tooluniverse-immunotherapy-response-prediction
Predict patient response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) using multi-biomarker integration. Given a cancer type, somatic mutations, and optional biomarkers (TMB, PD-L1, MSI status), performs systematic analysis across 11 phases covering TMB classification, neoantigen burden estimation, MSI/MMR assessment, PD-L1 evaluation, immune microenvironment profiling, mutation-based resistance/sensitivity prediction, clinical evidence retrieval, and multi-biomarker score integration. Generates a quantitative ICI Response Score (0-100), response likelihood tier, specific ICI drug recommendations with evidence, resistance risk factors, and a monitoring plan. Use when oncologists ask about immunotherapy eligibility, checkpoint inhibitor selection, or biomarker-guided ICI treatment decisions.
Best use case
tooluniverse-immunotherapy-response-prediction is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Predict patient response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) using multi-biomarker integration. Given a cancer type, somatic mutations, and optional biomarkers (TMB, PD-L1, MSI status), performs systematic analysis across 11 phases covering TMB classification, neoantigen burden estimation, MSI/MMR assessment, PD-L1 evaluation, immune microenvironment profiling, mutation-based resistance/sensitivity prediction, clinical evidence retrieval, and multi-biomarker score integration. Generates a quantitative ICI Response Score (0-100), response likelihood tier, specific ICI drug recommendations with evidence, resistance risk factors, and a monitoring plan. Use when oncologists ask about immunotherapy eligibility, checkpoint inhibitor selection, or biomarker-guided ICI treatment decisions.
Teams using tooluniverse-immunotherapy-response-prediction should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/tooluniverse-immunotherapy-response-prediction/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How tooluniverse-immunotherapy-response-prediction Compares
| Feature / Agent | tooluniverse-immunotherapy-response-prediction | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Predict patient response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) using multi-biomarker integration. Given a cancer type, somatic mutations, and optional biomarkers (TMB, PD-L1, MSI status), performs systematic analysis across 11 phases covering TMB classification, neoantigen burden estimation, MSI/MMR assessment, PD-L1 evaluation, immune microenvironment profiling, mutation-based resistance/sensitivity prediction, clinical evidence retrieval, and multi-biomarker score integration. Generates a quantitative ICI Response Score (0-100), response likelihood tier, specific ICI drug recommendations with evidence, resistance risk factors, and a monitoring plan. Use when oncologists ask about immunotherapy eligibility, checkpoint inhibitor selection, or biomarker-guided ICI treatment decisions.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Immunotherapy Response Prediction
Predict patient response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) using multi-biomarker integration. Transforms a patient tumor profile (cancer type + mutations + biomarkers) into a quantitative ICI Response Score with drug-specific recommendations, resistance risk assessment, and monitoring plan.
**KEY PRINCIPLES**:
1. **Report-first approach** - Create report file FIRST, then populate progressively
2. **Evidence-graded** - Every finding has an evidence tier (T1-T4)
3. **Quantitative output** - ICI Response Score (0-100) with transparent component breakdown
4. **Cancer-specific** - All thresholds and predictions are cancer-type adjusted
5. **Multi-biomarker** - Integrate TMB + MSI + PD-L1 + neoantigen + mutations
6. **Resistance-aware** - Always check for known resistance mutations (STK11, PTEN, JAK1/2, B2M)
7. **Drug-specific** - Recommend specific ICI agents with evidence
8. **Source-referenced** - Every statement cites the tool/database source
9. **English-first queries** - Always use English terms in tool calls
---
## When to Use
Apply when user asks:
- "Will this patient respond to immunotherapy?"
- "Should I give pembrolizumab to this melanoma patient?"
- "Patient has NSCLC with TMB 25, PD-L1 80% - predict ICI response"
- "MSI-high colorectal cancer - which checkpoint inhibitor?"
- "Patient has BRAF V600E melanoma, TMB 15 - immunotherapy or targeted?"
- "Low TMB NSCLC with STK11 mutation - should I try immunotherapy?"
- "Compare pembrolizumab vs nivolumab for this patient profile"
- "What biomarkers predict checkpoint inhibitor response?"
