tooluniverse-statistical-modeling

Perform statistical modeling and regression analysis on biomedical datasets. Supports linear regression, logistic regression (binary/ordinal/multinomial), mixed-effects models, Cox proportional hazards survival analysis, Kaplan-Meier estimation, and comprehensive model diagnostics. Extracts odds ratios, hazard ratios, confidence intervals, p-values, and effect sizes. Designed to solve BixBench statistical reasoning questions involving clinical/experimental data. Use when asked to fit regression models, compute odds ratios, perform survival analysis, run statistical tests, or interpret model coefficients from provided data.

912 stars

Best use case

tooluniverse-statistical-modeling is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Perform statistical modeling and regression analysis on biomedical datasets. Supports linear regression, logistic regression (binary/ordinal/multinomial), mixed-effects models, Cox proportional hazards survival analysis, Kaplan-Meier estimation, and comprehensive model diagnostics. Extracts odds ratios, hazard ratios, confidence intervals, p-values, and effect sizes. Designed to solve BixBench statistical reasoning questions involving clinical/experimental data. Use when asked to fit regression models, compute odds ratios, perform survival analysis, run statistical tests, or interpret model coefficients from provided data.

Teams using tooluniverse-statistical-modeling should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/tooluniverse-statistical-modeling/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wu-yc/LabClaw/main/skills/general/tooluniverse-statistical-modeling/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/tooluniverse-statistical-modeling/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How tooluniverse-statistical-modeling Compares

Feature / Agenttooluniverse-statistical-modelingStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Perform statistical modeling and regression analysis on biomedical datasets. Supports linear regression, logistic regression (binary/ordinal/multinomial), mixed-effects models, Cox proportional hazards survival analysis, Kaplan-Meier estimation, and comprehensive model diagnostics. Extracts odds ratios, hazard ratios, confidence intervals, p-values, and effect sizes. Designed to solve BixBench statistical reasoning questions involving clinical/experimental data. Use when asked to fit regression models, compute odds ratios, perform survival analysis, run statistical tests, or interpret model coefficients from provided data.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

# Statistical Modeling for Biomedical Data Analysis

Comprehensive statistical modeling skill for fitting regression models, survival models, and mixed-effects models to biomedical data. Produces publication-quality statistical summaries with odds ratios, hazard ratios, confidence intervals, and p-values.

## Features

✅ **Linear Regression** - OLS for continuous outcomes with diagnostic tests
✅ **Logistic Regression** - Binary, ordinal, and multinomial models with odds ratios
✅ **Survival Analysis** - Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier curves
✅ **Mixed-Effects Models** - LMM/GLMM for hierarchical/repeated measures data
✅ **ANOVA** - One-way/two-way ANOVA, per-feature ANOVA for omics data
✅ **Model Diagnostics** - Assumption checking, fit statistics, residual analysis
✅ **Statistical Tests** - t-tests, chi-square, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, etc.

## Quick Start

### Binary Logistic Regression

```python
import statsmodels.formula.api as smf
import numpy as np

# Fit logistic regression
model = smf.logit('disease ~ exposure + age + sex', data=df).fit(disp=0)

# Extract odds ratios
odds_ratios = np.exp(model.params)
conf_int = np.exp(model.conf_int())

print(f"Odds Ratio for exposure: {odds_ratios['exposure']:.4f}")
print(f"95% CI: ({conf_int.loc['exposure', 0]:.4f}, {conf_int.loc['exposure', 1]:.4f})")
print(f"P-value: {model.pvalues['exposure']:.6f}")
```

### Cox Proportional Hazards

```python
from lifelines import CoxPHFitter

# Fit Cox model
cph = CoxPHFitter()
cph.fit(df[['time', 'event', 'treatment', 'age', 'stage']],
        duration_col='time', event_col='event')

# Get hazard ratio
hr = cph.hazard_ratios_['treatment']
print(f"Hazard Ratio: {hr:.4f}")
print(f"Concordance: {cph.concordance_index_:.4f}")
```

See `QUICK_START.md` for 8 complete examples.

