fundraising-analyzer

Nonprofit fundraising performance analysis with donor segmentation, campaign ROI, retention metrics, and trend analysis. Use when evaluating fundraising effectiveness, analyzing donor data, or planning campaigns.

31 stars

Best use case

fundraising-analyzer is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Nonprofit fundraising performance analysis with donor segmentation, campaign ROI, retention metrics, and trend analysis. Use when evaluating fundraising effectiveness, analyzing donor data, or planning campaigns.

Teams using fundraising-analyzer should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/fundraising-analyzer/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/travisjneuman/.claude/main/skills/fundraising-analyzer/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/fundraising-analyzer/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How fundraising-analyzer Compares

Feature / Agentfundraising-analyzerStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Nonprofit fundraising performance analysis with donor segmentation, campaign ROI, retention metrics, and trend analysis. Use when evaluating fundraising effectiveness, analyzing donor data, or planning campaigns.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

# Fundraising Analyzer

Frameworks for analyzing nonprofit fundraising performance, segmenting donors, evaluating campaign effectiveness, and building data-driven fundraising strategies.

## Donor Analysis

### Donor Segmentation Framework

```
DONOR SEGMENTATION MATRIX:

BY GIVING LEVEL:
  Tier              | Annual Giving      | % of Donors | % of Revenue
  ------------------|--------------------| ------------|-------------
  Major donors      | $10,000+           | [%]         | [%]
  Mid-level donors  | $1,000 - $9,999    | [%]         | [%]
  Grassroots donors | $100 - $999        | [%]         | [%]
  Small donors      | Under $100         | [%]         | [%]

BY ENGAGEMENT:
  Segment           | Definition                    | Strategy
  ------------------|-------------------------------|------------------
  Champions         | Top 10% by giving + volunteer | Steward, recognize
  Loyal             | 3+ consecutive years giving   | Retain, upgrade
  Growing           | Increased gift this year      | Encourage, cultivate
  Lapsed risk       | Decreased gift or late renewal| Re-engage campaign
  Lapsed            | No gift in 13+ months         | Win-back campaign
  New               | First gift in last 12 months  | Welcome series

BY RECENCY-FREQUENCY-MONETARY (RFM):
  Score each 1-5:
  Recency:   How recently did they give? (5 = this month)
  Frequency: How often do they give?     (5 = monthly)
  Monetary:  How much do they give?      (5 = top tier)

  RFM Score  | Segment    | Priority
  555        | Best       | Highest — personal stewardship
  5XX        | Active     | High — upgrade opportunities
  X5X        | Frequent   | Medium — increase gift size
  XX5        | High value | High — increase frequency
  1XX        | At risk    | High — re-engagement needed
  111        | Lost       | Low — win-back or remove
```

### Donor Lifetime Value

```
DONOR LIFETIME VALUE (LTV) CALCULATOR:

INPUTS:
  Average annual gift:           $______
  Average giving years:          ______ years
  Donor retention rate:          ______%
  Discount rate:                 ______% (typically 5-8%)

SIMPLE LTV:
  LTV = Average annual gift × Average giving years
  LTV = $______ × ______ = $______

ADJUSTED LTV (with retention):
  LTV = Average gift × (Retention rate / (1 - Retention rate))
  LTV = $______ × (____% / (1 - ____%)) = $______

COST-ADJUSTED LTV:
  Acquisition cost:              $______
  Annual stewardship cost:       $______
  Net LTV = Adjusted LTV - Acquisition cost - (Stewardship × Years)
  Net LTV = $______

BY SEGMENT:
  Segment          | Avg Gift | Retention | LTV     | Acq Cost | Net LTV
  -----------------|----------|-----------|---------|----------|--------
  Major donors     | $______  | ____%     | $______ | $______  | $______
  Mid-level        | $______  | ____%     | $______ | $______  | $______
  Grassroots       | $______  | ____%     | $______ | $______  | $______
  Small            | $______  | ____%     | $______ | $______  | $______
```

## Campaign Analysis

### Campaign Performance Dashboard

```
CAMPAIGN REPORT: [Campaign Name]
Period: [Start Date] — [End Date]
Goal: $______

RESULTS:
  Revenue raised:       $______  (___% of goal)
  Number of gifts:      ______
  Average gift:         $______
  Median gift:          $______
  New donors acquired:  ______
  Returning donors:     ______

COST ANALYSIS:
  Total campaign cost:  $______
  Cost per dollar raised: $______
  Cost per acquisition:   $______
  ROI: (Revenue - Cost) / Cost = ______%

CHANNEL PERFORMANCE:
  Channel          | Revenue  | Gifts | Avg Gift | Cost    | ROI
  -----------------|----------|-------|----------|---------|-----
  Email            | $______  | _____ | $______  | $______ | ___%
  Direct mail      | $______  | _____ | $______  | $______ | ___%
  Social media     | $______  | _____ | $______  | $______ | ___%
  Website          | $______  | _____ | $______  | $______ | ___%
  Events           | $______  | _____ | $______  | $______ | ___%
  Phone/text       | $______  | _____ | $______  | $______ | ___%

YEAR-OVER-YEAR:
  Metric           | Last Year | This Year | Change
  Revenue          | $______   | $______   | ____%
  Donors           | ______    | ______    | ____%
  Avg gift         | $______   | $______   | ____%
  New donors       | ______    | ______    | ____%
```

