implementing-api-abuse-detection-with-rate-limiting
Implement API abuse detection using token bucket, sliding window, and adaptive rate limiting algorithms to prevent DDoS, brute force, and credential stuffing attacks.
Best use case
implementing-api-abuse-detection-with-rate-limiting is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Implement API abuse detection using token bucket, sliding window, and adaptive rate limiting algorithms to prevent DDoS, brute force, and credential stuffing attacks.
Teams using implementing-api-abuse-detection-with-rate-limiting should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/implementing-api-abuse-detection-with-rate-limiting/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How implementing-api-abuse-detection-with-rate-limiting Compares
| Feature / Agent | implementing-api-abuse-detection-with-rate-limiting | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Implement API abuse detection using token bucket, sliding window, and adaptive rate limiting algorithms to prevent DDoS, brute force, and credential stuffing attacks.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Implementing API Abuse Detection with Rate Limiting
## Overview
API rate limiting is a critical security control that restricts the number of requests a client can make within a defined time period. It defends against denial-of-service (DDoS), brute force login attempts, credential stuffing, API scraping, and resource exhaustion attacks. Modern implementations use algorithms like token bucket, sliding window, and fixed window counters, often backed by distributed stores like Redis. Adaptive rate limiting dynamically tightens limits during detected attacks and relaxes during normal operation, achieving a 94% reduction in successful DDoS attempts compared to static IP-based approaches.
## When to Use
- When deploying or configuring implementing api abuse detection with rate limiting capabilities in your environment
- When establishing security controls aligned to compliance requirements
- When building or improving security architecture for this domain
- When conducting security assessments that require this implementation
## Prerequisites
- API gateway (Kong, AWS API Gateway, Apigee) or reverse proxy (NGINX, Envoy)
- Redis or Memcached for distributed rate limit counters
- Monitoring and alerting infrastructure (Prometheus, Grafana, or SIEM)
- Understanding of normal API traffic patterns and baselines
- Python 3.8+ or Node.js for custom implementation
## Rate Limiting Algorithms
### Token Bucket Algorithm
The token bucket assigns each client a bucket with a fixed capacity of tokens. Tokens refill at a constant rate. Each request consumes one token. When the bucket is empty, requests are rejected. This allows controlled bursts while maintaining average limits.
```python
"""Token Bucket Rate Limiter with Redis Backend
Implements a distributed token bucket algorithm for API rate limiting
with burst allowance and automatic refill.
"""
import time
import redis
import json
from typing import Tuple
class TokenBucketRateLimiter:
def __init__(self, redis_client: redis.Redis,
max_tokens: int = 100,
refill_rate: float = 10.0,
key_prefix: str = "ratelimit:tb"):
self.redis = redis_client
self.max_tokens = max_tokens
self.refill_rate = refill_rate # tokens per second
self.key_prefix = key_prefix
def _get_key(self, client_id: str) -> str:
return f"{self.key_prefix}:{client_id}"
def allow_request(self, client_id: str, tokens_required: int = 1) -> Tuple[bool, dict]:
"""Check if a request should be allowed under the rate limit.
Returns (allowed, info) where info contains remaining tokens
and retry-after seconds.
