corporate-tax-strategic-planning
Reverse-engineer target tax outcomes, model multi-year retained earnings and R&D funding, and produce strategic tax analysis for small C-Corps. Covers deduction gap analysis, capital source modeling, §174 R&D amortization timing, NOL carryforward projections, and loan structure optimization.
Best use case
corporate-tax-strategic-planning is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Reverse-engineer target tax outcomes, model multi-year retained earnings and R&D funding, and produce strategic tax analysis for small C-Corps. Covers deduction gap analysis, capital source modeling, §174 R&D amortization timing, NOL carryforward projections, and loan structure optimization.
Teams using corporate-tax-strategic-planning should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/corporate-tax-strategic-planning/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How corporate-tax-strategic-planning Compares
| Feature / Agent | corporate-tax-strategic-planning | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Reverse-engineer target tax outcomes, model multi-year retained earnings and R&D funding, and produce strategic tax analysis for small C-Corps. Covers deduction gap analysis, capital source modeling, §174 R&D amortization timing, NOL carryforward projections, and loan structure optimization.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Corporate Tax Strategic Planning Reverse-engineer target tax outcomes, model multi-year funding for R&D, and produce strategic tax analysis for small C-Corps with consulting revenue. ## When to Use - User wants to reduce corporate tax to a specific target (reverse engineering) - User wants to model retained earnings + R&D budget across multiple years - User asks about funding future growth from current-year earnings - User wants to evaluate tax impact of different spending strategies - User asks about loan structuring between related entities ## Phase 1: Reverse-Engineer Target Tax to Required Deductions ### Step 1: Calculate the gap ``` Target tax / 0.21 = Required taxable income Revenue - Required taxable income = Required total deductions Required deductions - Current documented deductions = Gap ``` ### Step 2: List every possible deduction category For each category note: - Maximum gap it can fill - Current amount (if any) - Documentation status (have, need, impossible) - IRS risk level Categories to check: 1. Officer/W-2 compensation (retroactive = impossible for prior years) 2. Subcontractor/contractor costs (check all bank statements) 3. R&D expenses (§162 vs §174 classification) 4. Equipment/hardware (IRC §179) 5. Professional services (legal, accounting, consulting) 6. Insurance premiums 7. Travel/client expenses (50% deductible for meals) 8. Home office (simplified vs actual method) 9. Software/cloud compute 10. Interest expense 11. Bad debt 12. Advertising/marketing 13. Education/training ### Step 3: Sum realistic additional deductions Total realistic gap fill = sum of categories with actual documentation or high probability of bank statement confirmation. ### Step 4: Calculate achievable minimum tax ``` Revenue - (current + realistic additional deductions) = Achievable taxable income Achievable taxable income x 0.21 = Achievable tax ``` ### Critical Insight If the gap is >50% of revenue, flag it as unrealistic. A normal consulting firm has 40-60% direct labor/COGS. >90% total expense ratio = red flag. ## Phase 2: Retained Earnings and Multi-Year Funding Model ### Step 1: Baseline current retained cash ``` Revenue - Expenses - Tax = Retained earnings ``` ### Step 2: Identify all capital sources - Retained earnings from current year - Existing loans (remaining balance) - Loan-to-equity conversion possibility - Personal capital injection - Revenue from operations - External funding ### Step 3: Model section 174 R&D amortization timing Post-2022, R&D is NOT fully deductible in Year 1: - Domestic: 5-year amortization, half-year convention - Year 1: 10% of R&D (R / 5 / 2) - Year 2-5: 20% per year - Year 6: 10% (remaining half) This means a $300K R&D spend creates only $30K in Year 1 deductions. The remaining $270K is a section 174 amortization pool that provides deductions in future years. ### Step 4: Project 5-year cash flow AND tax For each year model: - Cash in bank (beginning balance + income - spending) - Tax deductions (current-year expenses + section 174 amortization + operating) - NOL created (if deductions > revenue) - Cumulative NOL balance - Future section 174 pool remaining ### Step 5: NOL utilization plan When revenue resumes: - NOL offsets up to 80% of taxable income per year - Calculate years to consume full NOL - Model tax liability during and after NOL period ## Phase 3: Loan Structure Analysis ### Multi-entity loan chain mapping ``` Entity A (personal) -> Entity B (operating) -> Entity C (investment) ``` For each link evaluate: 1. Imputed interest (IRC section 7872) - 0% loans trigger phantom income 2. Balance sheet