using-superpowers

Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions

643 stars

Best use case

using-superpowers is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions

Teams using using-superpowers should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/using-superpowers/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sangrokjung/claude-forge/main/skills/using-superpowers/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/using-superpowers/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How using-superpowers Compares

Feature / Agentusing-superpowersStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

<SUBAGENT-STOP>
If you were dispatched as a subagent to execute a specific task, skip this skill.
</SUBAGENT-STOP>

<EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>
If you think there is even a 1% chance a skill might apply to what you are doing, you ABSOLUTELY MUST invoke the skill.

IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MUST USE IT.

This is not negotiable. This is not optional. You cannot rationalize your way out of this.
</EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>

## Instruction Priority

Superpowers skills override default system prompt behavior, but **user instructions always take precedence**:

1. **User's explicit instructions** (CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, AGENTS.md, direct requests) — highest priority
2. **Superpowers skills** — override default system behavior where they conflict
3. **Default system prompt** — lowest priority

If CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, or AGENTS.md says "don't use TDD" and a skill says "always use TDD," follow the user's instructions. The user is in control.

## How to Access Skills

**In Claude Code:** Use the `Skill` tool. When you invoke a skill, its content is loaded and presented to you—follow it directly. Never use the Read tool on skill files.

**In Gemini CLI:** Skills activate via the `activate_skill` tool. Gemini loads skill metadata at session start and activates the full content on demand.

**In other environments:** Check your platform's documentation for how skills are loaded.

## Platform Adaptation

Skills use Claude Code tool names. Non-CC platforms: see `references/codex-tools.md` (Codex) for tool equivalents. Gemini CLI users get the tool mapping loaded automatically via GEMINI.md.

# Using Skills

## The Rule

**Invoke relevant or requested skills BEFORE any response or action.** Even a 1% chance a skill might apply means that you should invoke the skill to check. If an invoked skill turns out to be wrong for the situation, you don't need to use it.

```dot
digraph skill_flow {
    "User message received" [shape=doublecircle];
    "About to EnterPlanMode?" [shape=doublecircle];
    "Already brainstormed?" [shape=diamond];
    "Invoke brainstorming skill" [shape=box];
    "Might any skill apply?" [shape=diamond];
    "Domain-specific task?" [shape=diamond];
    "Invoke agent-router" [shape=box];
    "Invoke Skill tool" [shape=box];
    "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" [shape=box];
    "Has checklist?" [shape=diamond];
    "Create TodoWrite todo per item" [shape=box];
    "Follow skill exactly" [shape=box];
    "Respond (including clarifications)" [shape=doublecircle];

    "About to EnterPlanMode?" -> "Already brainstormed?";
    "Already brainstormed?" -> "Invoke brainstorming skill" [label="no"];
    "Already brainstormed?" -> "Might any skill apply?" [label="yes"];
    "Invoke brainstorming skill" -> "Might any skill apply?";

    "User message received" -> "Might any skill apply?";
    "Might any skill apply?" -> "Domain-specific task?" [label="yes"];
    "Might any skill apply?" -> "Respond (including clarifications)" [label="definitely not"];
    "Domain-specific task?" -> "Invoke agent-router" [label="yes (법률,재무,특허,마케팅...)"];
    "Domain-specific task?" -> "Invoke Skill tool" [label="no, use other skill"];
    "Invoke agent-router" -> "Respond (including clarifications)";
    "Invoke Skill tool" -> "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'";
    "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" -> "Has checklist?";
    "Has checklist?" -> "Create TodoWrite todo per item" [label="yes"];
    "Has checklist?" -> "Follow skill exactly" [label="no"];
    "Create TodoWrite todo per item" -> "Follow skill exactly";
}
```

## Red Flags

These thoughts mean STOP—you're rationalizing:

| Thought | Reality |
|---------|---------|
| "This is just a simple question" | Questions are tasks. Check for skills. |
| "I need more context first" | Skill check comes BEFORE clarifying questions. |
| "Let me explore the codebase first" | Skills tell you HOW to explore. Check first. |
| "I can check git/files quickly" | Files lack conversation context. Check for skills. |
| "Let me gather information first" | Skills tell you HOW to gather information. |
| "This doesn't need a formal skill" | If a skill exists, use it. |
| "I remember this skill" | Skills evolve. Read current version. |
| "This doesn't count as a task" | Action = task. Check for skills. |
| "The skill is overkill" | Simple things become complex. Use it. |
| "I'll just do this one thing first" | Check BEFORE doing anything. |
| "This feels productive" | Undisciplined action wastes time. Skills prevent this. |
| "I know what that means" | Knowing the concept ≠ using the skill. Invoke it. |
| "I can handle this myself" | If a specialized agent exists, delegate. Check agent-router. |
| "Spawning an agent is overkill" | Agents exist for a reason. Let them handle their domain. |
| "I'll just do this quickly" | Quick for you = worse quality. Agent = expert result. |

