competitor-alternatives
When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' or 'competitive landing pages.' Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. Emphasizes deep research, modular content architecture, and varied section types beyond feature tables.
Best use case
competitor-alternatives is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt. It is especially useful for teams working in multi. When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' or 'competitive landing pages.' Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. Emphasizes deep research, modular content architecture, and varied section types beyond feature tables.
When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' or 'competitive landing pages.' Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. Emphasizes deep research, modular content architecture, and varied section types beyond feature tables.
Users should expect a more consistent workflow output, faster repeated execution, and less time spent rewriting prompts from scratch.
Practical example
Example input
Use the "competitor-alternatives" skill to help with this workflow task. Context: When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' or 'competitive landing pages.' Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. Emphasizes deep research, modular content architecture, and varied section types beyond feature tables.
Example output
A structured workflow result with clearer steps, more consistent formatting, and an output that is easier to reuse in the next run.
When to use this skill
- Use this skill when you want a reusable workflow rather than writing the same prompt again and again.
When not to use this skill
- Do not use this when you only need a one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- Do not use it if you cannot install or maintain the related files, repository context, or supporting tools.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/competitor-alternatives/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How competitor-alternatives Compares
| Feature / Agent | competitor-alternatives | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' or 'competitive landing pages.' Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. Emphasizes deep research, modular content architecture, and varied section types beyond feature tables.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
AI Agent for Product Research
Browse AI agent skills for product research, competitive analysis, customer discovery, and structured product decision support.
AI Agents for Marketing
Discover AI agents for marketing workflows, from SEO and content production to campaign research, outreach, and analytics.
Best AI Agents for Marketing
A curated list of the best AI agents and skills for marketing teams focused on SEO, content systems, outreach, and campaign execution.
SKILL.md Source
# Competitor & Alternative Pages
You are an expert in creating competitor comparison and alternative pages. Your goal is to build pages that rank for competitive search terms, provide genuine value to evaluators, and position your product effectively.
## Initial Assessment
Before creating competitor pages, understand:
1. **Your Product**
- Core value proposition
- Key differentiators
- Ideal customer profile
- Pricing model
- Strengths and honest weaknesses
2. **Competitive Landscape**
- Direct competitors
- Indirect/adjacent competitors
- Market positioning of each
- Search volume for competitor terms
3. **Goals**
- SEO traffic capture
- Sales enablement
- Conversion from competitor users
- Brand positioning
---
## Core Principles
### 1. Honesty Builds Trust
- Acknowledge competitor strengths
- Be accurate about your limitations
- Don't misrepresent competitor features
- Readers are comparing—they'll verify claims
### 2. Depth Over Surface
- Go beyond feature checklists
- Explain *why* differences matter
- Include use cases and scenarios
- Show, don't just tell
### 3. Help Them Decide
- Different tools fit different needs
- Be clear about who you're best for
- Be clear about who competitor is best for
- Reduce evaluation friction
### 4. Modular Content Architecture
- Competitor data should be centralized
- Updates propagate to all pages
- Avoid duplicating research
- Single source of truth per competitor
---
## Page Formats
### Format 1: [Competitor] Alternative (Singular)
**Search intent**: User is actively looking to switch from a specific competitor
**URL pattern**: `/alternatives/[competitor]` or `/[competitor]-alternative`
**Target keywords**:
- "[Competitor] alternative"
- "alternative to [Competitor]"
- "switch from [Competitor]"
- "[Competitor] replacement"
**Page structure**:
1. Why people look for alternatives (validate their pain)
2. Summary: You as the alternative (quick positioning)
3. Detailed comparison (features, service, pricing)
4. Who should switch (and who shouldn't)
5. Migration path
6. Social proof from switchers
7. CTA
**Tone**: Empathetic to their frustration, helpful guide
---
### Format 2: [Competitor] Alternatives (Plural)
**Search intent**: User is researching options, earlier in journey
**URL pattern**: `/alternatives/[competitor]-alternatives` or `/best-[competitor]-alternatives`
**Target keywords**:
- "[Competitor] alternatives"
- "best [Competitor] alternatives"
- "tools like [Competitor]"
- "[Competitor] competitors"
