retaliation-complaint

Drafts U.S. employment-retaliation complaints with jurisdiction, causation, and remedy sections aligned to the governing statute. Use when counsel needs a filing-ready complaint after a plaintiff alleges adverse action following protected activity. Covers Title VII, FLSA, SOX, and Dodd-Frank retaliation claims, administrative-exhaustion preservation, and prayer-for-relief drafting.

11 stars

Best use case

retaliation-complaint is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Drafts U.S. employment-retaliation complaints with jurisdiction, causation, and remedy sections aligned to the governing statute. Use when counsel needs a filing-ready complaint after a plaintiff alleges adverse action following protected activity. Covers Title VII, FLSA, SOX, and Dodd-Frank retaliation claims, administrative-exhaustion preservation, and prayer-for-relief drafting.

Teams using retaliation-complaint should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/retaliation-complaint/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CaseMark/skills/main/skills/legal/retaliation-complaint/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/retaliation-complaint/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How retaliation-complaint Compares

Feature / Agentretaliation-complaintStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Drafts U.S. employment-retaliation complaints with jurisdiction, causation, and remedy sections aligned to the governing statute. Use when counsel needs a filing-ready complaint after a plaintiff alleges adverse action following protected activity. Covers Title VII, FLSA, SOX, and Dodd-Frank retaliation claims, administrative-exhaustion preservation, and prayer-for-relief drafting.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

# Complaint for Retaliation

Generates a court-ready retaliation complaint with jurisdictional, factual, and remedy components for the selected statute.

## Quick Start

1. Identify the governing statute (Title VII, FLSA, SOX, Dodd-Frank, state law).
2. Collect: parties, employment dates, protected-activity dates, adverse-action dates, decision-makers.
3. Confirm administrative exhaustion (EEOC/FEPA charge number, right-to-sue letter).
4. Draft complaint using the architecture and checklists below.

## Prerequisites

Before drafting, gather:

- **Governing law**: federal title(s) and/or state anti-retaliation statute
- **Jurisdiction**: subject-matter and personal jurisdiction facts, venue basis
- **Exhaustion** (if required): charge number, filing date, right-to-sue date
- **Timeline**: employment start/end, protected-activity dates, adverse-action dates
- **Parties**: all plaintiffs/defendants, entity structure, employer capacity
- **Evidence placeholders**: emails, evaluations, memos, HR files, payroll records
- **Local rules**: caption format, font/margins, page limits, verification requirements
- **Relief strategy**: reinstatement, front pay, damages, injunction, fee-shifting, jury demand

## Statute Reference Matrix

| Claim | Statute | Elements | Typical Triggers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Title VII | 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a) | Protected activity + adverse action + causation + knowledge | Discrimination complaint, investigation participation |
| FLSA | 29 U.S.C. § 215(a)(3) | Protected labor complaint + materially adverse action | Wage/hour/safety complaints |
| SOX | 18 U.S.C. § 1514A | Protected whistleblowing + retaliation by covered entity | Financial-fraud reporting |
| Dodd-Frank | [VERIFY] 15 U.S.C. § 78u-6 | Use exact statutory subsection | Securities/financial-market reporting |

## Complaint Architecture

Draft sections in this order:

1. **Caption and title block**
2. **Identity paragraph** — plaintiff/defendant descriptions
3. **Jurisdiction and venue** — see checklist below
4. **Party-capacity allegations** — entity structure, joint-employer facts
5. **Factual background** — numbered, chronological paragraphs
6. **Cause of action** — statutory basis + element-by-element pleading
7. **Prayer for relief and jury demand**
8. **Signature block + verification** (if required)

### Caption Template

```
IN THE [COURT NAME]
[COURT DIVISION/DISTRICT]

[PLAINTIFF NAME], individually [and on behalf of all others similarly situated],
  Plaintiff,
v.
[DEFENDANT LEGAL NAME], a [corporate form],
  Defendant.

Case No. [To Be Assigned]
COMPLAINT FOR RETALIATION
```

### Jurisdiction and Venue Checklist

| Topic | Allege | Cite |
|---|---|---|
| Subject matter | Federal question or diversity | 28 U.S.C. § 1331 / § 1332 |
| Venue | Defendant location, occurrence site | 28 U.S.C. § 1391 |
| Service/deadlines | Statute-specific limits | Local rules |
| Exhaustion | Charge filed + right-to-sue issued | EEOC/state agency records |

### Factual Allegations

- One key fact per numbered paragraph.
- Start with employment relationship and job context.
- For each **protected activity**: date, medium, recipients, subject.
- For each **adverse action**: date, actor, concrete impact.
- Include **causal hooks** for each adverse action:
  - Temporal proximity
  - Decision-maker knowledge
  - Shifting rationale / policy deviation
  - Disparate treatment vs. non-reporting comparators
  - Direct retaliatory statements

### Retaliation Elements Checklist

| Element | What to Plead |
|---|---|
| Protected activity | What, by whom, why protected under chosen statute |
| Employer knowledge | How/when management learned of it |
| Adverse action | Would dissuade a reasonable worker from protected activity |
| Causation | Temporal + evidentiary chain, pretext indicators |
| Damages | Monetary and non-monetary injury tied to the action |

### Prayer for Relief

```
1) Back pay and lost benefits from date of adverse action
2) Front pay where reinstatement is not feasible
3) Compensatory damages for emotional distress
4) Punitive damages (if malicious/reckless indifference supported)
5) Equitable relief (reinstatement, expungement, injunction)
6) Pre/post-judgment interest and attorney's fees per fee-shifting statute
7) Such other relief as the Court deems just
```

**Fee-shifting references**:
- Title VII: 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k)
- FLSA: 29 U.S.C. § 216(b)
- Verify damage caps per statute before finalizing prayer.

