Data Flow Tracing
This skill should be used when the user asks to "trace data flow", "follow user input", "source to sink analysis", "track variable", "find input sources", "taint analysis", or needs to understand how user-controlled data flows through an application during whitebox security review.
Best use case
Data Flow Tracing is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "trace data flow", "follow user input", "source to sink analysis", "track variable", "find input sources", "taint analysis", or needs to understand how user-controlled data flows through an application during whitebox security review.
Teams using Data Flow Tracing should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/data-flow-tracing/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How Data Flow Tracing Compares
| Feature / Agent | Data Flow Tracing | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
This skill should be used when the user asks to "trace data flow", "follow user input", "source to sink analysis", "track variable", "find input sources", "taint analysis", or needs to understand how user-controlled data flows through an application during whitebox security review.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Data Flow Tracing
## Purpose
Guide the process of tracing user-controlled input from entry points (sources) through the application to security-sensitive functions (sinks). This is essential for confirming vulnerability exploitability.
## When to Use
Activate this skill when:
- Confirming if identified sinks receive user input
- Mapping the path from source to sink
- Understanding data transformations and filters
- Determining if sanitization can be bypassed
## Core Concepts
### Sources (Input Entry Points)
**HTTP Sources**:
| Language | Common Sources |
|----------|----------------|
| PHP | `$_GET`, `$_POST`, `$_REQUEST`, `$_COOKIE`, `$_FILES`, `$_SERVER` |
| Java | `request.getParameter()`, `request.getHeader()`, `@RequestParam` |
| Python | `request.args`, `request.form`, `request.data`, `request.json` |
| Node.js | `req.query`, `req.body`, `req.params`, `req.headers` |
| .NET | `Request.QueryString`, `Request.Form`, `Request["param"]` |
**Other Sources**:
- Database queries (stored user data)
- File contents (user-uploaded or modified)
- Environment variables
- External API responses
### Sinks (Dangerous Functions)
Refer to the **dangerous-functions** skill for comprehensive sink lists.
### Data Transformations
Track how data changes between source and sink:
- Encoding/Decoding (base64, URL, HTML)
- Concatenation with other strings
- Array/object property access
- Type conversions
- String manipulations
## Tracing Methodology
### Step 1: Identify the Sink
Start from the dangerous function identified during code review.
### Step 2: Find Direct Parameters
Identify what variables/parameters are passed to the sink.
```
Example: system($cmd);
Direct parameter: $cmd
```
### Step 3: Trace Backwards
Follow each parameter to its origin:
1. Check function parameters
2. Check variable assignments
3. Check conditional branches
4. Check loop iterations
5. Check included/required files
### Step 4: Identify Sources
Determine where user input enters:
```
$cmd = $_GET['command']; // Direct source
$cmd = $row['command']; // Database (check how it was stored)
$cmd = $config['cmd']; // Config file (check if user-modifiable)
```
### Step 5: Map Transformations
Document all changes to the data:
```
Source: $_GET['input']
-> urldecode()
-> str_replace(['../', '..\\'], '', $input)
-> escapeshellarg()
-> Sink: exec()
```
### Step 6: Assess Exploitability
Consider:
- Are filters/sanitization bypassable?
- Is the full input controllable?
- Are there alternative paths?
