Best use case
scientific-manuscript is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Teams using scientific-manuscript should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/scientific-manuscript/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How scientific-manuscript Compares
| Feature / Agent | scientific-manuscript | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
SKILL.md Source
<!--
# COPYRIGHT NOTICE
# This file is part of the "Universal Biomedical Skills" project.
# Copyright (c) 2026 MD BABU MIA, PhD <md.babu.mia@mssm.edu>
# All Rights Reserved.
#
# This code is proprietary and confidential.
# Unauthorized copying of this file, via any medium is strictly prohibited.
#
# Provenance: Authenticated by MD BABU MIA
-->
---
name: scientific-manuscript
description: "High-impact scientific manuscript preparation for journals like Nature, Blood, Cell. Use when writing abstracts, introductions, methods, results, discussions, or figure legends. Includes citation management, statistical reporting standards, ICMJE guidelines, and journal-specific formatting for hematology/oncology publications."
license: Proprietary
---
# Scientific Manuscript Preparation
## Document Structure for High-Impact Journals
### Title
- Concise (<15 words for Nature, <20 for Blood)
- Include key finding and system/disease
- Avoid jargon and abbreviations
### Abstract (Structured for Blood/Clinical Journals)
```markdown
**Background:** One sentence on knowledge gap.
**Methods:** Key approaches, patient cohort size, techniques.
**Results:** Primary findings with statistics (P values, CIs).
**Conclusions:** Clinical/translational significance.
```
### Introduction (~500-800 words)
1. **Paragraph 1**: Broad context, disease burden, clinical relevance
2. **Paragraph 2**: Current knowledge, key mechanisms
3. **Paragraph 3**: Knowledge gap, unanswered questions
4. **Paragraph 4**: Study aims, hypothesis, approach overview
### Methods (Detailed, Reproducible)
```markdown
**Patient Cohort and Samples**
- IRB approval number, consent process
- Inclusion/exclusion criteria
- Sample processing, storage conditions
**Single-Cell RNA Sequencing**
- Library preparation (10x Genomics Chromium 3' v3.1)
- Sequencing platform, read depth
- Quality metrics (cells/sample, genes/cell, % mitochondrial)
**Computational Analysis**
- Software versions (Scanpy 1.9.x, scvi-tools 0.20.x)
- QC thresholds (min genes, max %MT)
- Integration method (TotalVI, Harmony)
- Clustering parameters (resolution, n_neighbors)
- Differential expression (Wilcoxon, FDR < 0.05, |log2FC| > 1)
**Statistical Analysis**
- Software (R 4.3.x, Python 3.11)
- Tests used with justification
- Multiple testing correction method
- Power analysis if applicable
```
### Results (~2000-3000 words)
- Lead each paragraph with key finding
- Reference figures in order (Figure 1A-C...)
- Report exact P values (P = 0.003, not P < 0.05)
- Include confidence intervals where relevant
- Avoid interpretation; save for Discussion
### Discussion (~1500-2000 words)
```markdown
**Paragraph 1**: Summarize key findings, relate to hypothesis
**Paragraph 2-4**: Compare to existing literature
- "Consistent with [Author et al.], we found..."
- "In contrast to [Study], our analysis revealed..."
- Mechanistic interpretation
**Paragraph 5**: Translational/Clinical implications
- Therapeutic targets
- Biomarkers
- Patient stratification
**Paragraph 6**: Limitations
- Sample size, cohort characteristics
- Technical limitations
- Generalizability
**Paragraph 7**: Future directions and conclusion
```
## Statistical Reporting Standards
### Continuous Variables
- Mean ± SD (normal) or Median [IQR] (non-normal)
- Report normality test used
### Categorical Variables
- N (%) with comparison test
### P Values
- Report exact values (P = 0.023)
- For very small: P < 0.0001
- Always report test used
### Sample Sizes
- "n = X patients" or "n = X cells"
- Report for each comparison group
## Figure Legends Template
```markdown
**Figure 1. Title describes main finding**
(A) Brief description of panel A. Statistical test, P value.