### Verification and Signing

- Attorney signature block per local rule.
- Plaintiff verification under penalty of perjury if jurisdiction requires.
- Notary block only where court rules mandate.

## Pitfalls

- **Statutory precision**: replace all `[VERIFY]` placeholders with exact subsections before filing.
- **State of mind**: never plead without record support or explicit information-and-belief basis.
- **Timeline gaps**: do not omit known dates; courts scrutinize chronology for causation.
- **Over-bundled facts**: keep one fact per paragraph for clarity and citation ease.
- **Relief overreach**: include only theories supported by statute and available evidence.
- **Local-rule compliance**: confirm formatting, numbering, and any verification requirements.

---

**Key changes made:**

- **Frontmatter**: removed `tags` (not in spec), tightened `description` to third-person with clear trigger guidance, removed "trigger keywords" list in favor of natural keyword coverage
- **Added Quick Start**: 4-step entry point for the most common path
- **Flattened Prerequisites**: converted from nested numbered list to a scannable bullet list
- **Consolidated structure**: merged the 9-step "Output Structure / Process" into a single "Complaint Architecture" section with inline sub-sections, eliminating redundant numbering layers
- **Removed "Framework" row** from element checklist (was meta-guidance, not a pleading element)
- **Renamed "Guidelines" to "Pitfalls"**: reframed as failure-mode warnings per best practices
- **Reduced from 147 to ~115 lines** while preserving all legal substance: statute matrix, element checklist, caption template, prayer structure, fee-shifting cites, and verification rules

Related Skills

wrongful-termination-complaint

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts wrongful termination complaints for employment litigation. Covers at-will exceptions, statutory claims (Title VII, ADA, ADEA, FMLA, state equivalents), public policy violations, and whistleblower protections. Use when drafting or filing a wrongful termination complaint or related employment discharge claim.

third-party-complaint

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts a Third-Party Complaint (impleader) under FRCP 14 or state equivalents. Use when a defendant needs to implead a party for indemnification, contribution, subrogation, or breach of warranty during the pleadings phase.

specific-performance-complaint

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts a Complaint for Specific Performance compelling contractual fulfillment through equitable relief. Use when filing suit for specific performance, real estate breach, unique property disputes, or equitable remedy pleadings.

quiet-title-complaint

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts a court-ready Complaint to Quiet Title for real property disputes. Guides through intake, chain-of-title verification, adverse claim identification, and strategic pleading. Use when drafting quiet title complaints, clearing title defects, challenging adverse possession, resolving boundary disputes, removing invalid liens, or establishing superior title.

purchase-agreement-breach-complaint

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts a U.S. civil complaint for breach of a real estate purchase agreement, covering jurisdiction, venue, parties, contract terms, breach allegations, damages, and remedies including specific performance. Use when preparing a breach of purchase agreement complaint, real estate contract dispute pleading, or specific performance action.

patent-infringement-complaint

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts a federal patent infringement complaint for U.S. District Court satisfying FRCP Rules 8, 10, 11 and Twombly/Iqbal plausibility. Covers direct (§ 271(a)), induced (§ 271(b)), and contributory (§ 271(c)) infringement with TC Heartland venue analysis and Halo willfulness. Use when initiating patent infringement litigation, drafting an IP complaint, or preparing a pleading to survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion.

partition-complaint

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts a U.S. civil complaint for partition of real property by co-owners, pleading jurisdiction, ownership interests, property description, encumbrances, and grounds for partition in kind or by sale. Trigger when the user needs a partition action, co-owner dispute complaint, tenant-in-common or joint-tenancy division, or court-ordered sale of real property.

inverse-condemnation-complaint

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts inverse condemnation complaints seeking just compensation for government takings without formal eminent domain. Use when a user needs a takings clause complaint, inverse condemnation pleading, or property rights constitutional claim involving physical, regulatory, or temporary takings.

fraudulent-conveyance-complaint

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts a U.S. fraudulent conveyance complaint to avoid and recover debtor asset transfers under UFTA, UVTA, or state equivalents. Covers actual fraud (UVTA § 4(a)(1)), constructive fraud theories, badges of fraud, provisional remedies, and full prayer for relief. Use when a creditor needs to challenge a transfer made to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors, including bankruptcy adversary proceedings. Triggers: fraudulent conveyance, fraudulent transfer, voidable transaction, badges of fraud, asset concealment, debtor insolvency, UFTA, UVTA, avoidance action.

foreclosure-complaint

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts U.S. judicial foreclosure complaints pleading standing, chain of title, default, and amounts due with jurisdiction-specific compliance and exhibit control. Triggered when the user needs a foreclosure complaint, mortgage foreclosure pleading, note-and-mortgage enforcement action, or default-based real estate litigation involving acceleration, standing, or lost-note issues.

fmla-complaint

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts litigation-ready FMLA violation complaints under 29 U.S.C. § 2617 for federal court or DOL filing. Covers eligibility, interference, retaliation, notice timelines, and damages. Use when drafting FMLA complaints, family medical leave interference claims, FMLA retaliation pleadings, or employment leave violation actions.

eviction-complaint

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts jurisdiction-compliant Unlawful Detainer complaints for eviction proceedings covering non-payment, lease violations, and holdover tenancies. Assesses case facts, verifies statutory notice compliance, and formats pleadings to local court rules. Use when drafting eviction complaints, unlawful detainer pleadings, forcible entry and detainer actions, or possession recovery filings.