**Page structure**:
1. Why people look for alternatives (common pain points)
2. What to look for in an alternative (criteria framework)
3. List of alternatives (you first, but include real options)
4. Comparison table (summary)
5. Detailed breakdown of each alternative
6. Recommendation by use case
7. CTA
**Tone**: Objective guide, you're one option among several (but positioned well)
**Important**: Include 4-7 real alternatives. Being genuinely helpful builds trust and ranks better.
---
### Format 3: You vs [Competitor]
**Search intent**: User is directly comparing you to a specific competitor
**URL pattern**: `/vs/[competitor]` or `/compare/[you]-vs-[competitor]`
**Target keywords**:
- "[You] vs [Competitor]"
- "[Competitor] vs [You]"
- "[You] compared to [Competitor]"
- "[You] or [Competitor]"
**Page structure**:
1. TL;DR summary (key differences in 2-3 sentences)
2. At-a-glance comparison table
3. Detailed comparison by category:
- Features
- Pricing
- Service & support
- Ease of use
- Integrations
4. Who [You] is best for
5. Who [Competitor] is best for (be honest)
6. What customers say (testimonials from switchers)
7. Migration support
8. CTA
**Tone**: Confident but fair, acknowledge where competitor excels
---
### Format 4: [Competitor A] vs [Competitor B]
**Search intent**: User comparing two competitors (not you directly)
**URL pattern**: `/compare/[competitor-a]-vs-[competitor-b]`
**Target keywords**:
- "[Competitor A] vs [Competitor B]"
- "[Competitor A] or [Competitor B]"
- "[Competitor A] compared to [Competitor B]"
**Page structure**:
1. Overview of both products
2. Comparison by category
3. Who each is best for
4. The third option (introduce yourself)
5. Comparison table (all three)
6. CTA
**Tone**: Objective analyst, earn trust through fairness, then introduce yourself
**Why this works**: Captures search traffic for competitor terms, positions you as knowledgeable, introduces you to qualified audience.
---
## Index Pages
Each format needs an index page that lists all pages of that type. These hub pages serve as navigation aids, SEO consolidators, and entry points for visitors exploring multiple comparisons.
### Alternatives Index
**URL**: `/alternatives` or `/alternatives/index`
**Purpose**: Lists all "[Competitor] Alternative" pages
**Page structure**:
1. Headline: "[Your Product] as an Alternative"
2. Brief intro on why people switch to you
3. List of all alternative pages with:
- Competitor name/logo
- One-line summary of key differentiator vs. that competitor
- Link to full comparison
4. Common reasons people switch (aggregated)
5. CTA
**Example**:
```markdown
## Explore [Your Product] as an Alternative
Looking to switch? See how [Your Product] compares to the tools you're evaluating:
- **[Notion Alternative](/alternatives/notion)** — Better for teams who need [X]
- **[Airtable Alternative](/alternatives/airtable)** — Better for teams who need [Y]
- **[Monday Alternative](/alternatives/monday)** — Better for teams who need [Z]
```
---
### Alternatives (Plural) Index
**URL**: `/alternatives/compare` or `/best-alternatives`
**Purpose**: Lists all "[Competitor] Alternatives" roundup pages
**Page structure**:
1. Headline: "Software Alternatives & Comparisons"
2. Brief intro on your comparison methodology
3. List of all alternatives roundup pages with:
- Competitor name
- Number of alternatives covered
- Link to roundup
4. CTA
**Example**:
```markdown
## Find the Right Tool
Comparing your options? Our guides cover the top alternatives:
- **[Best Notion Alternatives](/alternatives/notion-alternatives)** — 7 tools compared
- **[Best Airtable Alternatives](/alternatives/airtable-alternatives)** — 6 tools compared
- **[Best Monday Alternatives](/alternatives/monday-alternatives)** — 5 tools compared
```
---
### Vs Comparisons Index
**URL**: `/vs` or `/compare`
**Purpose**: Lists all "You vs [Competitor]" and "[A] vs [B]" pages
**Page structure**:
1. Headline: "Compare [Your Product]"
2. Section: "[Your Product] vs Competitors" — list of direct comparisons
3. Section: "Head-to-Head Comparisons" — list of [A] vs [B] pages
4. Brief methodology note
5. CTA
**Example**:
```markdown
## Compare [Your Product]
### [Your Product] vs. the Competition
- **[[Your Product] vs Notion](/vs/notion)** — Best for [differentiator]
- **[[Your Product] vs Airtable](/vs/airtable)** — Best for [differentiator]
- **[[Your Product] vs Monday](/vs/monday)** — Best for [differentiator]
### Other Comparisons
Evaluating tools we compete with? We've done the research:
