rea-request
Drafts a Request for Equitable Adjustment (REA) for U.S. federal government contracts under FAR provisions. Enforces element-driven cost/schedule narratives, FAR Part 31 cost structures, FAR 52.233-1 certification, and contemporaneous evidence marshaling. Use when a contractor seeks contract modification relief due to government-directed changes, differing site conditions, defective specifications, or government-caused delays.
Best use case
rea-request is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Drafts a Request for Equitable Adjustment (REA) for U.S. federal government contracts under FAR provisions. Enforces element-driven cost/schedule narratives, FAR Part 31 cost structures, FAR 52.233-1 certification, and contemporaneous evidence marshaling. Use when a contractor seeks contract modification relief due to government-directed changes, differing site conditions, defective specifications, or government-caused delays.
Teams using rea-request should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/rea-request/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How rea-request Compares
| Feature / Agent | rea-request | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Drafts a Request for Equitable Adjustment (REA) for U.S. federal government contracts under FAR provisions. Enforces element-driven cost/schedule narratives, FAR Part 31 cost structures, FAR 52.233-1 certification, and contemporaneous evidence marshaling. Use when a contractor seeks contract modification relief due to government-directed changes, differing site conditions, defective specifications, or government-caused delays.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Request for Equitable Adjustment (REA) Drafts a litigation-ready REA asserting entitlement, quantifying cost and schedule impacts, and satisfying FAR certification requirements for submission to a federal contracting officer. ## Prerequisites 1. **Contract documents** — base contract, modifications, PIID, applicable FAR clauses (esp. FAR 52.243-1 or FAR 52.243-4) 2. **Change trigger documentation** — government directive, modification order, or differing-conditions notice with precise dates 3. **Cost records** — timesheets, invoices, purchase orders, subcontract documents, cost ledgers 4. **Schedule records** — baseline CPM schedule, updates, delay logs, milestone tracking 5. **Project correspondence** — CO letters, emails, meeting minutes, daily logs contemporaneous with the change 6. **Contractor identity** — legal entity name, CAGE code, authorized signatory with delegation of authority ## Output Structure ### 1. Header Block | Field | Content | |---|---| | Contract No. / PIID | [Number] | | Agency / Contracting Office | [Name] | | Contracting Officer | [Name, address, contact] | | Contractor | [Legal name, CAGE code] | | REA Reference No. | [Internal tracking number] | | Date | [Submission date] | | Subject | Request for Equitable Adjustment — [Contract No.] | ### 2. Introduction & Legal Basis - Cite entitlement clause (e.g., FAR 52.243-1 Changes—Fixed-Price; FAR 52.243-4 Changes; differing site conditions clause) - State nature of change/event in one paragraph - Assert contractor's position: change exceeds original scope or constitutes a compensable change ### 3. Factual Narrative (Chronological) - Present events with dates referencing affected CLINs, SOW sections, or spec provisions - Quote government directives verbatim where available - Side-by-side: original requirement vs. changed/additional work - For differing conditions: baseline assumptions (contract) vs. actual conditions encountered - Cite exhibit numbers for each referenced document ### 4. Impact Analysis #### Cost Impacts (FAR Part 31) | Cost Element | Basis | Amount | |---|---|---| | Direct Labor (category/hours) | Timesheets / rates | $ | | Materials | Invoices / quotes | $ | | Equipment | Rental records / rates | $ | | Subcontractor Costs | Subcontract docs | $ | | Overhead (rate × base) | Rate agreement / incurred | $ | | G&A (rate × base) | Rate agreement / incurred | $ | | Profit / Fee | Contract structure / FAR guidelines | $ | | **Total Requested Adjustment** | | **$** | #### Schedule Impacts - Demonstrate critical path effect using CPM or comparable methodology - Quantify delay days per milestone and overall completion date - Address acceleration costs if contractor maintained original schedule despite change #### Performance Impacts - Describe changes to technical specs, quality standards, or deliverables ### 5. Supporting Evidence Index - **Tab A** — Contractual documents (contract, mods, specs, SOW) - **Tab B** — Government communications (directives, emails, CO letters, meeting minutes) - **Tab C** — Project records (daily logs, progress reports, inspection records) - **Tab D** — Financial documentation (invoices, timesheets, POs, cost ledgers) - **Tab E** — Expert analysis (engineering reports, schedule analysis, cost studies) - **Tab F** — Legal authorities (ASBCA/CBCA decisions, COFC precedents, FAR citations) [VERIFY each citation before filing] ### 6. Requested Adjustment Summary | Component | Requested | |---|---| | Total Cost Adjustment | $ | | Time Extension (calendar days) | [N] days | | Revised Completion Date | [Date] | | Affected Milestones | [List] | ### 7. Certification (FAR 52.233-1) > *For claims exceeding $100,000, include verbatim FAR 52.233-1(b) certification