clinicaltrials-gov-parser
Monitor and summarize competitor clinical trial status changes from ClinicalTrials.gov.
Best use case
clinicaltrials-gov-parser is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Monitor and summarize competitor clinical trial status changes from ClinicalTrials.gov.
Teams using clinicaltrials-gov-parser should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/clinicaltrials-gov-parser/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How clinicaltrials-gov-parser Compares
| Feature / Agent | clinicaltrials-gov-parser | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Monitor and summarize competitor clinical trial status changes from ClinicalTrials.gov.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)
# ClinicalTrials.gov Parser
Monitor and summarize competitor clinical trial status changes from ClinicalTrials.gov.
## When to Use
- Use this skill when the task needs Monitor and summarize competitor clinical trial status changes from ClinicalTrials.gov.
- Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format.
- Use this skill when you need a documented fallback path for missing inputs, execution errors, or partial evidence.
## Key Features
- Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Monitor and summarize competitor clinical trial status changes from ClinicalTrials.gov.
- Packaged executable path(s): `scripts/main.py`.
- Reference material available in `references/` for task-specific guidance.
- Structured execution path designed to keep outputs consistent and reviewable.
## Dependencies
See `## Prerequisites` above for related details.
- `Python`: `3.10+`. Repository baseline for current packaged skills.
- `dataclasses`: `unspecified`. Declared in `requirements.txt`.
- `requests`: `unspecified`. Declared in `requirements.txt`.
## Example Usage
See `## Usage` above for related details.
```bash
cd "20260318/scientific-skills/Evidence Insight/clinicaltrials-gov-parser"
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
python scripts/main.py --help
```
Example run plan:
1. Confirm the user input, output path, and any required config values.
2. Edit the in-file `CONFIG` block or documented parameters if the script uses fixed settings.
3. Run `python scripts/main.py` with the validated inputs.
4. Review the generated output and return the final artifact with any assumptions called out.
## Implementation Details
See `## Workflow` above for related details.
- Execution model: validate the request, choose the packaged workflow, and produce a bounded deliverable.
- Input controls: confirm the source files, scope limits, output format, and acceptance criteria before running any script.
- Primary implementation surface: `scripts/main.py`.
- Reference guidance: `references/` contains supporting rules, prompts, or checklists.
- Parameters to clarify first: input path, output path, scope filters, thresholds, and any domain-specific constraints.
- Output discipline: keep results reproducible, identify assumptions explicitly, and avoid undocumented side effects.
## Quick Check
Use this command to verify that the packaged script entry point can be parsed before deeper execution.
```bash
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
```
## Audit-Ready Commands
Use these concrete commands for validation. They are intentionally self-contained and avoid placeholder paths.
```bash
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
python scripts/main.py --help
```
## Workflow
1. Confirm the user objective, required inputs, and non-negotiable constraints before doing detailed work.
2. Validate that the request matches the documented scope and stop early if the task would require unsupported assumptions.
3. Use the packaged script path or the documented reasoning path with only the inputs that are actually available.
4. Return a structured result that separates assumptions, deliverables, risks, and unresolved items.
5. If execution fails or inputs are incomplete, switch to the fallback path and state exactly what blocked full completion.