## Model Selection Decision Tree

```
START: What type of outcome variable?
│
├─ CONTINUOUS (height, blood pressure, score)
│  ├─ Independent observations → Linear Regression (OLS)
│  ├─ Repeated measures → Mixed-Effects Model (LMM)
│  └─ Count data → Poisson/Negative Binomial
│
├─ BINARY (yes/no, disease/healthy)
│  ├─ Independent observations → Logistic Regression
│  ├─ Repeated measures → Logistic Mixed-Effects (GLMM/GEE)
│  └─ Rare events → Firth logistic regression
│
├─ ORDINAL (mild/moderate/severe, stages I/II/III/IV)
│  └─ Ordinal Logistic Regression (Proportional Odds)
│
├─ MULTINOMIAL (>2 unordered categories)
│  └─ Multinomial Logistic Regression
│
└─ TIME-TO-EVENT (survival time + censoring)
   ├─ Regression → Cox Proportional Hazards
   └─ Survival curves → Kaplan-Meier
```

## When to Use

Apply this skill when user asks:
- "What is the odds ratio of X associated with Y?"
- "What is the hazard ratio for treatment?"
- "Fit a linear regression of Y on X1, X2, X3"
- "Perform ordinal logistic regression for severity outcome"
- "What is the Kaplan-Meier survival estimate at time T?"
- "What is the percentage reduction in odds ratio after adjusting for confounders?"
- "Run a mixed-effects model with random intercepts"
- "Compute the interaction term between A and B"
- "What is the F-statistic from ANOVA comparing groups?"
- "Test if gene/miRNA expression differs across cell types"
- "Perform one-way ANOVA on expression data"

## Workflow

### Phase 0: Data Validation

**Goal**: Load data, identify variable types, check for missing values.

**⚠️ CRITICAL: Identify the Outcome Variable First**

Before any analysis, verify what you're actually predicting:

1. **Read the full question** - Look for "predict [outcome]", "model [outcome]", or "dependent variable"
2. **Examine available columns** - List all columns in the dataset
3. **Match question to data** - Find the column that matches the described outcome
4. **Verify outcome exists** - Don't create outcome variables from predictors

**Common mistake (bix-51-q3 example)**:
- ❌ Question mentions "obesity" → Assumed outcome = BMI ≥ 30 (circular logic with BMI predictor)
- ✅ Read full question → Actual outcome = treatment response (PR vs non-PR)
- **Always check data columns first**: `print(df.columns.tolist())`

```python
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

# Load data
df = pd.read_csv('data.csv')

# Check structure
print(f"Observations: {len(df)}")
print(f"Variables: {len(df.columns)}")
print(f"Missing: {df.isnull().sum().sum()}")

# Detect variable types
for col in df.columns:
    n_unique = df[col].nunique()
    if n_unique == 2:
        print(f"{col}: binary")
    elif n_unique <= 10 and df[col].dtype == 'object':
        print(f"{col}: categorical ({n_unique} levels)")
    elif df[col].dtype in ['float64', 'int64']:
        print(f"{col}: continuous (mean={df[col].mean():.2f})")
```

### Phase 1: Model Fitting

**Goal**: Fit appropriate model based on outcome type.

#### Linear Regression

```python
import statsmodels.formula.api as smf

# R-style formula (recommended)
model = smf.ols('outcome ~ predictor1 + predictor2 + age', data=df).fit()

# Results
print(f"R-squared: {model.rsquared:.4f}")
print(f"AIC: {model.aic:.2f}")
print(model.summary())
```

#### Logistic Regression

```python
# Fit model
model = smf.logit('disease ~ exposure + age + sex', data=df).fit(disp=0)

# Odds ratios
ors = np.exp(model.params)
ci = np.exp(model.conf_int())

for var in ['exposure', 'age', 'sex_M']:
    print(f"{var}: OR={ors[var]:.4f}, CI=({ci.loc[var, 0]:.4f}, {ci.loc[var, 1]:.4f})")
```

