Best use case
med-researcher-r1-guide is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Medical deep research agent with reasoning chain analysis
Teams using med-researcher-r1-guide should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/med-researcher-r1-guide/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How med-researcher-r1-guide Compares
| Feature / Agent | med-researcher-r1-guide | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Medical deep research agent with reasoning chain analysis
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
Best AI Skills for ChatGPT
Find the best AI skills to adapt into ChatGPT workflows for research, writing, summarization, planning, and repeatable assistant tasks.
Best AI Skills for Claude
Explore the best AI skills for Claude and Claude Code across coding, research, workflow automation, documentation, and agent operations.
AI Agent for Product Research
Browse AI agent skills for product research, competitive analysis, customer discovery, and structured product decision support.
SKILL.md Source
# MedResearcher-R1 Guide
## Overview
MedResearcher-R1 is a medical deep research agent that combines clinical reasoning chains with iterative literature search to answer complex medical questions. Unlike general research agents, it is specialized for medical evidence — understanding clinical trial designs, PICO frameworks, evidence hierarchies, and medical terminology. Uses reasoning chain analysis (R1) to decompose clinical questions and systematically gather evidence.
## Architecture
```
Clinical Question
↓
R1 Reasoning Chain (decompose into sub-questions)
↓
Medical Search Agent
├── PubMed (MeSH terms)
├── ClinicalTrials.gov
├── Cochrane Library
└── WHO ICTRP
↓
Evidence Extraction Agent
├── PICO extraction
├── Study design classification
├── Outcome extraction
└── Risk of bias assessment
↓
Synthesis Agent (evidence grading)
↓
Clinical Answer + Evidence Report
```
## Usage
```python
from med_researcher_r1 import MedResearcherR1
researcher = MedResearcherR1(
llm_provider="anthropic",
search_backends=["pubmed", "clinical_trials", "cochrane"],
)
# Complex clinical question
result = researcher.research(
question="In patients with treatment-resistant depression, "
"how does psilocybin-assisted therapy compare to "
"esketamine in terms of remission rates and "
"long-term outcomes?",
evidence_level="systematic", # systematic, rapid, scoping
max_papers=50,
)
print(result.summary)
print(f"\nEvidence quality: {result.evidence_grade}")
print(f"Papers analyzed: {len(result.papers)}")
```
## Reasoning Chain
```python
# Inspect the R1 reasoning chain
for step in result.reasoning_chain:
print(f"\nStep {step.number}: {step.type}")
print(f" Question: {step.question}")
print(f" Strategy: {step.search_strategy}")
print(f" Findings: {step.key_finding}")
print(f" Next: {step.next_action}")
# Example chain:
# Step 1: DECOMPOSE — Split into psilocybin efficacy,
# esketamine efficacy, head-to-head comparisons
# Step 2: SEARCH — PubMed: psilocybin depression RCT
# Step 3: EXTRACT — 3 RCTs found, extract PICO + outcomes
# Step 4: SEARCH — PubMed: esketamine depression outcomes
# Step 5: SYNTHESIZE — Compare evidence, note no direct
# head-to-head trials exist
# Step 6: CONCLUDE — Indirect comparison with caveats
```
## Evidence Grading
```python
# GRADE methodology for evidence quality
for paper in result.papers[:5]:
print(f"\n{paper.title} ({paper.year})")
print(f" Design: {paper.study_design}")
print(f" Sample: {paper.sample_size}")
print(f" Grade: {paper.evidence_grade}")
print(f" Risk of bias: {paper.risk_of_bias}")
# Aggregate evidence
print(f"\nOverall certainty: {result.certainty}")
# HIGH / MODERATE / LOW / VERY LOW
print(f"Recommendation: {result.recommendation}")
```
## Medical Search Configuration
```python
researcher = MedResearcherR1(
search_config={
"pubmed": {
"use_mesh": True,
"date_range": "2019/01/01:2025/12/31",
"article_types": [
"Randomized Controlled Trial",
"Meta-Analysis",
"Systematic Review",
],
},
"clinical_trials": {
"status": ["Completed", "Active, not recruiting"],
"phase": ["Phase 3", "Phase 4"],
},
},
reasoning_config={
"max_chain_length": 10,
"reflection_enabled": True,
"uncertainty_explicit": True,
},
)
```
## Clinical Use Cases
1. **Clinical queries**: Evidence-based answers to medical questions
2. **Drug comparison**: Indirect comparison when no head-to-head data
3. **Guideline review**: Check evidence supporting clinical guidelines
4. **Case analysis**: Literature context for unusual presentations
5. **Grant proposals**: Evidence landscape for research funding
## References
- [MedResearcher-R1 GitHub](https://github.com/AQ-MedAI/MedResearcher-R1)
- [PubMed E-utilities](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK25501/)
- [GRADE Handbook](https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html)Related Skills
thuthesis-guide
Write Tsinghua University theses using the ThuThesis LaTeX template
thesis-writing-guide
Templates, formatting rules, and strategies for thesis and dissertation writing
thesis-template-guide
Set up LaTeX templates for PhD and Master's thesis documents
sjtuthesis-guide
Write SJTU theses using the SJTUThesis LaTeX template with full compliance
novathesis-guide
LaTeX thesis template supporting multiple universities and formats
graphical-abstract-guide
Create SVG graphical abstracts for journal paper submissions
beamer-presentation-guide
Guide to creating academic presentations with LaTeX Beamer
plagiarism-detection-guide
Use plagiarism detection tools and ensure manuscript originality
paper-polish-guide
Review and polish LaTeX research papers for clarity and style
grammar-checker-guide
Use grammar and style checking tools to polish academic manuscripts
conciseness-editing-guide
Eliminate wordiness and redundancy in academic prose for clarity
academic-translation-guide
Academic translation, post-editing, and Chinglish correction guide