client-intake-summary

Produces a structured corporate-client intake brief from intake forms, consultation notes, and initial communications. Use when onboarding a new corporate matter, processing an intake packet, summarizing consult notes, running a conflict check, or triaging deadlines for a corporate governance matter.

11 stars

Best use case

client-intake-summary is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Produces a structured corporate-client intake brief from intake forms, consultation notes, and initial communications. Use when onboarding a new corporate matter, processing an intake packet, summarizing consult notes, running a conflict check, or triaging deadlines for a corporate governance matter.

Teams using client-intake-summary should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/client-intake-summary/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CaseMark/skills/main/skills/legal/client-intake-summary/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/client-intake-summary/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How client-intake-summary Compares

Feature / Agentclient-intake-summaryStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Produces a structured corporate-client intake brief from intake forms, consultation notes, and initial communications. Use when onboarding a new corporate matter, processing an intake packet, summarizing consult notes, running a conflict check, or triaging deadlines for a corporate governance matter.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

# Client Intake Summary

Converts raw intake materials into an evidence-tagged, team-ready brief for attorney review and matter activation.

## Prerequisites

Gather before starting:

- **Intake packet**: forms, engagement data, identity/contact details, entity structure
- **Communications**: emails, call/meeting notes, preliminary documents
- **Jurisdiction cues**: governing state, filing location, corporate governing documents
- **Conflict inputs**: firm CRM/conflict database or prior-representation list (or note that none was available)
- **Fee framework**: hourly/flat expectations, retainer status, billing constraints, payor source
- **Time-sensitive facts**: deadlines, hearings, board dates, contract expirations
- **Scope notes**: permission and confidentiality scope for each source document

## Quick Start

1. Collect and tag all source documents.
2. Run conflict/ethics check (or note gap).
3. Draft the brief using the section order and template below.
4. Mark every unknown field `Unknown` and every unverified legal point `[VERIFY]`.
5. Route to assigning attorney with urgency classification.

## Output Sections

Produce in this fixed order:

| Section | Content | Format |
|---|---|---|
| Executive Overview | 2–3 sentences: matter, client objective, urgency | Plain text |
| Client Profile | Names, roles, contacts, communication prefs, confidentiality sensitivity | Bulleted fields |
| Matter Snapshot | Type, legal issue, key parties, factual timeline, status, governing entities | Chronological table |
| Preliminary Legal Considerations | Governing law cues, implied claims, jurisdiction questions, privilege/authority risks, SOL flags | Checklist |
| Financial Notes | Fee discussion, retainer, budget constraints, funding source, billing risk | Bullets; standardize dollar amounts |
| Risks and Red Flags | Inconsistencies, credibility issues, unrealistic outcomes, complexity indicators | Risk table (Low/Med/High) |
| Conflicts and Ethics | Conflict search status, adverse-party overlap, confidentiality conflicts, privilege boundaries | Status table |
| Follow-Up Queue | Missing facts, documents, and answers needed | Numbered action list |
| Immediate Next Steps | 24h actions, 7-day actions, owner, dependency | Prioritized checklist |

### Header Template

```text
Client:
Matter ID:
Matter Type:
Jurisdiction:
Intake Sources:
Date Received:
Status: New / Pending / Urgent
```

## Core Drafting Rules

1. **Facts vs. inferences** — every `Fact` row must cite at least one source.
2. **Dates** — use `YYYY-MM-DD` throughout.
3. **Client quotes** — preserve only when materially relevant.
4. **Names** — verify spellings against source materials; do not over-edit.
5. **Uncertainty** — flag with `[VERIFY]` and list what must be checked.
6. **Order** — address conflict/confidentiality posture before legal merits.

## Pitfalls and Checks

- **No legal advice.** Tone is internal and professional; no counseling recommendations.
- **Urgency required.** Every brief must classify as `Immediate`, `This Week`, or `Routine`.
- **SOL / filing deadlines.** If mentioned, include the governing trigger rule + `[VERIFY]` for jurisdiction-specific requirements.
- **No fabricated timelines.** Missing dates go in the Follow-Up Queue, not invented.
- **Confidentiality.** Avoid unnecessary sensitive disclosures in shared summaries.
- **Corporate governance.** Capture entity authority limits, board/committee roles, and document governance references.
- **Closing line.** End with: recommended assignment owner, recommended first task, and estimated start date.