---
## Input Parsing
**Required**: Cancer type + at least one of: mutation list OR TMB value
**Optional**: PD-L1 expression, MSI status, immune infiltration data, HLA type, prior treatments, intended ICI
### Accepted Input Formats
| Format | Example | How to Parse |
|--------|---------|-------------|
| Cancer + mutations | "Melanoma, BRAF V600E, TP53 R273H" | cancer=melanoma, mutations=[BRAF V600E, TP53 R273H] |
| Cancer + TMB | "NSCLC, TMB 25 mut/Mb" | cancer=NSCLC, tmb=25 |
| Cancer + full profile | "Melanoma, BRAF V600E, TMB 15, PD-L1 50%, MSS" | cancer=melanoma, mutations=[BRAF V600E], tmb=15, pdl1=50, msi=MSS |
| Cancer + MSI status | "Colorectal cancer, MSI-high" | cancer=CRC, msi=MSI-H |
| Resistance query | "NSCLC, TMB 2, STK11 loss, PD-L1 <1%" | cancer=NSCLC, tmb=2, mutations=[STK11 loss], pdl1=0 |
| ICI selection | "Which ICI for NSCLC PD-L1 90%?" | cancer=NSCLC, pdl1=90, query_type=drug_selection |
### Cancer Type Normalization
Common aliases to resolve:
- NSCLC -> non-small cell lung carcinoma
- SCLC -> small cell lung carcinoma
- CRC -> colorectal cancer
- RCC -> renal cell carcinoma
- HNSCC -> head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
- UC / bladder -> urothelial carcinoma
- HCC -> hepatocellular carcinoma
- TNBC -> triple-negative breast cancer
- GEJ -> gastroesophageal junction cancer
### Gene Symbol Normalization
- PD-L1 -> CD274
- PD-1 -> PDCD1
- CTLA-4 -> CTLA4
- HER2 -> ERBB2
- MSH2/MLH1/MSH6/PMS2 -> MMR genes
---
## Phase 0: Tool Parameter Reference (CRITICAL)
**BEFORE calling ANY tool**, verify parameters using this reference table.
### Verified Tool Parameters
| Tool | Parameters | Notes |
|------|-----------|-------|
| `OpenTargets_get_disease_id_description_by_name` | `diseaseName` | Returns `{data: {search: {hits: [{id, name, description}]}}}` |
| `OpenTargets_get_drug_id_description_by_name` | `drugName` | Returns `{data: {search: {hits: [{id, name, description}]}}}` |
| `OpenTargets_get_associated_drugs_by_disease_efoId` | `efoId`, `size` | Returns `{data: {disease: {knownDrugs: {count, rows}}}}` |
| `OpenTargets_get_drug_mechanisms_of_action_by_chemblId` | `chemblId` | Returns `{data: {drug: {mechanismsOfAction: {rows}}}}` |
| `OpenTargets_get_approved_indications_by_drug_chemblId` | `chemblId` | Approved indications list |
| `OpenTargets_get_drug_description_by_chemblId` | `chemblId` | Drug description text |
| `OpenTargets_get_associated_targets_by_drug_chemblId` | `chemblId` | Drug targets |
| `MyGene_query_genes` | `query` (NOT `q`) | Returns `{hits: [{_id, symbol, name, ensembl: {gene}}]}` |
| `ensembl_lookup_gene` | `gene_id`, `species='homo_sapiens'` | REQUIRES species. Returns `{data: {id, display_name}}` |
| `EnsemblVEP_annotate_rsid` | `variant_id` (NOT `rsid`) | VEP annotation with SIFT/PolyPhen |
| `civic_search_evidence_items` | `therapy_name`, `disease_name` | Returns `{data: {evidenceItems: {nodes}}}` - may not filter accurately |
| `civic_search_variants` | `name`, `gene_name` | Returns `{data: {variants: {nodes}}}` - returns many unrelated variants |
| `civic_get_variants_by_gene` | `gene_id` (CIViC numeric ID) | Requires CIViC gene ID, NOT Entrez |
| `civic_search_assertions` | `therapy_name`, `disease_name` | Returns `{data: {assertions: {nodes}}}` |
| `civic_search_therapies` | `name` | Search therapies by name |
| `cBioPortal_get_mutations` | `study_id`, `gene_list` (string) | `gene_list` is a STRING not array |
| `cBioPortal_get_cancer_studies` | (no params needed) | May fail with keyword param |
| `drugbank_get_drug_basic_info_by_drug_name_or_id` | `query`, `case_sensitive`, `exact_match`, `limit` | ALL 4 REQUIRED |
| `drugbank_get_targets_by_drug_name_or_drugbank_id` | `query`, `case_sensitive`, `exact_match`, `limit` | ALL 4 REQUIRED |
| `drugbank_get_pharmacology_by_drug_name_or_drugbank_id` | `query`, `case_sensitive`, `exact_match`, `limit` | ALL 4 REQUIRED |
| `drugbank_get_indications_by_drug_name_or_drugbank_id` | `query`, `case_sensitive`, `exact_match`, `limit` | ALL 4 REQUIRED |
| `FDA_get_indications_by_drug_name` | `drug_name`, `limit` | Returns `{meta, results}` |
| `FDA_get_clinical_studies_info_by_drug_name` | `drug_name`, `limit` | Returns `{meta, results}` |