### Campaign Comparison Matrix

| Metric | Spring Appeal | Year-End | Gala Event | Giving Tuesday | Peer-to-Peer |
|--------|-------------|----------|-----------|---------------|-------------|
| **Revenue** | $______ | $______ | $______ | $______ | $______ |
| **Cost** | $______ | $______ | $______ | $______ | $______ |
| **ROI** | ____% | ____% | ____% | ____% | ____% |
| **New donors** | ______ | ______ | ______ | ______ | ______ |
| **Avg gift** | $______ | $______ | $______ | $______ | $______ |

## Key Metrics

### Fundraising Health Scorecard

```
ANNUAL FUNDRAISING SCORECARD:

GROWTH METRICS:
  Total revenue:                  $______ (target: $______)
  Revenue growth (YoY):           ____%   (benchmark: 5-10%)
  Number of donors:               ______  (target: ______)
  Donor growth (YoY):             ____%   (benchmark: 5-8%)

RETENTION METRICS:
  Overall retention rate:         ____%   (benchmark: 45-50%)
  First-year donor retention:     ____%   (benchmark: 25-30%)
  Multi-year donor retention:     ____%   (benchmark: 60-65%)
  Donor upgrade rate:             ____%   (benchmark: 10-15%)
  Donor downgrade rate:           ____%   (target: <10%)

EFFICIENCY METRICS:
  Cost to raise a dollar:         $______ (benchmark: $0.20-0.30)
  Fundraising expense ratio:      ____%   (benchmark: <15%)
  Average gift size:              $______
  Revenue per donor:              $______
  Revenue per staff FTE:          $______

DIVERSITY METRICS:
  # of revenue sources:           ______  (target: 5+)
  Largest source % of total:      ____%   (target: <30%)
  Individual vs institutional:    ___% / ___%

HEALTH INDICATORS:
  ✓ Green:  Retention > 50%, Growth > 5%, Diversity > 5 sources
  △ Yellow: Retention 40-50%, Growth 0-5%, 3-4 sources
  ✗ Red:    Retention < 40%, Decline, < 3 sources
```

### Benchmark Comparison

| Metric | Your Org | Sector Avg | Top Quartile | Status |
|--------|---------|-----------|-------------|--------|
| Retention rate | ____% | 45% | 65%+ | |
| First-year retention | ____% | 27% | 40%+ | |
| Cost per dollar | $____ | $0.25 | <$0.15 | |
| Online giving % | ____% | 13% | 25%+ | |
| Major gift % | ____% | 60% | 75%+ | |
| Monthly giving % | ____% | 15% | 30%+ | |

## Trend Analysis

### Multi-Year Trend Template

```
5-YEAR FUNDRAISING TRENDS:

YEAR          | Y-4      | Y-3      | Y-2      | Y-1      | Current
              |----------|----------|----------|----------|--------
Revenue       | $______  | $______  | $______  | $______  | $______
Donors        | ______   | ______   | ______   | ______   | ______
Avg Gift      | $______  | $______  | $______  | $______  | $______
Retention     | ____%    | ____%    | ____%    | ____%    | ____%
New Donors    | ______   | ______   | ______   | ______   | ______
Lapsed Donors | ______   | ______   | ______   | ______   | ______

TREND ANALYSIS:
  Revenue trend:    [Increasing / Stable / Declining] at ___% annually
  Donor base trend: [Growing / Stable / Shrinking] at ___% annually
  Key concern:      [Identify the most worrying trend]
  Key strength:     [Identify the most positive trend]

PROJECTIONS (next 3 years):
  If current trends continue:
    Revenue Y+1: $______
    Revenue Y+2: $______
    Revenue Y+3: $______

  If retention improves by 5%:
    Revenue Y+1: $______
    Revenue Y+2: $______
    Revenue Y+3: $______
```

