fmla-complaint
Drafts litigation-ready FMLA violation complaints under 29 U.S.C. § 2617 for federal court or DOL filing. Covers eligibility, interference, retaliation, notice timelines, and damages. Use when drafting FMLA complaints, family medical leave interference claims, FMLA retaliation pleadings, or employment leave violation actions.
Best use case
fmla-complaint is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Drafts litigation-ready FMLA violation complaints under 29 U.S.C. § 2617 for federal court or DOL filing. Covers eligibility, interference, retaliation, notice timelines, and damages. Use when drafting FMLA complaints, family medical leave interference claims, FMLA retaliation pleadings, or employment leave violation actions.
Teams using fmla-complaint should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/fmla-complaint/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How fmla-complaint Compares
| Feature / Agent | fmla-complaint | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Drafts litigation-ready FMLA violation complaints under 29 U.S.C. § 2617 for federal court or DOL filing. Covers eligibility, interference, retaliation, notice timelines, and damages. Use when drafting FMLA complaints, family medical leave interference claims, FMLA retaliation pleadings, or employment leave violation actions.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# FMLA Violation Complaint Drafts a federal complaint alleging employer interference with or retaliation for exercise of FMLA rights under 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. ## Prerequisites Gather before drafting: 1. **Employment records** — offer letter, pay stubs, timesheets (12-month tenure + 1,250+ hours) 2. **Leave documentation** — request correspondence, medical certifications, employer notices 3. **Adverse action evidence** — termination letter, demotion notice, disciplinary records 4. **Medical records** — provider certifications establishing serious health condition 5. **Employer FMLA policy** — handbook, posted notices 6. **Witness information** — names, titles, contact info 7. **Damages documentation** — pay stubs, benefits statements, out-of-pocket expenses ## Quick Start 1. Confirm FMLA eligibility (three prongs) 2. Identify qualifying leave reason under § 2612(a)(1) 3. Build notice/certification compliance timeline 4. Draft interference and/or retaliation counts 5. Calculate damages under § 2617(a)(1) 6. Add verification and signature blocks ## Complaint Structure ### I. Caption & Parties - **Complainant**: Full legal name, address, employee ID, job title, employment dates - **Employer**: Legal name, DBAs, principal address, registered agent, FEIN if available - **Forum**: Federal district court (28 U.S.C. § 1331) or DOL Wage and Hour Division ### II. Eligibility (29 U.S.C. § 2611) Establish all three prongs with documentary support: | Prong | Requirement | Evidence | |-------|-------------|----------| | Duration | 12+ months employed (need not be consecutive) | Employment records, offer letter | | Hours | 1,250+ hours in preceding 12 months (§ 2611(2)(A)(ii)) | Pay stubs, timesheets — calculate by pay period | | Worksite | 50+ employees within 75-mile radius for 20+ workweeks (§ 2611(2)(B)(ii)) | Public filings; note if in employer's exclusive knowledge | Preemptively address close-call defenses (gaps, borderline hours, multi-location aggregation). ### III. Qualifying Reason (29 U.S.C. § 2612(a)(1)) | Category | Statute | |----------|---------| | Birth/newborn care | § 2612(a)(1)(A) | | Adoption/foster placement | § 2612(a)(1)(B) | | Care for spouse/child/parent — serious health condition | § 2612(a)(1)(C) | | Employee's own serious health condition | § 2612(a)(1)(D) | | Military qualifying exigency | § 2612(a)(1)(E) | For serious health conditions, map to 29 CFR § 825.113: inpatient care, continuing treatment (3+ days + provider), chronic condition, permanent incapacity, or multiple treatments. ### IV. Notice & Certification Timeline Build a chronological compliance table. Each missed step is an independent violation. | Event | Regulatory Requirement | |-------|----------------------| | Employee notice to employer | 30 days if foreseeable (29 CFR § 825.302); ASAP if not (§ 825.303) | | Employer