(B) Description including axis labels if not obvious.
(C-D) Can combine similar panels.
Scale bars: X μm. Error bars: mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
n = X biological replicates from Y independent experiments.
```
## Reference Formatting
### Blood Journal (Vancouver)
```
1. Smith JA, Jones BC. Title of article. Blood. 2024;143(5):567-578.
```
### Nature (Author-Year)
```
Smith, J.A. & Jones, B.C. Title of article. Nature 620, 567–578 (2024).
```
## Journal-Specific Requirements
### Blood (ASH)
- Word limit: 4000 (full article)
- Figures: 7 max
- References: 60 max
- Structured abstract: 250 words
### Nature
- Word limit: ~3000 (Article)
- Main text figures: 6-8
- Methods: no limit, separate section
- Extended Data for supplementary figures
### Cell
- Word limit: 7000 (Article)
- STAR Methods format
- Graphical abstract required
## HIPAA Compliance Reminders
- No patient identifiers in any form
- Use Specimen IDs, not patient names/MRNs
- Aggregate data for small groups (n < 5)
- IRB approval statement required
- Data availability statement (GEO accession for sequencing)
## Writing Style
- Active voice preferred
- Past tense for results ("We found...")
- Present tense for established facts
- Avoid "interesting," "significant" (unless statistical)
- Be specific: "83.9-fold increase" not "marked increase"
See `references/journal_templates.md` for specific formats.
See `references/statistical_tests.md` for test selection guide.
<!-- AUTHOR_SIGNATURE: 9a7f3c2e-MD-BABU-MIA-2026-MSSM-SECURE -->Related Skills
scientific-writing
Assist with scientific paper writing, LaTeX formatting, abstract drafting, review responses, grant proposals, and academic communication. Use when user asks to write/edit a paper section, draft an abstract, format in LaTeX, respond to reviewer comments, write a grant proposal, or improve academic writing. Triggers on "write abstract", "draft introduction", "LaTeX", "reviewer response", "grant proposal", "improve my writing", "paper draft", "methods section".
scientific-visualization
Meta-skill for publication-ready figures. Use when creating journal submission figures requiring multi-panel layouts, significance annotations, error bars, colorblind-safe palettes, and specific journal formatting (Nature, Science, Cell). Orchestrates matplotlib/seaborn/plotly with publication styles. For quick exploration use seaborn or plotly directly.
scientific-summarization
Summarize and simplify scientific literature, educational content, and research papers
scientific-slides
Build slide decks and presentations for research talks. Use this for making PowerPoint slides, conference presentations, seminar talks, research presentations, thesis defense slides, or any scientific talk. Provides slide structure, design templates, timing guidance, and visual validation. Works with PowerPoint and LaTeX Beamer.
scientific-schematics
Create publication-quality scientific diagrams using Nano Banana 2 AI with smart iterative refinement. Uses Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for quality review. Only regenerates if quality is below threshold for your document type. Specialized in neural network architectures, system diagrams, flowcharts, biological pathways, and complex scientific visualizations.
scientific-retrieval
Retrieve and recommend relevant documents from financial, historical, and scientific archives
scientific-reasoning
Mathematical and physical reasoning with formal proof construction and problem solving
scientific-problem-selection
This skill should be used when scientists need help with research problem selection, project ideation, troubleshooting stuck projects, or strategic scientific decisions. Use this skill when users ask to pitch a new research idea, work through a project problem, evaluate project risks, plan research strategy, navigate decision trees, or get help choosing what scientific problem to work on. Typical requests include "I have an idea for a project", "I'm stuck on my research", "help me evaluate this project", "what should I work on", or "I need strategic advice about my research".
scientific-prediction
Predict material properties, economic indicators, and scientific outcomes using computational models
scientific-generation
Generate scientific code, protocols, and domain-specific text with quality control
scientific-diagram-generation
No description provided.
scientific-critical-thinking
Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.