| `FDA_get_adverse_reactions_by_drug_name` | `drug_name`, `limit` | Returns `{meta, results}` |
| `FDA_get_mechanism_of_action_by_drug_name` | `drug_name`, `limit` | Returns `{meta, results}` |
| `FDA_get_boxed_warning_info_by_drug_name` | `drug_name`, `limit` | May return NOT_FOUND |
| `FDA_get_warnings_by_drug_name` | `drug_name`, `limit` | Returns `{meta, results}` |
| `fda_pharmacogenomic_biomarkers` | `drug_name`, `biomarker`, `limit` | Returns `{count, shown, results: [{Drug, Biomarker, TherapeuticArea, LabelingSection}]}` |
| `clinical_trials_search` | `action='search_studies'`, `condition`, `intervention`, `limit` | Returns `{total_count, studies}` |
| `clinical_trials_get_details` | `action='get_study_details'`, `nct_id` | Full study object |
| `search_clinical_trials` | `query_term` (REQUIRED), `condition`, `intervention`, `pageSize` | Returns `{studies, total_count}` |
| `PubMed_search_articles` | `query`, `max_results` | Returns plain list of dicts |
| `UniProt_get_function_by_accession` | `accession` | Returns list of strings |
| `UniProt_get_disease_variants_by_accession` | `accession` | Disease-associated variants |
| `HPA_get_rna_expression_by_source` | `gene_name`, `source_type`, `source_name` | ALL 3 REQUIRED |
| `HPA_get_cancer_prognostics_by_gene` | `gene_name` | Cancer prognostic data |
| `iedb_search_epitopes` | `organism_name`, `source_antigen_name` | Returns `{status, data, count}` |
| `iedb_search_mhc` | various | MHC binding data |
| `enrichr_gene_enrichment_analysis` | `gene_list` (array), `libs` (array, REQUIRED) | Key libs: `KEGG_2021_Human`, `Reactome_2022` |
| `PharmGKB_get_clinical_annotations` | `query` | Clinical annotations |
| `gnomad_get_gene_constraints` | `gene_symbol` | Gene constraint metrics |
---
## Workflow Overview
```
Input: Cancer type + Mutations/TMB + Optional biomarkers (PD-L1, MSI, etc.)
Phase 1: Input Standardization & Cancer Context
- Resolve cancer type to EFO ID
- Parse mutation list
- Resolve genes to Ensembl/Entrez IDs
- Get cancer-specific ICI baseline
Phase 2: TMB Analysis
- TMB classification (low/intermediate/high)
- Cancer-specific TMB thresholds
- FDA TMB-H biomarker status
Phase 3: Neoantigen Analysis
- Estimate neoantigen burden from mutations
- Mutation type classification (missense/frameshift/nonsense)
- Neoantigen quality indicators
Phase 4: MSI/MMR Status Assessment
- MSI status integration
- MMR gene mutation check
- FDA MSI-H approval status
Phase 5: PD-L1 Expression Analysis
- PD-L1 level classification
- Cancer-specific PD-L1 thresholds
- FDA-approved PD-L1 cutoffs
Phase 6: Immune Microenvironment Profiling
- Immune checkpoint gene expression
- Tumor immune classification (hot/cold)
- Immune escape signatures
Phase 7: Mutation-Based Predictors
- Driver mutation analysis
- Resistance mutations (STK11, PTEN, JAK1/2, B2M)
- Sensitivity mutations (POLE)
- DNA damage repair pathway
Phase 8: Clinical Evidence & ICI Options
- FDA-approved ICIs for this cancer
- Clinical trial response rates
- Drug mechanism comparison
- Combination therapy evidence
Phase 9: Resistance Risk Assessment
- Known resistance factors
- Tumor immune evasion mechanisms
- Prior treatment context
Phase 10: Multi-Biomarker Score Integration
- Calculate ICI Response Score (0-100)
- Component breakdown
- Confidence level
Phase 11: Clinical Recommendations
- ICI drug recommendation
- Monitoring plan
- Alternative strategies
```
---
## Phase 1: Input Standardization & Cancer Context
### Step 1.1: Resolve Cancer Type
```python
# Get cancer EFO ID
result = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_disease_id_description_by_name(diseaseName='melanoma')
# -> {data: {search: {hits: [{id: 'EFO_0000756', name: 'melanoma', description: '...'}]}}}
```
**Cancer-specific ICI context** (hardcoded knowledge base):
| Cancer Type | EFO ID | Baseline ICI ORR | Key Biomarkers | FDA-Approved ICIs |
|-------------|--------|-------------------|----------------|-------------------|
| Melanoma | EFO_0000756 | 30-45% | TMB, PD-L1 | pembro, nivo, ipi, nivo+ipi, nivo+rela |
| NSCLC | EFO_0003060 | 15-50% (PD-L1 dependent) | PD-L1, TMB, STK11 | pembro, nivo, atezo, durva, cemiplimab |
| Bladder/UC | EFO_0000292 | 15-25% | PD-L1, TMB | pembro, nivo, atezo, avelumab, durva |
