gmail-email-to-repo-extraction
Extract structured data from Gmail inbox emails, enrich with domain-specific classification, legal-scan against deny list, commit to appropriate repo, then optionally delete originals.
Best use case
gmail-email-to-repo-extraction is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Extract structured data from Gmail inbox emails, enrich with domain-specific classification, legal-scan against deny list, commit to appropriate repo, then optionally delete originals.
Teams using gmail-email-to-repo-extraction should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/gmail-email-to-repo-extraction/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How gmail-email-to-repo-extraction Compares
| Feature / Agent | gmail-email-to-repo-extraction | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Extract structured data from Gmail inbox emails, enrich with domain-specific classification, legal-scan against deny list, commit to appropriate repo, then optionally delete originals.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Gmail Email → Repo Extraction
Pattern for extracting structured data from inbox emails, saving to repos, then cleaning up.
## Workflow
### Phase 1: Scan & Categorize
```bash
# 1. Refresh OAuth token
# 2. Search inbox for target sender(s)
# 3. Fetch message metadata for all matches
# 4. Categorize by sender domain:
# - extract_then_delete: valuable data, extract first
# - unsubscribe_then_delete: spam/marketing, just delete
# - keep: dev notifications, critical services
# - review: needs user decision before action
```
### Phase 2: Extract Structured Data
For data extraction emails (e.g., CRE listings, financial reports):
```python
def extract_enums(subject, body, sender):
"""Extract from subject line patterns first (reliable)"""
# Cap rates from subject: r'(\d+\.?\d*)\s*%?\s*CAP'
# Prices from subject: r'\$(\d+(?:\.\d+)?[KMB]?)'
# SF from subject: r'([\d,]+)\s*SF'
# Lease years: r'(\d+)\s*(?:Years?|Yr)'
pass
def extract_from_body(body):
"""Body text is noisy — footers, multi-state refs, signatures"""
# Only use body for state/province extraction when subject lacks location
# Use regex patterns for known field types
pass
def enrich_listing(listing):
"""Add inferred fields: lease_type, investment_grade, property_types, state"""
pass
```
**Key finding:** Subject line regex extraction is reliable. Body text is noisy due to corporate footers, multi-state operator portfolios, and email signatures.
### Phase 3: Legal Scan
```bash
cd /mnt/local-analysis/workspace-hub
bash scripts/legal/legal-sanity-scan.sh
# OR programmatically:
# Load .legal-deny-list.yaml → scan all extracted text → zero matches required
```
**Must pass before any commit.** Check extracted text + metadata against all deny patterns.
### Phase 4: Commit to Repo
```bash
# Target repo based on data domain:
# - O&G/CRE data → assethold/ or worldenergydata/
# - Business docs → aceengineer-admin/
# - Personal/family → achantas-data/
# - Real estate → sabithaandkrishnaestates/
cd <target-repo>/
git add data/
git commit -m "feat: {source} dataset — {N} records, legal scan passed (#{issue})"
git push origin main
```
Files to include:
- `listings.json` — raw extracted data
- `listings_enriched.json` — with inferred fields
- `listings.csv` — tabular format
- `market_analysis.json` — aggregated statistics
- `README.md` — documentation with dataset description, stats, legal scan status
### Phase 5: Delete from Gmail (after confirmation)
```python
def batch_delete(msg_ids, token, batch_size=25):
"""Delete messages in batches"""
for mid in msg_ids:
gmail_delete(mid, token)
```
**Safety rules:**
1. Only delete after data is committed and pushed to repo
2. User must approve delete list before execution
3. Keep messages from VIP/known contacts
4. Process unsubscribe candidates first (less risky)
## Known Sender Actions
Maintained dictionary mapping domains to actions:
```python
ACTIONS = {
# CRE marketplaces — extract data first
"sandsig.com": "extract_then_delete",
"marcusmillichap.com": "extract_then_delete",
"email.loopnet.com": "extract_then_delete",
"ten-x.ccsend.com": "extract_then_delete",
# Marketing/promo — unsubscribe then delete
"collide.io": "unsubscribe_then_delete",
"promote.weebly.com": "unsubscribe_then_delete",
"lists.wikimedia.org": "unsubscribe_then_delete",
"e.swimoutlet.com": "unsubscribe_then_delete",
"email.myflighthub.com": "unsubscribe_then_delete",
# Keep (valuable notifications)
"github.com": "keep",
"openrouter.ai": "keep",
# Review before action
"substack.com": "review",
"rigzonemail.com": "review",
"info.marineinsight.com": "review",
}
```
Expand this dictionary with experience. Use sender domain + List-Unsubscribe header to auto-classify unknown senders.
