qe-cicd-pipeline-qe-orchestrator

Orchestrate quality engineering across CI/CD pipeline phases. Use when designing test strategies, planning quality gates, or implementing shift-left/shift-right testing.

Best use case

qe-cicd-pipeline-qe-orchestrator is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Orchestrate quality engineering across CI/CD pipeline phases. Use when designing test strategies, planning quality gates, or implementing shift-left/shift-right testing.

Teams using qe-cicd-pipeline-qe-orchestrator should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/qe-cicd-pipeline-qe-orchestrator/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe/main/.kiro/skills/qe-cicd-pipeline-qe-orchestrator/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/qe-cicd-pipeline-qe-orchestrator/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How qe-cicd-pipeline-qe-orchestrator Compares

Feature / Agentqe-cicd-pipeline-qe-orchestratorStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Orchestrate quality engineering across CI/CD pipeline phases. Use when designing test strategies, planning quality gates, or implementing shift-left/shift-right testing.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

Related Guides

SKILL.md Source

# CI/CD Pipeline QE Orchestrator

<default_to_action>
When orchestrating quality across CI/CD pipeline:
1. ANALYZE pipeline phases: commit, build, test, staging, production
2. SELECT optimal skills and agents for each phase
3. CONFIGURE quality gates with measurable thresholds
4. EXECUTE with parallel agent coordination
5. ADAPT strategy based on risk, complexity, and environment

**Quick Phase Selection:**
- Commit (Shift-Left) → TDD, code review, unit tests
- Build → Coverage analysis, mutation testing, flaky detection
- Integration → API contracts, performance, security
- Staging → Chaos testing, visual regression, accessibility
- Production (Shift-Right) → Synthetic monitoring, RUM, compliance

**Critical Success Factors:**
- Quality gates block bad deployments
- Agents coordinate through memory namespaces
- Adapt strategy based on risk level
</default_to_action>

## Quick Reference Card

### When to Use
- Designing pipeline test strategies
- Implementing quality gates
- Coordinating multiple QE agents
- Shift-left and shift-right testing

### Phase-Agent Matrix
| Phase | Primary Agents | Key Skills |
|-------|---------------|------------|
| Commit | qe-test-generator, qe-requirements-validator | tdd-london-chicago, shift-left |
| Build | qe-test-executor, qe-coverage-analyzer, qe-flaky-test-hunter | test-automation, mutation-testing |
| Test | qe-api-contract-validator, qe-performance-tester, qe-security-scanner | api-testing, performance, security |
| Staging | qe-chaos-engineer, qe-visual-tester, qe-deployment-readiness | chaos-engineering, accessibility |
| Prod | qe-production-intelligence, qe-quality-analyzer | shift-right, compliance |

### Quality Gate Thresholds
| Phase | Metric | Threshold | Blocking |
|-------|--------|-----------|----------|
| Commit | Unit coverage | > 80% | Yes |
| Build | All tests pass | 100% | Yes |
| Build | Mutation score | > 70% | No |
| Test | API contracts | No breaking changes | Yes |
| Test | p95 response | < 200ms | Yes |
| Test | Security critical | 0 | Yes |
| Staging | Deployment readiness | > 85% | Yes |

### Fleet Configuration
- **Topology**: hierarchical
- **Max Agents**: 10 per phase
- **Coordination**: aqe/* memory namespace

---

## Pipeline Phases

### Phase 1: Commit (Shift-Left)

**Goal:** Catch defects early, ensure testability

**Agents:**
- `qe-test-generator` - Generate unit tests
- `qe-requirements-validator` - BDD scenarios, INVEST criteria

**Skills:** `shift-left-testing`, `tdd-london-chicago`, `code-review-quality`

```javascript
// Parallel execution
Task("Generate Tests", "Create unit tests for new methods", "qe-test-generator")
Task("Validate Requirements", "Check BDD scenarios", "qe-requirements-validator")
```

**Gates:** Unit coverage > 80%, Static analysis clean, Code review approved

---

### Phase 2: Build

**Goal:** Validate integration, ensure coverage

**Agents:**
- `qe-test-executor` - Run test suites
- `qe-coverage-analyzer` - Coverage gaps (O(log n))
- `qe-flaky-test-hunter` - Detect/stabilize flaky tests
- `qe-regression-risk-analyzer` - Minimal regression suite

**Skills:** `test-automation-strategy`, `mutation-testing`, `regression-testing`

```javascript
Task("Execute Tests", "Run full suite, store in aqe/test-results/*", "qe-test-executor")
Task("Coverage Analysis", "Identify gaps", "qe-coverage-analyzer")
Task("Flaky Detection", "Analyze test history", "qe-flaky-test-hunter")
```