| RCC | EFO_0000681 | 25-40% | PD-L1 | nivo, pembro, nivo+ipi, nivo+cabo, pembro+axitinib |
| HNSCC | EFO_0000181 | 15-20% | PD-L1 CPS | pembro, nivo |
| MSI-H (any) | N/A | 30-50% | MSI, dMMR | pembro (tissue-agnostic) |
| TMB-H (any) | N/A | 20-30% | TMB >=10 | pembro (tissue-agnostic) |
| CRC (MSI-H) | EFO_0000365 | 30-50% | MSI, dMMR | pembro, nivo, nivo+ipi |
| CRC (MSS) | EFO_0000365 | <5% | Generally poor | Generally not recommended |
| HCC | EFO_0000182 | 15-20% | PD-L1 | atezo+bev, durva+treme, nivo+ipi |
| TNBC | EFO_0005537 | 10-20% | PD-L1 CPS | pembro+chemo |
| Gastric/GEJ | EFO_0000178 | 10-20% | PD-L1 CPS, MSI | pembro, nivo |
### Step 1.2: Parse Mutations
Parse each mutation into structured format:
```
"BRAF V600E" -> {gene: "BRAF", variant: "V600E", type: "missense"}
"TP53 R273H" -> {gene: "TP53", variant: "R273H", type: "missense"}
"STK11 loss" -> {gene: "STK11", variant: "loss of function", type: "loss"}
```
### Step 1.3: Resolve Gene IDs
```python
# For each gene in mutation list
result = tu.tools.MyGene_query_genes(query='BRAF')
# -> hits[0]: {_id: '673', symbol: 'BRAF', ensembl: {gene: 'ENSG00000157764'}}
```
---
## Phase 2: TMB Analysis
### Step 2.1: TMB Classification
If TMB value provided directly, classify:
| TMB Range | Classification | ICI Score Component |
|-----------|---------------|---------------------|
| >= 20 mut/Mb | TMB-High | 30 points |
| 10-19.9 mut/Mb | TMB-Intermediate | 20 points |
| 5-9.9 mut/Mb | TMB-Low | 10 points |
| < 5 mut/Mb | TMB-Very-Low | 5 points |
If only mutations provided, estimate TMB:
- Count total mutations provided
- Note: User-provided lists are typically key mutations, not full exome
- Flag as "estimated from provided mutations - clinical TMB testing recommended"
### Step 2.2: TMB FDA Context
```python
# Check FDA TMB-H biomarker approval
result = tu.tools.fda_pharmacogenomic_biomarkers(drug_name='pembrolizumab', limit=100)
# Look for "Tumor Mutational Burden" in Biomarker field
# -> Pembrolizumab approved for TMB-H (>=10 mut/Mb) tissue-agnostic
```
### Step 2.3: Cancer-Specific TMB Thresholds
| Cancer Type | Typical TMB Range | High-TMB Threshold | Notes |
|-------------|-------------------|-------------------|-------|
| Melanoma | 5-50+ | >20 | High baseline TMB; UV-induced |
| NSCLC | 2-30 | >10 | Smoking-related; FDA cutoff 10 |
| Bladder | 5-25 | >10 | Moderate baseline |
| CRC (MSI-H) | 20-100+ | >10 | Very high in MSI-H |
| CRC (MSS) | 2-10 | >10 | Generally low |
| RCC | 1-8 | >10 | Low TMB but ICI-responsive |
| HNSCC | 2-15 | >10 | Moderate |
**IMPORTANT**: RCC responds to ICIs despite low TMB. TMB is less predictive in some cancers.
---
## Phase 3: Neoantigen Analysis
### Step 3.1: Neoantigen Burden Estimation
From mutation list:
- **Missense mutations** -> Each has ~20-50% chance of generating a neoantigen
- **Frameshift mutations** -> High neoantigen-generating potential (novel peptides)
- **Nonsense mutations** -> Moderate potential (truncated proteins)
- **Splice site mutations** -> Moderate potential (aberrant peptides)
Estimate: neoantigen_count ~= missense_count * 0.3 + frameshift_count * 1.5
### Step 3.2: Neoantigen Quality Assessment
```python
# Check mutation impact using UniProt
result = tu.tools.UniProt_get_function_by_accession(accession='P15056') # BRAF UniProt
# Assess if mutation is in functional domain
```
**Quality indicators**:
- Mutations in protein kinase domains -> high immunogenicity potential
- Mutations in surface-exposed regions -> better MHC presentation
- POLE/POLD1 mutations -> ultra-high neoantigen load (ultramutated)
### Step 3.3: IEDB Epitope Data (if relevant)
```python
# Check known epitopes for mutated proteins
result = tu.tools.iedb_search_epitopes(organism_name='homo sapiens', source_antigen_name='BRAF')
# Returns known epitopes, MHC restrictions
```
### Neoantigen Score Component
| Estimated Neoantigen Load | Classification | Score |
|---------------------------|---------------|-------|
| >50 neoantigens | High | 15 points |
| 20-50 neoantigens | Moderate | 10 points |
| <20 neoantigens | Low | 5 points |
---
## Phase 4: MSI/MMR Status Assessment
### Step 4.1: MSI Status Integration
If MSI status provided directly:
| MSI Status | Classification | Score Component |
|-----------|----------------|----------------|
