detecting-privilege-escalation-in-kubernetes-pods
Detect and prevent privilege escalation in Kubernetes pods by monitoring security contexts, capabilities, and syscall patterns with Falco and OPA policies.
Best use case
detecting-privilege-escalation-in-kubernetes-pods is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Detect and prevent privilege escalation in Kubernetes pods by monitoring security contexts, capabilities, and syscall patterns with Falco and OPA policies.
Teams using detecting-privilege-escalation-in-kubernetes-pods should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/detecting-privilege-escalation-in-kubernetes-pods/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How detecting-privilege-escalation-in-kubernetes-pods Compares
| Feature / Agent | detecting-privilege-escalation-in-kubernetes-pods | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Detect and prevent privilege escalation in Kubernetes pods by monitoring security contexts, capabilities, and syscall patterns with Falco and OPA policies.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Detecting Privilege Escalation in Kubernetes Pods
## Overview
Privilege escalation in Kubernetes occurs when a pod or container gains elevated permissions beyond its intended scope. This includes running as root, using privileged mode, mounting host filesystems, enabling dangerous Linux capabilities, or exploiting kernel vulnerabilities. Detection combines admission control (prevention), runtime monitoring (detection), and audit logging (investigation).
## When to Use
- When investigating security incidents that require detecting privilege escalation in kubernetes pods
- When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
- When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
- When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques
## Prerequisites
- Kubernetes cluster v1.25+ (Pod Security Admission support)
- kubectl with cluster-admin access
- Falco or similar runtime security tool
- OPA Gatekeeper or Kyverno for admission policies
## Privilege Escalation Vectors in Kubernetes
| Vector | Risk | Detection Method |
|--------|------|-----------------|
| privileged: true | Full host access | Admission control + audit |
| hostPID: true | Access host processes | Admission control |
| hostNetwork: true | Access host network stack | Admission control |
| hostPath volumes | Read/write host filesystem | Admission control |
| SYS_ADMIN capability | Near-privileged access | Admission + runtime |
| allowPrivilegeEscalation: true | setuid/setgid exploitation | Admission control |
| runAsUser: 0 | Container root | Admission control |
| automountServiceAccountToken | Token theft for API access | Admission control |
| Writable /proc or /sys | Kernel parameter manipulation | Runtime monitoring |
## Detection with Admission Control
### Pod Security Admission (Built-in)
```yaml
# Enforce restricted policy on namespace
apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
name: production
labels:
pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce: restricted
pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce-version: latest
pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit: restricted
pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn: restricted
```
### OPA Gatekeeper Policies
```yaml
# Block dangerous capabilities
apiVersion: templates.gatekeeper.sh/v1
kind: ConstraintTemplate
metadata:
name: k8sdangerouspriv
spec:
crd:
spec:
names:
kind: K8sDangerousPriv
targets:
- target: admission.k8s.gatekeeper.sh
rego: |
package k8sdangerouspriv
dangerous_caps := {"SYS_ADMIN", "SYS_PTRACE", "SYS_MODULE", "DAC_OVERRIDE", "NET_ADMIN", "NET_RAW"}
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
container := input.review.object.spec.containers[_]
cap := container.securityContext.capabilities.add[_]
dangerous_caps[cap]
msg := sprintf("Container %v adds dangerous capability: %v", [container.name, cap])
}
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
container := input.review.object.spec.containers[_]
container.securityContext.privileged == true
msg := sprintf("Container %v runs in privileged mode", [container.name])
}
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
container := input.review.object.spec.containers[_]
container.securityContext.allowPrivilegeEscalation == true
msg := sprintf("Container %v allows privilege escalation", [container.name])
}
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
input.review.object.spec.hostPID == true
msg := "Pod uses host PID namespace"
}
violation[{"msg": msg}] {
input.review.object.spec.hostNetwork == true
msg := "Pod uses host network"
}
```
## Runtime Detection with Falco
```yaml
# /etc/falco/rules.d/privesc-detection.yaml
- rule: Setuid Binary Execution in Container
desc: Detect execution of setuid/setgid binaries in a container
condition: >
spawned_process and container and
(proc.name in (su, sudo, newgrp, chsh, passwd) or
proc.is_exe_upper_layer=true)
output: >
Setuid/setgid binary executed in container
(user=%user.name container=%container.name image=%container.image.repository
command=%proc.cmdline parent=%proc.pname)
priority: WARNING
tags: [container, privilege-escalation, T1548]
- rule: Capability Gained in Container
desc: Detect when a process gains elevated capabilities
condition: >
evt.type = capset and container and
evt.arg.cap != ""
output: >
Process gained capabilities in container
(container=%container.name image=%container.image.repository
capabilities=%evt.arg.cap command=%proc.cmdline)
priority: WARNING
tags: [container, privilege-escalation, T1548.001]
- rule: Container with Dangerous Capabilities Started
desc: Detect container launched with dangerous capabilities
condition: >
container_started and container and
(container.image.repository != "registry.k8s.io/pause") and
(container.cap_effective contains SYS_ADMIN or
container.cap_effective contains SYS_PTRACE or
container.cap_effective contains SYS_MODULE)
output: >
Container with dangerous capabilities
