ui-review

Review UI code for StyleSeed design-system compliance, accessibility, mobile ergonomics, spacing discipline, and implementation quality.

31,392 stars

Best use case

ui-review is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Review UI code for StyleSeed design-system compliance, accessibility, mobile ergonomics, spacing discipline, and implementation quality.

Teams using ui-review should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/ui-review/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills/main/plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/ui-review/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/ui-review/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How ui-review Compares

Feature / Agentui-reviewStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Review UI code for StyleSeed design-system compliance, accessibility, mobile ergonomics, spacing discipline, and implementation quality.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

Related Guides

SKILL.md Source

# UI Review

## Overview

Part of [StyleSeed](https://github.com/bitjaru/styleseed), this skill audits UI code against the Toss seed's conventions instead of reviewing it as generic frontend work. It focuses on design-token discipline, component ergonomics, accessibility, mobile readiness, typography, and spacing consistency.

## When to Use
- Use when a component or page should follow the StyleSeed Toss design language
- Use when reviewing a UI-heavy PR for consistency and design-system violations
- Use when the output looks "mostly fine" but feels off in subtle ways
- Use when you need a structured review with concrete fixes

## Review Checklist

### Design Tokens

- no hardcoded hex colors when semantic tokens exist
- no improvised shadow values when tokenized shadows exist
- no arbitrary radius choices outside the system scale
- no random spacing values that break the seed rhythm

### Component Conventions

- uses the project's class merge helper
- supports `className` extension when appropriate
- uses the agreed typing pattern
- avoids wrapper components that only forward one class string
- reuses existing primitives before inventing new ones

### Accessibility

- touch targets large enough for mobile
- visible keyboard focus states
- labels and `aria-*` attributes where needed
- adequate color contrast
- reduced-motion respect for animation

### Mobile UX

- no horizontal overflow
- safe-area handling where relevant
- readable text sizes
- thumb-friendly interaction spacing
- bottom nav or sticky actions do not obscure content

### Typography and Spacing

- uses the system type hierarchy
- display and headings are not overly loose
- body text remains readable
- spacing follows the seed grid instead of arbitrary values

## Output Format

Return:
1. A verdict: Pass, Needs Improvement, or Fail
2. A prioritized list of issues with file and line references when available
3. Concrete fixes for each issue
4. Any open questions where the design intent is ambiguous

## Best Practices

- Review against the seed, not against personal taste
- Separate stylistic drift from real usability or accessibility bugs
- Prefer actionable diffs over abstract criticism
- Call out duplication when an existing component already solves the problem

## Additional Resources

- [StyleSeed repository](https://github.com/bitjaru/styleseed)
- [Source skill](https://github.com/bitjaru/styleseed/blob/main/seeds/toss/.claude/skills/ui-review/SKILL.md)

## Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

Related Skills

lightning-architecture-review

31392
from sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills

Review Bitcoin Lightning Network protocol designs, compare channel factory approaches, and analyze Layer 2 scaling tradeoffs. Covers trust models, on-chain footprint, consensus requirements, HTLC/PTLC compatibility, liveness, and watchtower support.

Blockchain & Crypto AnalysisClaude

gha-security-review

31392
from sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills

Find exploitable vulnerabilities in GitHub Actions workflows. Every finding MUST include a concrete exploitation scenario — if you can't build the attack, don't report it.

Security AuditClaude

gh-review-requests

31392
from sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills

Fetch unread GitHub notifications for open PRs where review is requested from a specified team or opened by a team member. Use when asked to "find PRs I need to review", "show my review requests", "what needs my review", "fetch GitHub review requests", or "check team review queue".

Developer ToolsClaude

fix-review

31392
from sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills

Verify fix commits address audit findings without new bugs

Security AuditingClaude

error-debugging-multi-agent-review

31392
from sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills

Use when working with error debugging multi agent review

Code ReviewClaude

django-perf-review

31392
from sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills

Django performance code review. Use when asked to "review Django performance", "find N+1 queries", "optimize Django", "check queryset performance", "database performance", "Django ORM issues", or audit Django code for performance problems.

Code OptimizationClaude

django-access-review

31392
from sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills

django-access-review

Security AnalysisClaude

differential-review

31392
from sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills

Security-focused code review for PRs, commits, and diffs.

SecurityClaude

comprehensive-review-pr-enhance

31392
from sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills

Generate structured PR descriptions from diffs, add review checklists, risk assessments, and test coverage summaries. Use when the user says "write a PR description", "improve this PR", "summarize my changes", "PR review", "pull request", or asks to document a diff for reviewers.

Development ToolsClaude

comprehensive-review-full-review

31392
from sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills

Use when working with comprehensive review full review

codex-review

31392
from sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills

Professional code review with auto CHANGELOG generation, integrated with Codex AI. Use when you want professional code review before commits, you need automatic CHANGELOG generation, or reviewing large-scale refactoring.

Code AnalysisClaudeCodex

code-reviewer

31392
from sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills

Elite code review expert specializing in modern AI-powered code

Developer ToolsClaude