| MSI-H / dMMR | MSI-High | 25 points |
| MSS / pMMR | Microsatellite Stable | 5 points |
| Unknown | Not tested | 10 points (neutral) |
### Step 4.2: MMR Gene Mutation Check
Check if any provided mutations are in MMR genes:
- **MLH1** (ENSG00000076242) - mismatch repair
- **MSH2** (ENSG00000095002) - mismatch repair
- **MSH6** (ENSG00000116062) - mismatch repair
- **PMS2** (ENSG00000122512) - mismatch repair
- **EPCAM** (ENSG00000119888) - can silence MSH2
If MMR gene mutations found but MSI status not provided -> flag as "possible MSI-H, recommend testing"
### Step 4.3: FDA MSI-H Approvals
```python
# Check FDA approvals for MSI-H
result = tu.tools.fda_pharmacogenomic_biomarkers(biomarker='Microsatellite Instability', limit=100)
# Pembrolizumab: tissue-agnostic for MSI-H/dMMR
# Nivolumab: CRC (MSI-H)
# Dostarlimab: dMMR solid tumors
```
---
## Phase 5: PD-L1 Expression Analysis
### Step 5.1: PD-L1 Level Classification
| PD-L1 Level | Classification | Score Component |
|-------------|----------------|----------------|
| >= 50% (TPS) | PD-L1 High | 20 points |
| 1-49% (TPS) | PD-L1 Positive | 12 points |
| < 1% (TPS) | PD-L1 Negative | 5 points |
| Unknown | Not tested | 10 points (neutral) |
### Step 5.2: Cancer-Specific PD-L1 Thresholds
| Cancer | Scoring Method | Key Thresholds | ICI Monotherapy Recommended? |
|--------|---------------|----------------|------------------------------|
| NSCLC | TPS | >=50%: first-line mono; >=1%: after chemo | Yes at >=50%, combo at >=1% |
| Melanoma | Not routinely required | N/A | Yes regardless of PD-L1 |
| Bladder | CPS or IC | CPS>=10 preferred | Yes with PD-L1 positive |
| HNSCC | CPS | CPS>=1: pembro; CPS>=20: mono preferred | CPS>=20 for monotherapy |
| Gastric | CPS | CPS>=1 | Pembro+chemo |
| TNBC | CPS | CPS>=10 | Pembro+chemo |
### Step 5.3: PD-L1 Gene Expression (Baseline Reference)
```python
# PD-L1 (CD274) expression patterns
result = tu.tools.HPA_get_cancer_prognostics_by_gene(gene_name='CD274')
# Cancer-type specific prognostic data
```
---
## Phase 6: Immune Microenvironment Profiling
### Step 6.1: Key Immune Checkpoint Genes
Query expression data for immune microenvironment markers:
```python
# Key immune genes to check
immune_genes = ['CD274', 'PDCD1', 'CTLA4', 'LAG3', 'HAVCR2', 'TIGIT', 'CD8A', 'CD8B', 'GZMA', 'GZMB', 'PRF1', 'IFNG']
# For each gene, get cancer-specific expression
for gene in immune_genes:
result = tu.tools.HPA_get_cancer_prognostics_by_gene(gene_name=gene)
```
### Step 6.2: Tumor Immune Classification
Based on available data, classify:
| Classification | Characteristics | ICI Likelihood |
|---------------|-----------------|----------------|
| Hot (T cell inflamed) | High CD8+ T cells, IFN-g, PD-L1+ | High response |
| Cold (immune desert) | Low immune infiltration | Low response |
| Immune excluded | Immune cells at margin, not infiltrating | Moderate response |
| Immune suppressed | High Tregs, MDSCs, immunosuppressive | Low-moderate |
### Step 6.3: Immune Pathway Enrichment
```python
# If mutation list includes immune-related genes, do pathway analysis
result = tu.tools.enrichr_gene_enrichment_analysis(
gene_list=['CD274', 'PDCD1', 'CTLA4', 'IFNG', 'CD8A'],
libs=['KEGG_2021_Human', 'Reactome_2022']
)
```
---
## Phase 7: Mutation-Based Predictors
### Step 7.1: ICI-Resistance Mutations (CRITICAL)
**Known resistance mutations** - apply PENALTIES:
| Gene | Mutation | Cancer Context | Mechanism | Penalty |
|------|----------|---------------|-----------|---------|
| STK11/LKB1 | Loss/inactivation | NSCLC (esp. KRAS+) | Immune exclusion, cold TME | -10 points |
| PTEN | Loss/deletion | Multiple | Reduced T cell infiltration | -5 points |
| JAK1 | Loss of function | Multiple | IFN-g signaling loss | -10 points |
| JAK2 | Loss of function | Multiple | IFN-g signaling loss | -10 points |
| B2M | Loss/mutation | Multiple | MHC-I loss, immune escape | -15 points |
| KEAP1 | Loss/mutation | NSCLC | Oxidative stress, cold TME | -5 points |
| MDM2 | Amplification | Multiple | Hyperprogression risk | -5 points |
| MDM4 | Amplification | Multiple | Hyperprogression risk | -5 points |
| EGFR | Activating mutation | NSCLC | Low TMB, cold TME | -5 points |
### Step 7.2: ICI-Sensitivity Mutations (BONUS)
| Gene | Mutation | Cancer Context | Mechanism | Bonus |
