mrsf-review
Review Markdown documents using the MRSF (Sidemark) sidecar format. Use when asked to review, comment on, or provide feedback on Markdown files. Adds structured, anchored review comments via the MRSF MCP server.
Best use case
mrsf-review is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Review Markdown documents using the MRSF (Sidemark) sidecar format. Use when asked to review, comment on, or provide feedback on Markdown files. Adds structured, anchored review comments via the MRSF MCP server.
Teams using mrsf-review should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/mrsf-review/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How mrsf-review Compares
| Feature / Agent | mrsf-review | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Review Markdown documents using the MRSF (Sidemark) sidecar format. Use when asked to review, comment on, or provide feedback on Markdown files. Adds structured, anchored review comments via the MRSF MCP server.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# MRSF Document Review You review Markdown documents by adding structured, anchored comments using the MRSF MCP server tools. ## Setup The MRSF MCP server must be available. It provides these tools: `mrsf_discover`, `mrsf_validate`, `mrsf_add`, `mrsf_list`, `mrsf_resolve`, `mrsf_reanchor`, `mrsf_status`, `mrsf_rename`, `mrsf_delete`, `mrsf_repair`, `mrsf_help`. ## Workflow 1. **Discover** the sidecar for the target document using `mrsf_discover`. 2. **Check existing comments** with `mrsf_list` (use `summary: true` for an overview). 3. **Read the document**, then **add comments** with `mrsf_add` for each issue found. Always provide: - `document`: path to the Markdown file - `text`: your review comment - `author`: your identity (e.g. "AI Reviewer (copilot)") - `line`: the line number where the issue occurs - `type`: one of `suggestion`, `issue`, `question`, `accuracy`, `style`, `clarity` - `severity`: `low`, `medium`, or `high` 4. **Validate** the sidecar with `mrsf_validate` after adding comments. 5. **Summarize** what you found using `mrsf_list` with `summary: true`. ## Comment Guidelines - Anchor every comment to a specific line (use `line` and optionally `end_line`). - Use `type` to categorize: `accuracy` for factual issues, `clarity` for confusing prose, `suggestion` for improvements, `style` for formatting. - Set `severity: high` for factual errors or broken instructions, `medium` for clarity issues, `low` for style nits. - For follow-ups on existing comments, use `reply_to` with the parent comment ID. - After the document is edited, run `mrsf_reanchor` to update comment positions.
Related Skills
performing-serverless-function-security-review
Performing security reviews of serverless functions across AWS Lambda, Azure Functions, and GCP Cloud Functions to identify overly permissive execution roles, insecure environment variables, injection vulnerabilities, and missing runtime protections.
performing-privileged-account-access-review
Conduct systematic reviews of privileged accounts to validate access rights, identify excessive permissions, and enforce least privilege across PAM infrastructure.
performing-oauth-scope-minimization-review
Performs OAuth 2.0 scope minimization review to identify over-permissioned third-party application integrations, excessive API scopes, unused token grants, and risky OAuth consent patterns across identity providers and SaaS platforms. Activates for requests involving OAuth scope audit, API permission review, third-party app risk assessment, or consent grant minimization.
performing-entitlement-review-with-sailpoint-iiq
Performs entitlement review and access certification campaigns using SailPoint IdentityIQ including manager certifications, targeted entitlement reviews, role-based access validation, SOD violation remediation, and automated revocation workflows. Activates for requests involving access reviews, entitlement certifications, SailPoint IIQ governance, or periodic user access recertification.
performing-access-review-and-certification
Conduct systematic access reviews and certifications to ensure users have appropriate access rights aligned with their roles. This skill covers review campaign design, reviewer selection, risk-based p
fix-review
Review security fixes and patches for completeness and correctness.
differential-review
Security-focused code review of diffs and pull requests using Trail of Bits expertise.
code-review
Automated code review for pull requests using specialized review patterns. Analyzes code for quality, security, performance, and best practices. Use when reviewing code changes, PRs, or doing code audits.
self-review
手元のコードをreviewerエージェントでセルフレビューし、指摘に基づいて自動修正するループ
review-current-branch
シニアソフトウェアエンジニアとして現在のブランチのプルリクエストをレビューする
reply-fix-to-review-comments
GitHub PR のレビューコメント（インライン）に対し、直前の会話で対応した commit を紐付けて「<commit URL> で修正しました」という Reply をまとめて投稿する。「レビュー Reply して」「レビューコメントに返信して」「修正報告投稿して」などのリクエストで使用。コード修正そのものは扱わず、修正・commit 済みの状態から呼ぶ前提。
fix-review-comments
直前の会話に含まれるレビュー結果を精査し、妥当な指摘に対して修正を実施する。レビュアーの指摘がすべて正しいとは限らないため、各コメントを批判的に評価する。「レビュー対応して」「レビューコメント修正して」「指摘を直して」「レビュー指摘に対応して」などのリクエストで使用。