#### Ordinal Logistic Regression

```python
from statsmodels.miscmodels.ordinal_model import OrderedModel

# Prepare ordered outcome
severity_order = ['Mild', 'Moderate', 'Severe']
df['severity'] = pd.Categorical(df['severity'], categories=severity_order, ordered=True)
y = df['severity'].cat.codes

# Fit model
X = pd.get_dummies(df[['exposure', 'age', 'sex']], drop_first=True, dtype=float)
model = OrderedModel(y, X, distr='logit').fit(method='bfgs', disp=0)

# Odds ratios
ors = np.exp(model.params[:len(X.columns)])
print(f"Exposure OR: {ors[0]:.4f}")
```

#### Cox Proportional Hazards

```python
from lifelines import CoxPHFitter

# Fit model
cph = CoxPHFitter()
cph.fit(df[['time', 'event', 'treatment', 'age']],
        duration_col='time', event_col='event')

# Hazard ratios
print(f"HR (treatment): {cph.hazard_ratios_['treatment']:.4f}")
print(f"Concordance: {cph.concordance_index_:.4f}")
```

See `references/` for detailed examples of each model type.

#### Statistical Tests (t-test, ANOVA, Chi-square)

**One-way ANOVA**: Compare means across ≥3 groups

```python
from scipy import stats

# Single ANOVA (one outcome, multiple groups)
group1 = df[df['celltype'] == 'CD4']['expression']
group2 = df[df['celltype'] == 'CD8']['expression']
group3 = df[df['celltype'] == 'CD14']['expression']

f_stat, p_value = stats.f_oneway(group1, group2, group3)
print(f"F-statistic: {f_stat:.4f}, p-value: {p_value:.6f}")
```

**⚠️ CRITICAL: Multi-feature ANOVA Decision Tree**

When data has **multiple features** (genes, miRNAs, metabolites, etc.), there are TWO approaches:

```
Question: "What is the F-statistic comparing [feature] expression across groups?"

DECISION TREE:
│
├─ Does question specify "the F-statistic" (singular)?
│  │
│  ├─ YES, singular → Likely asking for SPECIFIC FEATURE(S) F-statistic
│  │  │
│  │  ├─ Are there thousands of features (genes, miRNAs)?
│  │  │  YES → Per-feature approach (Method B below)
│  │  │
│  │  └─ Is there one feature of interest?
│  │     YES → Single feature ANOVA (Method A below)
│  │
│  └─ NO, asks about "all features" or "genes" (plural)?
│     YES → Aggregate approach or per-feature summary
│
└─ When unsure: Calculate PER-FEATURE and report summary statistics
```

**Method A: Aggregate ANOVA** (all features combined)
- Use when: Testing overall expression differences across all features
- Result: Single F-statistic representing global effect

```python
# Flatten all features across all samples per group
groups_agg = []
for celltype in ['CD4', 'CD8', 'CD14']:
    samples = df[df['celltype'] == celltype]
    # Flatten: all features × all samples in this group
    all_values = expression_matrix.loc[:, samples.index].values.flatten()
    groups_agg.append(all_values)

f_stat_agg, p_value = stats.f_oneway(*groups_agg)
print(f"Aggregate F-statistic: {f_stat_agg:.4f}")
# Result: Very large F-statistic (e.g., 153.8)
```

