legal-risk-assessment-green-low-risk-score-1-4
Sub-skill of legal-risk-assessment: GREEN -- Low Risk (Score 1-4) (+3).
Best use case
legal-risk-assessment-green-low-risk-score-1-4 is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Sub-skill of legal-risk-assessment: GREEN -- Low Risk (Score 1-4) (+3).
Teams using legal-risk-assessment-green-low-risk-score-1-4 should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/green-low-risk-score-1-4/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How legal-risk-assessment-green-low-risk-score-1-4 Compares
| Feature / Agent | legal-risk-assessment-green-low-risk-score-1-4 | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Sub-skill of legal-risk-assessment: GREEN -- Low Risk (Score 1-4) (+3).
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# GREEN -- Low Risk (Score 1-4) (+3) ## GREEN -- Low Risk (Score 1-4) **Characteristics**: - Minor issues that are unlikely to materialize - Standard business risks within normal operating parameters - Well-understood risks with established mitigations in place **Recommended Actions**: - **Accept**: Acknowledge the risk and proceed with standard controls - **Document**: Record in the risk register for tracking - **Monitor**: Include in periodic reviews (quarterly or annually) - **No escalation required**: Can be managed by the responsible team member **Examples**: - Vendor contract with minor deviation from standard terms in a non-critical area - Routine NDA with a well-known counterparty in a standard jurisdiction - Minor administrative compliance task with clear deadline and owner ## YELLOW -- Medium Risk (Score 5-9) **Characteristics**: - Moderate issues that could materialize under foreseeable circumstances - Risks that warrant attention but do not require immediate action - Issues with established precedent for management **Recommended Actions**: - **Mitigate**: Implement specific controls or negotiate to reduce exposure - **Monitor actively**: Review at regular intervals (monthly or as triggers occur) - **Document thoroughly**: Record risk, mitigations, and rationale in risk register - **Assign owner**: Ensure a specific person is responsible for monitoring and mitigation - **Brief stakeholders**: Inform relevant business stakeholders of the risk and mitigation plan - **Escalate if conditions change**: Define trigger events that would elevate the risk level **Examples**: - Contract with liability cap below standard but within negotiable range - Vendor processing personal data in a jurisdiction without clear adequacy determination - Regulatory development that may affect a business activity in the medium term - IP provision that is broader than preferred but common in the market ## ORANGE -- High Risk (Score 10-15) **Characteristics**: - Significant issues with meaningful probability of materializing - Risks that could result in substantial financial, operational, or reputational impact - Issues that require senior attention and dedicated mitigation efforts **Recommended Actions**: - **Escalate to senior counsel**: Brief the head of legal or designated senior counsel - **Develop mitigation plan**: Create a specific, actionable plan to reduce the risk - **Brief leadership**: Inform relevant business leaders of the risk and recommended approach - **Set review cadence**: Review weekly or at defined milestones - **Consider outside counsel**: Engage outside counsel for specialized advice if needed - **Document in detail**: Full risk memo with analysis, options, and recommendations - **Define contingency plan**: What will the organization do if the risk materializes? **Examples**: - Contract with uncapped indemnification in a material area - Data processing activity that may violate a regulatory requirement if not restructured - Threatened litigation from a significant counterparty - IP infringement allegation with colorable basis - Regulatory inquiry or audit request ## RED -- Critical Risk (Score 16-25) **Characteristics**: - Severe issues that are likely or certain to materialize - Risks that could fundamentally impact the business, its officers, or its stakeholders - Issues requiring immediate executive attention and rapid response **Recommended Actions**: - **Immediate escalation**: Brief General Counsel, C-suite, and/or Board as appropriate - **Engage outside counsel**: Retain specialized outside counsel immediately - **Establish response team**: Dedicated team to manage the risk with clear roles - **Consider insurance notification**: Notify insurers if applicable - **Crisis management**: Activate crisis management protocols if reputational risk is involved - **Preserve evidence**: Implement litigation hold if legal proceedings are possible - **Daily or more frequent review**: Active management until the risk is resolved or reduced - **Board reporting**: Include in board risk reporting as appropriate - **Regulatory notifications**: Make any required regulatory notifications **Examples**: - Active litigation with significant exposure - Data breach affecting regulated personal data - Regulatory enforcement action - Material contract breach by or against the organization - Government investigation - Credible IP infringement claim against a core product or service
Related Skills
hse-risk-analyzer
Analyze BSEE HSE (Health, Safety, Environment) incident data for risk assessment. Use for operator safety scoring, incident trend analysis, compliance tracking, and ESG-integrated economic evaluation.
risk-and-redundancy
Use when populating the Watch-outs section of a trip plan. Encodes failure modes (closures, weather, motion sickness, altitude, kid logistics) and the rule that every trip needs a Plan B for load-bearing legs. Invoked by trip-planner.
ai-tool-assessment
Assess and report on AI tool subscriptions, usage patterns, and cost-effectiveness. Use for reviewing AI subscriptions, analyzing tool usage, optimizing AI spend.
maritime-legal
AI-assisted maritime legal and casualty consulting — engineering-technical interface with admiralty proceedings
risk-assessment
Perform probabilistic risk assessment with Monte Carlo simulations for offshore marine operations
multi-tool-architecture-assessment
Systematic comparison of competing tools/approaches before committing to a multi-account, multi-tool architecture. Uses parallel subagents for research, system-state audit, and data quality analysis. Produces a decision matrix with explicit trade-offs.
legal-sanity-scan
Mandatory legal compliance gate for document intelligence, data catalogs, and code porting — scans for client names, proprietary references, and sensitive paths
legal-risk-assessment
Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria
provider-utilization-scorecard
Refresh provider quota snapshots and generate a weekly Codex/Codex/Gemini utilization scorecard grounded in quota data when available and session-activity fallback when not.
legal-sanity-review
Legal Sanity Review Workflow — mandatory pre-gate in the cross-review cycle
complexity-scorer-5-confidence-scoring
Sub-skill of complexity-scorer: 5. Confidence Scoring (+1).
complexity-scorer-3-context-aware-scoring
Sub-skill of complexity-scorer: 3. Context-Aware Scoring (+1).