code-reviewer-review-report-template
Sub-skill of code-reviewer: Review Report Template.
Best use case
code-reviewer-review-report-template is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Sub-skill of code-reviewer: Review Report Template.
Teams using code-reviewer-review-report-template should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/review-report-template/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How code-reviewer-review-report-template Compares
| Feature / Agent | code-reviewer-review-report-template | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Sub-skill of code-reviewer: Review Report Template.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
Best AI Skills for Claude
Explore the best AI skills for Claude and Claude Code across coding, research, workflow automation, documentation, and agent operations.
Cursor vs Codex for AI Workflows
Compare Cursor and Codex for AI coding workflows, repository assistance, debugging, refactoring, and reusable developer skills.
SKILL.md Source
# Review Report Template ## Review Report Template ```markdown # Code Review Report
Related Skills
interactive-report-generator
Generate interactive HTML reports with Plotly visualizations from data analysis results. Supports dashboards, charts, and professional styling.
data-validation-reporter
Generate interactive validation reports with quality scoring, missing data analysis, and type checking. Combines Pandas validation, Plotly visualization, and YAML configuration for comprehensive data quality reporting.
orcaflex-reporting-fixture-proof-pattern
Build and extend fixture-backed OrcaFlex reporting proof paths in digitalmodel using stable metadata baselines, normalized HTML snapshots, and reusable reporting test helpers.
plan-review-prompt-refresh-after-plan-edits
Refresh reviewer prompt files from the latest on-disk plan before every adversarial re-review. Prevents Codex/Gemini from critiquing stale plan text after local edits.
tdd-verification-and-adversarial-review
Verify pre-written TDD tests pass, conduct adversarial code review on committed diffs, and route findings to existing issues
multi-role-agent-contract-review-pipeline
Execute a 4-role agent team (Planner/Architect/Reviewer/Integrator) pipeline for self-reviewing knowledge artifacts before delivery
gsd-adversarial-review-pattern
Catch hidden test failures by running adversarial review on sparse-data edge cases before final push
blocker-reporting-outcome-validation
Pattern for closing issues where the deliverable is documented blockers rather than feature completion
adversarial-code-review-tdd
Systematic adversarial review pattern to identify breaking assumptions in already-passing test suites
adversarial-code-review-for-committed-diffs
Systematic process for reviewing already-committed code changes to catch type inconsistencies, edge cases, and docstring gaps
adversarial-code-review-and-fix
Systematic pattern for catching design flaws in already-passing code through adversarial review, then fixing them with TDD confirmation.
learned-git-worktree-hook-path-and-real-hook-shape-review
Catch hook-installation and governance bugs that only appear in linked git worktrees or against the real generated hook shape, not simplified test fixtures.