docx-feedback-tracker

Automatically detect DOCX track-changes history, version rounds, and author feedback to generate a Markdown modification explanation file when you run it on one or more DOCX versions.

53 stars

Best use case

docx-feedback-tracker is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Automatically detect DOCX track-changes history, version rounds, and author feedback to generate a Markdown modification explanation file when you run it on one or more DOCX versions.

Teams using docx-feedback-tracker should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/docx-feedback-tracker/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills/main/scientific-skills/Other/docx-feedback-tracker/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/docx-feedback-tracker/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How docx-feedback-tracker Compares

Feature / Agentdocx-feedback-trackerStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Automatically detect DOCX track-changes history, version rounds, and author feedback to generate a Markdown modification explanation file when you run it on one or more DOCX versions.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)

# DOCX Feedback Tracker

## When to Use

- You receive a DOCX with **Track Changes** and/or **Comments** enabled and need a consolidated change log by author.
- You have multiple DOCX versions (e.g., `-v1`, `-v2`, `-v3`) and want to reconstruct **round-based** modifications into a single report.
- A document has **no Track Changes**, but you still need **added/deleted** content via version-to-version text diffs.
- You want to generate a **Markdown modification explanation** automatically and save it next to the original DOCX files.
- You need to batch-process a folder of DOCX files and group them by topic into one change-log output per topic series.

## Key Features

- Detect and attribute changes to **track-changes authors** and **comment authors**.
- Extract **insertions** and **deletions** from DOCX OOXML (`w:ins` / `w:del`) and comments.
- Fallback to **version diffs** when track changes are absent (changes are then not attributable to specific authors).
- Group files by **topic series** and generate only one `<topic>-change-log.md` per series.
- Write output Markdown to the **same directory** as the inspected DOCX file(s).

## Dependencies

- Python 3.x
- No additional pinned third-party dependencies are specified in the provided documentation.

## Example Usage

### Single DOCX file

```bash
python script/docx_feedback_tracker.py "path\file.docx"
```

### Multiple DOCX versions (ordered rounds)

```bash
python script/docx_feedback_tracker.py "path\file-v1.docx" "path\file-v2.docx" "path\file-v3.docx"
```

### Batch process a directory

```bash
python script/docx_feedback_tracker.py --dir "path" --pattern "*.docx"
```

### Output

- **Grouping rule**: for the same topic series, only one Markdown file is generated:
  - `<topic>-change-log.md`
- **Output location**: the generated Markdown is saved in the **same directory** as the DOCX file(s).

## Implementation Details

- Entry script: `script/docx_feedback_tracker.py`
- Topic grouping and version-round ordering:
  - Files are grouped by the same base topic name.
  - Unmarked versions are treated as **v0**.
  - Version suffixes supported:
    - `-vN` (e.g., `report-v2.docx`)
    - `-N` (e.g., `report-2.docx`) — only applied when a same-name base exists.
  - If suffix-based ordering cannot be determined, files are sorted by **file timestamp**.
- Track changes and comments parsing:
  - Extract OOXML change nodes from:
    - `document.xml`
    - `comments.xml`
  - Primary markers:
    - `w:ins` for inserted content
    - `w:del` for deleted content
- Diff fallback when no track changes exist:
  - Perform text diffs between versions to compute added/deleted content.
  - Changes from diffs are **not attributable** to specific authors.
  - Before diffing, text is normalized to reduce false positives:
    - remove link tags
    - merge/normalize whitespace
- Output generation:
  - Produce a Markdown "modification explanation" and merge all rounds into a single file per topic series.
  - Template reference: `assets/change-log-template.md`
- OOXML reference for tracked changes:
  - `references/docx-tracked-changes.md`

## When Not to Use

- Do not use this skill when the required source data, identifiers, files, or credentials are missing.
- Do not use this skill when the user asks for fabricated results, unsupported claims, or out-of-scope conclusions.
- Do not use this skill when a simpler direct answer is more appropriate than the documented workflow.

## Required Inputs

- A clearly specified task goal aligned with the documented scope.
- All required files, identifiers, parameters, or environment variables before execution.
- Any domain constraints, formatting requirements, and expected output destination if applicable.

## Recommended Workflow

1. Validate the request against the skill boundary and confirm all required inputs are present.
2. Select the documented execution path and prefer the simplest supported command or procedure.
3. Produce the expected output using the documented file format, schema, or narrative structure.
4. Run a final validation pass for completeness, consistency, and safety before returning the result.

## Output Contract

- Return a structured deliverable that is directly usable without reformatting.
- If a file is produced, prefer a deterministic output name such as `docx_feedback_tracker_result.md` unless the skill documentation defines a better convention.
- Include a short validation summary describing what was checked, what assumptions were made, and any remaining limitations.

## Validation and Safety Rules

- Validate required inputs before execution and stop early when mandatory fields or files are missing.
- Do not fabricate measurements, references, findings, or conclusions that are not supported by the provided source material.
- Emit a clear warning when credentials, privacy constraints, safety boundaries, or unsupported requests affect the result.
- Keep the output safe, reproducible, and within the documented scope at all times.

## Failure Handling

- If validation fails, explain the exact missing field, file, or parameter and show the minimum fix required.
- If an external dependency or script fails, surface the command path, likely cause, and the next recovery step.
- If partial output is returned, label it clearly and identify which checks could not be completed.