eligibility notice | Within 5 business days (29 CFR § 825.300(b)) | | Employer rights/responsibilities notice | With eligibility notice (§ 825.300(c)) | | Certification request | Per § 825.305; 15 days to return | | Deficiency notice | Written, 7 days to cure (§ 825.305(c)) | | Designation notice | Within 5 business days (§ 825.300(d)) | ### V. Causes of Action Number each count separately. **Interference (29 U.S.C. § 2615(a)(1)):** | Violation Type | Key Provision | |---------------|---------------| | Outright denial of leave | § 2612(a)(1) | | Discouragement through threats | § 2615(a)(1) | | FMLA leave counted under no-fault attendance policy | 29 CFR § 825.220(c) | | Failure to maintain health benefits | § 2614(c)(1) | | Failure to restore to same/equivalent position | § 2614(a)(1); 29 CFR § 825.214(a) | | Requiring work during leave | § 2612 | | FMLA leave as negative factor in decisions | 29 CFR § 825.220(c) | | Failure to provide required notices | § 2619; 29 CFR § 825.300 | **Retaliation (29 U.S.C. § 2615(a)(2)):** Establish causation for each adverse action through: - Temporal proximity to protected activity - Comparator evidence (non-FMLA employees treated better) - Direct statements linking action to FMLA usage - Pattern of escalating discipline post-leave - Pretext (shifting or unsupported justifications) For every violation: specify date, actors (name + title), precise action/omission, consequence, and cite the statutory/regulatory provision. Use direct quotations where available. ### VI. Evidence Inventory - Employment records (offer letter, contract, personnel file) - Time/attendance records (timesheets, payroll) - Leave correspondence (emails, letters, texts with dates) - Medical documentation (certifications, provider letters) - Employer FMLA policy and notices (eligibility, rights, designation) - Performance/discipline records (pre- and post-leave) - Comparative evidence (treatment of non-FMLA employees) - Documents in employer's exclusive possession (flag for discovery) ### VII. Relief (29 U.S.C. § 2617(a)(1)) | Category | Basis | Method | |----------|-------|--------| | Reinstatement | § 2614(a)(1) | Same/equivalent position; front pay if infeasible | | Back pay | § 2617(a)(1)(A)(i)(I) | Wage rate × lost period, minus interim earnings | | Lost benefits | § 2617(a)(1)(A)(i)(II) | Health premiums, retirement, fringes | | Out-of-pocket medical | § 2617(a)(1)(A)(i)(II) | Itemized expenses from coverage loss | | Liquidated damages | § 2617(a)(1)(A)(iii) | Equal to wages + benefits; mandatory unless good faith (29 CFR § 825.400(c)) | | Attorney's fees | § 2617(a)(3) | Mandatory for prevailing plaintiffs | | Prejudgment interest | Federal/state rate | From date each loss incurred | | Post-judgment interest | 28 U.S.C. § 1961 | Federal statutory rate | | Injunctive relief | Equitable authority | Compliant policies, training, notice posting | Provide itemized calculations with supporting documentation. ### VIII. Verification & Signature - Verification under penalty of perjury (28 U.S.C. § 1746) - Complainant and attorney signature blocks - Rule 11 certification ## Pitfalls & Checks - **Statute of limitations**: 2 years; 3 years if willful (§ 2617(c)) - **Forum selection**: Weigh federal court vs. DOL based on remedies, speed, and strategy - **Liquidated damages**: Presumptively mandatory — frame violations to foreclose good-faith defense - **State law**: FMLA does not preempt state laws providing greater protections — note parallel claims - **Anticipate defenses**: Address eligibility challenges, legitimate business reasons, certification deficiencies proactively - **Discovery roadmap**: Flag documents in employer's exclusive possession - **Formatting**: Sequential numbered paragraphs per FRCP; professional, objective tone - Cite all regulatory provisions precisely — never paraphrase CFR section numbers - Mark uncertain citations with [VERIFY]
Related Skills
wrongful-termination-complaint
Drafts wrongful termination complaints for employment litigation. Covers at-will exceptions, statutory claims (Title VII, ADA, ADEA, FMLA, state equivalents), public policy violations, and whistleblower protections. Use when drafting or filing a wrongful termination complaint or related employment discharge claim.