Related Skills

witness-summary

11
from CaseMark/skills

Generates structured summaries of witness statements for litigation, extracting chronological narratives, key facts, credibility indicators, and evidentiary value. Use when summarizing depositions, declarations, affidavits, or witness testimony during discovery, pre-trial, or trial preparation.

verdict-judgment-summary

11
from CaseMark/skills

Produces structured post-trial verdict and judgment analysis memoranda for commercial litigation. Triggers when summarizing a jury verdict, bench trial decision, post-trial motion assessment, or appellate viability review. Covers liability determinations, damages breakdowns, critical rulings, and post-trial strategy.

urban-planning-summary

11
from CaseMark/skills

Summarizes legal issues in urban development projects covering zoning, land use disputes, and environmental compliance. Generates structured briefings for municipalities, developers, and legal counsel. Use when reviewing zoning ordinances, land use applications, environmental impact statements, or comprehensive plans before development or planning decisions.

trial-prep-summary

11
from CaseMark/skills

Generates a structured courtroom-ready trial preparation summary synthesizing procedural history, facts, legal issues, evidence, witnesses, and strategy into a quick-reference document. Trigger when preparing trial binders, pre-trial review documents, courtroom reference materials, or trial strategy memos in commercial litigation.

traffic-enforcement-summary

11
from CaseMark/skills

Generates structured summaries of traffic law enforcement data covering DUI metrics, violation trends, enforcement outcomes, and resource allocation. Use when analyzing citation records, arrest statistics, violation reports, or preparing public safety strategic planning documents for law enforcement leadership.

trade-law-summary

11
from CaseMark/skills

Produces structured U.S.-focused international trade law summaries covering tariffs, customs, export controls, sanctions, trade remedies, and trade agreements. Triggers when asked for international trade law summaries, tariff/customs analysis, export controls, sanctions guidance, WTO/GATT, USMCA, ITAR, EAR, OFAC, or import/export compliance updates.

telecom-law-summary

11
from CaseMark/skills

Generates executive-level summaries of recent US telecommunications law developments covering spectrum rights, network access, privacy, infrastructure, and enforcement. Structures analysis by topic with compliance deadlines and business impact. Use when briefing counsel, regulatory teams, or executives on FCC rulemakings, net neutrality, CPNI, 5G deployment, robocall enforcement, or the broader telecom legal landscape.

tax-summary-spousal-support

11
from CaseMark/skills

Produces structured financial summaries from tax returns, W-2s, 1099s, K-1s, and business filings for spousal support proceedings. Trigger when preparing income analyses for alimony discovery, settlement negotiations, pre-trial, or court filings in family law matters.

tax-return-summary

11
from CaseMark/skills

Produces structured, citation-backed summaries of tax returns (Form 1040, schedules, W-2s, 1099s) for divorce, personal injury, and bankruptcy litigation. Extracts income sources, deductions, credits, and flags anomalies. Use when summarizing tax returns, analyzing financial discovery, assessing earning capacity, reviewing 1040s, or preparing financial profiles for litigation.

summary-judgment

11
from CaseMark/skills

Produces structured summaries of summary judgment motions, orders, and decisions. Use when the user needs to summarize an MSJ ruling, prepare a case status report, evaluate appeal posture, or brief a client on a dispositive motion outcome.

summary-judgment-motion

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts a Motion for Summary Judgment package for personal injury litigation under FRCP 56 or state equivalent. Trigger when the user needs an MSJ, summary judgment brief, dispositive motion, no-genuine-dispute motion, or judgment-as-a-matter-of-law motion during pre-trial or discovery phases.

summary-judgment-brief

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts FRCP 56 summary judgment motion briefs for U.S. commercial litigation. Synthesizes discovery evidence with controlling authority to show no genuine dispute of material fact. Use when drafting MSJ briefs, dispositive motions, or partial summary judgment papers post-discovery.