(container=%container.name image=%container.image.repository
caps=%container.cap_effective)
priority: CRITICAL
tags: [container, privilege-escalation, T1068]
- rule: Write to /etc/passwd in Container
desc: Detect writes to /etc/passwd inside container
condition: >
open_write and container and fd.name = /etc/passwd
output: >
Write to /etc/passwd in container
(container=%container.name image=%container.image.repository
command=%proc.cmdline user=%user.name)
priority: CRITICAL
tags: [container, privilege-escalation, T1136]
```
## Kubernetes Audit Log Detection
```yaml
# audit-policy.yaml - Capture privilege escalation events
apiVersion: audit.k8s.io/v1
kind: Policy
rules:
# Log pod creation with security context details
- level: RequestResponse
resources:
- group: ""
resources: ["pods"]
verbs: ["create", "update", "patch"]
# Log privilege escalation attempts
- level: RequestResponse
resources:
- group: "rbac.authorization.k8s.io"
resources: ["clusterroles", "clusterrolebindings", "roles", "rolebindings"]
verbs: ["create", "update", "patch", "bind", "escalate"]
# Log service account token requests
- level: Metadata
resources:
- group: ""
resources: ["serviceaccounts/token"]
verbs: ["create"]
```
### Query Audit Logs for Privilege Escalation
```bash
# Find pods created with privileged security context
kubectl logs -n kube-system kube-apiserver-* | \
jq 'select(.verb == "create" and .objectRef.resource == "pods") |
select(.requestObject.spec.containers[].securityContext.privileged == true)'
# Find RBAC escalation attempts
kubectl logs -n kube-system kube-apiserver-* | \
jq 'select(.objectRef.resource == "clusterrolebindings" and .verb == "create")'
```
## Investigation Playbook
```bash
# Check pod security context
kubectl get pod <pod-name> -n <ns> -o jsonpath='{.spec.containers[*].securityContext}'
# Check effective capabilities
kubectl exec <pod-name> -n <ns> -- cat /proc/1/status | grep -i cap
# List pods running as root
kubectl get pods --all-namespaces -o json | \
jq '.items[] | select(.spec.containers[].securityContext.runAsUser == 0 or .spec.containers[].securityContext.privileged == true) | {name: .metadata.name, ns: .metadata.namespace}'
# Check for hostPath volumes
kubectl get pods --all-namespaces -o json | \
jq '.items[] | select(.spec.volumes[]?.hostPath != null) | {name: .metadata.name, ns: .metadata.namespace, paths: [.spec.volumes[].hostPath.path]}'
```
## Best Practices
1. **Enable Pod Security Admission** at `restricted` level for production namespaces
2. **Drop ALL capabilities** and add back only what is needed
3. **Set allowPrivilegeEscalation: false** on all containers
4. **Run as non-root** (runAsNonRoot: true, runAsUser > 0)
5. **Disable automountServiceAccountToken** unless API access is needed
6. **Monitor with Falco** for runtime privilege escalation attempts
7. **Audit RBAC changes** with Kubernetes audit logging
8. **Use seccomp profiles** to restrict syscallsRelated Skills
securing-kubernetes-on-cloud
This skill covers hardening managed Kubernetes clusters on EKS, AKS, and GKE by implementing Pod Security Standards, network policies, workload identity, RBAC scoping, image admission controls, and runtime security monitoring. It addresses cloud-specific security features including IRSA for EKS, Workload Identity for GKE, and Managed Identities for AKS.
scanning-kubernetes-manifests-with-kubesec
Perform security risk analysis on Kubernetes resource manifests using Kubesec to identify misconfigurations, privilege escalation risks, and deviations from security best practices.
privilege-declaration-generator
Generates tizen-manifest.xml and config.xml privilege declarations. Auto-detects required privileges from app source code.
performing-privileged-account-discovery
Discover and inventory all privileged accounts across enterprise infrastructure including domain admins, local admins, service accounts, database admins, cloud IAM roles, and application admin account
performing-privilege-escalation-on-linux
Linux privilege escalation involves elevating from a low-privilege user account to root access on a compromised system. Red teams exploit misconfigurations, vulnerable services, kernel exploits, and w
performing-privilege-escalation-assessment
Performs privilege escalation assessments on compromised Linux and Windows systems to identify paths from low-privilege access to root or SYSTEM-level control. The tester enumerates misconfigurations, vulnerable services, kernel exploits, SUID binaries, unquoted service paths, and credential stores to demonstrate the full impact of an initial compromise. Activates for requests involving privilege escalation testing, local exploitation, post-compromise escalation, or OS-level security assessment.
performing-kubernetes-penetration-testing
Kubernetes penetration testing systematically evaluates cluster security by simulating attacker techniques against the API server, kubelet, etcd, pods, RBAC, network policies, and secrets. Using tools
performing-kubernetes-etcd-security-assessment
Assess the security posture of Kubernetes etcd clusters by evaluating encryption at rest, TLS configuration, access controls, backup encryption, and network isolation.
performing-kubernetes-cis-benchmark-with-kube-bench
Audit Kubernetes cluster security posture against CIS benchmarks using kube-bench with automated checks for control plane, worker nodes, and RBAC.
performing-aws-privilege-escalation-assessment
Performing authorized privilege escalation assessments in AWS environments to identify IAM misconfigurations that allow users or roles to elevate their permissions using Pacu, CloudFox, Principal Mapper, and manual IAM policy analysis techniques.
manifest-privilege-validator
Validates tizen-manifest.xml privilege declarations. Checks privilege correctness, required privilege levels, and manifest conformance.
implementing-zero-standing-privilege-with-cyberark
Deploy CyberArk Secure Cloud Access to eliminate standing privileges in hybrid and multi-cloud environments using just-in-time access with time, entitlement, and approval controls.