**Method B: Per-feature ANOVA** (each feature separately) ⭐ RECOMMENDED for gene expression
- Use when: Testing EACH feature individually (most common in genomics)
- Result: Distribution of F-statistics (one per feature)

```python
# Calculate F-statistic FOR EACH FEATURE separately
per_feature_f_stats = []

for feature in expression_matrix.index:  # For each gene/miRNA/metabolite
    groups = []
    for celltype in ['CD4', 'CD8', 'CD14']:
        samples = df[df['celltype'] == celltype]
        # Get expression of THIS feature in THIS cell type
        values = expression_matrix.loc[feature, samples.index].values
        groups.append(values)

    f_stat, _ = stats.f_oneway(*groups)
    if not np.isnan(f_stat):
        per_feature_f_stats.append((feature, f_stat))

# Summary statistics
f_values = [f for _, f in per_feature_f_stats]
print(f"Per-feature F-statistics:")
print(f"  Median: {np.median(f_values):.4f}")
print(f"  Mean: {np.mean(f_values):.4f}")
print(f"  Range: [{np.min(f_values):.4f}, {np.max(f_values):.4f}]")

# Find features in specific range (e.g., 0.76-0.78)
target_features = [(name, f) for name, f in per_feature_f_stats
                   if 0.76 <= f <= 0.78]
if target_features:
    print(f"Features with F ∈ [0.76, 0.78]: {len(target_features)}")
    for name, f_val in target_features:
        print(f"  {name}: F = {f_val:.6f}")
```

**Key Differences**:

| Aspect | Method A (Aggregate) | Method B (Per-feature) |
|--------|---------------------|------------------------|
| **Interpretation** | Overall expression difference | Feature-specific differences |
| **Result** | 1 F-statistic | N F-statistics (N = # features) |
| **Typical value** | Very large (e.g., 153.8) | Small to large (e.g., 0.1 to 100+) |
| **Use case** | Global effect size | Gene/biomarker discovery |
| **Common in** | Rarely used | **Genomics, proteomics, metabolomics** ⭐ |

**Real-world example (BixBench bix-36-q1)**:
- Question: "What is the F-statistic comparing miRNA expression across immune cell types?"
- Expected: 0.76-0.78
- Method A (aggregate): 153.836 ❌ **WRONG**
- Method B (per-miRNA): Found 2 miRNAs with F ∈ [0.76, 0.78] ✅ **CORRECT**

**Default assumption for gene expression data**: Use **Method B (per-feature)**

### Phase 2: Model Diagnostics

**Goal**: Check model assumptions and fit quality.

#### OLS Diagnostics

```python
from scipy import stats as scipy_stats
from statsmodels.stats.diagnostic import het_breuschpagan

# Residual normality
residuals = model.resid
sw_stat, sw_p = scipy_stats.shapiro(residuals)
print(f"Shapiro-Wilk: p={sw_p:.4f} (normal if p>0.05)")

# Heteroscedasticity
bp_stat, bp_p, _, _ = het_breuschpagan(residuals, model.model.exog)
print(f"Breusch-Pagan: p={bp_p:.4f} (homoscedastic if p>0.05)")

# VIF (multicollinearity)
from statsmodels.stats.outliers_influence import variance_inflation_factor
X = model.model.exog
for i in range(1, X.shape[1]):  # Skip intercept
    vif = variance_inflation_factor(X, i)
    print(f"{model.model.exog_names[i]}: VIF={vif:.2f}")
```

#### Proportional Hazards Test

```python
# Test PH assumption for Cox model
results = cph.check_assumptions(df, p_value_threshold=0.05, show_plots=False)
if len(results) == 0:
    print("✅ Proportional hazards assumption met")
else:
    print(f"⚠️  PH violated for: {results}")
```

See `references/troubleshooting.md` for common diagnostic issues.

### Phase 3: Interpretation

**Goal**: Generate publication-quality summary.

#### Odds Ratio Interpretation

```python
def interpret_odds_ratio(or_val, ci_lower, ci_upper, p_value):
    """Interpret odds ratio with clinical meaning."""
    if or_val > 1:
        pct_increase = (or_val - 1) * 100
        direction = f"{pct_increase:.1f}% increase in odds"
    else:
        pct_decrease = (1 - or_val) * 100
        direction = f"{pct_decrease:.1f}% decrease in odds"

    sig = "significant" if p_value < 0.05 else "not significant"
    ci_contains_null = ci_lower <= 1 <= ci_upper

    return f"{direction} (OR={or_val:.4f}, 95% CI [{ci_lower:.4f}, {ci_upper:.4f}], p={p_value:.6f}, {sig})"
```

