strategy-sprint
Create product strategy in 1 day, 1 week, or 1 month timeframes. Progressive strategy development framework.
Best use case
strategy-sprint is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Create product strategy in 1 day, 1 week, or 1 month timeframes. Progressive strategy development framework.
Teams using strategy-sprint should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/strategy-sprint/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How strategy-sprint Compares
| Feature / Agent | strategy-sprint | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Create product strategy in 1 day, 1 week, or 1 month timeframes. Progressive strategy development framework.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Strategy Sprint: Write Strategy in 1 Day / 1 Week / 1 Month
**When to use:** When you need to create or update product strategy quickly, align stakeholders, or prepare for planning cycles
**Framework source:** Aakash Gupta's "How to Write a Product Strategy in 1 Day/Week/Month"
## Quick Start
1. Tell me: "I need a [1-day / 1-week / 1-month] strategy for [topic]"
2. I will check `thoughts/shared/pm/frameworks/` and `thoughts/shared/pm/context/business-info-template.md` for existing context
3. I will ask 3-5 clarifying questions about scope, stakeholders, and constraints
4. We build progressively -- even a 1-month sprint starts with the 1-day foundation first
5. Output goes to `thoughts/shared/product/strategy/strategy-[topic]-[date].md`
**Which tier should you pick?**
- **1-Day:** You need a quick strategic POV for a specific question. An exec asked for direction, a new opportunity appeared, or you need to align the team before deeper work. Output: 1-page doc.
- **1-Week:** You are building a full strategic plan for a new initiative, quarterly planning, or cross-functional buy-in. Includes research, validation, and rollout planning. Output: 3-5 page doc with research backing.
- **1-Month:** You are defining annual/quarterly strategy for the entire product, planning a major pivot, launching a new business line, or preparing for board-level decisions. Includes financial modeling, competitive analysis, and full stakeholder socialization. Output: 10-15 page comprehensive strategy doc.
### Tier Escalation Triggers
Sometimes you start at one tier and realize you need a bigger sprint. Here's when to escalate:
**1-Day → 1-Week Escalation:**
Escalate when any of these appear during your 1-day sprint:
- You discover the problem is not well-defined (you're debating WHAT to solve, not HOW)
- Competitive landscape has shifted significantly and you need fresh research
- Key stakeholders disagree on the strategic direction (not just the tactic)
- The "snap strategy" keeps changing scope as you work -- sign of insufficient framing
**1-Week → 1-Month Escalation:**
Escalate when any of these appear during your 1-week sprint:
- The strategy requires cross-functional alignment that can't happen in a week (e.g., pricing changes, platform shifts)
- You need primary research (user interviews, market data) that takes time to collect
- The strategy touches 3+ product areas and each needs its own analysis
- Leadership wants a Board-level strategy document, not an internal working doc
**How to escalate gracefully:**
1. Don't restart -- use what you've already produced as input to the higher tier
2. Frame it: "The 1-day sprint surfaced that this is bigger than a tactical fix. Here's what I found so far. I recommend a 1-week sprint starting with [specific question we need to answer]."
3. The 1-day output becomes Day 1 of the 1-week sprint
---
## Overview
Strategy doesn't always need to be a month-long exercise. Depending on your timeline and context, you can create effective strategy in three different timeframes:
- **1 Day:** Snap strategy for quick alignment
- **1 Week:** Iteration with design sprints and validation
- **1 Month:** Full socialization with all stakeholders
---
## The Framework
### 1-Day Strategy (Snap Strategy)
**Use when:**
- New opportunity emerges suddenly
- Executive asks for quick direction
- Need to align team before deeper work
**What to include:**
1. **Problem/Opportunity** (2-3 sentences)
- What's the core issue or opportunity?
- Why does it matter now?
2. **Target Customer** (1 paragraph)
- Who are we solving this for?
- What's their current pain?
3. **Hypothesis** (1 sentence)
- If we build X, then Y will happen because Z
4. **Success Metric** (1 metric + target)
- What number moves if this works?
- Example: "Increase activation from 45% to 60%"
5. **Key Risks** (3 bullets)
- What could prevent success?
- What assumptions are we making?
6. **Next Steps** (3 action items with owners)
**Time investment:** 4-6 hours
**Output:** 1-page doc that gets everyone pointed in the same direction
---
### 1-Week Strategy (Iteration Strategy)
**Use when:**
- Quarterly planning cycle
- New product area exploration
- Need cross-functional buy-in
**Build on 1-day foundation with:**
1. **Jobs-to-Be-Done Analysis**
- What job is the customer hiring our product to do?
- What progress are they trying to make?
- Reference: [[jtbd-canvas]]
2. **Competitive Positioning**
- How do we differentiate?
- What's our unfair advantage?
- Reference: [[7-powers-framework]]
3. **User Research Validation**
- 5-10 customer interviews
- Survey existing users
- Review support tickets and feedback
4. **Technical Feasibility Check**
- Sync with engineering leads
- Identify major technical risks
- Get rough effort estimates
5. **Success Criteria (expanded)**
- Primary metric + 3-5 guardrail metrics
- Leading indicators to track early
- Definition of "good enough" to ship
6. **Rollout Plan**
- Phased approach or big bang?