|------|----------|---------------|-----------|-------|
| POLE | Exonuclease domain | Any | Ultramutation, high neoantigens | +10 points |
| POLD1 | Proofreading domain | Any | Ultramutation | +5 points |
| BRCA1/2 | Loss of function | Multiple | Genomic instability | +3 points |
| ARID1A | Loss of function | Multiple | Chromatin remodeling, TME | +3 points |
| PBRM1 | Loss of function | RCC | ICI response in RCC | +5 points (RCC only) |
### Step 7.3: Driver Mutation Context
```python
# For each mutation, check CIViC evidence for ICI context
# Use OpenTargets for drug associations
result = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_associated_drugs_by_disease_efoId(efoId='EFO_0000756', size=50)
# Filter for ICI drugs (pembro, nivo, ipi, atezo, durva, avelumab, cemiplimab)
```
### Step 7.4: DNA Damage Repair (DDR) Pathway
Check if mutations are in DDR genes (associated with ICI response):
- **ATM, ATR, CHEK1, CHEK2** - DNA damage sensing
- **BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2** - homologous recombination
- **RAD50, MRE11, NBN** - double-strand break repair
- **POLE, POLD1** - polymerase proofreading
DDR mutations -> likely higher TMB -> better ICI response
---
## Phase 8: Clinical Evidence & ICI Options
### Step 8.1: FDA-Approved ICIs
```python
# Get FDA indications for key ICIs
ici_drugs = ['pembrolizumab', 'nivolumab', 'atezolizumab', 'durvalumab', 'ipilimumab', 'avelumab', 'cemiplimab']
for drug in ici_drugs:
result = tu.tools.FDA_get_indications_by_drug_name(drug_name=drug, limit=3)
# Extract cancer-specific indications
```
### Step 8.2: ICI Drug Profiles
| Drug | Target | Type | Key Indications |
|------|--------|------|-----------------|
| Pembrolizumab (Keytruda) | PD-1 | IgG4 mAb | Melanoma, NSCLC, HNSCC, Bladder, MSI-H, TMB-H, many others |
| Nivolumab (Opdivo) | PD-1 | IgG4 mAb | Melanoma, NSCLC, RCC, CRC (MSI-H), HCC, HNSCC |
| Atezolizumab (Tecentriq) | PD-L1 | IgG1 mAb | NSCLC, Bladder, HCC, Melanoma |
| Durvalumab (Imfinzi) | PD-L1 | IgG1 mAb | NSCLC (Stage III), Bladder, HCC, BTC |
| Ipilimumab (Yervoy) | CTLA-4 | IgG1 mAb | Melanoma, RCC (combo), CRC (MSI-H combo) |
| Avelumab (Bavencio) | PD-L1 | IgG1 mAb | Merkel cell, Bladder (maintenance) |
| Cemiplimab (Libtayo) | PD-1 | IgG4 mAb | CSCC, NSCLC, Basal cell |
| Dostarlimab (Jemperli) | PD-1 | IgG4 mAb | dMMR endometrial, dMMR solid tumors |
| Tremelimumab (Imjudo) | CTLA-4 | IgG2 mAb | HCC (combo with durva) |
### Step 8.3: Clinical Trial Evidence
```python
# Search for ICI trials in this cancer type
result = tu.tools.clinical_trials_search(
action='search_studies',
condition='melanoma',
intervention='pembrolizumab',
limit=10
)
# Returns: {total_count, studies: [{nctId, title, status, conditions}]}
```
### Step 8.4: Literature Evidence
```python
# Search PubMed for biomarker-specific ICI response data
result = tu.tools.PubMed_search_articles(
query='pembrolizumab melanoma TMB response biomarker',
max_results=10
)
# Returns list of {pmid, title, ...}
```
### Step 8.5: OpenTargets Drug-Target Evidence
```python
# Get drug mechanism details
result = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_drug_mechanisms_of_action_by_chemblId(chemblId='CHEMBL3137343')
# -> pembrolizumab: PD-1 inhibitor, targets PDCD1 (ENSG00000188389)
```
### Key ICI ChEMBL IDs
| Drug | ChEMBL ID |
|------|-----------|
| Pembrolizumab | CHEMBL3137343 |
| Nivolumab | CHEMBL2108738 |
| Atezolizumab | CHEMBL3707227 |
| Durvalumab | CHEMBL3301587 |
| Ipilimumab | CHEMBL1789844 |
| Avelumab | CHEMBL3833373 |
| Cemiplimab | CHEMBL4297723 |
---
## Phase 9: Resistance Risk Assessment
### Step 9.1: Known Resistance Factors Check
For each mutation in the patient profile, check against resistance database:
```python
# Check for resistance evidence in CIViC
# CIViC evidence types: PREDICTIVE, PROGNOSTIC, DIAGNOSTIC, PREDISPOSING, ONCOGENIC
result = tu.tools.civic_search_evidence_items(therapy_name='pembrolizumab')
# Filter for resistance-associated evidence
```
### Step 9.2: Pathway-Level Resistance
| Pathway | Resistance Mechanism | Genes |
|---------|---------------------|-------|
| IFN-g signaling | Loss of IFN-g response | JAK1, JAK2, STAT1, IRF1 |
