deep-research

Execute autonomous multi-step deep research on any topic. Use when the user asks for comprehensive research, literature reviews, competitive analysis, topic deep-dives, or wants to understand a complex subject from multiple angles. Triggers on "deep research", "research on", "investigate", "literature review", "comprehensive analysis", "what do we know about", "summarize research on".

564 stars

Best use case

deep-research is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Execute autonomous multi-step deep research on any topic. Use when the user asks for comprehensive research, literature reviews, competitive analysis, topic deep-dives, or wants to understand a complex subject from multiple angles. Triggers on "deep research", "research on", "investigate", "literature review", "comprehensive analysis", "what do we know about", "summarize research on".

Teams using deep-research should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/deep-research/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/beita6969/ScienceClaw/main/skills/deep-research/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/deep-research/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How deep-research Compares

Feature / Agentdeep-researchStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Execute autonomous multi-step deep research on any topic. Use when the user asks for comprehensive research, literature reviews, competitive analysis, topic deep-dives, or wants to understand a complex subject from multiple angles. Triggers on "deep research", "research on", "investigate", "literature review", "comprehensive analysis", "what do we know about", "summarize research on".

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

Related Guides

SKILL.md Source

# Deep Research

Autonomous multi-step research that searches multiple sources, reads full content, synthesizes findings, and produces a structured report.

## When to Use

- User wants a thorough understanding of a topic (medical condition, drug, treatment, technology)
- User asks for a literature review or evidence summary
- User wants competitive or landscape analysis
- User wants to investigate an open question with multiple angles
- User asks "what does the research say about X"

## Research Strategy

### Step 1: Query Decomposition
Break the research question into 3–5 sub-questions covering:
- Core definition / mechanism
- Current evidence / state of the art
- Debates, limitations, or contradictions
- Clinical / practical implications (if medical)
- Recent developments (last 1–2 years)

### Step 2: Multi-Source Search
Run searches across complementary sources using the available search tools:

```python
# Use multi-search-engine for broad web coverage
# Use pubmed-search for peer-reviewed medical literature
# Use agent-browser to read full-text articles and retrieve content blocked by snippets
```

**Search order:**
1. PubMed (if medical/biomedical topic) — for peer-reviewed evidence
2. Multi-search-engine (Bing, Google, DuckDuckGo) — for guidelines, reviews, news
3. Wikipedia — for background and structured overviews
4. agent-browser — for reading full articles, PDFs, clinical guidelines

### Step 3: Source Evaluation
For each source note:
- Publication type (RCT, meta-analysis, guideline, review, news)
- Date (prefer sources within 5 years for medical topics)
- Authority (journal impact, organization credibility)
- Relevance to the specific sub-question

### Step 4: Synthesis
Synthesize across sources into a coherent narrative. Do NOT just concatenate summaries — identify:
- Points of consensus
- Contradictions or conflicting evidence
- Knowledge gaps
- Strongest evidence vs. weak/preliminary evidence

### Step 5: Structured Report
Produce a well-formatted Markdown report with:

```markdown
# [Topic] — Deep Research Report

## Summary
2–3 sentence executive summary of the key finding.

## Background
What is this? Core definitions, mechanisms, or context.

## Current Evidence
What does the research show? Organized by sub-question or theme.

## Key Debates / Open Questions
Where do experts disagree? What is still unknown?

## Clinical / Practical Implications
(For medical topics) What should clinicians or patients know?

## Recent Developments
Anything notable from the past 12–24 months.

## Sources
Numbered list of all sources with titles, URLs/DOIs, and dates.
```

## Medical Research Guidelines

When researching medical topics:
- **Prioritize evidence hierarchy**: Systematic reviews > RCTs > Cohort studies > Case reports > Expert opinion
- **Include safety information**: Drug interactions, contraindications, adverse effects
- **Note population specifics**: Pediatric vs. adult, special populations, comorbidities
- **Flag regulatory status**: FDA/EMA approval status, off-label use
- **Cite clinical guidelines**: NICE, AHA, ACC, IDSA, WHO guidelines where relevant
- **Distinguish mechanistic from clinical evidence**: Lab/animal data ≠ human evidence

## Depth Levels

Adapt depth to user request:
- **Quick overview** (user asks briefly): 3–5 sources, 1-page summary
- **Standard research** (default): 8–15 sources, full structured report
- **Comprehensive review** (user asks explicitly): 20+ sources, deep synthesis with evidence grading

## Example Execution

**User:** "Research the evidence for metformin use in longevity/anti-aging"

1. Decompose: mechanism of action → RCT evidence → observational data → safety profile → current trials
2. Search PubMed for "metformin longevity aging", "TAME trial metformin"
3. Search web for "metformin anti-aging clinical trials 2024"
4. Read key papers with agent-browser
5. Synthesize: strong mechanistic evidence, TAME trial ongoing, limited long-term human RCT data
6. Produce structured report with citations

Related Skills

social-science-research

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Orchestrates a social science research workflow from literature review through data collection, text analysis, statistical modeling, and report generation. Use when conducting empirical social science research, policy analysis, or mixed-methods studies. NOT for pure natural science analysis or clinical trial data.

research-reflection

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Reflect on completed research tasks to improve future performance. Use when: a research task has just been completed and the agent should evaluate its own process, store lessons learned, or retrieve past reflections before starting new work. NOT for: active research execution or data analysis.

research-lookup

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Look up current research information using the Parallel Chat API (primary) or Perplexity sonar-pro-search (academic paper searches). Automatically routes queries to the best backend. Use for finding papers, gathering research data, and verifying scientific information.

research-literature

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

COPYRIGHT NOTICE

research-grants

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Write competitive research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and Taiwan NSTC. Agency-specific formatting, review criteria, budget preparation, broader impacts, significance statements, innovation narratives, and compliance with submission requirements.

research-ethics

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Guides research ethics compliance including IRB protocol preparation, informed consent document drafting, research integrity standards, data management plans, and ethical considerations for human/animal subjects; trigger when users discuss IRB, ethical approval, consent forms, or responsible conduct of research.

psychology-research

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Conduct psychological research analysis including mental health, cognitive science, and behavioral studies

education-research

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Supports education research including pedagogical method evaluation, learning analytics, assessment design, curriculum development analysis, and educational technology evaluation; trigger when users discuss teaching effectiveness, learning outcomes, educational interventions, or student performance data.

deep-research-swarm

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

COPYRIGHT NOTICE

creative-thinking-for-research

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Applies cognitive science frameworks for creative thinking to CS and AI research ideation. Use when seeking genuinely novel research directions by leveraging combinatorial creativity, analogical reasoning, constraint manipulation, and other empirically grounded creative strategies.

academic-deep-research

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Transparent, rigorous research with full methodology — not a black-box API wrapper. Conducts exhaustive investigation through mandated 2-cycle research per theme, APA 7th citations, evidence hierarchy, and 3 user checkpoints. Self-contained using native OpenClaw tools (web_search, web_fetch, sessions_spawn). Use for literature reviews, competitive intelligence, or any research requiring academic rigor and reproducibility.

xurl

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

A CLI tool for making authenticated requests to the X (Twitter) API. Use this skill when you need to post tweets, reply, quote, search, read posts, manage followers, send DMs, upload media, or interact with any X API v2 endpoint.