cda-certified-claim

Drafts U.S. Contract Disputes Act (CDA) certified claims for federal government contracts, covering FAR Part 33 compliance, entitlement/quantum sections, certification language, and final-decision demand. Use when preparing a CDA claim, certified claim, or submission to a contracting officer under the Contract Disputes Act.

11 stars

Best use case

cda-certified-claim is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Drafts U.S. Contract Disputes Act (CDA) certified claims for federal government contracts, covering FAR Part 33 compliance, entitlement/quantum sections, certification language, and final-decision demand. Use when preparing a CDA claim, certified claim, or submission to a contracting officer under the Contract Disputes Act.

Teams using cda-certified-claim should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/cda-certified-claim/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CaseMark/skills/main/skills/legal/cda-certified-claim/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/cda-certified-claim/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How cda-certified-claim Compares

Feature / Agentcda-certified-claimStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Drafts U.S. Contract Disputes Act (CDA) certified claims for federal government contracts, covering FAR Part 33 compliance, entitlement/quantum sections, certification language, and final-decision demand. Use when preparing a CDA claim, certified claim, or submission to a contracting officer under the Contract Disputes Act.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

# CDA Certified Claim

Produces a CDA-compliant claim package that preserves appeal rights and supports entitlement and quantum under 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101–7109.

## Prerequisites

Gather before drafting:

1. Executed contract and all modifications (including disputes/changes clauses)
2. Contracting officer name, title, office address, submission method
3. Chronology of events with source documents
4. Damages data with source records (cost reports, invoices, payroll, schedules)
5. Authorized company official for certification (if claim > $100,000)

## Quick Start

Structure the claim package using the sections below in order. Replace all bracketed fields with case-specific facts.

## Claim Structure

### 1. Header

- Claimant: full legal name and address (as in contract)
- Contracting Officer: name, title, agency, office address
- Contract Number (including mods), Award Date, Submission Date
- Subject: "Certified Claim under the Contract Disputes Act (CDA)"

### 2. Executive Summary (5–10 lines)

- Contract purpose, type, period of performance
- Claim type: change / differing site conditions / delay / breach
- Relief requested: definite sum and/or time extension
- Request for final decision

### 3. Contract Background

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Contract type | [FFP / CPFF / T&M] |
| Scope | [brief scope] |
| POP | [start–end] |
| Value | [base + options] |
| Key clauses | [clause numbers/titles] |

### 4. Statement of Claim (Definite Relief)

- Monetary: `$[exact amount]` — no ranges or estimates
- Time extension: `[exact days]` calendar/work days (if applicable)
- Identify claim theory and triggering government act/omission

### 5. Factual Narrative

Chronological table with exhibit cites:

| Date | Event | Personnel | Exhibit |
|---|---|---|---|
| [YYYY-MM-DD] | [event] | [names/titles] | [Ex. #] |

### 6. Entitlement

Map claim theory elements to facts and authority:

| Theory | Elements | Authority | Facts Satisfied |
|---|---|---|---|
| Change | [elements] | FAR 52.243-1 / 52.243-2 | [facts] |
| Differing Site Conditions | [Type I/II] | FAR 52.236-2 | [facts] |
| Delay/Suspension | [elements] | [clause] | [facts] |

Required authority anchors:

- 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101–7109 (CDA)
- FAR Part 33; FAR 33.211 (final decision requirements) [VERIFY]
- Case law: include full name, citation, one-sentence holding

### 7. Quantum

| Cost Category | Basis | Amount | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct labor | [hours × rate] | $ | [Ex. #] |
| Materials | [qty × unit] | $ | [Ex. #] |
| Equipment | [rental/owned] | $ | [Ex. #] |
| Subcontracts | [COs/invoices] | $ | [Ex. #] |
| Indirects | [rate × base] | $ | [Ex. #] |
| Delay/overhead | [method] | $ | [Ex. #] |
| Productivity loss | [method] | $ | [Ex. #] |
| CDA interest | [rate + period] | $ | [Ex. #] |
| **Total** | | **$[total]** | |

- Delay/home-office overhead: specify method (e.g., Eichleay) and inputs
- Interest: cite 41 U.S.C. § 7109

### 8. Certification

**Required if claim > $100,000.** Insert exact statutory text without modification:

> "I certify that the claim is made in good faith; that the supporting data are accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; that the amount requested accurately reflects the contract adjustment for which the contractor believes the Government is liable; and that I am duly authorized to certify the claim on behalf of the contractor."

Signature block: Name, Title, Company, Date.

For claims ≤ $100,000: omit certification but still request a final decision.