- **[Notion vs Airtable](/compare/notion-vs-airtable)**
- **[Notion vs Monday](/compare/notion-vs-monday)**
- **[Airtable vs Monday](/compare/airtable-vs-monday)**
```
---
### Index Page Best Practices
**Keep them updated**: When you add a new comparison page, add it to the relevant index.
**Internal linking**:
- Link from index → individual pages
- Link from individual pages → back to index
- Cross-link between related comparisons
**SEO value**:
- Index pages can rank for broad terms like "project management tool comparisons"
- Pass link equity to individual comparison pages
- Help search engines discover all comparison content
**Sorting options**:
- By popularity (search volume)
- Alphabetically
- By category/use case
- By date added (show freshness)
**Include on index pages**:
- Last updated date for credibility
- Number of pages/comparisons available
- Quick filters if you have many comparisons
---
## Content Architecture
### Centralized Competitor Data
Create a single source of truth for each competitor:
```
competitor_data/
├── notion.md
├── airtable.md
├── monday.md
└── ...
```
**Per competitor, document**:
```yaml
name: Notion
website: notion.so
tagline: "The all-in-one workspace"
founded: 2016
headquarters: San Francisco
# Positioning
primary_use_case: "docs + light databases"
target_audience: "teams wanting flexible workspace"
market_position: "premium, feature-rich"
# Pricing
pricing_model: per-seat
free_tier: true
free_tier_limits: "limited blocks, 1 user"
starter_price: $8/user/month
business_price: $15/user/month
enterprise: custom
# Features (rate 1-5 or describe)
features:
documents: 5
databases: 4
project_management: 3
collaboration: 4
integrations: 3
mobile_app: 3
offline_mode: 2
api: 4
# Strengths (be honest)
strengths:
- Extremely flexible and customizable
- Beautiful, modern interface
- Strong template ecosystem
- Active community
# Weaknesses (be fair)
weaknesses:
- Can be slow with large databases
- Learning curve for advanced features
- Limited automations compared to dedicated tools
- Offline mode is limited
# Best for
best_for:
- Teams wanting all-in-one workspace
- Content-heavy workflows
- Documentation-first teams
- Startups and small teams
# Not ideal for
not_ideal_for:
- Complex project management needs
- Large databases (1000s of rows)
- Teams needing robust offline
- Enterprise with strict compliance
# Common complaints (from reviews)
common_complaints:
- "Gets slow with lots of content"
- "Hard to find things as workspace grows"
- "Mobile app is clunky"
# Migration notes
migration_from:
difficulty: medium
data_export: "Markdown, CSV, HTML"
what_transfers: "Pages, databases"
what_doesnt: "Automations, integrations setup"
time_estimate: "1-3 days for small team"
```
### Your Product Data
Same structure for yourself—be honest:
```yaml
name: [Your Product]
# ... same fields
strengths:
- [Your real strengths]
weaknesses:
- [Your honest weaknesses]
best_for:
- [Your ideal customers]
not_ideal_for:
- [Who should use something else]
```
### Page Generation
Each page pulls from centralized data:
- **[Competitor] Alternative page**: Pulls competitor data + your data
- **[Competitor] Alternatives page**: Pulls competitor data + your data + other alternatives
- **You vs [Competitor] page**: Pulls your data + competitor data
- **[A] vs [B] page**: Pulls both competitor data + your data
**Benefits**:
- Update competitor pricing once, updates everywhere
- Add new feature comparison once, appears on all pages
- Consistent accuracy across pages
- Easier to maintain at scale
---
## Section Templates
### TL;DR Summary
Start every page with a quick summary for scanners:
```markdown
**TL;DR**: [Competitor] excels at [strength] but struggles with [weakness].
[Your product] is built for [your focus], offering [key differentiator].
Choose [Competitor] if [their ideal use case]. Choose [You] if [your ideal use case].
```
### Paragraph Comparison (Not Just Tables)
For each major dimension, write a paragraph:
```markdown
## Features
[Competitor] offers [description of their feature approach].
Their strength is [specific strength], which works well for [use case].
However, [limitation] can be challenging for [user type].
[Your product] takes a different approach with [your approach].
This means [benefit], though [honest tradeoff].
Teams who [specific need] often find this more effective.
```
### Feature Comparison Section
Go beyond checkmarks:
```markdown
## Feature Comparison
### [Feature Category]
**[Competitor]**: [2-3 sentence description of how they handle this]
- Strengths: [specific]
- Limitations: [specific]
**[Your product]**: [2-3 sentence description]
- Strengths: [specific]
- Limitations: [specific]
**Bottom line**: Choose [Competitor] if [scenario]. Choose [You] if [scenario].
```
### Pricing Comparison Section
```markdown
## Pricing
| | [Competitor] | [Your Product] |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | [Details] | [Details] |
| Starting price | $X/user/mo | $X/user/mo |
| Business tier | $X/user/mo | $X/user/mo |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom |
**What's included**: [Competitor]'s $X plan includes [features], while
[Your product]'s $X plan includes [features].
**Total cost consideration**: Beyond per-seat pricing, consider [hidden costs,
add-ons, implementation]. [Competitor] charges extra for [X], while
[Your product] includes [Y] in base pricing.
**Value comparison**: For a 10-person team, [Competitor] costs approximately
$X/year while [Your product] costs $Y/year, with [key differences in what you get].
```
### Service & Support Comparison
```markdown
## Service & Support
| | [Competitor] | [Your Product] |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation | [Quality assessment] | [Quality assessment] |
| Response time | [SLA if known] | [Your SLA] |
| Support channels | [List] | [List] |
| Onboarding | [What they offer] | [What you offer] |
| CSM included | [At what tier] | [At what tier] |
**Support quality**: Based on [G2/Capterra reviews, your research],
[Competitor] support is described as [assessment]. Common feedback includes
[quotes or themes].
[Your product] offers [your support approach]. [Specific differentiator like
response time, dedicated CSM, implementation help].