## Quick Validation

Run this minimal verification path before full execution when possible:

```text
No local script validation step is required for this skill.
```

Expected output format:

```text
Result file: docx_feedback_tracker_result.md
Validation summary: PASS/FAIL with brief notes
Assumptions: explicit list if any
```

Related Skills

resubmission-deadline-tracker

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Track manuscript resubmission deadlines and automatically generate phase-appropriate task breakdowns for academic researchers based on remaining time.

keyword-velocity-tracker

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Calculate literature growth velocity and acceleration to assess research.

skill-auditor

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

A comprehensive auditor for any agent skill — including Manus, OpenClaw/ClawHub, Claude, LobeHub, or custom SKILL.md-based skills. Use this skill whenever a user wants to evaluate, audit, review, score, or quality-check an agent skill before publishing, updating, or deploying. Covers two hard veto gates (structural redlines + research integrity redlines), static quality scoring across 25 criteria (ISO 25010 + OpenSSF + Agent), dynamic test input generation, multi-mode execution testing, multi-layer output evaluation with five specialized category rubrics (Evidence Insight / Protocol Design / Data Analysis / Academic Writing / Other), a Research Veto that applies to all four research categories, human eval viewer generation, actionable P0/P1/P2 optimization recommendations, and automatic skill improvement that outputs a polished, production-ready SKILL.md. Also use whenever a user says "audit my skill", "evaluate my skill", "improve my skill", or wants a corrected version after evaluation.

two-sample-mr-research-planner

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Generates complete two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) research designs from a user-provided research direction. Use when users want to design, plan, or build a study using two-sample MR to test causal relationships. Triggers:"design a two-sample MR study", "build a publishable MR paper", "test whether this biomarker causally affects this disease", "generate Lite/Standard/Advanced MR plans", "screen multiple exposures with MR", "bidirectional MR design", "causal inference using GWAS summary statistics", or "I want to study X and Y using MR". Always outputs four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with a recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, and publication upgrade path.

research-proposal-generator

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Generates a comprehensive research proposal design based on input literature, including hypothesis, mechanism verification, and budget. Use when the user wants to design a research project from a paper.

research-grants

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Write competitive research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and Taiwan's NSTC when you need agency-compliant narratives, budgets, and review-criteria alignment for a specific solicitation/FOA/BAA.

protocol-standardization

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Standardize fragmented experimental steps into reproducible protocol documents when you need method organization, lab SOP drafting, or cross-operator reproducibility; missing parameters must be explicitly marked as "To be supplemented/Not provided".

prospero-registration-helper

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Assists researchers in generating PROSPERO registration content for meta-analyses from a title and optional protocol. Use when the user wants to draft a PROSPERO registration form.

non-tumor-ml-research-planner

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Generates complete non-tumor biomedical machine learning research designs from a user-provided research direction. Always use this skill when users want to plan bioinformatics + ML papers for non-cancer diseases (metabolic, cardiovascular, kidney, inflammatory, autoimmune, infectious, neurological, endocrine, wound healing, chronic multifactor), design diagnostic biomarker studies, combine GEO datasets with feature selection and ML modeling, or generate Lite/Standard/Advanced/Publication+ workload plans. Trigger for:"non-tumor ML study", "bioinformatics paper outside oncology", "key genes and diagnostic model for a disease", "pyroptosis/ferroptosis/senescence/autophagy + disease", "GEO datasets + machine learning", "RF + LASSO diagnostic model", "DEG + feature selection + validation", "immune infiltration + biomarker", "non-cancer biomarker paper". Trigger even for casual phrasings like "I want to study X using machine learning", "help me design a non-tumor bioinformatics paper", or "how do I build a diagnostic model for disease Y".

network-tox-docking-research-planner

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Generates complete network toxicology + molecular docking research designs from a user-provided toxicant and disease/phenotype. Always use this skill when users want to investigate how an environmental toxicant, endocrine disruptor, heavy metal, food contaminant, pharmaceutical residue, or consumer product chemical may contribute to a disease through shared molecular targets, hub genes, pathways, and docking evidence. Trigger for:"network toxicology study", "toxicology mechanism paper", "target prediction + PPI + docking", "environmental pollutant and disease mechanism", "hub genes and docking for toxicant", "Lite/Standard/Advanced toxicology plan", "CTD + SwissTargetPrediction + GeneCards + STRING", "CB-Dock2 docking study", "triclosan/BPA/cadmium/PFAS + disease". Also triggers for Chinese phrasings:"网络毒理学研究设计"、"毒物机制论文"、"靶点预测+PPI+对接"、"环境污染物与疾病机制". Trigger even for casual phrasings like "I want to study how chemical X affects disease Y" or "help me design a toxicology paper". Always output four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with a recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, and publication upgrade path.

meta-protocol-writer

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Generates a PROSPERO-compliant Meta-analysis protocol based on Title and PICOS. Use when the user wants to write a protocol for a systematic review or meta-analysis.

hypothesis-generation

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Structured scientific hypothesis formulation from observations; use when you have experimental observations or preliminary data and need testable hypotheses with predictions, mechanisms, and validation experiments.