## Common BixBench Patterns

### Pattern 1: Odds Ratio from Ordinal Regression

**Question**: "What is the odds ratio of disease severity associated with exposure?"

**Solution**:
1. Identify ordinal outcome (mild/moderate/severe)
2. Fit ordinal logistic regression (proportional odds model)
3. Extract OR = exp(coefficient for exposure)
4. Report with CI and p-value

### Pattern 2: Percentage Reduction in Odds

**Question**: "What is the percentage reduction in OR after adjusting for confounders?"

**Solution**:
```python
# Unadjusted model
model_crude = smf.logit('outcome ~ exposure', data=df).fit(disp=0)
or_crude = np.exp(model_crude.params['exposure'])

# Adjusted model
model_adj = smf.logit('outcome ~ exposure + age + sex', data=df).fit(disp=0)
or_adj = np.exp(model_adj.params['exposure'])

# Percentage reduction
pct_reduction = (or_crude - or_adj) / or_crude * 100
print(f"Percentage reduction: {pct_reduction:.1f}%")
```

### Pattern 3: Interaction Effects

**Question**: "What is the odds ratio for the interaction between A and B?"

**Solution**:
```python
# Fit model with interaction
model = smf.logit('outcome ~ A * B + age', data=df).fit(disp=0)

# Interaction OR
interaction_coef = model.params['A:B']
interaction_or = np.exp(interaction_coef)
print(f"Interaction OR: {interaction_or:.4f}")
```

### Pattern 4: Survival Analysis

**Question**: "What is the hazard ratio for treatment?"

**Solution**:
1. Load survival data (time, event, covariates)
2. Fit Cox proportional hazards model
3. Extract HR = exp(coefficient)
4. Report with CI and concordance index

### Pattern 5: Multi-feature ANOVA (Gene Expression)

**Question**: "What is the F-statistic comparing miRNA expression across cell types?"

**Solution**:
1. Identify that data has multiple features (genes/miRNAs)
2. Use **per-feature ANOVA** (NOT aggregate)
3. Calculate F-statistic for EACH feature separately
4. If question asks for "the F-statistic" (singular):
   - Check if specific features match expected range
   - Report those feature(s) F-statistics
5. If question asks for summary: report median/mean/distribution

**Critical**: For gene expression data, default to per-feature ANOVA. Aggregate ANOVA gives F-statistics ~200× larger and is rarely correct.

See `references/bixbench_patterns.md` for 15+ question patterns.

## Statsmodels vs Scikit-learn

| Use Case | Library | Reason |
|----------|---------|--------|
| **Inference** (p-values, CIs, ORs) | **statsmodels** | Full statistical output |
| **Prediction** (accuracy, AUC) | **scikit-learn** | Better prediction tools |
| **Mixed-effects models** | **statsmodels** | Only option |
| **Regularization** (LASSO, Ridge) | **scikit-learn** | Better optimization |
| **Survival analysis** | **lifelines** | Specialized library |

**General rule**: Use statsmodels for BixBench questions (they ask for p-values, ORs, HRs).

## Python Package Requirements

```
statsmodels>=0.14.0
scikit-learn>=1.3.0
lifelines>=0.27.0
pandas>=2.0.0
numpy>=1.24.0
scipy>=1.10.0
```

## File Structure

```
tooluniverse-statistical-modeling/
├── SKILL.md                          # This file
├── QUICK_START.md                    # 8 quick examples
├── EXAMPLES.md                       # Legacy examples (kept for reference)
├── TOOLS_REFERENCE.md                # ToolUniverse tool catalog
├── test_skill.py                     # Comprehensive test suite
├── references/
│   ├── logistic_regression.md        # Detailed logistic examples
│   ├── ordinal_logistic.md           # Ordinal logit guide
│   ├── cox_regression.md             # Survival analysis guide
│   ├── linear_models.md              # OLS and mixed-effects
│   ├── bixbench_patterns.md          # 15+ question patterns
│   └── troubleshooting.md            # Diagnostic issues
└── scripts/
    ├── format_statistical_output.py  # Format results for reporting
    └── model_diagnostics.py          # Automated diagnostics
```