## Skill Priority

When multiple skills could apply, use this order:

1. **Process skills first** (brainstorming, debugging) - determine HOW to approach
2. **Agent routing second** (agent-router) - determine WHO should handle (domain delegation)
3. **Implementation skills third** (frontend-design, mcp-builder) - guide execution

"Let's build X" → brainstorming first, then implementation skills.
"Fix this bug" → debugging first, then domain-specific skills.
"계약서 검토해줘" → agent-router → contract-legal agent spawned.
"세금 계산해줘" → agent-router → financial-accountant agent spawned.

## Skill Types

**Rigid** (TDD, debugging): Follow exactly. Don't adapt away discipline.

**Flexible** (patterns): Adapt principles to context.

The skill itself tells you which.

## User Instructions

Instructions say WHAT, not HOW. "Add X" or "Fix Y" doesn't mean skip workflows.

Related Skills

verify-implementation

643
from sangrokjung/claude-forge

프로젝트의 모든 verify 스킬을 실행하여 통합 패턴 검증 보고서를 생성합니다. 기능 구현 후, PR 전, 코드 리뷰 시 사용.

verification-engine

643
from sangrokjung/claude-forge

통합 검증 엔진 - 서브에이전트 기반 fresh-context 검증 루프 (v6)

team-orchestrator

643
from sangrokjung/claude-forge

Agent Teams 오케스트레이션 엔진 - 팀 구성, 작업 분배, 의존성 관리, 결과 집계

strategic-compact

643
from sangrokjung/claude-forge

Suggests manual context compaction at logical intervals to preserve context through task phases rather than arbitrary auto-compaction.

skill-factory

643
from sangrokjung/claude-forge

Analyze session work and automatically convert reusable patterns into Claude Code skills. Use when: "세션을 스킬로", "스킬 만들어", "이거 스킬로", "skill factory", "이 작업 자동화해", "스킬 추출", "make this a skill", "extract skill", "convert to skill", "스킬 팩토리", "자동 스킬 생성". Differs from skill-creator (archived) and manage-skills (drift detection): this skill actively analyzes sessions, checks for duplicates, and creates skills via Agent Teams.

session-wrap

643
from sangrokjung/claude-forge

세션 종료 전 자동 정리 스킬. 4개 병렬 subagent가 문서 업데이트, 반복 패턴, 학습 포인트, 후속 작업을 동시 탐지하고, 1개 검증 subagent가 중복 제거 후 사용자에게 선택지를 제시한다. 트리거: /session-wrap, 세션 마무리, 세션 정리, 작업 마무리

security-pipeline

643
from sangrokjung/claude-forge

보안 파이프라인 - CWE Top 25 + STRIDE 자동 검증

prompts-chat

643
from sangrokjung/claude-forge

스킬/프롬프트 탐색 및 검색 통합 스킬. 사용자가 스킬 설치, 프롬프트 검색, 프롬프트 개선을 요청할 때 활성화.

manage-skills

643
from sangrokjung/claude-forge

세션 변경사항을 분석하여 검증 스킬 누락을 탐지합니다. 기존 스킬을 동적으로 탐색하고, 새 스킬을 생성하거나 기존 스킬을 업데이트한 뒤 프로젝트 CLAUDE.md를 관리합니다.

frontend-code-review

643
from sangrokjung/claude-forge

Trigger when the user requests a review of frontend files (e.g., `.tsx`, `.ts`, `.js`). Support both pending-change reviews and focused file reviews while applying the checklist rules.

eval-harness

643
from sangrokjung/claude-forge

Formal evaluation framework for Claude Code sessions implementing eval-driven development (EDD) principles

continuous-learning-v2

643
from sangrokjung/claude-forge

Instinct-based learning system that observes sessions via hooks, creates atomic instincts with confidence scoring, and evolves them into skills/commands/agents.