**Gates:** All tests pass, Coverage > 90% critical paths, No new flaky tests

---

### Phase 3: Integration/Test

**Goal:** Validate contracts, performance, security

**Agents:**
- `qe-api-contract-validator` - Breaking changes detection
- `qe-performance-tester` - Load test critical paths
- `qe-security-scanner` - SAST/DAST scans
- `qe-test-data-architect` - Realistic test data (10k+/sec)

**Skills:** `api-testing-patterns`, `performance-testing`, `security-testing`

```javascript
// Parallel testing
Task("API Contracts", "Validate for breaking changes", "qe-api-contract-validator")
Task("Performance", "Load test 1000 users", "qe-performance-tester")
Task("Security", "SAST/DAST scan", "qe-security-scanner")
```

**Gates:** No breaking API changes, p95 < 200ms, No critical vulnerabilities

---

### Phase 4: Staging

**Goal:** Validate production-like environment, resilience

**Agents:**
- `qe-chaos-engineer` - Fault injection
- `qe-visual-tester` - Visual regression
- `qe-deployment-readiness` - Risk assessment

**Skills:** `chaos-engineering-resilience`, `accessibility-testing`, `visual-testing`

```javascript
Task("Chaos Testing", "Controlled failure injection", "qe-chaos-engineer")
Task("Visual Testing", "Visual regression", "qe-visual-tester")
Task("Deployment Check", "Risk assessment", "qe-deployment-readiness")
```

**Gates:** Chaos tests pass, No visual regressions, Readiness > 85%

---

### Phase 5: Production (Shift-Right)

**Goal:** Monitor real usage, validate compliance

**Agents:**
- `qe-production-intelligence` - Incident → test scenarios
- `qe-quality-analyzer` - Quality metrics and trends

**Skills:** `shift-right-testing`, `compliance-testing`

```javascript
Task("Production Intelligence", "Convert incidents to tests", "qe-production-intelligence")
Task("Quality Analysis", "Production metrics", "qe-quality-analyzer")
```

**Gates:** Synthetic monitors pass, Error rate < 0.1%, Compliance validated

---

## Complete Pipeline Example

```javascript
// Phase 1: Commit
Task("TDD Generation", "Generate tests for new features", "qe-test-generator")
Task("Requirements", "Validate BDD scenarios", "qe-requirements-validator")

// Phase 2: Build
Task("Execute Tests", "Full suite with coverage", "qe-test-executor")
Task("Coverage", "Analyze gaps", "qe-coverage-analyzer")
Task("Flaky Hunt", "Stabilize flaky tests", "qe-flaky-test-hunter")

// Phase 3: Integration
Task("API Contracts", "Check breaking changes", "qe-api-contract-validator")
Task("Performance", "1000 user load test", "qe-performance-tester")
Task("Security", "SAST/DAST scans", "qe-security-scanner")

// Phase 4: Staging
Task("Chaos", "Fault injection testing", "qe-chaos-engineer")
Task("Visual", "Visual regression", "qe-visual-tester")
Task("Readiness", "Deployment assessment", "qe-deployment-readiness")

// Phase 5: Production
Task("Intelligence", "Convert incidents", "qe-production-intelligence")
Task("Quality Gate", "Final validation", "qe-quality-gate")
```

---

## Adaptive Strategy

### By Risk Level
| Risk | Strategy | Agents |
|------|----------|--------|
| Critical | All phases, manual gates | Full fleet |
| High | Automated gates, comprehensive | 10+ agents |
| Medium | Smart selection, risk-based | 5-8 agents |
| Low | Minimal regression, fast | 2-3 agents |

### By Application Type
| Type | Focus Skills | Primary Agents |
|------|-------------|----------------|
| API | api-testing, contract, performance | api-contract-validator, performance-tester |
| Web UI | visual-testing, accessibility | visual-tester, accessibility |
| Mobile | mobile-testing, compatibility | performance-tester, visual-tester |
| Backend | database-testing, security | security-scanner, performance-tester |

---

## Agent Coordination Hints

### Memory Namespace
```
aqe/pipeline/
├── phase-results/*         - Results from each phase
├── quality-gates/*         - Gate validation results
├── orchestration-plan/*    - Selected skills and agents
├── test-plan/generated     - Test plans
├── coverage/gaps           - Coverage analysis
├── security/findings       - Security results
└── performance/results     - Performance data
```

### Fleet Orchestration
```typescript
Task("Fleet Orchestration",
     "Coordinate 10 agents across phases: commit (2), build (3), test (3), staging (2)",
     "qe-fleet-commander")
```

