expert-interview-topics
Generates professional interview titles and questions based on expert background and topic. Provides a structured workflow for interview preparation.
Best use case
expert-interview-topics is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Generates professional interview titles and questions based on expert background and topic. Provides a structured workflow for interview preparation.
Teams using expert-interview-topics should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/expert-interview-topics/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How expert-interview-topics Compares
| Feature / Agent | expert-interview-topics | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Generates professional interview titles and questions based on expert background and topic. Provides a structured workflow for interview preparation.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)
## When to Use
- Use this skill when the request matches its documented task boundary.
- Use it when the user can provide the required inputs and expects a structured deliverable.
- Prefer this skill for repeatable, checklist-driven execution rather than open-ended brainstorming.
## Key Features
- Scope-focused workflow aligned to: "Generates professional interview titles and questions based on expert background and topic. Provides a structured workflow for interview preparation.".
- Packaged executable path(s): `scripts/main.py` plus 1 additional script(s).
- Structured execution path designed to keep outputs consistent and reviewable.
## Dependencies
- `Python`: `3.10+`. Repository baseline for current packaged skills.
- `Third-party packages`: `not explicitly version-pinned in this skill package`. Add pinned versions if this skill needs stricter environment control.
## Example Usage
See `## Usage` above for related details.
```bash
cd "20260316/scientific-skills/Others/expert-interview-topics"
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
python scripts/main.py --help
```
Example run plan:
1. Confirm the user input, output path, and any required config values.
2. Edit the in-file `CONFIG` block or documented parameters if the script uses fixed settings.
3. Run `python scripts/main.py` with the validated inputs.
4. Review the generated output and return the final artifact with any assumptions called out.
## Implementation Details
- Execution model: validate the request, choose the packaged workflow, and produce a bounded deliverable.
- Input controls: confirm the source files, scope limits, output format, and acceptance criteria before running any script.
- Primary implementation surface: `scripts/main.py` with additional helper scripts under `scripts/`.
- Parameters to clarify first: input path, output path, scope filters, thresholds, and any domain-specific constraints.
- Output discipline: keep results reproducible, identify assumptions explicitly, and avoid undocumented side effects.
## Validation Shortcut
Run this minimal command first to verify the supported execution path:
```bash
python scripts/validate_skill.py --help
```
# Expert Interview Topics
This skill provides a professional workflow to generate interview titles and questions based on an expert's background and a discussion topic. It encapsulates the logic for title ideation, selection, and in-depth question formulation.
**Note**: This skill outputs the structured reasoning process and prompts, allowing users to execute the generation steps with their preferred Large Language Model (LLM).
## Usage
Run the Python script in the `scripts` directory.
### Command
```bash
python scripts/main.py --topic "<topic>" --background "<expert_background>" [--file "<path_to_transcript>"]
```
### Arguments
- `--topic`: The main topic or direction of the interview.
- `--background`: Detailed background information of the expert (Name, Unit, Research direction, Achievements, etc.).
- `--file` (Optional): Path to an existing interview transcript file (txt, md, etc.).
## Output
The script outputs three prompt templates corresponding to the workflow steps:
1. **Title Generation Prompt**: Ready to use.
2. **Title Selection Prompt**: Contains a placeholder `{generated_titles}` to be filled with the result from Step 1.
3. **Question Generation Prompt**: Contains a placeholder `{selected_title}` to be filled with the result from Step 2.
## Example
```bash
python scripts/main.py --topic "AI in Healthcare" --background "Dr. Smith, Chief Scientist at HealthAI"
```
## When Not to Use
- Do not use this skill when the required source data, identifiers, files, or credentials are missing.
- Do not use this skill when the user asks for fabricated results, unsupported claims, or out-of-scope conclusions.
- Do not use this skill when a simpler direct answer is more appropriate than the documented workflow.
## Required Inputs
- A clearly specified task goal aligned with the documented scope.
- All required files, identifiers, parameters, or environment variables before execution.
- Any domain constraints, formatting requirements, and expected output destination if applicable.
## Recommended Workflow
1. Validate the request against the skill boundary and confirm all required inputs are present.
2. Select the documented execution path and prefer the simplest supported command or procedure.
3. Produce the expected output using the documented file format, schema, or narrative structure.
4. Run a final validation pass for completeness, consistency, and safety before returning the result.
## Output Contract
- Return a structured deliverable that is directly usable without reformatting.
- If a file is produced, prefer a deterministic output name such as `expert_interview_topics_result.md` unless the skill documentation defines a better convention.
- Include a short validation summary describing what was checked, what assumptions were made, and any remaining limitations.
## Validation and Safety Rules
- Validate required inputs before execution and stop early when mandatory fields or files are missing.
- Do not fabricate measurements, references, findings, or conclusions that are not supported by the provided source material.
- Emit a clear warning when credentials, privacy constraints, safety boundaries, or unsupported requests affect the result.
- Keep the output safe, reproducible, and within the documented scope at all times.
## Failure Handling
- If validation fails, explain the exact missing field, file, or parameter and show the minimum fix required.
- If an external dependency or script fails, surface the command path, likely cause, and the next recovery step.
- If partial output is returned, label it clearly and identify which checks could not be completed.
## Quick Validation
Run this minimal verification path before full execution when possible:
```bash
python scripts/main.py --help
```
Expected output format:
```text
Result file: expert_interview_topics_result.md
Validation summary: PASS/FAIL with brief notes
Assumptions: explicit list if any
```
## Deterministic Output Rules
- Use the same section order for every supported request of this skill.