"""
key = self._get_key(client_id)
now = time.time()
# Atomic token bucket operation using Lua script
lua_script = """
local key = KEYS[1]
local max_tokens = tonumber(ARGV[1])
local refill_rate = tonumber(ARGV[2])
local now = tonumber(ARGV[3])
local requested = tonumber(ARGV[4])
local bucket = redis.call('HMGET', key, 'tokens', 'last_refill')
local tokens = tonumber(bucket[1])
local last_refill = tonumber(bucket[2])
-- Initialize bucket if it doesn't exist
if tokens == nil then
tokens = max_tokens
last_refill = now
end
-- Calculate refilled tokens
local elapsed = now - last_refill
local refilled = elapsed * refill_rate
tokens = math.min(max_tokens, tokens + refilled)
-- Check if enough tokens available
local allowed = 0
if tokens >= requested then
tokens = tokens - requested
allowed = 1
end
-- Update bucket state
redis.call('HMSET', key, 'tokens', tokens, 'last_refill', now)
redis.call('EXPIRE', key, 3600) -- TTL for cleanup
-- Calculate retry-after if denied
local retry_after = 0
if allowed == 0 then
retry_after = math.ceil((requested - tokens) / refill_rate)
end
return {allowed, math.floor(tokens), retry_after}
"""
result = self.redis.eval(
lua_script, 1, key,
self.max_tokens, self.refill_rate, now, tokens_required
)
allowed = bool(result[0])
remaining = int(result[1])
retry_after = int(result[2])
return allowed, {
"remaining": remaining,
"limit": self.max_tokens,
"retry_after": retry_after,
"reset": int(now + (self.max_tokens - remaining) / self.refill_rate)
}
```
### Sliding Window Rate Limiter
```python
"""Sliding Window Rate Limiter
Tracks requests over a continuously moving time window,
providing smoother rate limiting than fixed windows with
only a 2.3% false positive rate.
"""
class SlidingWindowRateLimiter:
def __init__(self, redis_client: redis.Redis,
window_seconds: int = 60,
max_requests: int = 100,
key_prefix: str = "ratelimit:sw"):
self.redis = redis_client
self.window = window_seconds
self.max_requests = max_requests
self.key_prefix = key_prefix
def allow_request(self, client_id: str) -> Tuple[bool, dict]:
key = f"{self.key_prefix}:{client_id}"
now = time.time()
window_start = now - self.window
# Atomic sliding window using sorted set
pipe = self.redis.pipeline()
# Remove expired entries
pipe.zremrangebyscore(key, 0, window_start)
# Add current request
pipe.zadd(key, {f"{now}:{id(now)}": now})
# Count requests in window
pipe.zcard(key)
# Set TTL
pipe.expire(key, self.window + 1)
results = pipe.execute()
current_count = results[2]
allowed = current_count <= self.max_requests
if not allowed:
# Remove the request we just added since it's denied
self.redis.zremrangebyscore(key, now, now)
return allowed, {
"remaining": max(0, self.max_requests - current_count),
"limit": self.max_requests,
"window": self.window,
"current_count": current_count
}
```
### Adaptive Rate Limiter
```python
"""Adaptive Rate Limiter
Dynamically adjusts rate limits based on detected attack patterns.
Tightens limits during attacks and relaxes during normal operation.
"""
from enum import Enum
from dataclasses import dataclass
class ThreatLevel(Enum):
NORMAL = "normal"
ELEVATED = "elevated"
HIGH = "high"
CRITICAL = "critical"
@dataclass
class AdaptiveLimits:
requests_per_minute: int
burst_size: int
block_duration_seconds: int
THREAT_LIMITS = {
ThreatLevel.NORMAL: AdaptiveLimits(100, 20, 0),
ThreatLevel.ELEVATED: AdaptiveLimits(50, 10, 60),
ThreatLevel.HIGH: AdaptiveLimits(20, 5, 300),
ThreatLevel.CRITICAL: AdaptiveLimits(5, 2, 3600),
}
class AdaptiveRateLimiter:
def __init__(self, redis_client: redis.Redis):
self.redis = redis_client
self.token_bucket = TokenBucketRateLimiter(redis_client)
self.sliding_window = SlidingWindowRateLimiter(redis_client)
def assess_threat_level(self, client_id: str) -> ThreatLevel:
"""Assess the current threat level for a client based on behavior."""