### Blackboard Events
| Event | Trigger | Subscribers |
|-------|---------|-------------|
| `phase:commit:complete` | Commit phase done | build agents |
| `coverage:gap:detected` | Gap found | test-generator |
| `security:finding:critical` | Vulnerability | quality-gate |
| `quality:gate:evaluated` | Gate decision | fleet-commander |

---

## Quality Gate Configuration

```json
{
  "commit": {
    "gates": [
      { "metric": "unit_coverage", "threshold": 80, "blocking": true },
      { "metric": "static_analysis_critical", "max": 0, "blocking": true }
    ]
  },
  "build": {
    "gates": [
      { "metric": "all_tests_passed", "threshold": 100, "blocking": true },
      { "metric": "mutation_score", "threshold": 70, "blocking": false }
    ]
  },
  "integration": {
    "gates": [
      { "metric": "api_breaking_changes", "max": 0, "blocking": true },
      { "metric": "performance_p95_ms", "threshold": 200, "blocking": true },
      { "metric": "security_critical", "max": 0, "blocking": true }
    ]
  }
}
```

---

## Troubleshooting

| Issue | Cause | Solution |
|-------|-------|----------|
| OOM during tests | Running all tests in parallel | Use batched execution |
| Pipeline too slow | Comprehensive testing every commit | Smart test selection |
| Gates always failing | Thresholds too strict | Analyze trends, adjust |

---

## Related Skills
- [agentic-quality-engineering](../agentic-quality-engineering/) - Fleet coordination
- [shift-left-testing](../shift-left-testing/) - Early defect detection
- [shift-right-testing](../shift-right-testing/) - Production monitoring
- [chaos-engineering-resilience](../chaos-engineering-resilience/) - Resilience testing

---

## Remember

The CI/CD Pipeline QE Orchestrator provides:
- **Phase-based strategy** with optimal skill/agent selection
- **Quality gates** that block bad deployments
- **Adaptive strategy** based on risk and context
- **Full fleet coordination** through memory namespaces

**With Agents:** Use `qe-fleet-commander` for multi-agent orchestration. Coordinate through `aqe/*` memory namespace. Batch operations for efficiency.

Related Skills

validation-pipeline

298
from proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe

Runs multi-stage validation gates with per-step scoring, pass/fail verdicts, and aggregate quality reports. Use when validating requirements, code, or artifacts through structured gate enforcement before merge or release.

qcsd-cicd-swarm

298
from proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe

Use when enforcing CI/CD quality gates before release, running regression analysis, detecting flaky tests, or assessing deployment readiness in the QCSD Verification phase.

cicd-pipeline-qe-orchestrator

298
from proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe

Orchestrate quality engineering across CI/CD pipeline phases. Use when designing test strategies, planning quality gates, or implementing shift-left/shift-right testing.

qe-visual-testing-advanced

298
from proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe

Advanced visual regression testing with pixel-perfect comparison, AI-powered diff analysis, responsive design validation, and cross-browser visual consistency. Use when detecting UI regressions, validating designs, or ensuring visual consistency.

qe-verification-quality

298
from proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe

Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.

qe-testability-scoring

298
from proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe

AI-powered testability assessment using 10 principles of intrinsic testability with Playwright and optional Vibium integration. Evaluates web applications against Observability, Controllability, Algorithmic Simplicity, Transparency, Stability, Explainability, Unbugginess, Smallness, Decomposability, and Similarity. Use when assessing software testability, evaluating test readiness, identifying testability improvements, or generating testability reports.

qe-test-reporting-analytics

298
from proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe

Advanced test reporting, quality dashboards, predictive analytics, trend analysis, and executive reporting for QE metrics. Use when communicating quality status, tracking trends, or making data-driven decisions.

qe-test-idea-rewriting

298
from proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe

Transform passive 'Verify X' test descriptions into active, observable test actions. Use when test ideas lack specificity, use vague language, or fail quality validation. Converts to action-verb format for clearer, more testable descriptions.

qe-test-environment-management

298
from proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe

Test environment provisioning, infrastructure as code for testing, Docker/Kubernetes for test environments, service virtualization, and cost optimization. Use when managing test infrastructure, ensuring environment parity, or optimizing testing costs.

qe-test-design-techniques

298
from proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe

Systematic test design with boundary value analysis, equivalence partitioning, decision tables, state transition testing, and combinatorial testing. Use when designing comprehensive test cases, reducing redundant tests, or ensuring systematic coverage.

qe-test-data-management

298
from proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe

Strategic test data generation, management, and privacy compliance. Use when creating test data, handling PII, ensuring GDPR/CCPA compliance, or scaling data generation for realistic testing scenarios.

qe-test-automation-strategy

298
from proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe

Design and implement effective test automation with proper pyramid, patterns, and CI/CD integration. Use when building automation frameworks or improving test efficiency.