```
### Who It's For Section
```markdown
## Who Should Choose [Competitor]
[Competitor] is the right choice if:
- [Specific use case or need]
- [Team type or size]
- [Workflow or requirement]
- [Budget or priority]
**Ideal [Competitor] customer**: [Persona description in 1-2 sentences]
## Who Should Choose [Your Product]
[Your product] is built for teams who:
- [Specific use case or need]
- [Team type or size]
- [Workflow or requirement]
- [Priority or value]
**Ideal [Your product] customer**: [Persona description in 1-2 sentences]
```
### Migration Section
```markdown
## Switching from [Competitor]
### What transfers
- [Data type]: [How easily, any caveats]
- [Data type]: [How easily, any caveats]
### What needs reconfiguration
- [Thing]: [Why and effort level]
- [Thing]: [Why and effort level]
### Migration support
We offer [migration support details]:
- [Free data import tool / white-glove migration]
- [Documentation / migration guide]
- [Timeline expectation]
- [Support during transition]
### What customers say about switching
> "[Quote from customer who switched]"
> — [Name], [Role] at [Company]
```
### Social Proof Section
Focus on switchers:
```markdown
## What Customers Say
### Switched from [Competitor]
> "[Specific quote about why they switched and outcome]"
> — [Name], [Role] at [Company]
> "[Another quote]"
> — [Name], [Role] at [Company]
### Results after switching
- [Company] saw [specific result]
- [Company] reduced [metric] by [amount]
```
---
## Comparison Table Best Practices
### Beyond Checkmarks
Instead of:
| Feature | You | Competitor |
|---------|-----|-----------|
| Feature A | ✓ | ✓ |
| Feature B | ✓ | ✗ |
Do this:
| Feature | You | Competitor |
|---------|-----|-----------|
| Feature A | Full support with [detail] | Basic support, [limitation] |
| Feature B | [Specific capability] | Not available |
### Organize by Category
Group features into meaningful categories:
- Core functionality
- Collaboration
- Integrations
- Security & compliance
- Support & service
### Include Ratings Where Useful
| Category | You | Competitor | Notes |
|----------|-----|-----------|-------|
| Ease of use | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | [Brief note] |
| Feature depth | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | [Brief note] |
---
## Research Process
### Deep Competitor Research
For each competitor, gather:
1. **Product research**
- Sign up for free trial
- Use the product yourself
- Document features, UX, limitations
- Take screenshots
2. **Pricing research**
- Current pricing (check regularly)
- What's included at each tier
- Hidden costs, add-ons
- Contract terms
3. **Review mining**
- G2, Capterra, TrustRadius reviews
- Common praise themes
- Common complaint themes
- Ratings by category
4. **Customer feedback**
- Talk to customers who switched
- Talk to prospects who chose competitor
- Document real quotes
5. **Content research**
- Their positioning and messaging
- Their comparison pages (how do they compare to you?)
- Their documentation quality
- Their changelog (recent development)
### Ongoing Updates
Competitor pages need maintenance:
- **Quarterly**: Verify pricing, check for major feature changes
- **When notified**: Customer mentions competitor change
- **Annually**: Full refresh of all competitor data
---
## SEO Considerations
### Keyword Targeting
| Format | Primary Keywords | Secondary Keywords |
|--------|-----------------|-------------------|
| Alternative (singular) | [Competitor] alternative | alternative to [Competitor], switch from [Competitor], [Competitor] replacement |
| Alternatives (plural) | [Competitor] alternatives | best [Competitor] alternatives, tools like [Competitor], [Competitor] competitors |
| You vs Competitor | [You] vs [Competitor] | [Competitor] vs [You], [You] compared to [Competitor] |
| Competitor vs Competitor | [A] vs [B] | [B] vs [A], [A] or [B], [A] compared to [B] |
### Internal Linking
- Link between related competitor pages
- Link from feature pages to relevant comparisons
- Link from blog posts mentioning competitors
- Hub page linking to all competitor content
### Schema Markup
Consider FAQ schema for common questions:
```json
{
"@type": "FAQPage",
"mainEntity": [
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "What is the best alternative to [Competitor]?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "[Your answer positioning yourself]"
}
}
]
}
```
---
## Output Format
### Competitor Data File
```yaml
# [competitor].yaml
# Complete competitor profile for use across all comparison pages
```
### Page Content
For each page:
- URL and meta tags
- Full page copy organized by section
- Comparison tables
- CTAs
### Page Set Plan
Recommended pages to create:
1. [List of alternative pages]
2. [List of vs pages]
3. Priority order based on search volume
---
## Questions to Ask
If you need more context:
1. Who are your top 3-5 competitors?
2. What's your core differentiator?
3. What are common reasons people switch to you?
4. Do you have customer quotes about switching?
5. What's your pricing vs. competitors?
6. Do you offer migration support?
---
## Related Skills
- **programmatic-seo**: For building competitor pages at scale
- **copywriting**: For writing compelling comparison copy
- **seo-audit**: For optimizing competitor pages
- **schema-markup**: For FAQ and comparison schemaRelated Skills
competitor-teardown
Structured competitive analysis with feature matrices, SWOT, positioning maps, and UX review. Covers research frameworks, pricing comparison, review mining, and visual deliverables. Use for: market research, competitive intelligence, investor decks, product strategy, sales enablement. Triggers: competitor analysis, competitive analysis, competitor teardown, market research, competitive intelligence, swot analysis, competitor comparison, market landscape, competitor review, competitive landscape, feature comparison, market positioning
competitor-analysis
Analyze competitor website structures, messaging patterns, and unique features. Use when researching competition, identifying gaps, or informing content strategy.
azure-quotas
Check/manage Azure quotas and usage across providers. For deployment planning, capacity validation, region selection. WHEN: "check quotas", "service limits", "current usage", "request quota increase", "quota exceeded", "validate capacity", "regional availability", "provisioning limits", "vCPU limit", "how many vCPUs available in my subscription".
raindrop-io
Manage Raindrop.io bookmarks with AI assistance. Save and organize bookmarks, search your collection, manage reading lists, and organize research materials. Use when working with bookmarks, web research, reading lists, or when user mentions Raindrop.io.
zlibrary-to-notebooklm
自动从 Z-Library 下载书籍并上传到 Google NotebookLM。支持 PDF/EPUB 格式,自动转换,一键创建知识库。
discover-skills
当你发现当前可用的技能都不够合适(或用户明确要求你寻找技能)时使用。本技能会基于任务目标和约束,给出一份精简的候选技能清单,帮助你选出最适配当前任务的技能。
web-performance-seo
Fix PageSpeed Insights/Lighthouse accessibility "!" errors caused by contrast audit failures (CSS filters, OKLCH/OKLAB, low opacity, gradient text, image backgrounds). Use for accessibility-driven SEO/performance debugging and remediation.
project-to-obsidian
将代码项目转换为 Obsidian 知识库。当用户提到 obsidian、项目文档、知识库、分析项目、转换项目 时激活。 【激活后必须执行】: 1. 先完整阅读本 SKILL.md 文件 2. 理解 AI 写入规则(默认到 00_Inbox/AI/、追加式、统一 Schema) 3. 执行 STEP 0: 使用 AskUserQuestion 询问用户确认 4. 用户确认后才开始 STEP 1 项目扫描 5. 严格按 STEP 0 → 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 顺序执行 【禁止行为】: - 禁止不读 SKILL.md 就开始分析项目 - 禁止跳过 STEP 0 用户确认 - 禁止直接在 30_Resources 创建(先到 00_Inbox/AI/) - 禁止自作主张决定输出位置
obsidian-helper
Obsidian 智能笔记助手。当用户提到 obsidian、日记、笔记、知识库、capture、review 时激活。 【激活后必须执行】: 1. 先完整阅读本 SKILL.md 文件 2. 理解 AI 写入三条硬规矩(00_Inbox/AI/、追加式、白名单字段) 3. 按 STEP 0 → STEP 1 → ... 顺序执行 4. 不要跳过任何步骤,不要自作主张 【禁止行为】: - 禁止不读 SKILL.md 就开始工作 - 禁止跳过用户确认步骤 - 禁止在非 00_Inbox/AI/ 位置创建新笔记(除非用户明确指定)
internationalizing-websites
Adds multi-language support to Next.js websites with proper SEO configuration including hreflang tags, localized sitemaps, and language-specific content. Use when adding new languages, setting up i18n, optimizing for international SEO, or when user mentions localization, translation, multi-language, or specific languages like Japanese, Korean, Chinese.
google-official-seo-guide
Official Google SEO guide covering search optimization, best practices, Search Console, crawling, indexing, and improving website search visibility based on official Google documentation
github-release-assistant
Generate bilingual GitHub release documentation (README.md + README.zh.md) from repo metadata and user input, and guide release prep with git add/commit/push. Use when the user asks to write or polish README files, create bilingual docs, prepare a GitHub release, or mentions release assistant/README generation.