metrics_key = f"metrics:{client_id}"
metrics = self.redis.hgetall(metrics_key)
if not metrics:
return ThreatLevel.NORMAL
error_rate = float(metrics.get(b'error_rate', 0))
auth_failures = int(metrics.get(b'auth_failures_5m', 0))
unique_endpoints = int(metrics.get(b'unique_endpoints_5m', 0))
request_rate = float(metrics.get(b'requests_per_second', 0))
# Scoring-based threat assessment
score = 0
if auth_failures > 10:
score += 3
elif auth_failures > 5:
score += 2
elif auth_failures > 2:
score += 1
if error_rate > 0.8:
score += 3
elif error_rate > 0.5:
score += 2
if request_rate > 50:
score += 2
elif request_rate > 20:
score += 1
if unique_endpoints > 50:
score += 2 # Possible enumeration
if score >= 7:
return ThreatLevel.CRITICAL
elif score >= 5:
return ThreatLevel.HIGH
elif score >= 3:
return ThreatLevel.ELEVATED
return ThreatLevel.NORMAL
def allow_request(self, client_id: str, endpoint: str) -> Tuple[bool, dict]:
"""Rate limit with adaptive thresholds based on threat level."""
threat_level = self.assess_threat_level(client_id)
limits = THREAT_LIMITS[threat_level]
# Check if client is currently blocked
block_key = f"blocked:{client_id}"
if self.redis.exists(block_key):
ttl = self.redis.ttl(block_key)
return False, {
"blocked": True,
"threat_level": threat_level.value,
"retry_after": ttl,
"reason": "Temporarily blocked due to suspicious activity"
}
# Apply rate limit with threat-adjusted parameters
self.token_bucket.max_tokens = limits.burst_size
self.token_bucket.refill_rate = limits.requests_per_minute / 60.0
allowed, info = self.token_bucket.allow_request(client_id)
if not allowed and limits.block_duration_seconds > 0:
# Block the client for the threat-level duration
self.redis.setex(block_key, limits.block_duration_seconds, threat_level.value)
info["threat_level"] = threat_level.value
return allowed, info
def record_request_outcome(self, client_id: str, status_code: int, endpoint: str):
"""Track request outcomes for threat assessment."""
metrics_key = f"metrics:{client_id}"
pipe = self.redis.pipeline()
pipe.hincrby(metrics_key, 'total_requests', 1)
if status_code in (401, 403):
pipe.hincrby(metrics_key, 'auth_failures_5m', 1)
if status_code >= 400:
pipe.hincrby(metrics_key, 'errors_5m', 1)
# Track unique endpoints for enumeration detection
pipe.sadd(f"endpoints:{client_id}", endpoint)
pipe.expire(metrics_key, 300) # 5-minute window
pipe.expire(f"endpoints:{client_id}", 300)
pipe.execute()
```
### NGINX Rate Limiting Configuration
```nginx
# Define rate limit zones
limit_req_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=api_general:10m rate=10r/s;
limit_req_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=api_auth:10m rate=3r/s;
limit_req_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=api_sensitive:10m rate=1r/s;
# Apply rate limits to API routes
server {
listen 443 ssl;
# General API endpoints - 10 req/s with burst of 20
location /api/v1/ {
limit_req zone=api_general burst=20 nodelay;
limit_req_status 429;
proxy_pass http://api_backend;
}
# Authentication endpoints - strict 3 req/s
location /api/v1/auth/ {
limit_req zone=api_auth burst=5;
limit_req_status 429;
proxy_pass http://api_backend;
}
# Sensitive data endpoints - 1 req/s
location /api/v1/admin/ {
limit_req zone=api_sensitive burst=3;
limit_req_status 429;
proxy_pass http://api_backend;
}
# Custom 429 response with Retry-After header
error_page 429 = @rate_limited;
location @rate_limited {
add_header Retry-After 30;
add_header X-RateLimit-Limit $limit_req_status;
return 429 '{"error": "rate_limit_exceeded", "retry_after": 30}';
}
}
```
## Response Headers
Always include standard rate limit headers:
```
HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
X-RateLimit-Limit: 100
X-RateLimit-Remaining: 0
X-RateLimit-Reset: 1672531200
Retry-After: 30
Content-Type: application/json
{"error": "rate_limit_exceeded", "retry_after": 30}
```
## References
- APIsec Rate Limiting Strategies: https://www.apisec.ai/blog/api-rate-limiting-strategies-preventing
- HackerOne Rate Limiting Best Practices: https://www.hackerone.com/blog/rate-limiting-strategies-protecting-your-api-ddos-and-brute-force-attacks
- API7.ai Rate Limiting Algorithms Guide: https://api7.ai/blog/rate-limiting-guide-algorithms-best-practices
- Redis Rate Limiting: https://redis.io/glossary/rate-limiting/
- Rakuten SixthSense API Rate Limiting: https://sixthsense.rakuten.com/blog/API-Rate-Limiting-A-Critical-Layer-for-API-ProtectionRelated Skills
substrate-vulnerability-scanner
Scans Substrate/Polkadot pallets for 7 critical vulnerabilities including arithmetic overflow, panic DoS, incorrect weights, and bad origin checks. Use when auditing Substrate runtimes or FRAME pallets. (project, gitignored)
plurigrid-asi-integrated
Unified Plurigrid ASI skill combining ACSets, Gay-MCP colors, bisimulation games, world-hopping, glass-bead synthesis, and triad interleaving for autonomous skill dispersal.