## Use Cases
- **Trial Monitoring**: Track status changes of specific clinical trials
- **Competitive Intelligence**: Monitor competitor trial activities and milestones
- **Recruitment Tracking**: Get updates on enrollment status
- **Completion Alerts**: Monitor trial completion and results posting
## Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Default | Required | Description |
|-----------|------|---------|----------|-------------|
| `--sponsor` | string | - | No | Trial sponsor name |
| `--condition` | string | - | No | Medical condition/disease |
| `--status` | string | - | No | Trial status (Recruiting, Completed, etc.) |
| `--trials` | string | - | No | Comma-separated trial IDs (NCT numbers) |
| `--output` | string | json | No | Output format (json, csv) |
| `--days` | int | 30 | No | Number of days for monitoring |
## Usage
```python
from scripts.main import ClinicalTrialsMonitor
# Initialize monitor
monitor = ClinicalTrialsMonitor()
# Search for trials
trials = monitor.search_trials(
sponsor="Pfizer",
condition="Diabetes",
status="Recruiting"
)
# Get trial details
trial = monitor.get_trial("NCT05108922")
# Check for status changes
changes = monitor.check_status_changes(trial_ids=["NCT05108922"])
```
## CLI Usage
```text
# Search trials
python scripts/main.py search --sponsor "Pfizer" --condition "Diabetes"
# Get trial details
python scripts/main.py get NCT05108922
# Monitor status changes
python scripts/main.py monitor --trials NCT05108922,NCT05108923 --output json
# Generate summary report
python scripts/main.py report --sponsor "Pfizer" --days 30
```
## API Methods
| Method | Description |
|--------|-------------|
| `search_trials()` | Search trials with filters |
| `get_trial(nct_id)` | Get detailed trial information |
| `check_status_changes()` | Check for status updates |
| `get_recruitment_status()` | Get enrollment updates |
| `generate_summary()` | Generate competitor summary |
## Technical Details
- **API**: ClinicalTrials.gov API v2
- **Rate Limit**: 10 requests/second
- **Data Format**: JSON
- **Difficulty**: Medium
## References
- See `references/api-docs.md` for API documentation
- See `references/status-codes.md` for trial status definitions
- See `references/examples.md` for usage examples
## Risk Assessment
| Risk Indicator | Assessment | Level |
|----------------|------------|-------|
| Code Execution | Python scripts with tools | High |
| Network Access | External API calls | High |
| File System Access | Read/write data | Medium |
| Instruction Tampering | Standard prompt guidelines | Low |
| Data Exposure | Data handled securely | Medium |
## Security Checklist
- [ ] No hardcoded credentials or API keys
- [ ] No unauthorized file system access (../)
- [ ] Output does not expose sensitive information
- [ ] Prompt injection protections in place
- [ ] API requests use HTTPS only
- [ ] Input validated against allowed patterns
- [ ] API timeout and retry mechanisms implemented
- [ ] Output directory restricted to workspace
- [ ] Script execution in sandboxed environment
- [ ] Error messages sanitized (no internal paths exposed)
- [ ] Dependencies audited
- [ ] No exposure of internal service architecture
## Prerequisites
```text
# Python dependencies
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
## Evaluation Criteria
### Success Metrics
- [ ] Successfully executes main functionality
- [ ] Output meets quality standards
- [ ] Handles edge cases gracefully
- [ ] Performance is acceptable
### Test Cases
1. **Basic Functionality**: Standard input → Expected output
2. **Edge Case**: Invalid input → Graceful error handling
3. **Performance**: Large dataset → Acceptable processing time
## Lifecycle Status
- **Current Stage**: Draft
- **Next Review Date**: 2026-03-06
- **Known Issues**: None
- **Planned Improvements**:
- Performance optimization
- Additional feature support
## Output Requirements
Every final response should make these items explicit when they are relevant:
- Objective or requested deliverable
- Inputs used and assumptions introduced
- Workflow or decision path
- Core result, recommendation, or artifact
- Constraints, risks, caveats, or validation needs
- Unresolved items and next-step checks
## Error Handling
- If required inputs are missing, state exactly which fields are missing and request only the minimum additional information.
- If the task goes outside the documented scope, stop instead of guessing or silently widening the assignment.
- If `scripts/main.py` fails, report the failure point, summarize what still can be completed safely, and provide a manual fallback.
- Do not fabricate files, citations, data, search results, or execution outcomes.
## Input Validation
This skill accepts requests that match the documented purpose of `clinicaltrials-gov-parser` and include enough context to complete the workflow safely.
Do not continue the workflow when the request is out of scope, missing a critical input, or would require unsupported assumptions. Instead respond:
> `clinicaltrials-gov-parser` only handles its documented workflow. Please provide the missing required inputs or switch to a more suitable skill.
## Response Template
Use the following fixed structure for non-trivial requests:
1. Objective
2. Inputs Received
3. Assumptions
4. Workflow
5. Deliverable
6. Risks and Limits
7. Next Checks
If the request is simple, you may compress the structure, but still keep assumptions and limits explicit when they affect correctness.Related Skills
clinicaltrials-db
Query the ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 to search for clinical trials, retrieve detailed study protocols, and analyze recruitment status; use when you need to find trials by condition/drug, export results, or verify study details by NCT ID.
