solver

How the Faebryk parameter solver works (Sets/Literals, Parameters, Expressions), the core invariants enforced during mutation, and practical workflows for debugging and extending the solver. Use when implementing or modifying constraint solving, parameter bounds, or debugging expression simplification.

3,147 stars

Best use case

solver is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

How the Faebryk parameter solver works (Sets/Literals, Parameters, Expressions), the core invariants enforced during mutation, and practical workflows for debugging and extending the solver. Use when implementing or modifying constraint solving, parameter bounds, or debugging expression simplification.

Teams using solver should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/solver/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/atopile/atopile/main/.claude/skills/solver/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/solver/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How solver Compares

Feature / AgentsolverStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

How the Faebryk parameter solver works (Sets/Literals, Parameters, Expressions), the core invariants enforced during mutation, and practical workflows for debugging and extending the solver. Use when implementing or modifying constraint solving, parameter bounds, or debugging expression simplification.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

Related Guides

SKILL.md Source

# Solver Module

The solver is the heart of atopile's **parameter subsystem**: it symbolically simplifies and checks constraint systems built from **Parameters**, **Literals (Sets)**, and **Expressions**.

If you are touching solver internals, read these first:

- `src/faebryk/core/solver/README.md` (concepts, set correlation, append-only graphs, canonicalization)
- `src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/invariants.py` (the *actual* invariants enforced during expression insertion)

## Quick Start

```python
import faebryk.core.node as fabll
import faebryk.library._F as F
from faebryk.core.solver.defaultsolver import DefaultSolver
from faebryk.libs.test.boundexpressions import BoundExpressions

E = BoundExpressions()

class _App(fabll.Node):
    x = F.Parameters.NumericParameter.MakeChild(unit=E.U.dl)

app = _App.bind_typegraph(tg=E.tg).create_instance(g=E.g)
x = app.x.get().can_be_operand.get()
E.is_subset(x, E.lit_op_range(((9, E.U.dl), (11, E.U.dl))), assert_=True)

solver = DefaultSolver()
res = solver.simplify(g=E.g, tg=E.tg, terminal=True).data.mutation_map
lit = res.try_extract_superset(app.x.get().is_parameter_operatable.get(), domain_default=True)
assert lit is not None
```

## Relevant Files

- Solver runtime + orchestration:
  - `src/faebryk/core/solver/defaultsolver.py` (`DefaultSolver`, iteration loop, terminal vs non-terminal)
  - `src/faebryk/core/solver/solver.py` (solver protocol + helper APIs)
- Mutation machinery (this is where “graphs are append-only” is handled):
  - `src/faebryk/core/solver/mutator.py` (`Mutator`, `Transformations`, `MutationStage`, `MutationMap`, tracebacks)
- Symbolic layer (canonical forms + invariants):
  - `src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/invariants.py` (`insert_expression(...)` invariant pipeline)
  - `src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/canonical.py` (canonicalization passes)
  - `src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/*` (structural + expression-wise algorithms)
- Domain objects (what users actually create in graphs):
  - `src/faebryk/library/Parameters.py` (ParameterOperatables, domains, compact repr)
  - `src/faebryk/library/Expressions.py` (expression node types, predicates, assertables)
  - `src/faebryk/library/Literals.py` (Sets; numeric/boolean/enum literals)
- Test helpers:
  - `src/faebryk/libs/test/boundexpressions.py` (concise graph + expression construction for tests)

## Dependants (Call Sites)

- Library components (`src/faebryk/library/`): define parameters/constraints (e.g. `R.resistance`)
- Compiler + frontends: translate `ato` constraints into solver expressions
- Picker backend: uses solver simplification + bounds extraction to prune candidate parts

## How to Work With / Develop / Test

### Mental Model (the parts that matter for correctness)

### 1) Literals are Sets (and correlation is subtle)
- A literal like `100kOhm +/- 10%` is a **Set** (a range), not a scalar.
- **Singleton sets are self-correlated**; all other sets are treated as **uncorrelated**, even with themselves.
  - This is why `X - X` is not necessarily `{0}` when `X` is a range, but *is* `{0}` when `X` is a singleton.