language [VERIFY current text]:* > > "I certify that the claim is made in good faith; that the supporting data are accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; that the amount requested accurately reflects the contract adjustment for which the contractor believes the government is liable; and that I am duly authorized to certify the claim on behalf of the contractor." **Signature block**: Authorized representative name, title, date, contact — confirm signatory has documented delegation of authority. ## Guidelines - **Notice** — Confirm timely notice under applicable changes clause; address late-notice arguments preemptively - **Causation** — Every cost/schedule element must trace to a specific government act or condition; no unsubstantiated lump sums - **Scope limitation** — Changes must be within general contract scope (cardinal change doctrine bars out-of-scope recovery) - **Cost principles** — All costs must be allowable, allocable, and reasonable under FAR Part 31; flag potentially unallowable costs - **Certification threshold** — Claims >$100,000 require FAR 52.233-1 certification; false certification triggers False Claims Act exposure - **Preserve entitlement** — State full position even when negotiating; frame concessions as facilitation, not waiver - **Contemporaneous docs** — Boards and courts heavily favor records created at the time of change over after-the-fact reconstruction - **[VERIFY]** all board/court citations (ASBCA, CBCA, COFC) before submission; confirm they remain good law
Related Skills
documenting-surgical-pathology-requests
Structures surgical pathology requisitions with clinical history, specimen description, and specific diagnostic questions. Use when submitting pathology specimens, writing pathology requisitions, or requesting special studies.
tax-clearance-request
Drafts formal request letters for Tax Clearance Certificates from state tax authorities on behalf of corporate entities. Triggers on tax clearance requests, pre-dissolution tax letters, business sale tax certification, merger tax compliance, asset transfer clearance, or license renewal tax documentation.
request-for-admissions
Drafts Requests for Admissions under FRCP 36 or state equivalents for personal injury litigation. Extracts facts from case documents to produce numbered admission requests covering factual matters, document authentication, and law-to-fact application. Use when drafting RFAs, narrowing trial issues, authenticating exhibits, or preparing discovery requests.
repair-request-addendum
Drafts a Repair Request Addendum modifying an existing residential or commercial lease to establish enforceable repair obligations with timelines, cost allocation, and remedies. Cross-references original lease provisions to avoid conflicts. Use when formalizing repair requests, drafting lease addenda for maintenance or habitability issues, or documenting landlord-tenant repair agreements. Trigger keywords: repair addendum, lease repair amendment, habitability repair, maintenance addendum, repair-and-deduct, rent abatement.
payoff-letter-request
Drafts formal payoff letter requests to lenders for the precise amount needed to satisfy a loan obligation on a given date. Extracts loan details from matter documents, identifies missing information, and tailors urgency to transaction deadlines. Incorporates RESPA compliance, per diem interest, and itemized breakdown specifications. Use when requesting payoff statements, mortgage payoff letters, loan satisfaction amounts, or lien release calculations in closings, refinancing, or debt satisfaction scenarios.
jury-trial-request
Drafts a formal Request for Jury Trial invoking Sixth Amendment (criminal) or Seventh Amendment (civil) rights. Covers federal FRCP Rule 38, FRCrP Rule 23, state procedural variations, filing deadlines, jury fees, and waiver avoidance. Use when filing a jury demand, requesting jury trial, electing jury over bench trial, or preserving jury rights during pleadings or pre-trial phases.
managing-secondary-transfer-requests
Processes LP interest transfer requests with GP consent evaluation, ROFR administration, and transfer documentation requirements. Use when managing LP transfers, evaluating transfer requests, or coordinating interest assignments.
managing-investor-compliance-requests
Coordinates regulatory and compliance information requests from institutional LPs including FOIA, regulatory filings, and audit support. Use when responding to compliance requests, managing FOIA inquiries, or supporting LP audit processes.
skill-name
Replace with a specific description of what this skill does and when to use it. Include keywords that help agents identify relevant tasks.
writing-surgical-consultation-notes
Creates structured surgical consultation responses with assessment and surgical candidacy determination. Use when responding to surgical consults, evaluating surgical candidates, or documenting surgical recommendations.
writing-operative-reports
Creates structured operative notes with findings, technique, specimens, and estimated blood loss. Use when dictating operative reports, documenting surgical procedures, or recording intraoperative findings.
writing-irb-submissions
Creates IRB submission packages with protocol summaries, consent forms, and risk-benefit analysis. Use when submitting to IRB, preparing ethics applications, or writing consent documents.