz execution patterns in the environment - After threat intelligence indicates active campaigns using these techniques - During incident response to scope compromise related to these techniques - When EDR or SIEM alerts trigger on related indicators - During periodic security assessments and purple team exercises ## Prerequisites - EDR platform with process and network telemetry (CrowdStrike, MDE, SentinelOne) - SIEM with relevant log data ingested (Splunk, Elastic, Sentinel) - Sysmon deployed with comprehensive configuration - Windows Security Event Log forwarding enabled - Threat intelligence feeds for IOC correlation ## Workflow 1. **Formulate Hypothesis**: Define a testable hypothesis based on threat intelligence or ATT&CK gap analysis. 2. **Identify Data Sources**: Determine which logs and telemetry are needed to validate or refute the hypothesis. 3. **Execute Queries**: Run detection queries against SIEM and EDR platforms to collect relevant events. 4. **Analyze Results**: Examine query results for anomalies, correlating across multiple data sources. 5. **Validate Findings**: Distinguish true positives from false positives through contextual analysis. 6. **Correlate Activity**: Link findings to broader attack chains and threat actor TTPs. 7. **Document and Report**: Record findings, update detection rules, and recommend response actions. ## Key Concepts | Concept | Description | |---------|-------------| | T1003.001 | LSASS Memory | | T1003.006 | DCSync | | T1558.003 | Kerberoasting | | T1558.001 | Golden Ticket | ## Tools & Systems | Tool | Purpose | |------|---------| | CrowdStrike Falcon | EDR telemetry and threat detection | | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Advanced hunting with KQL | | Splunk Enterprise | SIEM log analysis with SPL queries | | Elastic Security | Detection rules and investigation timeline | | Sysmon | Detailed Windows event monitoring | | Velociraptor | Endpoint artifact collection and hunting | | Sigma Rules | Cross-platform detection rule format | ## Common Scenarios 1. **Scenario 1**: Standard sekurlsa::logonpasswords credential dump 2. **Scenario 2**: PowerShell Invoke-Mimikatz reflective loading 3. **Scenario 3**: DCSync from non-DC host 4. **Scenario 4**: Golden ticket creation for persistence ## Output Format ``` Hunt ID: TH-DETECT-[DATE]-[SEQ] Technique: T1003.001 Host: [Hostname] User: [Account context] Evidence: [Log entries, process trees, network data] Risk Level: [Critical/High/Medium/Low] Confidence: [High/Medium/Low] Recommended Action: [Containment, investigation, monitoring] ```
Related Skills
securing-aws-lambda-execution-roles
Securing AWS Lambda execution roles by implementing least-privilege IAM policies, applying permission boundaries, restricting resource-based policies, using IAM Access Analyzer to validate permissions, and enforcing role scoping through SCPs.
org-babel-execution
Literate programming execution engine via org-babel for polyglot skill execution
hunting-for-lolbins-execution-in-endpoint-logs
Hunt for adversary abuse of Living Off the Land Binaries (LOLBins) by analyzing endpoint process creation logs for suspicious execution patterns of legitimate Windows system binaries used for malicious purposes.
hunting-for-anomalous-powershell-execution
Hunt for malicious PowerShell activity by analyzing Script Block Logging (Event 4104), Module Logging (Event 4103), and process creation events. The analyst parses Windows Event Log EVTX files to detect obfuscated commands, AMSI bypass attempts, encoded payloads, credential dumping keywords, and suspicious download cradles. Activates for requests involving PowerShell threat hunting, script block analysis, encoded command detection, or AMSI bypass identification.
detecting-wmi-persistence
Detect WMI event subscription persistence by analyzing Sysmon Event IDs 19, 20, and 21 for malicious EventFilter, EventConsumer, and FilterToConsumerBinding creation.
detecting-typosquatting-packages-in-npm-pypi
Detects typosquatting attacks in npm and PyPI package registries by analyzing package name similarity using Levenshtein distance and other string metrics, examining publish date heuristics to identify recently created packages mimicking established ones, and flagging download count anomalies where suspicious packages have disproportionately low usage compared to their legitimate targets. The analyst queries the PyPI JSON API and npm registry API to gather package metadata for automated comparison. Activates for requests involving package typosquatting detection, dependency confusion analysis, malicious package identification, or software supply chain threat hunting in package registries.
detecting-t1548-abuse-elevation-control-mechanism
Detect abuse of elevation control mechanisms including UAC bypass, sudo exploitation, and setuid/setgid manipulation by monitoring registry modifications, process elevation flags, and unusual parent-child process relationships.
detecting-t1055-process-injection-with-sysmon
Detect process injection techniques (T1055) including classic DLL injection, process hollowing, and APC injection by analyzing Sysmon events for cross-process memory operations, remote thread creation, and anomalous DLL loading patterns.
detecting-t1003-credential-dumping-with-edr
Detect OS credential dumping techniques targeting LSASS memory, SAM database, NTDS.dit, and cached credentials using EDR telemetry, Sysmon process access monitoring, and Windows security event correlation.
detecting-suspicious-powershell-execution
Detect suspicious PowerShell execution patterns including encoded commands, download cradles, AMSI bypass attempts, and constrained language mode evasion.
detecting-suspicious-oauth-application-consent
Detect risky OAuth application consent grants in Azure AD / Microsoft Entra ID using Microsoft Graph API, audit logs, and permission analysis to identify illicit consent grant attacks.
detecting-supply-chain-attacks-in-ci-cd
Scans GitHub Actions workflows and CI/CD pipeline configurations for supply chain attack vectors including unpinned actions, script injection via expressions, dependency confusion, and secrets exposure. Uses PyGithub and YAML parsing for automated audit. Use when hardening CI/CD pipelines or investigating compromised build systems.