### 2) Symbols (Parameters) introduce correlation
- A `Parameter` behaves like a mathematical symbol (variable), not a Python variable.
- Correlation between symbols is created via *asserted* constraints, most notably:
  - `Is(A, B).assert_()` / `A.alias_is(B)` creates a strong “these are the same” correlation.
  - `IsSubset(A, X).assert_()` / `A.constrain_subset(X)` constrains `A` to be within `X`.
  - `IsSubset(X, A).assert_()` / `A.constrain_superset(X)` constrains `A` to accept at least `X`.

### 3) Expressions are graph objects (not just Python trees)
Expressions are nodes in the Faebryk graph that point at operand nodes. This matters because…

### 4) The underlying graphs are append-only
The solver cannot “edit” an expression in-place. Instead it:
- builds a new graph containing transformed/copied nodes,
- records a mapping from old nodes → new nodes (`MutationMap`),
- leaves the old graph untouched.

### Development Workflow

1) Reproduce in a minimal graph (prefer tests + `BoundExpressions`).
2) Run `DefaultSolver().simplify(...)` and inspect the resulting `MutationMap`.
3) If you’re changing rewrite logic, make sure you understand and preserve the invariant pipeline in
   `src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/invariants.py::insert_expression`.
4) Add/adjust algorithms in `src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/*` (most logic lives there, not in `mutator.py`).

### Testing
- Solver tests live in `test/core/solver/`:
  - `test/core/solver/test_solver.py`
  - `test/core/solver/test_literal_folding.py`
  - `test/core/solver/test_solver_util.py`

Run a tight loop while iterating:

- `ato dev test --llm test/core/solver -k invariant -q`
- `ato dev test --llm test/core/solver/test_solver.py::test_simplify -q`

## Best Practices

### Prefer explicit `simplify(...)` arguments
`DefaultSolver.simplify` has a compatibility layer that accepts `(tg, g)` or `(g, tg)`. In new code, prefer named args:

```python
res = DefaultSolver().simplify(g=g, tg=tg, terminal=True)
mutation_map = res.data.mutation_map
```

### Use the `Mutator`/`insert_expression` pipeline, not ad-hoc rewrites
When you “create” or “rewrite” an expression, you are really requesting that the solver insert something into the
transient graph while upholding invariants. The canonical place where this happens is:

- `src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/invariants.py::insert_expression`

If you bypass this, you will almost certainly violate an invariant and get:
- duplicate/congruent expressions,
- multiple incompatible bounds on an operand,
- predicates used as operands,
- missed literal folding, or
- contradictions that don’t point back to the real root cause.

## Core Invariants (source of truth: `insert_expression`)

The invariant pipeline is sequencing-sensitive. At a high level it enforces (paraphrased):

- No predicate operands: `Op(P!, ...)` is rewritten to use boolean literals where possible
- Predicate literal rules: `P{S|True} -> P!`; `P!{S/P|False} -> Contradiction`; `P!{S|True} -> P!`
- No literal inequalities: inequalities involving literals are rewritten into subset constraints
- No singleton supersets as operands: `f(A{S|{x}}, ...) -> f(x, ...)`
- No congruence: congruent expressions are deduplicated (with optional rules for uncorrelated congruence)
- Minimal subsumption: stronger constraints subsume weaker ones; redundant ones become irrelevant
- Single “merged” superset/subset per operand (e.g. intersected supersets)
- No empty supersets/subsets: empty-set constraints are contradictions
- Fold pure literal expressions into literals (and re-express as subset/superset where appropriate)
- Terminate certain literal subset constraints to stop churn
- Canonical form: expressions are created/normalized into canonical operators

When adding a new algorithm, the easiest way to stay correct is to construct a new `ExpressionBuilder`
and let `insert_expression` do the hard work.