third-party-complaint
Drafts a Third-Party Complaint (impleader) under FRCP 14 or state equivalents. Use when a defendant needs to implead a party for indemnification, contribution, subrogation, or breach of warranty during the pleadings phase.
specific-performance-complaint
Drafts a Complaint for Specific Performance compelling contractual fulfillment through equitable relief. Use when filing suit for specific performance, real estate breach, unique property disputes, or equitable remedy pleadings.
retaliation-complaint
Drafts U.S. employment-retaliation complaints with jurisdiction, causation, and remedy sections aligned to the governing statute. Use when counsel needs a filing-ready complaint after a plaintiff alleges adverse action following protected activity. Covers Title VII, FLSA, SOX, and Dodd-Frank retaliation claims, administrative-exhaustion preservation, and prayer-for-relief drafting.
quiet-title-complaint
Drafts a court-ready Complaint to Quiet Title for real property disputes. Guides through intake, chain-of-title verification, adverse claim identification, and strategic pleading. Use when drafting quiet title complaints, clearing title defects, challenging adverse possession, resolving boundary disputes, removing invalid liens, or establishing superior title.
purchase-agreement-breach-complaint
Drafts a U.S. civil complaint for breach of a real estate purchase agreement, covering jurisdiction, venue, parties, contract terms, breach allegations, damages, and remedies including specific performance. Use when preparing a breach of purchase agreement complaint, real estate contract dispute pleading, or specific performance action.
patent-infringement-complaint
Drafts a federal patent infringement complaint for U.S. District Court satisfying FRCP Rules 8, 10, 11 and Twombly/Iqbal plausibility. Covers direct (§ 271(a)), induced (§ 271(b)), and contributory (§ 271(c)) infringement with TC Heartland venue analysis and Halo willfulness. Use when initiating patent infringement litigation, drafting an IP complaint, or preparing a pleading to survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion.
partition-complaint
Drafts a U.S. civil complaint for partition of real property by co-owners, pleading jurisdiction, ownership interests, property description, encumbrances, and grounds for partition in kind or by sale. Trigger when the user needs a partition action, co-owner dispute complaint, tenant-in-common or joint-tenancy division, or court-ordered sale of real property.
inverse-condemnation-complaint
Drafts inverse condemnation complaints seeking just compensation for government takings without formal eminent domain. Use when a user needs a takings clause complaint, inverse condemnation pleading, or property rights constitutional claim involving physical, regulatory, or temporary takings.
fraudulent-conveyance-complaint
Drafts a U.S. fraudulent conveyance complaint to avoid and recover debtor asset transfers under UFTA, UVTA, or state equivalents. Covers actual fraud (UVTA § 4(a)(1)), constructive fraud theories, badges of fraud, provisional remedies, and full prayer for relief. Use when a creditor needs to challenge a transfer made to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors, including bankruptcy adversary proceedings. Triggers: fraudulent conveyance, fraudulent transfer, voidable transaction, badges of fraud, asset concealment, debtor insolvency, UFTA, UVTA, avoidance action.
foreclosure-complaint
Drafts U.S. judicial foreclosure complaints pleading standing, chain of title, default, and amounts due with jurisdiction-specific compliance and exhibit control. Triggered when the user needs a foreclosure complaint, mortgage foreclosure pleading, note-and-mortgage enforcement action, or default-based real estate litigation involving acceleration, standing, or lost-note issues.
eviction-complaint
Drafts jurisdiction-compliant Unlawful Detainer complaints for eviction proceedings covering non-payment, lease violations, and holdover tenancies. Assesses case facts, verifies statutory notice compliance, and formats pleadings to local court rules. Use when drafting eviction complaints, unlawful detainer pleadings, forcible entry and detainer actions, or possession recovery filings.