- Beta testing strategy
- Kill criteria (when to stop)
**Daily Breakdown (1-Week Sprint):**
| Day | Focus | Deliverable | Hours |
| ------------- | --------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- |
| **Monday** | Foundation + Research Setup | 1-day snap strategy draft; schedule 5-8 interviews; pull support tickets and NPS data | 5-6 hrs |
| **Tuesday** | Customer Research | Conduct 3-5 interviews; review survey data and support themes; draft JTBD canvas | 5-6 hrs |
| **Wednesday** | Competitive + Technical | Competitive positioning analysis; engineering feasibility sync; identify top 3 technical risks | 4-5 hrs |
| **Thursday** | Synthesis + Strategy Draft | Combine research into strategy doc; define success criteria and guardrails; draft rollout plan | 5-6 hrs |
| **Friday** | Review + Finalize | Get feedback from 2-3 key stakeholders; incorporate feedback; finalize 3-5 page doc with clear next steps | 3-4 hrs |
**End-of-week deliverable:** 3-5 page strategy doc with JTBD analysis, competitive positioning, success metrics, and rollout plan.
**Time investment:** 20-30 hours across 5 days
**Output:** 3-5 page doc with research backing
---
### 1-Month Strategy (Full Socialization)
**Use when:**
- Annual planning
- Major product pivot
- New business line
- Board-level strategic decisions
**Build on 1-week foundation with:**
1. **Market Analysis**
- TAM/SAM/SOM sizing
- Market trends and forces
- Competitor deep dives (3-5 players)
- Reference: `/competitor-analysis`
2. **Strategic Fit**
- How does this ladder up to company vision?
- Resource allocation tradeoffs
- What are we NOT doing as a result?
3. **7 Powers Analysis**
- Which power(s) does this unlock?
- Network effects, brand, scale, switching costs?
- Reference: [[7-powers-framework]]
4. **Financial Model**
- Revenue projections
- Cost to build and maintain
- Payback period and ROI
5. **Org & Resourcing Plan**
- Team structure needed
- Hiring requirements
- Dependencies on other teams
6. **Risk Mitigation**
- For each major risk, what's the mitigation plan?
- What experiments can de-risk early?
7. **Roadmap (6-12 months)**
- Phased milestones
- Key decision points
- Go/no-go criteria at each phase
8. **Stakeholder Alignment Sessions**
- Engineering review
- Design review
- Executive review
- Sales/CS input (if relevant)
- Legal/compliance check
**Weekly Breakdown (1-Month Sprint):**
| Week | Theme | Key Activities | Deliverables |
| ------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| **Week 1: Foundation** | Discovery + Snap Strategy | Complete 1-day snap strategy; kick off market research; schedule all stakeholder reviews for weeks 2-3; begin competitive analysis; pull baseline metrics | Snap strategy doc (1-page); research plan; stakeholder review calendar |
| **Week 2: Deep Research** | User Research + Market Analysis | Conduct 8-10 user interviews; complete competitive deep dives (3-5 players); TAM/SAM/SOM sizing; engineering feasibility assessment; 7 Powers analysis | Research synthesis; competitive landscape doc; market sizing; technical feasibility report |
| **Week 3: Synthesis + Socialization** | Strategy Draft + Stakeholder Reviews | Write full strategy doc; run stakeholder alignment sessions (engineering, design, exec, sales/CS, legal); build financial model; draft roadmap | Strategy doc v1 (10-15 pages); financial model; stakeholder feedback log |
| **Week 4: Finalization** | Incorporate Feedback + Finalize | Incorporate all stakeholder feedback; finalize roadmap with go/no-go criteria; create executive summary; build FAQ doc from all questions received; present final strategy | Final strategy doc; executive summary; FAQ; presentation deck; risk mitigation plan |
**Key milestones within each week:**
- **Week 1, Day 3:** Snap strategy shared with leadership for early alignment
- **Week 2, Day 5:** Research synthesis complete, major insights shared
- **Week 3, Day 2-4:** Stakeholder reviews (do NOT push these to Week 4)
- **Week 4, Day 3:** Final draft circulated for async comments
- **Week 4, Day 5:** Strategy approved and shared broadly
**Time investment:** 60-80 hours across 4 weeks
**Output:** 10-15 page comprehensive strategy doc
---
## How to Use This Skill
### Step 1: Determine Your Timeline
Ask yourself:
- How much time do I actually have?
- What's the decision we're trying to make?
- Who needs to be aligned?
**Don't default to 1-month if 1-week will do.**
---
### Step 2: Use This Prompt Pattern
```
Use /strategy-sprint and reference thoughts/shared/pm/context/business-info-template.md
I need to create a [1-day / 1-week / 1-month] strategy for: [describe the opportunity/problem]
Timeline: [your actual deadline]
Key stakeholders: [who needs to approve this]
Main decision: [what decision does this strategy inform]
Help me work through the appropriate framework step by step.