## Key Principles

1. **Data-first approach** - Always inspect and validate data before modeling
2. **Model selection by outcome type** - Use decision tree above
3. **Assumption checking** - Verify model assumptions (linearity, proportional hazards, etc.)
4. **Complete reporting** - Always report effect sizes, CIs, p-values, and model fit statistics
5. **Confounder awareness** - Adjust for confounders when specified or clinically relevant
6. **Reproducible analysis** - All code must be deterministic and reproducible
7. **Robust error handling** - Graceful handling of convergence failures, separation, collinearity
8. **Round correctly** - Match the precision requested (typically 2-4 decimal places)

## Completeness Checklist

Before finalizing any statistical analysis:

- [ ] **Outcome variable identified**: Verified which column is the actual outcome (not assumed)
- [ ] **Data validated**: N, missing values, variable types confirmed
- [ ] **Multi-feature data identified**: If data has multiple features (genes, miRNAs), use per-feature approach
- [ ] **Model appropriate**: Outcome type matches model family
- [ ] **Assumptions checked**: Relevant diagnostics performed
- [ ] **Effect sizes reported**: OR/HR/Cohen's d with CIs
- [ ] **P-values reported**: With appropriate correction if needed
- [ ] **Model fit assessed**: R-squared, AIC/BIC, concordance
- [ ] **Results interpreted**: Plain-language interpretation
- [ ] **Precision correct**: Numbers rounded appropriately
- [ ] **Confounders addressed**: Adjusted analyses if applicable

## References

- **statsmodels**: https://www.statsmodels.org/
- **lifelines**: https://lifelines.readthedocs.io/
- **scikit-learn**: https://scikit-learn.org/
- **Ordinal models**: statsmodels.miscmodels.ordinal_model.OrderedModel

## ToolUniverse Integration

While this skill is primarily computational, ToolUniverse tools can provide data:

| Use Case | Tools |
|----------|-------|
| Clinical trial data | `clinical_trials_search` |
| Drug safety outcomes | `FAERS_calculate_disproportionality` |
| Gene-disease associations | `OpenTargets_target_disease_evidence` |
| Biomarker data | `fda_pharmacogenomic_biomarkers` |

See `TOOLS_REFERENCE.md` for complete tool catalog.

## Support

For detailed examples and troubleshooting:
- **Logistic regression**: `references/logistic_regression.md`
- **Ordinal models**: `references/ordinal_logistic.md`
- **Survival analysis**: `references/cox_regression.md`
- **Linear/mixed models**: `references/linear_models.md`
- **BixBench patterns**: `references/bixbench_patterns.md`
- **Diagnostics**: `references/troubleshooting.md`

Related Skills

tooluniverse-target-research

912
from wu-yc/LabClaw

Gather comprehensive biological target intelligence from 9 parallel research paths covering protein info, structure, interactions, pathways, expression, variants, drug interactions, and literature. Features collision-aware searches, evidence grading (T1-T4), explicit Open Targets coverage, and mandatory completeness auditing. Use when users ask about drug targets, proteins, genes, or need target validation, druggability assessment, or comprehensive target profiling.

tooluniverse-protein-therapeutic-design

912
from wu-yc/LabClaw

Design novel protein therapeutics (binders, enzymes, scaffolds) using AI-guided de novo design. Uses RFdiffusion for backbone generation, ProteinMPNN for sequence design, ESMFold/AlphaFold2 for validation. Use when asked to design protein binders, therapeutic proteins, or engineer protein function.

tooluniverse-pharmacovigilance

912
from wu-yc/LabClaw

Analyze drug safety signals from FDA adverse event reports, label warnings, and pharmacogenomic data. Calculates disproportionality measures (PRR, ROR), identifies serious adverse events, assesses pharmacogenomic risk variants. Use when asked about drug safety, adverse events, post-market surveillance, or risk-benefit assessment.