## Gmail API Notes
### OAuth Token Refresh
```python
def refresh(acct):
cred = os.path.expanduser(f"~/.gmail-{acct}/credentials.json")
with open(cred) as f:
saved = json.load(f)
data = urllib.parse.urlencode({
"client_id": CLIENT_ID, "client_secret": CLIENT_SECRET,
"refresh_token": saved["refresh_token"], "grant_type": "refresh_token",
}).encode()
# POST to https://oauth2.googleapis.com/token
# Update saved['access_token'] and save back
```
### List vs Get
- `list` returns `messages[]` with `id`, `threadId`, `resultSizeEstimate`
- `get` with `format=metadata` returns headers without body (fast)
- `get` with `format=full` returns full message (slow, use only for body extraction)
### Delete
```python
req = urllib.request.Request(
f"https://gmail.googleapis.com/gmail/v1/users/me/messages/{mid}",
headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {token}"}, method="DELETE")
urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=30)
```
### Draft Threading
To create a draft reply in an existing thread:
1. Get the thread's last message ID
2. Set `In-Reply-To` and `References` headers
3. Use `threadId` in the draft API body
4. Keep exact same subject line
### Attachment Download
```python
# Find attachment ID from full message payload
req = urllib.request.Request(
f"https://gmail.googleapis.com/gmail/v1/users/me/messages/{mid}/attachments/{attachment_id}",
headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {token}"})
data = json.loads(urllib.request.urlopen(req).read())
file_data = base64.urlsafe_b64decode(data["data"])
```
## Pitfalls
1. **State extraction from body is noisy** — corporate footers, multi-state operators, contact addresses all trigger false matches. Prefer subject line patterns for location data.
2. **Gmail category queries (`category:promotions`) may return 0** — the API sometimes doesn't return estimates for category filters. Use sender-domain-based scanning instead.
3. **OAuth tokens expire every hour** — always refresh before batch operations. For large operations, refresh periodically during processing.
4. **Sandbox state loss** — each code execution is a fresh sandbox. Don't rely on state between calls. Always re-auth tokens at the start of each script.
5. **List-Unsubscribe header is more reliable than email pattern matching** — some marketing emails don't use "unsubscribe" in the sender address but do have the header.
6. **Legal deny list is domain-specific** — the `.legal-deny-list.yaml` checks for offshore engineering client references. CRE listing data from Sands IG is public market info and won't match. Always run the scan regardless.
7. **Don't batch-delete without first confirming extract-then-delete is complete** — order matters: extract → commit → push → delete.Related Skills
interactive-report-generator
Generate interactive HTML reports with Plotly visualizations from data analysis results. Supports dashboards, charts, and professional styling.
data-validation-reporter
Generate interactive validation reports with quality scoring, missing data analysis, and type checking. Combines Pandas validation, Plotly visualization, and YAML configuration for comprehensive data quality reporting.
repo-ecosystem-hygiene
Interpret the daily read-only repo ecosystem hygiene audit and route remediation through approved workflows.
llm-wiki-source-extraction-coverage
Doc-type-aware extraction contract for llm-wiki source ingestion with measurable coverage and source-anchored traceability. Use when (1) ingesting a PDF, DOCX, XLSX, PPTX, HTML, or scanned-image source into a wiki `sources/` page, (2) computing the pre-extraction estimate (what fraction of the source we expect to recover) and post-extraction yield (what fraction we actually recovered), (3) anchoring wiki claims back to specific page / paragraph / cell / slide positions in the source so a reviewer can re-verify or revise against the actual document, (4) deciding whether OCR fallback or manual transcription is needed. Codifies workspace-hub's existing OCR fallback chain and python-docx / openpyxl / trafilatura patterns into a format-specific routing table. Companion to research/llm-wiki-page-shape-contract (Rule 7 input-layer pages) and research/llm-wiki — this skill is the defense against silent extraction failure.
orcaflex-reporting-fixture-proof-pattern
Build and extend fixture-backed OrcaFlex reporting proof paths in digitalmodel using stable metadata baselines, normalized HTML snapshots, and reusable reporting test helpers.
repo-sync
Smart repository synchronization across workspace-hub ecosystem — diagnoses and fixes pull failures (detached HEAD, diverged branches, uncommitted changes)
repo-structure
Canonical source layout, test mirroring, root cleanliness, gitignore, docs classification, and committed artifact rules for all workspace-hub tier-1 repos. Consult before creating directories or files in any submodule.
repo-portfolio-steering
Generate a one-page portfolio steering report for workspace-hub. Use when the user invokes /repo-portfolio-steering, asks about harness vs engineering balance, wants a portfolio health check, or asks which repos to fund next. Reports on portfolio steering, GTM readiness, and provider activity balance.
repo-mission-portfolio-audit
Audit the workspace-hub repo portfolio to extract each repo's mission, identify documentation gaps, and prioritize a plan/approval sequence with explicit LLM-wiki weighting for future issue triage.
mixed-ops-vs-repo-fix-plan-boundary
Plan mixed operational-vs-repo remediation issues by proving live-state classification first, then only proposing code changes for confirmed repo-owned failure paths.
repo-separation-for-sensitive-data
Architecture pattern for splitting confidential data and reusable algorithms across repos
portable-baseline-pattern-extraction
Extract and separate portable baseline config from machine-specific overrides in multi-environment projects