### 9. Demand for Final Decision

State: "This is a claim under the CDA and requests a final decision by the Contracting Officer."

Include appeal preservation language per 41 U.S.C. § 7104 [VERIFY].

### 10. Exhibits

| Exhibit | Description | Date | Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|

Every factual assertion and quantum line item must cite an exhibit.

### 11. Delivery

State delivery method. Attach proof of receipt. Retain a complete copy.

## Pitfalls

- **No definite sum** — never use ranges, estimates, or "TBD"
- **Missing exhibit links** — every fact and cost must map to an exhibit
- **Wrong contracting officer** — verify addressee before submission
- **Unverified case law** — confirm jurisdiction (ASBCA, CBCA, COFC, Fed. Cir.)
- **Certification omitted** — required for claims > $100,000; omission may waive appeal rights
- **Uncertain citations** — mark with `[VERIFY]`
- **Argumentative tone** — keep factual and objective throughout

Related Skills

conducting-false-claims-analysis

11
from CaseMark/skills

Evaluates billing practices for False Claims Act risk with qui tam and voluntary disclosure considerations. Use when assessing FCA risk, evaluating billing compliance, or considering self-disclosure.

unclaimed-property-policy

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts an enterprise Escheatment and Unclaimed Property Policy covering property identification, dormancy matrices, due diligence notices, NAUPA-format reporting, remittance, recordkeeping, and audit preparedness across all US state jurisdictions. Use when establishing or updating an unclaimed property compliance framework, preparing for state audits, or evaluating voluntary disclosure programs.

release-of-claims

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts enforceable Release of All Claims documents for personal injury settlement resolution. Produces general releases with broad discharge language, unknown-claims waivers (including Cal. Civ. Code § 1542), consideration recitals, protective representations, and execution formalities. Use when drafting settlement releases, general releases, claim waivers, discharge agreements, or mutual release documents in personal injury litigation.

objection-to-proof-of-claim

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts Objections to Proof of Claim for U.S. bankruptcy courts under 11 U.S.C. § 502. Extracts case facts, identifies evidentiary deficiencies, and articulates grounds for disallowance or reduction. Use when a debtor, trustee, or party in interest challenges a creditor's proof of claim, claim classification, or insufficient documentation.

notice-of-assets-claims

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts a Notice of Assets and Request for Claims for probate estates. Triggers when administering an estate, publishing creditor notice, filing a probate notice of assets, or establishing claim bar dates. Handles jurisdictional research, asset disclosure, claim filing procedures, and execution requirements under state-specific probate codes.

insurance-claim-summaries

11
from CaseMark/skills

Generates structured summaries of U.S. insurance claim files covering identification, incident narrative, party positions, coverage analysis, and resolution status. Use when synthesizing claim files for adjusters, legal counsel, or claims managers during pre-filing review, discovery, or settlement preparation. Trigger keywords: claim summary, insurance claim, coverage summary, adjuster summary, coverage denial, reservation of rights.

counterclaim-crossclaim

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts court-ready counterclaims and crossclaims for commercial litigation. Analyzes case documents, classifies compulsory vs. permissive counterclaims, ensures procedural compliance with federal/state rules, and structures causes of action with proper element pleading. Use when a defendant must assert affirmative claims against the plaintiff or crossclaims against co-defendants during pleadings.

class-claim-form

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts U.S. class action settlement claim forms compliant with FRCP 23 and court approval orders. Triggers on claim form drafting, settlement administrator packets, online claim workflows, or class member submission forms.

class-action-claim-form

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts official class action claim forms balancing plain-language accessibility with FRCP 23 enforceability. Trigger when creating settlement claim forms, proof-of-claim documents, or class member claim submissions.

claim-construction-order

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts a U.S. federal court Claim Construction Order (Markman order) applying the Phillips v. AWH Corp. intrinsic/extrinsic evidence hierarchy to construe disputed patent claim terms. Use when drafting Markman orders, claim construction memoranda, or disputed-term rulings in U.S. patent litigation.

claim-construction-chart

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts Joint Claim Construction Charts for patent litigation Markman hearings in US federal courts. Organizes disputed claim terms with competing party constructions, intrinsic/extrinsic evidence citations, and agreement status. Use when preparing claim construction charts, Markman hearing exhibits, or joint prehearing statements in IP litigation.

bankruptcy-proof-of-claim

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts filing-ready proofs of claim for U.S. bankruptcy proceedings using Official Form B 410 under FRBP 3001. Handles secured, unsecured priority, and general unsecured claims with proper valuation, documentation, and bar date compliance. Use when a creditor needs to file or amend a proof of claim in a bankruptcy case.