final-order-judgment

Drafts court-ready Final Orders and Judgments for class action litigation with caption, procedural history, findings of fact, conclusions of law, and enforceable relief. Use when drafting final judgments, post-trial orders, summary judgment orders, or settlement approval orders in class actions.

11 stars

Best use case

final-order-judgment is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Drafts court-ready Final Orders and Judgments for class action litigation with caption, procedural history, findings of fact, conclusions of law, and enforceable relief. Use when drafting final judgments, post-trial orders, summary judgment orders, or settlement approval orders in class actions.

Teams using final-order-judgment should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/final-order-judgment/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CaseMark/skills/main/skills/legal/final-order-judgment/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/final-order-judgment/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How final-order-judgment Compares

Feature / Agentfinal-order-judgmentStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Drafts court-ready Final Orders and Judgments for class action litigation with caption, procedural history, findings of fact, conclusions of law, and enforceable relief. Use when drafting final judgments, post-trial orders, summary judgment orders, or settlement approval orders in class actions.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

# Final Order and Judgment

Drafts a Final Order and Judgment that resolves all claims, establishes enforceable directives, and withstands appellate review in class action cases.

## Prerequisites

Gather before drafting:

- **Caption details** — court, jurisdiction, case number, named parties, class definition
- **Procedural history** — key filings, motions, hearing dates, trial type (bench/jury), or settlement/summary judgment posture
- **Evidentiary record** — transcripts, exhibits, discovery materials, stipulated facts
- **Legal authorities** — governing statutes, controlling precedent, constitutional provisions
- **Relief sought** — monetary amounts, injunctive terms, fee petitions, class distribution plan
- **Local rules** — formatting requirements, separate document rule, proposed order procedures

## Document Structure

### 1. Caption and Title

- Full court name with division/district
- All named plaintiffs/defendants; class definition reference
- Case number (including consolidated numbers)
- Title: "FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT" (or jurisdiction-preferred term)
- Conform to local rule formatting (margins, font, spacing)

### 2. Recitals and Procedural History

- Nature of action and claims asserted
- Basis for decision: trial (bench/jury), summary judgment, or settlement approval
- Chronological key events with specific docket entry numbers and dates
- Settlement agreements or stipulations incorporated by reference

### 3. Findings of Fact

- Number sequentially; support each with record citations (transcript pages, exhibit numbers)
- Organize chronologically or thematically
- Distinguish contested vs. uncontested facts
- State standard of proof applied (preponderance / clear and convincing)
- Include class treatment findings: numerosity, commonality, typicality, adequacy

### 4. Conclusions of Law

- Number sequentially; cite statutes, regulations, and case law in Bluebook format
- Address every cause of action and affirmative defense
- For each claim: state elements, apply facts, state conclusion
- Include Rule 23 requirements; if settlement, address fairness under Rule 23(e) [VERIFY]
- Note binding vs. persuasive authority

### 5. Relief and Remedies

| Relief Type | Required Specificity |
|---|---|
| Monetary damages | Exact amounts, prejudgment interest (rate + method), costs, fees |
| Class distribution | Method, claims process, cy pres provisions |
| Injunctive relief | Precise conduct, duration, compliance mechanisms |
| Dismissals | With/without prejudice; specify claims and parties |
| Retained jurisdiction | Scope for enforcement, fee disputes, distribution |

- All claims and all parties must be resolved — no unresolved issues
- Specify compliance deadlines and enforcement mechanisms (contempt, reporting)

### 6. Execution Block

```
IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: _______________

_________________________________
[Judge Name]
[Title]
[Court]
```

- Include service/notice requirements per local rules
- Note entry-of-judgment procedures and separate document rule (Fed. R. Civ. P. 58) [VERIFY]

## Checks

- **Record support** — every factual finding cites the record; every legal conclusion cites authority
- **Unambiguous relief** — orders enforceable on their face without external documents (unless expressly incorporated)
- **Class requirements** — address notice to class, opt-out treatment, binding effect on absent members
- **Bluebook compliance** — all citations in proper format; verify currency and jurisdictional relevance
- **Cross-references** — findings of fact numbers align with conclusions of law references
- **Separate document rule** — in federal court, judgment in a separate document under Rule 58(a) unless excepted [VERIFY]
- **Local rules** — confirm proposed order procedures, formatting, e-filing specs
- **Settlement orders** — include fairness, adequate representation, and notice adequacy findings per Rule 23(e)(2) [VERIFY]

Related Skills

writing-admission-orders

11
from CaseMark/skills

Generates structured admission order sets with diagnosis-specific protocols and safety checks. Use when admitting patients, creating admission orders, or setting up inpatient care plans.

managing-tmj-disorders

11
from CaseMark/skills

Structures TMD evaluation with clinical and imaging assessment, classification, and treatment protocols. Use when evaluating TMJ disorders, classifying TMD, or documenting TMJ treatment.

managing-thyroid-disorders

11
from CaseMark/skills

Guides thyroid evaluation with TSH interpretation, medication titration, and nodule workup protocols. Use when managing hypothyroidism, evaluating thyroid nodules, or adjusting levothyroxine.

managing-substance-use-disorders

11
from CaseMark/skills

Structures SUD assessment with ASAM criteria placement, MAT protocols, and recovery planning. Use when assessing substance use, applying ASAM criteria, or managing medication-assisted treatment.

managing-postoperative-orders

11
from CaseMark/skills

Generates postoperative order sets with pain management, DVT prophylaxis, diet advancement, and activity progression. Use when writing post-op orders, managing surgical recovery, or creating post-procedure protocols.

managing-pelvic-floor-disorders

11
from CaseMark/skills

Guides pelvic floor assessment with POP-Q staging and treatment algorithm documentation. Use when evaluating pelvic organ prolapse, staging PFDs, or managing incontinence.

managing-pediatric-growth-disorders

11
from CaseMark/skills

Evaluates short stature and growth velocity with bone age interpretation and endocrine workup. Use when evaluating growth disorders, interpreting growth curves, or ordering growth workup.

managing-eating-disorders

11
from CaseMark/skills

Guides eating disorder assessment with medical stability criteria and treatment level determination. Use when evaluating eating disorders, assessing medical stability, or determining treatment level.

managing-attention-deficit-disorders

11
from CaseMark/skills

Structures ADHD evaluation in children with behavioral rating scales and medication trials. Use when evaluating pediatric ADHD, interpreting Vanderbilt/Conners scales, or managing stimulant therapy.

verdict-judgment-summary

11
from CaseMark/skills

Produces structured post-trial verdict and judgment analysis memoranda for commercial litigation. Triggers when summarizing a jury verdict, bench trial decision, post-trial motion assessment, or appellate viability review. Covers liability determinations, damages breakdowns, critical rulings, and post-trial strategy.

summary-judgment

11
from CaseMark/skills

Produces structured summaries of summary judgment motions, orders, and decisions. Use when the user needs to summarize an MSJ ruling, prepare a case status report, evaluate appeal posture, or brief a client on a dispositive motion outcome.

summary-judgment-motion

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts a Motion for Summary Judgment package for personal injury litigation under FRCP 56 or state equivalent. Trigger when the user needs an MSJ, summary judgment brief, dispositive motion, no-genuine-dispute motion, or judgment-as-a-matter-of-law motion during pre-trial or discovery phases.