skill-auditor
A comprehensive auditor for any agent skill — including Manus, OpenClaw/ClawHub, Claude, LobeHub, or custom SKILL.md-based skills. Use this skill whenever a user wants to evaluate, audit, review, score, or quality-check an agent skill before publishing, updating, or deploying. Covers two hard veto gates (structural redlines + research integrity redlines), static quality scoring across 25 criteria (ISO 25010 + OpenSSF + Agent), dynamic test input generation, multi-mode execution testing, multi-layer output evaluation with five specialized category rubrics (Evidence Insight / Protocol Design / Data Analysis / Academic Writing / Other), a Research Veto that applies to all four research categories, human eval viewer generation, actionable P0/P1/P2 optimization recommendations, and automatic skill improvement that outputs a polished, production-ready SKILL.md. Also use whenever a user says "audit my skill", "evaluate my skill", "improve my skill", or wants a corrected version after evaluation.
two-sample-mr-research-planner
Generates complete two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) research designs from a user-provided research direction. Use when users want to design, plan, or build a study using two-sample MR to test causal relationships. Triggers:"design a two-sample MR study", "build a publishable MR paper", "test whether this biomarker causally affects this disease", "generate Lite/Standard/Advanced MR plans", "screen multiple exposures with MR", "bidirectional MR design", "causal inference using GWAS summary statistics", or "I want to study X and Y using MR". Always outputs four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with a recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, and publication upgrade path.
research-proposal-generator
Generates a comprehensive research proposal design based on input literature, including hypothesis, mechanism verification, and budget. Use when the user wants to design a research project from a paper.
research-grants
Write competitive research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and Taiwan's NSTC when you need agency-compliant narratives, budgets, and review-criteria alignment for a specific solicitation/FOA/BAA.
protocol-standardization
Standardize fragmented experimental steps into reproducible protocol documents when you need method organization, lab SOP drafting, or cross-operator reproducibility; missing parameters must be explicitly marked as "To be supplemented/Not provided".
prospero-registration-helper
Assists researchers in generating PROSPERO registration content for meta-analyses from a title and optional protocol. Use when the user wants to draft a PROSPERO registration form.
non-tumor-ml-research-planner
Generates complete non-tumor biomedical machine learning research designs from a user-provided research direction. Always use this skill when users want to plan bioinformatics + ML papers for non-cancer diseases (metabolic, cardiovascular, kidney, inflammatory, autoimmune, infectious, neurological, endocrine, wound healing, chronic multifactor), design diagnostic biomarker studies, combine GEO datasets with feature selection and ML modeling, or generate Lite/Standard/Advanced/Publication+ workload plans. Trigger for:"non-tumor ML study", "bioinformatics paper outside oncology", "key genes and diagnostic model for a disease", "pyroptosis/ferroptosis/senescence/autophagy + disease", "GEO datasets + machine learning", "RF + LASSO diagnostic model", "DEG + feature selection + validation", "immune infiltration + biomarker", "non-cancer biomarker paper". Trigger even for casual phrasings like "I want to study X using machine learning", "help me design a non-tumor bioinformatics paper", or "how do I build a diagnostic model for disease Y".
network-tox-docking-research-planner
Generates complete network toxicology + molecular docking research designs from a user-provided toxicant and disease/phenotype. Always use this skill when users want to investigate how an environmental toxicant, endocrine disruptor, heavy metal, food contaminant, pharmaceutical residue, or consumer product chemical may contribute to a disease through shared molecular targets, hub genes, pathways, and docking evidence. Trigger for:"network toxicology study", "toxicology mechanism paper", "target prediction + PPI + docking", "environmental pollutant and disease mechanism", "hub genes and docking for toxicant", "Lite/Standard/Advanced toxicology plan", "CTD + SwissTargetPrediction + GeneCards + STRING", "CB-Dock2 docking study", "triclosan/BPA/cadmium/PFAS + disease". Also triggers for Chinese phrasings:"网络毒理学研究设计"、"毒物机制论文"、"靶点预测+PPI+对接"、"环境污染物与疾病机制". Trigger even for casual phrasings like "I want to study how chemical X affects disease Y" or "help me design a toxicology paper". Always output four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with a recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, and publication upgrade path.
meta-protocol-writer
Generates a PROSPERO-compliant Meta-analysis protocol based on Title and PICOS. Use when the user wants to write a protocol for a systematic review or meta-analysis.
hypothesis-generation
Structured scientific hypothesis formulation from observations; use when you have experimental observations or preliminary data and need testable hypotheses with predictions, mechanisms, and validation experiments.
hypogenic
Automated LLM-driven hypothesis generation and testing for tabular datasets; use when you need systematic exploration of empirical patterns (e.g., fraud detection, content analysis) and want to combine literature insights with data-driven hypothesis evaluation.