plan-review-gate
Adversarial plan review by 3 independent reviewers (Feasibility, Completeness, Scope & Alignment) before presenting to user.
Best use case
plan-review-gate is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Adversarial plan review by 3 independent reviewers (Feasibility, Completeness, Scope & Alignment) before presenting to user.
Teams using plan-review-gate should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/plan-review-gate/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How plan-review-gate Compares
| Feature / Agent | plan-review-gate | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Adversarial plan review by 3 independent reviewers (Feasibility, Completeness, Scope & Alignment) before presenting to user.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Plan Review Gate ## Overview Three independent adversarial reviewers validate any implementation plan before it is presented to the user. Each reviews independently with no shared context. ## When to Use - After the Architect creates an implementation plan - Before presenting a plan for user approval - When validating work unit decomposition quality ## Process 1. **Feasibility Reviewer** - Can this plan actually be implemented? Technical viability, resource requirements, timeline reality 2. **Completeness Reviewer** - Does the plan cover everything? Missing edge cases, untested paths, incomplete DoD items 3. **Scope & Alignment Reviewer** - Does the plan match the issue? Scope creep detection, requirement traceability All 3 must PASS before the plan is presented. ## Key Rules - Reviewers operate independently (no shared context) - Each provides a binary PASS/FAIL verdict - Findings include specific references to plan sections - Failed plans require revision before re-review ## Tool Use Invoke as part of: `methodologies/metaswarm/metaswarm-orchestrator` (Phase 1b)
Related Skills
plan
Plan a Babysitter workflow without executing the run.
plantuml-renderer
Render PlantUML diagrams to various image formats with theme and styling support
api-gateway-configurator
Configure API gateways for SDK traffic management
MoveIt Motion Planning Skill
Deep expertise in MoveIt/MoveIt2 configuration and manipulation planning
Motion Planning Skill
Sampling-based and optimization-based motion planning algorithms
Grasp Planning Skill
Grasp planning and execution for robotic manipulation tasks
OKR Planning
Objectives and Key Results planning, tracking, and alignment capabilities
systematic-review
Conduct comprehensive literature searches, quality assessments, evidence synthesis, and meta-analyses
quality-assurance-review
Conduct systematic quality reviews of instructional materials using established rubrics (Quality Matters) and design standards
risk-mitigation-planning
Develop comprehensive risk management plans for collections and cultural venues including disaster preparedness, security protocols, and insurance coordination
peer-review-simulator
Skill for simulating peer review feedback on manuscripts
experiment-planner-doe
Design of Experiments skill for systematic optimization of nanomaterial synthesis and processing