scientific-writing

Assist with scientific paper writing, LaTeX formatting, abstract drafting, review responses, grant proposals, and academic communication. Use when user asks to write/edit a paper section, draft an abstract, format in LaTeX, respond to reviewer comments, write a grant proposal, or improve academic writing. Triggers on "write abstract", "draft introduction", "LaTeX", "reviewer response", "grant proposal", "improve my writing", "paper draft", "methods section".

564 stars

Best use case

scientific-writing is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Assist with scientific paper writing, LaTeX formatting, abstract drafting, review responses, grant proposals, and academic communication. Use when user asks to write/edit a paper section, draft an abstract, format in LaTeX, respond to reviewer comments, write a grant proposal, or improve academic writing. Triggers on "write abstract", "draft introduction", "LaTeX", "reviewer response", "grant proposal", "improve my writing", "paper draft", "methods section".

Teams using scientific-writing should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/scientific-writing/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/beita6969/ScienceClaw/main/skills/scientific-writing/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/scientific-writing/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How scientific-writing Compares

Feature / Agentscientific-writingStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Assist with scientific paper writing, LaTeX formatting, abstract drafting, review responses, grant proposals, and academic communication. Use when user asks to write/edit a paper section, draft an abstract, format in LaTeX, respond to reviewer comments, write a grant proposal, or improve academic writing. Triggers on "write abstract", "draft introduction", "LaTeX", "reviewer response", "grant proposal", "improve my writing", "paper draft", "methods section".

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

Related Guides

SKILL.md Source

# Scientific Writing

Academic paper composition, LaTeX formatting, and scholarly communication.

## Paper Structure Templates

### IMRaD (standard empirical paper)
1. **Title**: Concise, informative, includes key variables
2. **Abstract**: Background (1-2 sentences) → Objective → Methods → Results → Conclusion (150-300 words)
3. **Introduction**: Broad context → Narrow focus → Gap → Research question/hypothesis
4. **Methods**: Reproducible detail; subsections by procedure
5. **Results**: Findings without interpretation; tables/figures referenced
6. **Discussion**: Summary → Interpretation → Comparison with literature → Limitations → Implications → Future work
7. **References**: Consistent citation style

### Review / Survey Paper
1. Introduction with scope and search methodology
2. Taxonomy / organizational framework
3. Systematic coverage of subtopics
4. Synthesis and comparison
5. Open problems and future directions

### Grant Proposal (NSF/NIH style)
1. Specific Aims (1 page)
2. Significance
3. Innovation
4. Approach (preliminary data, research plan, timeline)
5. Budget justification

## LaTeX Support

### Common Templates

Article:
```latex
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsthm}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage[margin=1in]{geometry}
\usepackage{natbib}

\title{Your Title}
\author{Author Name \\ Institution \\ \texttt{email@example.com}}
\date{\today}

\begin{document}
\maketitle
\begin{abstract}
Your abstract here.
\end{abstract}

\section{Introduction}
\section{Methods}
\section{Results}
\section{Discussion}

\bibliographystyle{plainnat}
\bibliography{references}
\end{document}
```

### Useful LaTeX Packages
- `booktabs` — professional tables
- `siunitx` — SI units and number formatting
- `algorithm2e` — pseudocode
- `tikz/pgfplots` — figures and plots
- `cleveref` — smart cross-references
- `subcaption` — subfigures
- `listings/minted` — code listings

### BibTeX Entry Formats
```bibtex
@article{key,
  author  = {Last, First and Last2, First2},
  title   = {Paper Title},
  journal = {Journal Name},
  year    = {2024},
  volume  = {1},
  pages   = {1--10},
  doi     = {10.xxxx/xxxxx}
}
```

## Reviewer Response Template

```
We thank the reviewer for their constructive feedback. Below we address each comment point by point.

---

**Reviewer Comment 1:** [Quote the comment]

**Response:** [Your response]

**Changes made:** [Describe specific changes with page/line numbers]

---
```

Guidelines for reviewer responses:
- Be respectful and grateful, even for harsh reviews
- Address every point, even minor ones
- Clearly distinguish between changes made and rebuttals
- Provide evidence (new analyses, references) for disagreements
- Reference specific manuscript locations for changes

## Writing Quality Checklist

### Clarity
- One idea per paragraph
- Topic sentence first
- Active voice preferred (but passive OK for methods)
- Avoid jargon without definition
- Short sentences for complex ideas

### Precision
- Quantify claims ("increased by 15%" not "significantly increased")
- Distinguish correlation from causation
- Use hedging appropriately ("suggests" vs "proves")
- Report effect sizes, not just p-values

### Flow
- Logical paragraph transitions
- Consistent terminology throughout
- Forward references for later sections
- Signposting ("First... Second... Finally...")

### Common Issues to Fix
- Dangling modifiers
- Pronoun ambiguity ("this" without referent)
- Nominalization overuse (use verbs, not noun forms)
- Redundancy ("past history", "future plans")
- Weak openings ("It is well known that...")

## Citation Styles
- APA 7th: (Author, Year) — social sciences
- IEEE: [1] numbered — engineering/CS
- Vancouver: (1) numbered — biomedical
- Chicago: footnotes — humanities
- Nature: superscript numbered — natural sciences

When unsure, ask the user for their target journal/conference and adapt accordingly.

Related Skills

writing

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

No description provided.

scientific-visualization

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Meta-skill for publication-ready figures. Use when creating journal submission figures requiring multi-panel layouts, significance annotations, error bars, colorblind-safe palettes, and specific journal formatting (Nature, Science, Cell). Orchestrates matplotlib/seaborn/plotly with publication styles. For quick exploration use seaborn or plotly directly.

scientific-summarization

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Summarize and simplify scientific literature, educational content, and research papers

scientific-slides

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Build slide decks and presentations for research talks. Use this for making PowerPoint slides, conference presentations, seminar talks, research presentations, thesis defense slides, or any scientific talk. Provides slide structure, design templates, timing guidance, and visual validation. Works with PowerPoint and LaTeX Beamer.

scientific-schematics

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Create publication-quality scientific diagrams using Nano Banana 2 AI with smart iterative refinement. Uses Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for quality review. Only regenerates if quality is below threshold for your document type. Specialized in neural network architectures, system diagrams, flowcharts, biological pathways, and complex scientific visualizations.

scientific-retrieval

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Retrieve and recommend relevant documents from financial, historical, and scientific archives

scientific-reasoning

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Mathematical and physical reasoning with formal proof construction and problem solving

scientific-problem-selection

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

This skill should be used when scientists need help with research problem selection, project ideation, troubleshooting stuck projects, or strategic scientific decisions. Use this skill when users ask to pitch a new research idea, work through a project problem, evaluate project risks, plan research strategy, navigate decision trees, or get help choosing what scientific problem to work on. Typical requests include "I have an idea for a project", "I'm stuck on my research", "help me evaluate this project", "what should I work on", or "I need strategic advice about my research".

scientific-prediction

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Predict material properties, economic indicators, and scientific outcomes using computational models

scientific-manuscript

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

COPYRIGHT NOTICE

scientific-generation

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

Generate scientific code, protocols, and domain-specific text with quality control

scientific-diagram-generation

564
from beita6969/ScienceClaw

No description provided.