```
---
### Step 3: Build Progressively
- Start with 1-day version FIRST (even if you have a month)
- Get early feedback on the snap strategy
- Then layer in additional depth based on timeline
- **Don't skip the foundation**
---
## Pro Tips
**For 1-Day Strategy:**
- Write the hypothesis FIRST - everything else supports it
- If you can't articulate it in one sentence, you're not clear yet
- Get feedback from 2-3 key people before sharing broadly
**For 1-Week Strategy:**
- Do customer interviews EARLY in the week (Mon-Tue)
- Leave Fri for synthesis and doc writing
- Use `/user-research-synthesis` to process interviews quickly
**For 1-Month Strategy:**
- Schedule stakeholder reviews in weeks 2-3, not week 4
- Build in time to incorporate feedback
- Create a FAQ doc as you go (capture all questions you get)
- Use sub-agents for multiple perspectives: [[engineer-reviewer]], [[executive-reviewer]]
**Universal tip:**
- Always include "What we're NOT doing" - strategy is about tradeoffs
- Make your assumptions explicit - call them out directly
- End with clear next steps and owners
---
## Common Mistakes
❌ **Spending a month when a week would work**
- Strategy should be "just enough" to make a decision
- You can always add depth later
❌ **Skipping the 1-day foundation**
- Jumping straight to detailed analysis without clarity
- Results in unfocused strategy documents
❌ **Writing strategy in isolation**
- Strategy needs conversation and debate
- Get input early and often
❌ **Treating this as final**
- Strategy evolves as you learn
- Plan to revisit quarterly
---
## Example Workflow
**Scenario:** You need a growth strategy for Q2
**Week 1:** Create 1-day snap strategy
- Define problem, hypothesis, success metric
- Share with team leads for initial feedback
- Time: 4 hours
**Week 2:** Expand to 1-week strategy
- Run 8 customer interviews
- Get technical feasibility input
- Draft rollout plan
- Time: 20 hours
**Week 3-4:** (Optional) Expand to 1-month if needed
- Build financial model
- Run competitive analysis
- Socialize with all stakeholders
- Time: 40 additional hours
**Result:** You have a clear strategy in 2 weeks instead of rushing a half-baked doc in 1 month
---
## Related Skills
- `/prd-draft` - Turn strategy into PRDs
- `/competitor-analysis` - Research competitors
- `/user-research-synthesis` - Process customer insights
- [[jtbd-canvas]] - Understand customer jobs
- [[7-powers-framework]] - Identify unfair advantages
---
## Output Quality Self-Check
Before delivering the strategy document, verify:
- [ ] **Hypothesis is one sentence:** Can you state the core hypothesis in a single, clear sentence? If not, sharpen it.
- [ ] **Tradeoffs are explicit:** Does the doc include a "What we are NOT doing" section with real tradeoffs, not just obvious non-starters?
- [ ] **Success metric is measurable:** Is there at least one concrete metric with a baseline and target (not "improve engagement")?
- [ ] **Risks are specific:** Are risks named with probability/impact, not vague ("market risk")? Each risk should have a mitigation action.
- [ ] **Next steps have owners and dates:** Every action item has a name attached and a deadline, not just "follow up."
- [ ] **Appropriate depth for tier:** 1-day = 1 page max. 1-week = 3-5 pages. 1-month = 10-15 pages. If you are significantly over or under, adjust.
- [ ] **Stakeholder input reflected:** If stakeholders were consulted, their feedback is visibly incorporated (not just "we talked to engineering").
- [ ] **Progressive build verified:** If doing a 1-week or 1-month sprint, confirm the 1-day foundation was completed first and is consistent with the expanded doc.
- [ ] **Tier escalation triggers noted:** If scope expanded beyond the chosen tier during the sprint, flag the escalation triggers that were hit and recommend the appropriate higher tier.
---
**Framework credit:** Adapted from Aakash Gupta's strategy framework. Read the full article: https://www.news.aakashg.com/p/strategy-in-1-day-week-monthRelated Skills
write-prod-strategy
Product strategy docs using 7-component framework
expansion-strategy
Upsell, cross-sell, and account growth tactics. Framework for revenue expansion.
ralph-wiggum
Devil's advocate PRD/document reviewer with humor and sharp critique
prioritize
Classify PM tasks using LNO Framework (Leverage/Neutral/Overhead) to focus on high-impact work.
prd-review-panel
Multi-agent PRD review (7 perspectives)
prd-draft
Create a PRD (product requirements document) for features and initiatives. Guides through clarifying questions, generates a structured draft with hypothesis, strategic fit, non-goals, success metrics, and rollout plan, then offers multi-agent review. Use when the user asks to create a PRD, product spec, feature spec, requirements doc, or product brief.
launch-checklist
Comprehensive product launch planning
impact-sizing
Quantify feature value with driver trees, confidence levels, and the 4-step sizing framework.
feature-results
Post-launch analysis and results documentation. Document what shipped and what we learned.
define-north-star
Identify and validate your North Star Metric. Aligns product strategy with key business metric.
decision-doc
Document important product decisions. Creates decision logs with rationale, alternatives, and trade-offs.
weekly-review
Review week's progress, meetings, learnings