product-roadmap-rice-score
Sub-skill of product-roadmap: RICE Score (+3).
Best use case
product-roadmap-rice-score is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Sub-skill of product-roadmap: RICE Score (+3).
Teams using product-roadmap-rice-score should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/rice-score/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How product-roadmap-rice-score Compares
| Feature / Agent | product-roadmap-rice-score | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Sub-skill of product-roadmap: RICE Score (+3).
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
SKILL.md Source
# RICE Score (+3) ## RICE Score Score each initiative on four dimensions, then calculate RICE = (Reach x Impact x Confidence) / Effort - **Reach**: How many users/customers will this affect in a given time period? - **Impact**: How much will this move the needle for each person reached? Score: 3 = massive, 2 = high, 1 = medium, 0.5 = low, 0.25 = minimal. - **Confidence**: How confident are we in the estimates? 100% = high, 80% = medium, 50% = low. - **Effort**: How many person-months of work? ## MoSCoW - **Must have**: Non-negotiable commitments. - **Should have**: Important and expected, but delivery is viable without them. - **Could have**: Desirable but clearly lower priority. - **Won't have**: Explicitly out of scope for this period. ## ICE Score Simpler than RICE. Score each item 1-10 on Impact, Confidence, and Ease. ICE Score = Impact x Confidence x Ease ## Value vs Effort Matrix - **High value, Low effort** (Quick wins): Do these first. - **High value, High effort** (Big bets): Plan these carefully. - **Low value, Low effort** (Fill-ins): Do these when you have spare capacity. - **Low value, High effort** (Money pits): Do not do these.
Related Skills
well-production-dashboard
Create interactive well production dashboards with real-time monitoring, verification integration, economic metrics, and multi-format exports. Use for well performance analysis, field aggregation, production forecasting, and API-driven dashboards.
production-forecaster
Forecast oil & gas well production using decline curve analysis. Use when estimating EUR, generating type curves, fitting Arps models (exponential, hyperbolic, harmonic), or running reserve calculations. Supports conventional and unconventional wells, P10/P50/P90 probabilistic outputs, and multi-field type curve comparison.
gtm-site-readiness-audit-local-vs-production
Audit GTM feature work by separating local artifact readiness from production deployment state, then fix common blockers in aceengineer-website and GTM collateral.
github-roadmap-anchor-reuse
Reuse and reopen existing roadmap/epic GitHub issues instead of fragmenting work across duplicate replacement epics; retarget children and link active issues for continuity.
domain-gap-to-issue-roadmap
Deep multi-repo ecosystem audit → domain gap matrix → structured GitHub issue roadmap with epics. Use when the user wants to assess capabilities across repos and create a backlog of work items covering code, data, and documentation gaps.
testing-production
Production validation specialist ensuring applications are fully implemented and deployment-ready. Use to verify no mock/stub/fake implementations remain, validate against real databases and APIs, perform end-to-end testing with actual systems, and confirm production readiness.
roadmap-to-github-issue-wave
Turn a roadmap/readiness review into a de-duplicated GitHub epic + child issue set with verification and explicit scope boundaries.
roadmap-issue-reopen-retarget-balance
Reopen existing roadmap anchors, close replacement epics, retarget new child issues, and add sequencing/de-dup comments so GitHub roadmap work preserves continuity and execution quality.
roadmap-anchor-issue-governance
Reopen and reuse the original roadmap/umbrella issue as the governance anchor; create new issues only for genuinely missing scoped work, then retarget/link all execution issues back to the anchor.
llm-wiki-roadmap-integration
Integrate repo-ecosystem work into an existing llm-wiki / knowledge-roadmap issue without creating duplicate GitHub issues.
product-roadmap
Plan and track product capabilities, phases, and feature priorities across workspace repositories
weekly-gtm-productivity-steering
Turn interactive weekly GTM priorities into agent-executable packets and run productivity-flow reviews that reduce owner orchestration time.