| Antigen presentation | MHC-I downregulation | B2M, TAP1, TAP2, HLA-A/B/C |
| WNT/b-catenin | T cell exclusion | CTNNB1 activating mutations |
| MAPK pathway | Immune suppression | MEK, ERK hyperactivation |
| PI3K/AKT/mTOR | Immune suppression | PTEN loss, PIK3CA |
### Step 9.3: Resistance Risk Score
Summarize resistance risk as:
- **Low risk**: No resistance mutations, favorable TME
- **Moderate risk**: 1 resistance factor OR uncertain TME
- **High risk**: Multiple resistance mutations OR known resistant phenotype
---
## Phase 10: Multi-Biomarker Score Integration
### ICI Response Score Calculation (0-100)
```
TOTAL SCORE = TMB_score + MSI_score + PDL1_score + Neoantigen_score + Mutation_bonus + Resistance_penalty
Where:
TMB_score: 5-30 points (based on TMB classification)
MSI_score: 5-25 points (based on MSI status)
PDL1_score: 5-20 points (based on PD-L1 level)
Neoantigen_score: 5-15 points (based on estimated neoantigens)
Mutation_bonus: 0-10 points (POLE, PBRM1, etc.)
Resistance_penalty: -20 to 0 points (STK11, PTEN, JAK1/2, B2M)
Minimum score: 0 (floor)
Maximum score: 100 (cap)
```
### Response Likelihood Tiers
| Score Range | Tier | Expected ORR | Recommendation |
|-------------|------|-------------|----------------|
| 70-100 | HIGH | 50-80% | Strong ICI candidate; monotherapy or combo |
| 40-69 | MODERATE | 20-50% | Consider ICI; combo preferred; monitor closely |
| 0-39 | LOW | <20% | ICI alone unlikely effective; consider alternatives |
### Confidence Level
| Data Completeness | Confidence |
|-------------------|-----------|
| All biomarkers (TMB + MSI + PD-L1 + mutations) | HIGH |
| 3 of 4 biomarkers | MODERATE-HIGH |
| 2 of 4 biomarkers | MODERATE |
| 1 biomarker only | LOW |
| Cancer type only | VERY LOW |
---
---
> **Extended Reference**: For detailed tool tables, examples, and templates, read `REFERENCE.md` in this skill directory.
> The agent can access it via: `read skills/tooluniverse-immunotherapy-response-prediction/REFERENCE.md`Related Skills
tooluniverse
Router skill for ToolUniverse tasks. First checks if specialized tooluniverse skills (34+ skills covering disease/drug/target research, clinical decision support, genomics, epigenomics, chemical safety, systems biology, and more) can solve the problem, then falls back to general strategies for using 1400+ scientific tools. Covers tool discovery, multi-hop queries, comprehensive research workflows, disambiguation, evidence grading, and report generation. Use when users need to research any scientific topic, find biological data, or explore drug/target/disease relationships.
tooluniverse-variant-interpretation
Systematic clinical variant interpretation from raw variant calls to ACMG-classified recommendations with structural impact analysis. Aggregates evidence from ClinVar, gnomAD, CIViC, UniProt, and PDB across ACMG criteria. Produces pathogenicity scores (0-100), clinical recommendations, and treatment implications. Use when interpreting genetic variants, classifying variants of uncertain significance (VUS), performing ACMG variant classification, or translating variant calls to clinical actionability.
tooluniverse-variant-analysis
Production-ready VCF processing, variant annotation, mutation analysis, and structural variant (SV/CNV) interpretation for bioinformatics questions. Parses VCF files (streaming, large files), classifies mutation types (missense, nonsense, synonymous, frameshift, splice, intronic, intergenic) and structural variants (deletions, duplications, inversions, translocations), applies VAF/depth/quality/consequence filters, annotates with ClinVar/dbSNP/gnomAD/CADD via ToolUniverse, interprets SV/CNV clinical significance using ClinGen dosage sensitivity scores, computes variant statistics, and generates reports. Solves questions like "What fraction of variants with VAF < 0.3 are missense?", "How many non-reference variants remain after filtering intronic/intergenic?", "What is the pathogenicity of this deletion affecting BRCA1?", or "Which dosage-sensitive genes overlap this CNV?". Use when processing VCF files, annotating variants, filtering by VAF/depth/consequence, classifying mutations, interpreting structural variants, assessing CNV pathogenicity, comparing cohorts, or answering variant analysis questions.