## Internals & Runtime Behavior

### Instantiation & Dependencies
- **`DefaultSolver()` holds state**: when called with `terminal=False`, it can keep a reusable internal state for incremental solving.
- **Terminal vs non-terminal**:
  - `terminal=True` (default) is more powerful but not intended to be reused as incremental state.
  - `terminal=False` runs only non-terminal algorithms and stores `reusable_state` for subsequent calls.
- **Graph scoping**: `simplify(..., relevant=[...])` is the intended hook to avoid “solve the entire world”.

### Data Structures
- `MutationStage`: one algorithm application over an input graph → output graph, with a `Transformations` object.
- `MutationMap`: a chain of stages; lets you:
  - map old → new operables (`map_forward`)
  - map new → old sources (`map_backward`)
  - extract current bounds as literals (`try_extract_superset`; subset extraction is typically via the mapped operable’s `try_extract_subset()`)
  - generate tracebacks for “why did this change?” (see `Traceback` in `mutator.py`)

### Debugging & Logging
Useful config flags (see `src/faebryk/core/solver/utils.py`):

- `SLOG=1`: debug logging for solver/mutator
- `SPRINT_START=1`: log start of each phase
- `SVERBOSE_TABLE=1`: verbose mutation tables
- `SSHOW_SS_IS=1`: include subset/is predicates in graph printouts
- `SMAX_ITERATIONS=N`: raise early if stuck looping (helps catch bad rewrites)

In failures, look for `Contradiction` / `ContradictionByLiteral` output: it prints mutation tracebacks back to
origin expressions/parameters, which is usually the shortest path to the actual bug.

### Performance
- Prefer restricting scope via `relevant=[...]` when you can.
- Avoid creating huge numbers of near-duplicate expressions; congruence + subsumption help, but churn still costs.
- If you add an algorithm, make it *idempotent* (or explicitly mark/terminate what you produce) to avoid infinite iteration.

Related Skills

lsp

3147
from atopile/atopile

How the atopile Language Server works (pygls), how it builds per-document graphs for completion/hover/defs, and the invariants for keeping it fast and crash-proof.

SEXP Benchmark Strategy

3147
from atopile/atopile

## Goal

sexp

3147
from atopile/atopile

How the Zig S-expression engine and typed KiCad models work, how they are exposed to Python (pyzig_sexp), and the invariants around parsing, formatting, and freeing. Use when working with KiCad file parsing, S-expression generation, or layout sync.

pyzig

3147
from atopile/atopile

How the Zig↔Python binding layer works (pyzig), including build-on-import, wrapper generation patterns, ownership rules, and where to add new exported APIs. Use when adding Zig-Python bindings, modifying native extensions, or debugging C-API interactions.

planning

3147
from atopile/atopile

Spec-driven planning for complex design tasks: when to plan, how to write specs as .ato files, and how to verify against requirements.

Package Agent

3147
from atopile/atopile

You are a package specialist.

library

3147
from atopile/atopile

How the Faebryk component library is structured, how `_F.py` is generated, and the conventions/invariants for adding new library modules. Use when adding or modifying library components, traits, or module definitions.

graph

3147
from atopile/atopile

How the Zig-backed instance graph works (GraphView/NodeReference/EdgeReference), the real Python API surface, and the invariants around allocation, attributes, and cleanup. Use when working with low-level graph APIs, memory management, or building systems that traverse the instance graph.

frontend

3147
from atopile/atopile

Frontend standards for atopile extension webviews: architecture, contracts, design system, and testing workflow.

faebryk

3147
from atopile/atopile

How Faebryk's TypeGraph works (GraphView + Zig edges), how to traverse/resolve references, and how FabLL types/traits map onto edge types. Use when working with TypeGraph traversal, edge types, or building type-aware queries.

fabll

3147
from atopile/atopile

How FabLL (faebryk.core.node) maps Python node/trait declarations into the TypeGraph + instance graph, including field/trait invariants and instantiation patterns. Use when defining new components or traits, working with the Node API, or understanding type registration.

domain-layer

3147
from atopile/atopile

Instructions for electronics-specific logic and build processes: netlists, PCBs, build steps, and exporters. Use when implementing or modifying build steps, exporters, PCB generation, or BOM/netlist output.