ui-review
Review UI code for StyleSeed design-system compliance, accessibility, mobile ergonomics, spacing discipline, and implementation quality.
Best use case
ui-review is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Review UI code for StyleSeed design-system compliance, accessibility, mobile ergonomics, spacing discipline, and implementation quality.
Teams using ui-review should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/ui-review/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How ui-review Compares
| Feature / Agent | ui-review | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Review UI code for StyleSeed design-system compliance, accessibility, mobile ergonomics, spacing discipline, and implementation quality.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
Best AI Skills for Claude
Explore the best AI skills for Claude and Claude Code across coding, research, workflow automation, documentation, and agent operations.
Cursor vs Codex for AI Workflows
Compare Cursor and Codex for AI coding workflows, repository assistance, debugging, refactoring, and reusable developer skills.
SKILL.md Source
# UI Review ## Overview Part of [StyleSeed](https://github.com/bitjaru/styleseed), this skill audits UI code against the Toss seed's conventions instead of reviewing it as generic frontend work. It focuses on design-token discipline, component ergonomics, accessibility, mobile readiness, typography, and spacing consistency. ## When to Use - Use when a component or page should follow the StyleSeed Toss design language - Use when reviewing a UI-heavy PR for consistency and design-system violations - Use when the output looks "mostly fine" but feels off in subtle ways - Use when you need a structured review with concrete fixes ## Review Checklist ### Design Tokens - no hardcoded hex colors when semantic tokens exist - no improvised shadow values when tokenized shadows exist - no arbitrary radius choices outside the system scale - no random spacing values that break the seed rhythm ### Component Conventions - uses the project's class merge helper - supports `className` extension when appropriate - uses the agreed typing pattern - avoids wrapper components that only forward one class string - reuses existing primitives before inventing new ones ### Accessibility - touch targets large enough for mobile - visible keyboard focus states - labels and `aria-*` attributes where needed - adequate color contrast - reduced-motion respect for animation ### Mobile UX - no horizontal overflow - safe-area handling where relevant - readable text sizes - thumb-friendly interaction spacing - bottom nav or sticky actions do not obscure content ### Typography and Spacing - uses the system type hierarchy - display and headings are not overly loose - body text remains readable - spacing follows the seed grid instead of arbitrary values ## Output Format Return: 1. A verdict: Pass, Needs Improvement, or Fail 2. A prioritized list of issues with file and line references when available 3. Concrete fixes for each issue 4. Any open questions where the design intent is ambiguous ## Best Practices - Review against the seed, not against personal taste - Separate stylistic drift from real usability or accessibility bugs - Prefer actionable diffs over abstract criticism - Call out duplication when an existing component already solves the problem ## Additional Resources - [StyleSeed repository](https://github.com/bitjaru/styleseed) - [Source skill](https://github.com/bitjaru/styleseed/blob/main/seeds/toss/.claude/skills/ui-review/SKILL.md) ## Limitations - Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above. - Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review. - Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
Related Skills
lightning-architecture-review
Review Bitcoin Lightning Network protocol designs, compare channel factory approaches, and analyze Layer 2 scaling tradeoffs. Covers trust models, on-chain footprint, consensus requirements, HTLC/PTLC compatibility, liveness, and watchtower support.
gha-security-review
Find exploitable vulnerabilities in GitHub Actions workflows. Every finding MUST include a concrete exploitation scenario — if you can't build the attack, don't report it.
gh-review-requests
Fetch unread GitHub notifications for open PRs where review is requested from a specified team or opened by a team member. Use when asked to "find PRs I need to review", "show my review requests", "what needs my review", "fetch GitHub review requests", or "check team review queue".
fix-review
Verify fix commits address audit findings without new bugs
error-debugging-multi-agent-review
Use when working with error debugging multi agent review
django-perf-review
Django performance code review. Use when asked to "review Django performance", "find N+1 queries", "optimize Django", "check queryset performance", "database performance", "Django ORM issues", or audit Django code for performance problems.
django-access-review
django-access-review
differential-review
Security-focused code review for PRs, commits, and diffs.
comprehensive-review-pr-enhance
Generate structured PR descriptions from diffs, add review checklists, risk assessments, and test coverage summaries. Use when the user says "write a PR description", "improve this PR", "summarize my changes", "PR review", "pull request", or asks to document a diff for reviewers.
comprehensive-review-full-review
Use when working with comprehensive review full review
codex-review
Professional code review with auto CHANGELOG generation, integrated with Codex AI. Use when you want professional code review before commits, you need automatic CHANGELOG generation, or reviewing large-scale refactoring.
code-reviewer
Elite code review expert specializing in modern AI-powered code