- Keep output field names stable and do not rename documented keys across examples.
- If a value is unavailable, emit an explicit placeholder instead of omitting the field.
## Completion Checklist
- Confirm all required inputs were present and valid.
- Confirm the supported execution path completed without unresolved errors.
- Confirm the final deliverable matches the documented format exactly.
- Confirm assumptions, limitations, and warnings are surfaced explicitly.Related Skills
expert-interview-generator
Generates a full expert interview article including introduction, Q&A body, and summary based on interview questions and expert background. Use when you have interview questions and an expert profile and need a polished article.
pathway-introduction-expert
Generates comprehensive academic introductions for biological pathways, including signaling processes, markers, and inhibitors. Use when the user asks to introduce a pathway, molecule, or gene.
residency-interview-prep
Mock interview preparation tool for residency Match interviews. Generates.
skill-auditor
A comprehensive auditor for any agent skill — including Manus, OpenClaw/ClawHub, Claude, LobeHub, or custom SKILL.md-based skills. Use this skill whenever a user wants to evaluate, audit, review, score, or quality-check an agent skill before publishing, updating, or deploying. Covers two hard veto gates (structural redlines + research integrity redlines), static quality scoring across 25 criteria (ISO 25010 + OpenSSF + Agent), dynamic test input generation, multi-mode execution testing, multi-layer output evaluation with five specialized category rubrics (Evidence Insight / Protocol Design / Data Analysis / Academic Writing / Other), a Research Veto that applies to all four research categories, human eval viewer generation, actionable P0/P1/P2 optimization recommendations, and automatic skill improvement that outputs a polished, production-ready SKILL.md. Also use whenever a user says "audit my skill", "evaluate my skill", "improve my skill", or wants a corrected version after evaluation.
two-sample-mr-research-planner
Generates complete two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) research designs from a user-provided research direction. Use when users want to design, plan, or build a study using two-sample MR to test causal relationships. Triggers:"design a two-sample MR study", "build a publishable MR paper", "test whether this biomarker causally affects this disease", "generate Lite/Standard/Advanced MR plans", "screen multiple exposures with MR", "bidirectional MR design", "causal inference using GWAS summary statistics", or "I want to study X and Y using MR". Always outputs four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with a recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, and publication upgrade path.
research-proposal-generator
Generates a comprehensive research proposal design based on input literature, including hypothesis, mechanism verification, and budget. Use when the user wants to design a research project from a paper.
research-grants
Write competitive research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and Taiwan's NSTC when you need agency-compliant narratives, budgets, and review-criteria alignment for a specific solicitation/FOA/BAA.
protocol-standardization
Standardize fragmented experimental steps into reproducible protocol documents when you need method organization, lab SOP drafting, or cross-operator reproducibility; missing parameters must be explicitly marked as "To be supplemented/Not provided".
prospero-registration-helper
Assists researchers in generating PROSPERO registration content for meta-analyses from a title and optional protocol. Use when the user wants to draft a PROSPERO registration form.
non-tumor-ml-research-planner
Generates complete non-tumor biomedical machine learning research designs from a user-provided research direction. Always use this skill when users want to plan bioinformatics + ML papers for non-cancer diseases (metabolic, cardiovascular, kidney, inflammatory, autoimmune, infectious, neurological, endocrine, wound healing, chronic multifactor), design diagnostic biomarker studies, combine GEO datasets with feature selection and ML modeling, or generate Lite/Standard/Advanced/Publication+ workload plans. Trigger for:"non-tumor ML study", "bioinformatics paper outside oncology", "key genes and diagnostic model for a disease", "pyroptosis/ferroptosis/senescence/autophagy + disease", "GEO datasets + machine learning", "RF + LASSO diagnostic model", "DEG + feature selection + validation", "immune infiltration + biomarker", "non-cancer biomarker paper". Trigger even for casual phrasings like "I want to study X using machine learning", "help me design a non-tumor bioinformatics paper", or "how do I build a diagnostic model for disease Y".
network-tox-docking-research-planner
Generates complete network toxicology + molecular docking research designs from a user-provided toxicant and disease/phenotype. Always use this skill when users want to investigate how an environmental toxicant, endocrine disruptor, heavy metal, food contaminant, pharmaceutical residue, or consumer product chemical may contribute to a disease through shared molecular targets, hub genes, pathways, and docking evidence. Trigger for:"network toxicology study", "toxicology mechanism paper", "target prediction + PPI + docking", "environmental pollutant and disease mechanism", "hub genes and docking for toxicant", "Lite/Standard/Advanced toxicology plan", "CTD + SwissTargetPrediction + GeneCards + STRING", "CB-Dock2 docking study", "triclosan/BPA/cadmium/PFAS + disease". Also triggers for Chinese phrasings:"网络毒理学研究设计"、"毒物机制论文"、"靶点预测+PPI+对接"、"环境污染物与疾病机制". Trigger even for casual phrasings like "I want to study how chemical X affects disease Y" or "help me design a toxicology paper". Always output four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with a recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, and publication upgrade path.
meta-protocol-writer
Generates a PROSPERO-compliant Meta-analysis protocol based on Title and PICOS. Use when the user wants to write a protocol for a systematic review or meta-analysis.