## Tracing Techniques
### Static Analysis (Manual)
**Forward Tracing**: Start from source, follow to sinks
```
$input = $_GET['x'];
$processed = process($input);
dangerous_function($processed);
```
**Backward Tracing**: Start from sink, trace to source
```
dangerous_function($var);
<- $var = transform($data);
<- $data = $_POST['param'];
```
### Using IDE Features
- Find all references to variable
- Go to definition
- Find usages
- Call hierarchy
### Using Grep
```bash
# Find where variable is assigned
grep -rn "\$varname\s*=" --include="*.php"
# Find where variable is used
grep -rn "\$varname" --include="*.php"
# Find function calls
grep -rn "functionName\s*(" --include="*.php"
```
## Common Patterns
### Direct Flow
```
$input = $_GET['cmd'];
system($input); // Vulnerable
```
### Database-Mediated Flow
```
// Store
$db->insert(['cmd' => $_POST['cmd']]);
// Later, retrieve and execute
$row = $db->query("SELECT cmd FROM jobs")->fetch();
system($row['cmd']); // Vulnerable if original input wasn't sanitized
```
### Configuration Flow
```
// Config loaded from user-modifiable file
$config = parse_ini_file('/var/www/config.ini');
system($config['backup_cmd']); // Vulnerable if config is modifiable
```
### Multi-File Flow
```
// file1.php
$_SESSION['cmd'] = $_GET['cmd'];
// file2.php
system($_SESSION['cmd']); // Vulnerable
```
## Sanitization Analysis
### Identify Sanitization Functions
```
$input = htmlspecialchars($_GET['x']); // XSS protection
$input = escapeshellarg($_GET['x']); // Command injection protection
$input = intval($_GET['x']); // Type casting
$input = preg_replace('/[^a-z]/', '', $_GET['x']); // Whitelist
```
### Assess Bypass Potential
| Sanitization | Bypass Considerations |
|--------------|----------------------|
| Blacklist | Missing characters, encoding |
| Whitelist | Logic errors, regex flaws |
| Type casting | Depends on sink requirements |
| Encoding | Double encoding, context |
| Length limits | Truncation attacks |
### Common Bypass Techniques
- Case variations
- Encoding (URL, Unicode, HTML)
- Null bytes
- Double encoding
- Alternative representations
## Documentation Template
When tracing, document findings:
```markdown
## Finding: [Vulnerability Type]
### Sink
- File: path/to/file.php
- Line: 42
- Function: system($cmd)
### Source
- File: path/to/file.php
- Line: 35
- Source: $_GET['command']
### Data Flow
1. $_GET['command'] received (line 35)
2. Passed to sanitize() function (line 36)
3. Concatenated with prefix (line 38)
4. Passed to system() (line 42)
### Sanitization
- sanitize() removes semicolons and pipes
- Bypass: Use newline (%0a) or $() syntax
### Exploitability
- Confirmed exploitable
- Payload: `valid_command%0awhoami`
```
## Integration with Other Skills
- Use **dangerous-functions** to identify sinks
- Use **vuln-patterns** for exploitation techniques
- Use **exploit-techniques** to develop PoCRelated Skills
Sensitive Data Leakage
Detect ANY credential/secret flowing to ANY output sink. Use when asked about "credential leakage", "secret logging", "sensitive data exposure", "CWE-532", "password in logs", "token exposure", or security logging issues.
Workspace Discovery
This skill should be used when the user asks to "detect workspaces", "find packages", "list monorepo packages", "workspace structure", "monorepo analysis", or needs to identify workspace/package boundaries in a codebase for focused security analysis.
vulnerability-chains
This skill should be used when the user asks about "vulnerability chains", "chained exploits", "multi-step attacks", "SSRF to RCE", "pivot attacks", or needs to identify how vulnerabilities in different components can be combined during whitebox security review.
Vulnerability Patterns
This skill should be used when the user asks about "vulnerability patterns", "how to find SQL injection", "XSS patterns", "command injection techniques", "OWASP vulnerabilities", "common web vulnerabilities", "exploitation patterns", or needs to understand how specific vulnerability classes work during whitebox security review.
Threat Modeling
This skill should be used when the user asks about "threat model", "STRIDE", "data flow diagram", "attack surface", "threat analysis", "security architecture", "component threats", "trust boundaries", "technology decomposition", or needs systematic threat identification during whitebox security review.
verify-finding
Drive a single finding through CPG verification and false-positive triage.
start-audit
Guided first-run security audit: doctor, scope, threats, scan, verify, report.
scope-repo
Decide audit boundaries for large or monorepo targets and write audit-plan.md.
review-pr
Diff-aware PR security review with verified findings and PR comment payload.
package-evidence
Bundle findings, reports, audit plan, and ledger into one evidence zip.
Security Misconfiguration
This skill should be used when the user asks about "security misconfiguration", "default credentials", "debug mode", "security headers", "exposed endpoints", "TLS configuration", or needs to find configuration-related vulnerabilities during whitebox security review.
Secret Scanning
This skill should be used when the user asks about "secret scanning", "find secrets", "hardcoded credentials", "leaked API keys", "git history secrets", "credential scanning", "detect passwords in code", or needs to identify secrets and credentials in source code or git history during whitebox security review.