chaos-engineering-resilience
Chaos engineering principles, controlled failure injection, resilience testing, and system recovery validation. Use when testing distributed systems, building confidence in fault tolerance, or validating disaster recovery.
Best use case
chaos-engineering-resilience is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Chaos engineering principles, controlled failure injection, resilience testing, and system recovery validation. Use when testing distributed systems, building confidence in fault tolerance, or validating disaster recovery.
Teams using chaos-engineering-resilience should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/chaos-engineering-resilience/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How chaos-engineering-resilience Compares
| Feature / Agent | chaos-engineering-resilience | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Chaos engineering principles, controlled failure injection, resilience testing, and system recovery validation. Use when testing distributed systems, building confidence in fault tolerance, or validating disaster recovery.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Chaos Engineering & Resilience Testing
<default_to_action>
When testing system resilience or injecting failures:
1. DEFINE steady state (normal metrics: error rate, latency, throughput)
2. HYPOTHESIZE system continues in steady state during failure
3. INJECT real-world failures (network, instance, disk, CPU)
4. OBSERVE and measure deviation from steady state
5. FIX weaknesses discovered, document runbooks, repeat
**Quick Chaos Steps:**
- Start small: Dev → Staging → 1% prod → gradual rollout
- Define clear rollback triggers (error_rate > 5%)
- Measure blast radius, never exceed planned scope
- Document findings → runbooks → improved resilience
**Critical Success Factors:**
- Controlled experiments with automatic rollback
- Steady state must be measurable
- Start in non-production, graduate to production
</default_to_action>
## Quick Reference Card
### When to Use
- Distributed systems validation
- Disaster recovery testing
- Building confidence in fault tolerance
- Pre-production resilience verification
### Failure Types to Inject
| Category | Failures | Tools |
|----------|----------|-------|
| **Network** | Latency, packet loss, partition | tc, toxiproxy |
| **Infrastructure** | Instance kill, disk failure, CPU | Chaos Monkey |
| **Application** | Exceptions, slow responses, leaks | Gremlin, LitmusChaos |
| **Dependencies** | Service outage, timeout | WireMock |
### Blast Radius Progression
```
Dev (safe) → Staging → 1% prod → 10% → 50% → 100%
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
Learn Validate Careful Full confidence
```
### Steady State Metrics
| Metric | Normal | Alert Threshold |
|--------|--------|-----------------|
| Error rate | < 0.1% | > 1% |
| p99 latency | < 200ms | > 500ms |
| Throughput | baseline | -20% |
---
## Chaos Experiment Structure
```typescript
// Chaos experiment definition
const experiment = {
name: 'Database latency injection',
hypothesis: 'System handles 500ms DB latency gracefully',
steadyState: {
errorRate: '< 0.1%',
p99Latency: '< 300ms'
},
method: {
type: 'network-latency',
target: 'database',
delay: '500ms',
duration: '5m'
},
rollback: {
automatic: true,
trigger: 'errorRate > 5%'
}
};
```
---
## Agent-Driven Chaos
```typescript
// qe-chaos-engineer runs controlled experiments
await Task("Chaos Experiment", {
target: 'payment-service',
failure: 'terminate-random-instance',
blastRadius: '10%',
duration: '5m',
steadyStateHypothesis: {
metric: 'success-rate',
threshold: 0.99
},
autoRollback: true
}, "qe-chaos-engineer");
// Validates:
// - System recovers automatically
// - Error rate stays within threshold
// - No data loss
// - Alerts triggered appropriately
```
---
## Agent Coordination Hints
### Memory Namespace
```
aqe/chaos-engineering/
├── experiments/* - Experiment definitions & results
├── steady-states/* - Baseline measurements
├── runbooks/* - Generated recovery procedures
└── blast-radius/* - Impact analysis
```
### Fleet Coordination
```typescript
const chaosFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
strategy: 'chaos-engineering',
agents: [
'qe-chaos-engineer', // Experiment execution
'qe-performance-tester', // Baseline metrics
'qe-production-intelligence' // Production monitoring
],
topology: 'sequential'
});
```
---
## Related Skills
- [shift-right-testing](../shift-right-testing/) - Production testing
- [performance-testing](../performance-testing/) - Load testing
- [test-environment-management](../test-environment-management/) - Environment stability
---
## Remember
**Break things on purpose to prevent unplanned outages.** Find weaknesses before users do. Define steady state, inject failures, measure impact, fix weaknesses, create runbooks. Start small, increase blast radius gradually.
**With Agents:** `qe-chaos-engineer` automates chaos experiments with blast radius control, automatic rollback, and comprehensive resilience validation. Generates runbooks from experiment results.Related Skills
qe-agentic-quality-engineering
AI agents as force multipliers for quality work. Core skill for all 19 QE agents using PACT principles.
qe-chaos-resilience
Injects controlled faults (network partition, latency, process kill, disk pressure) into distributed systems and validates recovery behavior. Use when testing circuit breakers, failover paths, retry logic, or building confidence in system resilience through chaos engineering.
agentic-quality-engineering
Use when orchestrating QE agents, understanding PACT principles, configuring the AQE v3 fleet, or leveraging AI agents as force multipliers for quality work.
qe-chaos-engineering-resilience
Chaos engineering principles, controlled failure injection, resilience testing, and system recovery validation. Use when testing distributed systems, building confidence in fault tolerance, or validating disaster recovery.
qe-visual-testing-advanced
Advanced visual regression testing with pixel-perfect comparison, AI-powered diff analysis, responsive design validation, and cross-browser visual consistency. Use when detecting UI regressions, validating designs, or ensuring visual consistency.
qe-verification-quality
Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.
qe-testability-scoring
AI-powered testability assessment using 10 principles of intrinsic testability with Playwright and optional Vibium integration. Evaluates web applications against Observability, Controllability, Algorithmic Simplicity, Transparency, Stability, Explainability, Unbugginess, Smallness, Decomposability, and Similarity. Use when assessing software testability, evaluating test readiness, identifying testability improvements, or generating testability reports.
qe-test-reporting-analytics
Advanced test reporting, quality dashboards, predictive analytics, trend analysis, and executive reporting for QE metrics. Use when communicating quality status, tracking trends, or making data-driven decisions.
qe-test-idea-rewriting
Transform passive 'Verify X' test descriptions into active, observable test actions. Use when test ideas lack specificity, use vague language, or fail quality validation. Converts to action-verb format for clearer, more testable descriptions.
qe-test-environment-management
Test environment provisioning, infrastructure as code for testing, Docker/Kubernetes for test environments, service virtualization, and cost optimization. Use when managing test infrastructure, ensuring environment parity, or optimizing testing costs.
qe-test-design-techniques
Systematic test design with boundary value analysis, equivalence partitioning, decision tables, state transition testing, and combinatorial testing. Use when designing comprehensive test cases, reducing redundant tests, or ensuring systematic coverage.
qe-test-data-management
Strategic test data generation, management, and privacy compliance. Use when creating test data, handling PII, ensuring GDPR/CCPA compliance, or scaling data generation for realistic testing scenarios.