absolute-path-review-prompt-dispatch

Prevent adversarial review dispatch failures caused by relative prompt paths, superseded background sessions, and stale completion notices when launching Codex/Gemini review jobs.

5 stars

Best use case

absolute-path-review-prompt-dispatch is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Prevent adversarial review dispatch failures caused by relative prompt paths, superseded background sessions, and stale completion notices when launching Codex/Gemini review jobs.

Teams using absolute-path-review-prompt-dispatch should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/absolute-path-review-prompt-dispatch/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub/main/.agents/skills/software-development/absolute-path-review-prompt-dispatch/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/absolute-path-review-prompt-dispatch/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How absolute-path-review-prompt-dispatch Compares

Feature / Agentabsolute-path-review-prompt-dispatchStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Prevent adversarial review dispatch failures caused by relative prompt paths, superseded background sessions, and stale completion notices when launching Codex/Gemini review jobs.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

Related Guides

SKILL.md Source

# Absolute-Path Review Prompt Dispatch

Use when launching adversarial plan/code reviews through background `codex exec` or `gemini exec` jobs.

## When this skill applies
- You write a review prompt to `.planning/quick/*.md`
- You launch Codex/Gemini in background mode with `terminal(background=true, pty=true)`
- You need review artifacts to remain trustworthy even if an earlier dispatch attempt fails

## Core problem
A review prompt file can exist in the repo, but a background shell may still fail to resolve a relative path like:

`codex exec "$(cat .planning/quick/review-342-prompt.md)"`

Observed failure:
- `cat: .planning/quick/review-342-prompt.md: No such file or directory`

This can happen even when the file exists under the intended workdir. Once you recover and relaunch successfully, Hermes may still deliver stale completion notices for the earlier failed session.

## Reliable pattern

### 1. Write the prompt into the real workspace
Use `terminal()` or another real-filesystem write path so the shell can read it.

### 2. Verify existence before dispatch
Run a real-shell check such as:
- `pwd`
- `find . -maxdepth 3 -type f | grep 'review-342'`
- `ls -la .planning .planning/quick`

### 3. Launch with absolute paths
Prefer absolute prompt and output paths:

```bash
codex exec "$(cat /abs/path/to/review-342-prompt.md)" \
  2>&1 | tee /abs/path/to/review-342-codex.out

gemini exec "$(cat /abs/path/to/review-342-prompt.md)" \
  2>&1 | tee /abs/path/to/review-342-gemini.out
```

This avoids cwd drift and ambiguous shell context in background runs.

### 4. Treat the first successful recovered run as canonical
If the original run fails and you relaunch:
- kill the failed process if still running
- save artifacts only from the recovered canonical run
- ignore later stale completion notices from superseded sessions

### 5. Record unavailable providers explicitly
If Gemini/Codex never yields a substantive review, save a canonical artifact with:
- verdict: `UNAVAILABLE`
- concrete failure reason
- raw log path
- operational decision taken

## Minimal recovery workflow
1. Background run fails with relative-path `cat` error
2. Confirm prompt file actually exists on disk
3. Kill the failed background session
4. Relaunch with absolute prompt path + absolute tee path
5. Wait/poll the new session only
6. Save the canonical review artifact(s)
7. Ignore stale system completion messages for the abandoned session

## Pitfalls
- Relative prompt paths can fail in background shells even when the repo workdir looks correct
- A stale completion notification can arrive after you already saved the real review result
- Raw background logs are not the durable artifact; always write the final canonical review file under `scripts/review/results/`

## Good signs
- `find`/`ls` show the prompt file before launch
- background command uses absolute paths for both `cat` and `tee`
- later system notifications do not change the already-saved canonical outcome

Related Skills

plan-review-prompt-refresh-after-plan-edits

5
from vamseeachanta/workspace-hub

Refresh reviewer prompt files from the latest on-disk plan before every adversarial re-review. Prevents Codex/Gemini from critiquing stale plan text after local edits.

tdd-verification-and-adversarial-review

5
from vamseeachanta/workspace-hub

Verify pre-written TDD tests pass, conduct adversarial code review on committed diffs, and route findings to existing issues

python-import-path-mismatch-debugging

5
from vamseeachanta/workspace-hub

Diagnose and fix ModuleNotFoundError when a package is installed but imports still fail due to environment/path mismatches

python-import-path-debugging

5
from vamseeachanta/workspace-hub

Diagnose ModuleNotFoundError when a package is installed but still fails to import

multi-role-agent-contract-review-pipeline

5
from vamseeachanta/workspace-hub

Execute a 4-role agent team (Planner/Architect/Reviewer/Integrator) pipeline for self-reviewing knowledge artifacts before delivery

label-driven-prompt-generation-architecture

5
from vamseeachanta/workspace-hub

Pattern for building automation scripts that classify GitHub issues into prompt templates using label-based routing and extract contextual data for batch processing

gsd-adversarial-review-pattern

5
from vamseeachanta/workspace-hub

Catch hidden test failures by running adversarial review on sparse-data edge cases before final push

agent-team-prompt-generation

5
from vamseeachanta/workspace-hub

Create self-contained execution prompts that define multi-role workflows for Codex sessions without external dependencies

adversarial-code-review-tdd

5
from vamseeachanta/workspace-hub

Systematic adversarial review pattern to identify breaking assumptions in already-passing test suites

adversarial-code-review-for-committed-diffs

5
from vamseeachanta/workspace-hub

Systematic process for reviewing already-committed code changes to catch type inconsistencies, edge cases, and docstring gaps

adversarial-code-review-and-fix

5
from vamseeachanta/workspace-hub

Systematic pattern for catching design flaws in already-passing code through adversarial review, then fixing them with TDD confirmation.

learned-git-worktree-hook-path-and-real-hook-shape-review

5
from vamseeachanta/workspace-hub

Catch hook-installation and governance bugs that only appear in linked git worktrees or against the real generated hook shape, not simplified test fixtures.