code-review-orchestration
6-agent parallel code review orchestration covering architecture, security, performance, testing, quality, and documentation dimensions with weighted scoring.
Best use case
code-review-orchestration is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
6-agent parallel code review orchestration covering architecture, security, performance, testing, quality, and documentation dimensions with weighted scoring.
Teams using code-review-orchestration should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/code-review-orchestration/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How code-review-orchestration Compares
| Feature / Agent | code-review-orchestration | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
6-agent parallel code review orchestration covering architecture, security, performance, testing, quality, and documentation dimensions with weighted scoring.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
Best AI Skills for Claude
Explore the best AI skills for Claude and Claude Code across coding, research, workflow automation, documentation, and agent operations.
Cursor vs Codex for AI Workflows
Compare Cursor and Codex for AI coding workflows, repository assistance, debugging, refactoring, and reusable developer skills.
SKILL.md Source
# Code Review Orchestration ## Overview Orchestrates 6 specialized review agents running in parallel across independent dimensions. Each agent scores independently, and results are aggregated into a weighted final score with a clear recommendation. ## Six Dimensions ### Architecture (weight: 20%) Module boundaries, dependency direction, design pattern adherence, architectural drift. ### Security (weight: 25%) Injection vulnerabilities, auth, secrets, crypto, dependencies, headers. ### Performance (weight: 15%) Algorithmic complexity, resource leaks, database patterns, caching, async. ### Testing (weight: 15%) Coverage, quality, edge cases, isolation, flakiness, integration, error paths. ### Quality (weight: 15%) Naming, readability, error handling, type safety, DRY, comments. ### Documentation (weight: 10%) JSDoc, README updates, changelog, inline comments, type documentation. ## Scoring and Recommendation - **APPROVE**: overall >= 80 AND zero critical issues - **REQUEST_CHANGES**: overall >= 60 OR has critical issues - **REJECT**: overall < 60 ## When to Use - `/code-review` slash command - Post-implementation review in spec execution - Pre-merge quality gate ## Agents Used - `code-review-coordinator`, `security-analyst`, `performance-analyst` - `testing-specialist`, `architecture-reviewer` ## Processes Used By - `claudekit-code-review` (primary consumer) - `claudekit-orchestrator` (via command dispatch)
Related Skills
systematic-review
Conduct comprehensive literature searches, quality assessments, evidence synthesis, and meta-analyses
quality-assurance-review
Conduct systematic quality reviews of instructional materials using established rubrics (Quality Matters) and design standards
peer-review-simulator
Skill for simulating peer review feedback on manuscripts
dfm-review
Skill for design for manufacturing review and optimization
design-review
Skill for formal design review preparation and execution (PDR/CDR)
design-review-facilitator
Design review planning and execution skill for structured design phase gate reviews per 21 CFR 820.30
clinical-literature-reviewer
Systematic literature review skill for clinical evaluation supporting regulatory submissions
performance-review
Generate performance review documentation and facilitate evaluation processes
requesting-code-review
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements.
receiving-code-review
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions. Requires technical rigor and verification, not blind implementation.
swarm-orchestration
Multi-agent swarm formation and coordinated execution with topology-aware agent deployment, consensus protocols, and anti-drift enforcement.
security-review
Security vulnerability assessment identifying OWASP risks, injection vectors, authentication issues, and data exposure with severity classification.