impact - receivable/payable bloat 3. Audit complexity - IRS tracing funds through entities 4. Cash flow impact - repayments draining operating cash 5. Tax advantage (usually none for pass-through between related entities) ### Restructuring evaluation - Direct route (eliminate middleman entity) - Loan-to-equity conversion - Loan forgiveness (triggers CODI = taxable!) - Interest rate change to AFR **CRITICAL:** Loan forgiveness = cancellation of debt income (CODI) = taxable to debtor. Loan conversion to equity is NOT taxable. ## Phase 4: Document Everything ### Output files (in the entity repo) ``` taxes/2025/ ├── 2025-corporate-tax-analysis.yaml # 3+ scenarios, all numbers ├── 2025-ai-rd-budget-strategy.yaml # R&D thesis, QRE classification ├── 2025-retained-earnings-ai-growth-model.yaml # 5-yr funding model └── session-tax-review-YYYY-MM-DD.md # Session summary ``` Each YAML file should be self-contained - usable by future sessions. ## Pitfalls 1. **Confusing spending with deduction** - Money spent on assets (section 179) stays in the company as an asset, the cost is deducted. This is the ONLY way to both retain value AND deduct the cost. 2. **Assuming R&D is fully deductible** - section 174 amortization since 2022 means only 10% is deductible in Year 1. 3. **Loan forgiveness as tax strategy** - CODI makes forgiven debt taxable income. Conversion to equity is not taxable. 4. **Retroactive W-2** - Cannot issue a W-2 for a prior tax year after that year has ended. Only possible prospectively. 5. **NOL carryforward assumptions** - Must confirm prior year returns were filed. If 2024 is unfiled, the 2023 NOL is unsubstantiated. 6. **Itemizing vs standard** - For TX (no state tax), property tax alone rarely exceeds the MFJ standard deduction ($31,500 in 2025). Always compare. ## GitHub Issue Pattern When creating future tax/strategy issues: | Priority | When | Pattern | |----------|-----------|--------------------------------------------| | BLOCKER | ASAP | Unfiled prior year returns | | HIGH | Quarter | Missing docs, extension decisions | | MEDIUM | Next year | Annual filing with year header (2027, 2028...) | | LOW | Future | Strategic planning (R&D, productization) | Close issues when they are: - Captured in documentation (use "exit strategy" issue) - Superseded by a better approach - Premature (future actions with no current-year relevance) - Not actionable (loans that are only retrospective internal documentation)
Related Skills
corporate-tax-filing-reconciliation
Reconcile multi-document tax packets and build line-by-line IRS filing guides for first-year C-Corps with real-estate holdings
corporate-tax-filing-reconciliation-and-decision
Reconcile multi-document corporate tax packets, verify line-item accuracy against source data, and structure decision trees for filing timing and extension strategies.
cash-basis-corporate-tax-reconciliation
Reconcile conflicting revenue sources and prepare Form 1120 for cash-method C-Corps using bank deposits as authoritative source
external-drive-ingest-planning
Plan safe external-drive ingests into repo-aligned storage such as /mnt/ace: read-only mounts, manifests, staged rsync, dedupe-merge gates, GitHub issue traceability, and governance/execution split.
planning-lane-cross-review-permission-fallback
Handle overnight planning-only lanes where plan revision/editing works but real cross-provider review dispatch is permission-blocked.
overnight-planning-noop-run-salvage
Recover when unattended overnight Codex planning runs exit 0 but produce no required artifacts; salvage the wave by auditing existing plan state, generating missing summary artifacts manually, and preserving morning monitoring surfaces.
large-parallel-planning-wave-environment-failure-handoff
Handle large pre-plan-review planning waves that succeed analytically but fail to persist artifacts due to quota exhaustion, sandbox write failures, or cancelled GitHub mutations.
github-visual-planning-issues
Create review-friendly GitHub planning issues that supersede stale/seasonal issues and include source-backed image thumbnails for faster human review.
planning-goal
Goal-Oriented Action Planning (GOAP) specialist that dynamically creates intelligent plans to achieve complex objectives. Use for multi-step tasks with dependencies, adaptive replanning, complex deployment workflows, or when a high-level goal needs systematic breakdown into achievable actions.
planning-code-goal
Code-centric Goal-Oriented Action Planning integrated with SPARC methodology. Use for feature implementation planning, performance optimization goals, testing strategy development, or any software development objective requiring systematic breakdown with measurable success criteria.
corporate-tax-form-fill
Programmatically fill IRS tax form PDFs (Form 1120, etc.) using pymupdf/fitz. Covers field discovery, mapping, filling, cross-checking, and PDF generation.
issue-planning-mode
Mandatory planning workflow for ALL GitHub issues — plan, review, approve, then implement.