performing-yara-rule-development-for-detection
Develop precise YARA rules for malware detection by identifying unique byte patterns, strings, and behavioral indicators in executable files while minimizing false positives.
performing-steganography-detection
Detect and extract hidden data embedded in images, audio, and other media files using steganalysis tools to uncover covert communication channels.
performing-lateral-movement-detection
Detects lateral movement techniques including Pass-the-Hash, PsExec, WMI execution, RDP pivoting, and SMB-based spreading using SIEM correlation of Windows event logs, network flow data, and endpoint telemetry mapped to MITRE ATT&CK Lateral Movement (TA0008) techniques.
performing-dns-tunneling-detection
Detects DNS tunneling by computing Shannon entropy of DNS query names, analyzing query length distributions, inspecting TXT record payloads, and identifying high subdomain cardinality. Uses scapy for packet capture analysis and statistical methods to distinguish legitimate DNS from covert channels. Use when hunting for data exfiltration.
performing-container-escape-detection
Detects container escape attempts by analyzing namespace configurations, privileged container checks, dangerous capability assignments, and host path mounts using the kubernetes Python client. Identifies CVE-2022-0492 style escapes via cgroup abuse. Use when auditing container security posture or investigating escape attempts.
performing-api-rate-limiting-bypass
Tests API rate limiting implementations for bypass vulnerabilities by manipulating request headers, IP addresses, HTTP methods, API versions, and encoding schemes to circumvent request throttling controls. The tester identifies rate limit headers, determines enforcement mechanisms, and attempts bypasses including X-Forwarded-For spoofing, parameter pollution, case variation, and endpoint path manipulation. Maps to OWASP API4:2023 Unrestricted Resource Consumption. Activates for requests involving rate limit bypass, API throttling evasion, brute force protection testing, or API abuse prevention assessment.
performing-adversary-in-the-middle-phishing-detection
Detect and respond to Adversary-in-the-Middle (AiTM) phishing attacks that use reverse proxy kits like EvilProxy, Evilginx, and Tycoon 2FA to bypass MFA and steal session tokens.
implementing-zero-trust-with-hashicorp-boundary
Implement HashiCorp Boundary for identity-aware zero trust infrastructure access management with dynamic credential brokering, session recording, and Vault integration.
implementing-zero-trust-with-beyondcorp
Deploy Google BeyondCorp Enterprise zero trust access controls using Identity-Aware Proxy (IAP), context-aware access policies, device trust validation, and Access Context Manager to enforce identity and posture-based access to GCP resources and internal applications.
implementing-zero-trust-network-access
Implementing Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) in cloud environments by configuring identity-aware proxies, micro-segmentation, continuous verification with conditional access policies, and replacing traditional VPN-based access with BeyondCorp-style architectures across AWS, Azure, and GCP.