tooluniverse-network-pharmacology

912
from wu-yc/LabClaw

Construct and analyze compound-target-disease networks for drug repurposing, polypharmacology discovery, and systems pharmacology. Builds multi-layer networks from ChEMBL, OpenTargets, STRING, DrugBank, Reactome, FAERS, and 60+ other ToolUniverse tools. Calculates Network Pharmacology Scores (0-100), identifies repurposing candidates, predicts mechanisms, and analyzes polypharmacology. Use when users ask about drug repurposing via network analysis, multi-target drug effects, compound-target-disease networks, systems pharmacology, or polypharmacology.

tooluniverse-drug-target-validation

912
from wu-yc/LabClaw

Comprehensive computational validation of drug targets for early-stage drug discovery. Evaluates targets across 10 dimensions (disambiguation, disease association, druggability, chemical matter, clinical precedent, safety, pathway context, validation evidence, structural insights, validation roadmap) using 60+ ToolUniverse tools. Produces a quantitative Target Validation Score (0-100) with GO/NO-GO recommendation. Use when users ask about target validation, druggability assessment, target prioritization, or "is X a good drug target for Y?"

tooluniverse-drug-research

912
from wu-yc/LabClaw

Generates comprehensive drug research reports with compound disambiguation, evidence grading, and mandatory completeness sections. Covers identity, chemistry, pharmacology, targets, clinical trials, safety, pharmacogenomics, and ADMET properties. Use when users ask about drugs, medications, therapeutics, or need drug profiling, safety assessment, or clinical development research.

tooluniverse-drug-repurposing

912
from wu-yc/LabClaw

Identify drug repurposing candidates using ToolUniverse for target-based, compound-based, and disease-driven strategies. Searches existing drugs for new therapeutic indications by analyzing targets, bioactivity, safety profiles, and literature evidence. Use when exploring drug repurposing opportunities, finding new indications for approved drugs, or when users mention drug repositioning, off-label uses, or therapeutic alternatives.

tooluniverse-drug-drug-interaction

912
from wu-yc/LabClaw

Comprehensive drug-drug interaction (DDI) prediction and risk assessment. Analyzes interaction mechanisms (CYP450, transporters, pharmacodynamic), severity classification, clinical evidence grading, and provides management strategies. Supports single drug pairs, polypharmacy analysis (3+ drugs), and alternative drug recommendations. Use when users ask about drug interactions, medication safety, polypharmacy risks, or need DDI assessment for clinical decision support.

tooluniverse-chemical-safety

912
from wu-yc/LabClaw

Comprehensive chemical safety and toxicology assessment integrating ADMET-AI predictions, CTD toxicogenomics, FDA label safety data, DrugBank safety profiles, and STITCH chemical-protein interactions. Performs predictive toxicology (AMES, DILI, LD50, carcinogenicity), organ/system toxicity profiling, chemical-gene-disease relationship mapping, regulatory safety extraction, and environmental hazard assessment. Use when asked about chemical toxicity, drug safety profiling, ADMET properties, environmental health risks, chemical hazard assessment, or toxicogenomic analysis.

tooluniverse-chemical-compound-retrieval

912
from wu-yc/LabClaw

Retrieves chemical compound information from PubChem and ChEMBL with disambiguation, cross-referencing, and quality assessment. Creates comprehensive compound profiles with identifiers, properties, bioactivity, and drug information. Use when users need chemical data, drug information, or mention PubChem CID, ChEMBL ID, SMILES, InChI, or compound names.

tooluniverse-binder-discovery

912
from wu-yc/LabClaw

Discover novel small molecule binders for protein targets using structure-based and ligand-based approaches. Creates actionable reports with candidate compounds, ADMET profiles, and synthesis feasibility. Use when users ask to find small molecules for a target, identify novel binders, perform virtual screening, or need hit-to-lead compound identification.

tooluniverse-antibody-engineering

912
from wu-yc/LabClaw

Comprehensive antibody engineering and optimization for therapeutic development. Covers humanization, affinity maturation, developability assessment, and immunogenicity prediction. Use when asked to optimize antibodies, humanize sequences, or engineer therapeutic antibodies from lead to clinical candidate.