communication-summarization

Generates structured memorandum-style summaries of legal communications (email threads, meeting notes, correspondence, negotiation records). Captures decisions, commitments, deadlines, party positions, and legally significant language. Triggers when the user asks to summarize communication chains for corporate matters, discovery review, settlement negotiations, or matter file management.

11 stars

Best use case

communication-summarization is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Generates structured memorandum-style summaries of legal communications (email threads, meeting notes, correspondence, negotiation records). Captures decisions, commitments, deadlines, party positions, and legally significant language. Triggers when the user asks to summarize communication chains for corporate matters, discovery review, settlement negotiations, or matter file management.

Teams using communication-summarization should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/communication-summarization/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CaseMark/skills/main/skills/legal/communication-summarization/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/communication-summarization/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How communication-summarization Compares

Feature / Agentcommunication-summarizationStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Generates structured memorandum-style summaries of legal communications (email threads, meeting notes, correspondence, negotiation records). Captures decisions, commitments, deadlines, party positions, and legally significant language. Triggers when the user asks to summarize communication chains for corporate matters, discovery review, settlement negotiations, or matter file management.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

# Communication Summarization

Distills legal communication chains into a structured memorandum capturing decisions, commitments, deadlines, and legally significant elements.

## Quick Start

1. Collect source communications (email threads, meeting notes, transcripts)
2. Gather matter context if available (contracts, prior agreements, party relationships)
3. Produce memorandum following the output structure below

## Output Structure

### Header Block

| Field | Content |
|---|---|
| To | [Requesting attorney / matter file] |
| From | CaseMark |
| Date | [Today's date] |
| Re | Communication Summary — [Matter/Subject] |
| Sources | [All documents/threads reviewed] |

### 1. Executive Overview

2–3 sentences: purpose of communications, period covered, key outcome or current status.

### 2. Background and Context

- Parties involved (names, roles, organizations)
- Communication period (date range)
- Subject matter / transaction / dispute

### 3. Key Decisions and Agreements

| Date | Parties | Decision / Agreement | Source |
|---|---|---|---|

Flag agreements that modify existing contracts, could constitute acceptance/waiver/novation, or contain representations/admissions.

### 4. Commitments and Deadlines

| Date | Party | Commitment / Obligation | Source |
|---|---|---|---|

### 5. Outstanding Issues

- Unresolved disputes or open questions
- Conflicting party positions
- Gaps in the communication record

### 6. Legally Significant Language

Flag and quote verbatim (with source and date) any:
- Notice language (contractual or statutory)
- Admissions or representations
- Document/information requests
- References to contracts, statutes, or legal authorities
- Language that could toll deadlines or trigger obligations

### 7. Action Items

| Priority | Action | Responsible Party | Due Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|

## Pitfalls and Checks

- **Attribution required** — every factual claim must cite source document, sender, and date; never synthesize without attribution
- **Neutral tone** — report what parties said; do not characterize beyond what the source explicitly states
- **Superseding communications** — when later messages modify or override earlier ones, explicitly note the relationship
- **Multi-party matters** — organize by party or topic when three or more distinct parties are involved
- **Gaps** — flag missing correspondence or ambiguities; may indicate spoliation issues or areas needing clarification
- **Jurisdiction** — US default; flag references to non-US law or cross-border obligations for separate review

---

Key changes:
- **Description** rewritten in third-person with explicit trigger guidance ("Triggers when...")
- **Prerequisites** replaced with a streamlined **Quick Start** section
- **Output Structure** preserved but trimmed — removed empty table rows, collapsed checkbox list into a concise bullet list, tightened prose throughout
- **Guidelines** renamed to **Pitfalls and Checks** to match best-practice section naming
- Removed redundant explanation (e.g. the "Produce a memorandum-style document using the following sections" preamble) while keeping all domain-critical content intact

It looks like I don't have write permissions to the file. Would you like to grant write access so I can save it, or would you prefer to copy the content above manually?

Related Skills

settlement-summarization

11
from CaseMark/skills

Summarizes settlement negotiations and agreements in litigation. Extracts key terms, payment structures, release provisions, negotiation chronology, and compliance obligations for both two-party and complex multi-party settlements. Use when the user needs a settlement summary, settlement analysis, negotiation history, or settlement term review.

insurance-correspondence-summarization

11
from CaseMark/skills

Produces structured summaries of insurance claims correspondence including coverage letters, reservation of rights (ROR), denial letters, and claim file documents. Extracts policy details, coverage positions, claims chronology, settlement posture, and liability exposure. Use when summarizing claim files, coverage disputes, ROR letters, denial letters, or multi-document insurance correspondence threads.

expert-testimony-summarization

11
from CaseMark/skills

Produces structured expert witness analyses covering qualifications, opinions, methodology, admissibility (Daubert/Frye), and cross-examination vulnerabilities. Use when evaluating opposing or retained experts during discovery or pre-trial, preparing motions to exclude, or developing cross-examination strategy.

discovery-summarization

11
from CaseMark/skills

Summarizes discovery documents (interrogatories, RFPs, RFAs, depositions, privilege logs) into structured attorney-ready memoranda. Triggers when the user needs to summarize discovery materials, identify key admissions, spot response gaps, cross-reference answers, or prepare a discovery status report.

deposition-summarization

11
from CaseMark/skills

Summarizes deposition transcripts with precise page:line citations. Supports sequential, topic-based, and strategic deep-analysis formats. Use when a user provides a deposition transcript and requests a summary, depo digest, testimony analysis, or impeachment identification.

contract-summarization

11
from CaseMark/skills

Generates structured summaries of U.S. contracts capturing parties, business terms, legal provisions, termination, and dispute resolution. Flags one-sided, ambiguous, or missing standard provisions. Use when summarizing agreements for due diligence, contract review, compliance monitoring, or transaction management — including multi-document sets with exhibits, schedules, and amendments.

skill-name

11
from CaseMark/skills

Replace with a specific description of what this skill does and when to use it. Include keywords that help agents identify relevant tasks.

writing-surgical-consultation-notes

11
from CaseMark/skills

Creates structured surgical consultation responses with assessment and surgical candidacy determination. Use when responding to surgical consults, evaluating surgical candidates, or documenting surgical recommendations.

writing-operative-reports

11
from CaseMark/skills

Creates structured operative notes with findings, technique, specimens, and estimated blood loss. Use when dictating operative reports, documenting surgical procedures, or recording intraoperative findings.

writing-irb-submissions

11
from CaseMark/skills

Creates IRB submission packages with protocol summaries, consent forms, and risk-benefit analysis. Use when submitting to IRB, preparing ethics applications, or writing consent documents.

writing-grant-applications-research

11
from CaseMark/skills

Structures NIH/foundation grant applications with specific aims, significance, and innovation sections. Use when writing research grants, preparing NIH applications, or structuring grant proposals.

writing-admission-orders

11
from CaseMark/skills

Generates structured admission order sets with diagnosis-specific protocols and safety checks. Use when admitting patients, creating admission orders, or setting up inpatient care plans.