research-ethics

Guides research ethics compliance including IRB protocol preparation, informed consent document drafting, research integrity standards, data management plans, and ethical considerations for human/animal subjects; trigger when users discuss IRB, ethical approval, consent forms, or responsible conduct of research.

564 stars

Best use case

research-ethics is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Guides research ethics compliance including IRB protocol preparation, informed consent document drafting, research integrity standards, data management plans, and ethical considerations for human/animal subjects; trigger when users discuss IRB, ethical approval, consent forms, or responsible conduct of research.

Teams using research-ethics should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/research-ethics/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/beita6969/ScienceClaw/main/skills/research-ethics/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/research-ethics/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How research-ethics Compares

Feature / Agentresearch-ethicsStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Guides research ethics compliance including IRB protocol preparation, informed consent document drafting, research integrity standards, data management plans, and ethical considerations for human/animal subjects; trigger when users discuss IRB, ethical approval, consent forms, or responsible conduct of research.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

## When to Trigger

Activate this skill when the user mentions:
- IRB (Institutional Review Board), ethics committee approval
- Informed consent, assent forms, consent waivers
- Human subjects research, vulnerable populations
- IACUC, animal research protocols, the 3Rs
- Research integrity, fabrication, falsification, plagiarism
- Data management plans, data sharing obligations
- Conflicts of interest, dual-use research
- HIPAA, GDPR, data privacy in research

## Step-by-Step Methodology

1. **Determine regulatory framework** - Identify applicable regulations: Common Rule (45 CFR 46) for US federally funded human research, FDA regulations for clinical trials, IACUC guidelines for animal research. Determine if international guidelines apply (Declaration of Helsinki, ICH-GCP).
2. **Risk assessment** - Classify research risk level: exempt, expedited, or full board review. Identify potential physical, psychological, social, legal, and economic risks to participants. Evaluate risk-benefit ratio.
3. **Protocol development** - Draft IRB protocol including: study objectives, design and procedures, participant population and recruitment methods, inclusion/exclusion criteria, risks and benefits, data security measures, and compensation plans.
4. **Informed consent preparation** - Write consent documents at appropriate reading level (8th grade for general populations). Include: purpose, procedures, risks, benefits, alternatives, confidentiality protections, voluntary participation statement, and contact information. Address special populations (children require assent + parental consent, prisoners, cognitively impaired).
5. **Data protection planning** - Develop data management plan addressing: identifiable vs. de-identified data, encryption and storage, access controls, retention period, sharing and archival policies. Ensure HIPAA compliance for health data, GDPR for EU participants.
6. **Research integrity framework** - Establish responsible conduct practices: proper authorship attribution (ICMJE criteria), conflict of interest disclosure, data integrity protocols, record keeping standards, and procedures for reporting misconduct.
7. **Ongoing compliance** - Plan for: annual continuing review, adverse event reporting, protocol amendments, audit readiness, participant withdrawal procedures, and study closure.

## Key Resources

- **OHRP (Office for Human Research Protections)** - Federal guidance documents
- **Belmont Report** - Foundational ethical principles
- **CIOMS Guidelines** - International ethical guidelines
- **ARRIVE Guidelines** - Animal research reporting standards
- **NIH Data Management and Sharing Policy** - Data sharing requirements

## Output Format

- IRB protocol as a structured document with all required sections.
- Informed consent forms with proper formatting and reading level.
- Risk assessment as a table: risk category, likelihood, severity, mitigation strategy.
- Data management plan following funder-specific templates (NIH, NSF).
- Ethics checklist for study-specific considerations.

## Quality Checklist

- [ ] Applicable regulatory framework identified and cited
- [ ] Risk level classification justified
- [ ] Informed consent written at appropriate reading level
- [ ] Vulnerable population protections addressed if applicable
- [ ] Data security measures commensurate with data sensitivity
- [ ] Confidentiality and anonymization procedures specified
- [ ] Conflict of interest disclosures complete
- [ ] Adverse event reporting procedures defined
- [ ] Cultural sensitivity considered in consent and recruitment materials

Related Skills

social-science-research

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Orchestrates a social science research workflow from literature review through data collection, text analysis, statistical modeling, and report generation. Use when conducting empirical social science research, policy analysis, or mixed-methods studies. NOT for pure natural science analysis or clinical trial data.

research-reflection

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Reflect on completed research tasks to improve future performance. Use when: a research task has just been completed and the agent should evaluate its own process, store lessons learned, or retrieve past reflections before starting new work. NOT for: active research execution or data analysis.

research-lookup

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Look up current research information using the Parallel Chat API (primary) or Perplexity sonar-pro-search (academic paper searches). Automatically routes queries to the best backend. Use for finding papers, gathering research data, and verifying scientific information.

research-literature

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

COPYRIGHT NOTICE

research-grants

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Write competitive research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and Taiwan NSTC. Agency-specific formatting, review criteria, budget preparation, broader impacts, significance statements, innovation narratives, and compliance with submission requirements.

psychology-research

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Conduct psychological research analysis including mental health, cognitive science, and behavioral studies

education-research

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Supports education research including pedagogical method evaluation, learning analytics, assessment design, curriculum development analysis, and educational technology evaluation; trigger when users discuss teaching effectiveness, learning outcomes, educational interventions, or student performance data.

deep-research

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Execute autonomous multi-step deep research on any topic. Use when the user asks for comprehensive research, literature reviews, competitive analysis, topic deep-dives, or wants to understand a complex subject from multiple angles. Triggers on "deep research", "research on", "investigate", "literature review", "comprehensive analysis", "what do we know about", "summarize research on".

deep-research-swarm

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

COPYRIGHT NOTICE

creative-thinking-for-research

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Applies cognitive science frameworks for creative thinking to CS and AI research ideation. Use when seeking genuinely novel research directions by leveraging combinatorial creativity, analogical reasoning, constraint manipulation, and other empirically grounded creative strategies.

academic-deep-research

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Transparent, rigorous research with full methodology — not a black-box API wrapper. Conducts exhaustive investigation through mandated 2-cycle research per theme, APA 7th citations, evidence hierarchy, and 3 user checkpoints. Self-contained using native OpenClaw tools (web_search, web_fetch, sessions_spawn). Use for literature reviews, competitive intelligence, or any research requiring academic rigor and reproducibility.

xurl

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

A CLI tool for making authenticated requests to the X (Twitter) API. Use this skill when you need to post tweets, reply, quote, search, read posts, manage followers, send DMs, upload media, or interact with any X API v2 endpoint.