## Giving Strategy Templates

### Monthly Giving Program Analysis

```
MONTHLY GIVING PROGRAM:

CURRENT STATE:
  Monthly donors:           ______
  Average monthly gift:     $______
  Annual value per donor:   $______ (monthly × 12)
  Total annual revenue:     $______
  % of total fundraising:   ____%
  Retention rate:           ____%  (benchmark: 80-90%)

GROWTH ANALYSIS:
  New monthly donors (this year):    ______
  Upgraded from one-time:            ______
  Cancelled:                         ______
  Net change:                        ______

UPGRADE OPPORTUNITIES:
  Donors giving < $25/month:         ______ → Upgrade to $35
  Donors giving $25-49/month:        ______ → Upgrade to $50
  Donors giving $50-99/month:        ______ → Upgrade to $100
  Potential revenue increase:        $______/year

ACQUISITION CHANNELS:
  Channel              | Conversions | Avg Gift | Cost/Acquisition
  Website popup        | ______      | $______  | $______
  Email campaign       | ______      | $______  | $______
  Direct mail insert   | ______      | $______  | $______
  Thank-you page upsell| ______      | $______  | $______
```

### Major Gift Pipeline

```
MAJOR GIFT PIPELINE: FY[Year]

STAGE           | # Prospects | Total Value | Avg Gift  | Probability
----------------|-------------|-------------|-----------|------------
Identification  | ______      | $______     | $______   | 10%
Qualification   | ______      | $______     | $______   | 25%
Cultivation     | ______      | $______     | $______   | 50%
Solicitation    | ______      | $______     | $______   | 75%
Closed          | ______      | $______     | $______   | 100%

WEIGHTED PIPELINE VALUE:
  = Σ (Value at each stage × Probability)
  = $______

PIPELINE METRICS:
  Average cultivation time:    ______ months
  Close rate (solicited):      ____%
  Average solicitation:        $______
  Average closed gift:         $______
  Gifts above ask:             ____%
  Gifts below ask:             ____%
```

## See Also

- [Impact Report Writer](../impact-report-writer/SKILL.md)
- [Grant Proposal Builder](../grant-proposal-builder/SKILL.md)
- [Volunteer Coordinator](../volunteer-coordinator/SKILL.md)

Related Skills

tech-debt-analyzer

31
from travisjneuman/.claude

This skill should be used when analyzing technical debt in a codebase, documenting code quality issues, creating technical debt registers, or assessing code maintainability. Use this for identifying code smells, architectural issues, dependency problems, missing documentation, security vulnerabilities, and creating comprehensive technical debt documentation.

real-estate-analyzer

31
from travisjneuman/.claude

Property valuation, market analysis, investment ROI calculations, comparable analysis, and rental yield assessment. Use when evaluating real estate investments, analyzing property markets, or calculating returns.

learning-gap-analyzer

31
from travisjneuman/.claude

Map understanding, identify knowledge gaps, and build targeted learning plans with spaced repetition. Use when assessing knowledge levels, designing study plans, or optimizing learning paths.

example-skill

31
from travisjneuman/.claude

Example skill - replace with your skill's description and activation keywords

websockets-realtime

31
from travisjneuman/.claude

Real-time communication with WebSockets, Server-Sent Events, and related technologies. Use when building chat, live updates, collaborative features, or any real-time functionality.

video-production

31
from travisjneuman/.claude

Professional video production from planning to delivery. Use when creating video content, editing workflows, motion graphics, or optimizing video for different platforms.

ui-research

31
from travisjneuman/.claude

Research-first UI/UX design workflow. Use BEFORE any frontend visual work to research modern patterns, gather inspiration from real products, and avoid generic AI-generated looks. Mandatory prerequisite for quality UI work.

ui-animation

31
from travisjneuman/.claude

Motion design and animation for user interfaces. Use when creating micro-interactions, page transitions, loading states, or any UI animation across web and mobile platforms.

travel-planner

31
from travisjneuman/.claude

Travel destination research and daily itinerary creation with logistics planning, budget tracking, and experience optimization. Use when planning trips, creating travel itineraries, comparing destinations, or organizing travel logistics.

test-specialist

31
from travisjneuman/.claude

This skill should be used when writing test cases, fixing bugs, analyzing code for potential issues, or improving test coverage for JavaScript/TypeScript applications. Use this for unit tests, integration tests, end-to-end tests, debugging runtime errors, logic bugs, performance issues, security vulnerabilities, and systematic code analysis.

tdd-workflow

31
from travisjneuman/.claude

Test-Driven Development workflow enforcement with RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle. Use when implementing features test-first or improving test coverage.

tauri-desktop

31
from travisjneuman/.claude

Tauri 2.0 project setup, Rust backend + web frontend, plugin system, IPC commands, security model, auto-update, and mobile support. Use when building lightweight cross-platform desktop or mobile apps with Tauri.