quality-assurance-review
Conduct systematic quality reviews of instructional materials using established rubrics (Quality Matters) and design standards
Best use case
quality-assurance-review is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Conduct systematic quality reviews of instructional materials using established rubrics (Quality Matters) and design standards
Teams using quality-assurance-review should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/quality-assurance-review/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How quality-assurance-review Compares
| Feature / Agent | quality-assurance-review | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Conduct systematic quality reviews of instructional materials using established rubrics (Quality Matters) and design standards
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
SKILL.md Source
# Quality Assurance Review Conduct systematic quality reviews of instructional materials using established rubrics such as Quality Matters and instructional design standards. ## Overview This skill enables systematic quality review of instructional materials and courses. It encompasses application of quality standards, rubric-based evaluation, feedback provision, and continuous improvement to ensure high-quality learning experiences. ## Capabilities ### Standards Application - Apply Quality Matters rubric - Use instructional design standards - Evaluate accessibility compliance - Assess alignment quality - Check technical functionality ### Review Process - Conduct systematic reviews - Document findings thoroughly - Provide constructive feedback - Prioritize improvements - Track resolution ### Feedback Communication - Write clear feedback - Explain standards requirements - Offer improvement suggestions - Acknowledge strengths - Guide revision process ### Continuous Improvement - Identify patterns across reviews - Recommend systemic changes - Track quality metrics - Support reviewer calibration - Update standards application ## Usage Guidelines ### Review Process 1. Prepare review materials 2. Apply rubric systematically 3. Document observations 4. Assess each standard 5. Compile findings 6. Write feedback report 7. Support improvement ### Quality Criteria - Alignment of objectives, activities, assessments - Clear navigation and organization - Accessible and inclusive design - Engaging instructional strategies - Effective learner support ### Feedback Guidelines - Be specific and actionable - Reference standards clearly - Provide examples - Acknowledge effective elements - Prioritize recommendations ## Integration Points ### Related Processes - Quality Matters Course Review - Program Accreditation Preparation - E-Learning Course Authoring ### Collaborating Skills - accessibility-compliance-auditing - curriculum-gap-analysis - learning-analytics-interpretation ## References - Quality Matters rubric and standards - OSCQR rubric - Instructional design best practices - Accessibility standards
Related Skills
systematic-review
Conduct comprehensive literature searches, quality assessments, evidence synthesis, and meta-analyses
quality-metrics-measurement
Collect, calculate, and report healthcare quality metrics including core measures, HEDIS, patient safety indicators, and value-based purchasing measures
peer-review-simulator
Skill for simulating peer review feedback on manuscripts
dfm-review
Skill for design for manufacturing review and optimization
design-review
Skill for formal design review preparation and execution (PDR/CDR)
design-review-facilitator
Design review planning and execution skill for structured design phase gate reviews per 21 CFR 820.30
clinical-literature-reviewer
Systematic literature review skill for clinical evaluation supporting regulatory submissions
fastqc-quality-analyzer
Sequencing quality control skill for assessing read quality, adapter contamination, and sequence composition
code-quality-analyzer
Static code analysis, technical debt assessment, engineering velocity metrics
master-data-quality-manager
Supply chain master data quality monitoring and improvement skill
quality-auditor
Internal quality audit skill with planning, execution, findings documentation, and corrective action tracking
cost-of-quality-analyzer
Cost of Quality analysis skill with prevention, appraisal, internal failure, and external failure cost tracking