tooluniverse-target-research
Gather comprehensive biological target intelligence from 9 parallel research paths covering protein info, structure, interactions, pathways, expression, variants, drug interactions, and literature. Features collision-aware searches, evidence grading (T1-T4), explicit Open Targets coverage, and mandatory completeness auditing. Use when users ask about drug targets, proteins, genes, or need target validation, druggability assessment, or comprehensive target profiling.
tooluniverse-systems-biology
Comprehensive systems biology and pathway analysis using multiple pathway databases (Reactome, KEGG, WikiPathways, Pathway Commons, BioModels). Performs pathway enrichment, protein-pathway mapping, keyword searches, and systems-level analysis. Use when analyzing gene sets, exploring biological pathways, or investigating systems-level biology.
tooluniverse-structural-variant-analysis
Comprehensive structural variant (SV) analysis skill for clinical genomics. Classifies SVs (deletions, duplications, inversions, translocations), assesses pathogenicity using ACMG-adapted criteria, evaluates gene disruption and dosage sensitivity, and provides clinical interpretation with evidence grading. Use when analyzing CNVs, large deletions/duplications, chromosomal rearrangements, or any structural variants requiring clinical interpretation.
tooluniverse-statistical-modeling
Perform statistical modeling and regression analysis on biomedical datasets. Supports linear regression, logistic regression (binary/ordinal/multinomial), mixed-effects models, Cox proportional hazards survival analysis, Kaplan-Meier estimation, and comprehensive model diagnostics. Extracts odds ratios, hazard ratios, confidence intervals, p-values, and effect sizes. Designed to solve BixBench statistical reasoning questions involving clinical/experimental data. Use when asked to fit regression models, compute odds ratios, perform survival analysis, run statistical tests, or interpret model coefficients from provided data.
tooluniverse-spatial-transcriptomics
Analyze spatial transcriptomics data to map gene expression in tissue architecture. Supports 10x Visium, MERFISH, seqFISH, Slide-seq, and imaging-based platforms. Performs spatial clustering, domain identification, cell-cell proximity analysis, spatial gene expression patterns, tissue architecture mapping, and integration with single-cell data. Use when analyzing spatial transcriptomics datasets, studying tissue organization, identifying spatial expression patterns, mapping cell-cell interactions in tissue context, characterizing tumor microenvironment spatial structure, or integrating spatial and single-cell RNA-seq data for comprehensive tissue analysis.
tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis
Computational analysis framework for spatial multi-omics data integration. Given spatially variable genes (SVGs), spatial domain annotations, tissue type, and disease context from spatial transcriptomics/proteomics experiments (10x Visium, MERFISH, DBiTplus, SLIDE-seq, etc.), performs comprehensive biological interpretation including pathway enrichment, cell-cell interaction inference, druggable target identification, immune microenvironment characterization, and multi-modal integration. Produces a detailed markdown report with Spatial Omics Integration Score (0-100), domain-by-domain characterization, and validation recommendations. Uses 70+ ToolUniverse tools across 9 analysis phases. Use when users ask about spatial transcriptomics analysis, spatial omics interpretation, tissue heterogeneity, spatial gene expression patterns, tumor microenvironment mapping, tissue zonation, or cell-cell communication from spatial data.
tooluniverse-single-cell
Production-ready single-cell and expression matrix analysis using scanpy, anndata, and scipy. Performs scRNA-seq QC, normalization, PCA, UMAP, Leiden/Louvain clustering, differential expression (Wilcoxon, t-test, DESeq2), cell type annotation, per-cell-type statistical analysis, gene-expression correlation, batch correction (Harmony), trajectory inference, and cell-cell communication analysis. NEW: Analyzes ligand-receptor interactions between cell types using OmniPath (CellPhoneDB, CellChatDB), scores communication strength, identifies signaling cascades, and handles multi-subunit receptor complexes. Integrates with ToolUniverse gene annotation tools (HPA, Ensembl, MyGene, UniProt) and enrichment tools (gseapy, PANTHER, STRING). Supports h5ad, 10X, CSV/TSV count matrices, and pre-annotated datasets. Use when analyzing single-cell RNA-seq data, studying cell-cell interactions, performing cell type differential expression, computing gene-expression correlations by cell type, analyzing tumor-immune communication, or answering questions about scRNA-seq datasets.
tooluniverse-sequence-retrieval
Retrieves biological sequences (DNA, RNA, protein) from NCBI and ENA with gene disambiguation, accession type handling, and comprehensive sequence profiles. Creates detailed reports with sequence metadata, cross-database references, and download options. Use when users need nucleotide sequences, protein sequences, genome data, or mention GenBank, RefSeq, EMBL accessions.
tooluniverse-sdk
Build AI scientist systems using ToolUniverse Python SDK for scientific research. Use when users need to access 1000++ scientific tools through Python code, create scientific workflows, perform drug discovery, protein analysis, genomics analysis, literature research, or any computational biology task. Triggers include requests to use scientific tools programmatically, build research pipelines, analyze biological data, search literature, predict drug properties, or create AI-powered scientific workflows.